[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 211 (Monday, November 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67423-67427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-27820]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Mine Safety and Health Administration


Petitions for Modification of Application of Existing Mandatory 
Safety Standards

AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 
1977 and Title 30 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 44 govern the 
application, processing, and disposition of petitions for modification. 
This notice is a summary of petitions for modification submitted to the 
Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) by the parties listed 
below.

DATES: All comments on the petitions must be received by the MSHA's 
Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances on or before December 
2, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments, identified by ``docket 
number'' on the subject line, by any of the following methods:
    1. Electronic Mail: [email protected]. Include the docket 
number of the petition in the subject line of the message.
    2. Facsimile: 202-693-9441.
    3. Regular Mail or Hand Delivery: MSHA, Office of Standards, 
Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th Street South, Suite 4E401, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-5452, Attention: Sheila McConnell, Acting 
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances. Persons 
delivering documents are required to check in at the receptionist's 
desk in Suite 4E401. Individuals may inspect copies of the petitions 
and comments during normal business hours at the address listed above.
    MSHA will consider only comments postmarked by the U.S. Postal 
Service or proof of delivery from another delivery service such as UPS 
or Federal Express on or before the deadline for comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Barron, Office of Standards,

[[Page 67424]]

Regulations, and Variances at 202-693-9447 (Voice), 
[email protected] (Email), or 202-693-9441 (Facsimile). [These are 
not toll-free numbers.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 
(Mine Act) allows the mine operator or representative of miners to file 
a petition to modify the application of any mandatory safety standard 
to a coal or other mine if the Secretary of Labor determines that:
    1. An alternative method of achieving the result of such standard 
exists which will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure 
of protection afforded the miners of such mine by such standard; or
    2. That the application of such standard to such mine will result 
in a diminution of safety to the miners in such mine.
    In addition, the regulations at 30 CFR 44.10 and 44.11 establish 
the requirements and procedures for filing petitions for modification.

II. Petitions for Modification

    Docket Number: M-2015-004-M.
    Petitioner: Cementation USA, Inc., 10151 Centennial Parkway, Suite 
110, Sandy, Utah 84070.
    Mine: Eagle Mine, MSHA I.D. No. 20-03454, located in Marquette 
County, Michigan.
    Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 57.15031 (Location of self-rescue 
devices).
    Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the 
existing standard to permit the miners at the Eagle Mine to wear 10-
minute Ocenco Self-Contained Self-Rescue (SCSR) Devices on their mine 
belts in tandem with 1-hour SCSRs located on their vehicles, or 
equipment being operated within 500 feet or five minutes walking 
distance from any miner, whichever is less. The petitioner states that:
    (1) The Eagle Mine is a trackless mining environment that utilizes 
rubber-tired, diesel- powered equipment.
    (2) The majority of the work performed in this environment keeps 
the miners on or near mobile equipment.
    (3) Mine Emergency Planning requires miners report to refuge 
chambers during emergencies.
    (4) There are two 4-person and three 12-person MineARC refuge 
chambers strategically located underground.
    (5) Only 48 persons are allowed underground at any given time, 
based on occupancy ratings of refuge chambers.
    (6) Refuge chambers are strategically located and able to be 
reached within 10-minutes from the working locations.
    (7) Secondary escape ways are located on each level are able to be 
reached within 10 minutes from anywhere on the working level.
    (8) Miners currently carry Drager Oxy 6000 on their mine belt. The 
Drager Oxy 6000 is an MSHA approved SCSR that weighs 3.5 kg/7.7lbs.
    (9) The Ocenco M-20 SCSR is an MSHA approved SCSR that weights 3.2 
lbs.
    (10) Miners will frequently catch the release latches of the Oxy 
6000 SCSR on equipment handles, requiring replacement of the units.
    The petitioner proposes to:
    (1) Require all Cementation miners to wear Ocenco M-20 unit Self-
Contained Self-Rescue Devices on their mine belts.
    (2) Require all Cementation miners to inspect their issued Ocenco 
M-20 unit on a daily basis
    (3) Have one Drager Oxy 6000 SCSR per occupant seat located on each 
piece of Cementation underground equipment or vehicle.
    (4) Have the equipment operators inspect the Drager Oxy 6000 SCSR 
stored on Cementation equipment as part of the pre-op inspection.
    (5) Provide cached six Drager Oxy 6000 SCSRs in each refuge 
chamber. The SCSRs will be inspected on a weekly basis as part of the 
weekly refuge chamber inspection.
    (6) Provide cached five Drager Oxy 6000 SCSRs at the secondary 
escape way on each working level of the mine. These SCSRs will be 
inspected on a weekly basis.
    (7) Store the MSHA Rated SCSRs in a sealed box that is clearly 
marked with highly visible reflective signage indicated on all escape 
and evacuation maps posted in the mine. These SCSRs will be inspected 
on a weekly basis.
    (8) Provide training for all underground miners quarterly in the 
use, limitations, care, and inspection of the 10-minue and the 1-hour 
SCSR devices. This training will include:
    (a) Hands-on training for all types of self-rescue devices used at 
the mine, which include:
    (i) Instruction and demonstration in the use, care, and maintenance 
of self-rescue devices; and
    (ii) The complete donning of the SCSR by assuming a donning 
position, opening the device, activating the device, inserting the 
mouthpiece, and putting on the nose clip.
    (b) Hands on training in transferring from a 10-minute SCSR to a 1-
hour SCSR.
    (9) Provide instructor certified training annually for each 
Cementation miner that will include donning SCSRs in smoke, simulated 
smoke, or an equivalent environment, and breathing through a realistic 
SCSR training unit that provides the sensation of SCSR airflow 
resistance and heat.
    (10) Have the operator certify by signature and date that the 
training was conducted according to the conditions in this petition, at 
the completion of training. This certification will include the names 
of the miners who participated in the training.
    (11) The certifications will be made available to the Cementation 
miner's representative or an authorized Representative of the Secretary 
on request. This certificate will be kept at the mine for three years.
    (12) Inspect all stored 1-hour SCSRs in the mine for defects in 
accordance with the manufacturer's instructions on a weekly basis and 
record the results for each device. Records of these inspections will 
be made available to the miner's representative and an Authorized 
Representative of the Secretary on request. Records of these 
inspections will be maintained for three years.
    (13) Maintain all SCSRs in good condition. SCSRs that do not 
function properly will be removed from service and replaced with 
properly functioning SCSRs.
    The petitioner asserts that the combination of self-contained self-
rescue devices will at all times guarantee no less than the same 
measure of protection for miners as afforded by the standard.
    Docket Number: M-2015-005-M.
    Petitioner: Tronox Alkali Corp., 950 17th Street, Suite 2600, 
Denver, Colorado 80202.
    Mine: Tronox Alkali @Westvaco, MSHA I.D. No. 48-00152, located in 
Sweetwater County, Wyoming.
    Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 57.4760(a) (Shaft mines).
    Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the 
existing standard that recognizes that Tronox Alkali Corp., can utilize 
a mechanical ventilation reversal process for compliance that at all 
times, provides the same or a greater degree of protection to persons 
underground as would be afforded by other methods of compliance (e.g. 
control doors), and avoids reducing safety by the use of other methods. 
The petitioner states that:
    (a) Westvaco is governed in part by 30 CFR 57.22214, which 
prohibits compliance with 30 CFR 57.4760(a), if controls doors are 
used.
    As a Class III underground mine, ``changes in ventilation which 
affect the

[[Page 67425]]

main air current or any split thereof, and which adversely affect the 
safety of persons in the mine will be made only when the mine is 
idle,'' 30 CFR 57.22214(a) (emphasis added). The only persons permitted 
in the mine during these ventilation changes are the persons making 
such changes, 30 CFR 57.22214(b). The use of control doors potentially 
violates the provision and diminishes safety.
    The actuation of control doors near intake shafts changes the 
ventilation of the main air current, could occur while the mine is not 
idle, and may adversely affect safety, even if only performed when 
fire, smoke, or toxic gases are detected. In contrast, controlled air 
reversal would only be instituted by management to improve safety by 
moving combustion gases out of the mine and away from miners. 
Accordingly, changes in a mine's ventilation via control doors has the 
potential to conflict with 30 CFR 57.22214. On the other hand, 
mechanical ventilation reversal of the airflow would not conflict, 
thereby providing further reasons for the approval of this petition.
    b. Empirical testing of the underground airflow confirms that 
Tronox can accomplish ventilation reversal pursuant to 30 CFR 
57.4760(a)(2).
    Tronox and its predecessor have operated Westvaco since before the 
Mine Act was enacted. Throughout that time, Westvaco worked with 
knowledge that, if necessary, a reversal of airflow was always 
available to control the spread of fire, smoke, and toxic gases.
    During an April 8, 2015, MSHA spot inspections, the Secretary's 
authorized representative issued the Citations to Tronox for alleged 
violation of the standard. In response to the Citations, Tronox 
upgraded its ventilation system. Westvaco has three intake shafts (Nos. 
8, 5, and 7), each equipped with identical 1500 hp Jeffry 8HU Vane 
Axial ventilation fans, located on the surface. These fans provide the 
motive air forced into the mine to maintain a positive pressure, 
forcing air out of the mine through Shaft Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 9. 
Tronox engineering upgrades allow the mine's hoistman to turn off the 
ventilation fans, individually or in combination, from their 
workstation. The hoistman's station is manned during every shift at 
Westvaco.
    After the upgrades were complete, Tronox performed engineering 
tests and analyses to confirm that the on-duty hoistman could 
mechanically reverse the ventilation airflow in the mine by turning off 
the main fans in various permutations. Specifically, by turning off one 
of the three main fans that force air into the mine, Tronox is able to 
maintain positive pressure while simultaneously directing the flow of 
air toward a different exhaust shaft.
    Tronox tested the fans' effect on underground airflow with 
anemometers, smoke tubes, pressure transducers, and synchronized 
watches. During the test, Tronox turned off each ventilation fan and 
measured the airflow direction, velocity, and pressure fluctuations at 
the bottom of the shaft, before and after each fan was de-energized. 
The airflow direction was cross-checked at the top of the shaft to 
validate the findings underground. The pressure transducers at the top 
and bottom of the intake shaft were set to log pressure readings every 
five seconds. The testing showed a quantifiable change in the direction 
of the underground airflow near each of the shaft stations, which would 
control the spread of smoke and toxic gases underground in the event of 
a fire.
    1. When the 8 Shaft fan is operating the airflow in the vicinity 
traveled away from the 8 Shaft, through the east and southern 
passageways, towards the longwall. The anemometer and smoke tube 
recorded the velocity of the airflow in the area.
    When the 8 Shaft fan is turned off, the direction of the airflow 
reversed in less than two minutes, and the 8 Shaft transitioned from an 
intake shaft to an exhaust shaft. The velocity of the airflow, now 
traveling towards the 8 Shaft, was measured between 35 and 125 feet per 
minute.
    Most important when the 8 Shaft fan was running the airflow in the 
three passageways--east, south, and southwest--emanating from the 8 
Shaft had been towards the 5 Shaft and 7 Shaft. With the 8 Shaft turn 
off, the airflow in these three passages reversed, traveling towards 
the 8 Shaft and away from the 5 Shaft and 7 Shaft. In the event 
Westvaco experiences a fire in the southern section of the mine, by 
turning off the 8 Shaft fan, the change in air pressure would force the 
smoke and toxic gases to travel towards and exit the mine through the 8 
Shaft. At the same time, fresh air from the 5 Shaft and 7 Shaft main 
fans would fill the passageways used by the miners to reach the two 
designated escape routes at the 5 Shaft and 7 Shaft, and would enhance 
the safety of the evacuation in a means comparable to, or exceeding the 
safety provided by the control doors.
    2. When the 5 Shaft is operating, the airflow in the vicinity 
traveled away from the 5 Shaft through the north, west, and southern 
passageways. The anemometers recorded the velocity of the airflow in 
this area.
    When the 5 Shaft was turned off, once again the direction of the 
airflow reversed in less than two minutes, and the 5 Shaft transitioned 
from an intake shaft to an exhaust shaft. The velocity of the airflow, 
now traveling towards the 5 Shaft, was measured between 140 and 195 
feet per minute.
    Similar to the 8 Shaft, when the 5 Shaft fan was running, the 
airflow in the three adjacent passageways--east, south, and southwest--
emanating from the 5 Shaft had been towards the 8 Shaft and the 7 
Shaft. With the 5 Shaft fan turned off, the airflow in these three 
passages reversed, traveling towards the 5 Shaft and away from the 8 
Shaft and the 7 Shaft. In the event Westvaco experienced a fire in the 
central section of the mine, by turning off the 5 Shaft fan, the change 
in air pressure would force the smoke and toxic gases to travel towards 
and exit the mine through the 5 Shaft. At the same time, fresh air from 
the 8 Shaft and the 7 Shaft main fans would fill the northern and 
southern passageways, would provide the miners with good air as they 
progressed to the 8 Shaft primary hoist or the 7 Shaft northern escape 
route, and would enhance the safety of the evacuation in a means 
comparable to or exceeding the safety provided by control doors.
    3. When the 7 Shaft fan is operating the airflow in the vicinity 
traveled away from the 7 Shaft, through west passageway. The anemometer 
recorded the velocity of the airflow in the area.
    When the 7 Shaft fan was turned off, the direction of the airflow 
reversed in less than two minutes, and the 7 Shaft transitioned from an 
intake shaft to an exhaust shaft. The velocity of the airflow, now 
traveling towards the 7 Shaft, was measured at 195 feet per minute.
    The 7 Shaft is on the northern side of the mine, and the intake air 
travels from the 7 Shaft down a westward passageway before joining the 
airstream supplied by the 5 Shaft in the center of the mine. With the 7 
Shaft fan turned off, the airflow in the northern section of the mine 
is reversed, and the air supplied by the 5 Shaft flows into the 
northern section and exhausts through the 7 Shaft. In the event 
Westvaco experienced a fire in the norther section of the mine, by 
turning off the 7 Shaft fan, the change in air pressure would force the 
smoke and toxic gases to travel towards and exit the mine through the 7 
Shaft. At the same time, fresh air from the 5 Shaft main fan would fill 
the northern section passageways, would provide the miners with good 
air as they progressed to the 8 Shaft primary hoist or the 5 Shaft 
escape route, and would enhance the safety of the evacuation in

[[Page 67426]]

a means comparable to, or exceeding the safety provided by control 
doors.
    4. Overall results of engineering upgrades and Westvaco conditions. 
Based on the empirical data gathered from Tronox' testing, the upgrades 
permit the reversal of the direction of the airflow underground in all 
sections of the mine within two minutes. This performance 
demonstration, when used in accordance with the Westvaco Emergency 
Control Plan, readily complies with subsection (a)(2) of the standard, 
and provides equivalent or improved protection as compared to 
subsection (a)(1) of the standard, while preventing a potential 
diminution of safety from other compliance methods.
    Control doors in an underground mine are intended to constrain or 
restrict airflow and ventilation in an attempt to isolate fire, smoke, 
and toxic gases. By isolating these hazards, control doors (in theory) 
prevent airflow migrating from the hazardous area to sections of the 
mine that can expel any hazardous gases or smoke. By isolating various 
sections of a mine and restricting the ventilation, control doors 
potentially trap smoke and toxic gases in areas miners may need to 
travel in order to reach operational hoists and escapeways. However, 
the ability to mechanically reverse the ventilation airflow in 
designated sections of the mine, not only draws smoke and toxic gases 
away from egress points, it provide a source of fresh air into the 
areas where miners are located.
    c. The installation of control doors at Westvaco could result in a 
diminution of safety by reducing or eliminating ventilation during an 
evacuation. The purpose of the standard is to ``control the spread of 
fire, smoke and toxic gases.'' The first alternative to comply with the 
Standard envisions the installation of control doors. The second 
alternative envisions mechanical ventilation reversal, 30 CFR 
57.4760(a). The alternatives are mutually exclusive. If Tronox is 
forced to implement the first alternative, and the installed control 
doors were actuated in response to an emergency, Westvaco's main fans 
at the affected intake shafts would be isolated and rendered 
ineffective. The fans, if left running would be forcing air into closed 
shafts, and the motors would be forced out of their operating ranges 
and likely stalled, resulting in a loss of ventilation in passageways 
adjoining the closed control doors.
    Conversely, Tronox' procedures were tested and proven to reverse 
the airflow in the mine with the shutdown of a main fan. Requiring 
Tronox to install control doors would restrict this airflow reversal, 
and would likely increase the accumulation of smoke and toxic gases in 
areas confined between any control doors that closed in an emergency. A 
better solution to protect the health and safety of the evacuating 
miners would affirm that an airflow reversal will draw smoke and toxic 
gases out of the shaft, rather than accumulating underground where 
miners are still evacuating.
    Moreover, compliance with 30 CFR 57.4760(a)(2), which specifically 
authorizes airflow reversal, provides a greater or equal level to 
safety than the use of control doors. By continuing to operate fans at 
the unaffected intake shafts, Westvaco is maintaining positive 
pressure, impeding the geological formation from degassing, and 
reducing the amount of methane in the mine. The airflow reversal 
provides a superior measure of protection than the alternatives, which 
would not impede degassing of subsurface methane into the workplace.
    1. The alternate solution contemplated by 30 CFR 57.4760(a)(1), 
control doors, will result in a diminution of safety to miners at 
Westvaco, as compared to Tronox' installed engineering upgrades that 
produce air reversal capability for use in a manner consistent with its 
escape and evacuation plan. If the control doors for all three shafts 
were actuated in response to an emergency, all three ventilation fans 
would have to be turned off. Turning off all three fans and having the 
control doors closed would put Westvaco in a more hazardous situation 
than utilizing intentional reverse airflow ventilation because: (a) 
Contaminated air near the fire may not be forced up the designated 
exhaust shaft needed to provide safety for the miners; and (b) there 
may be no ventilation source for the miners along the escape routes or 
in the shafts.
    In addition, the standard requires that control doors be 
constructed so that they can be opened from either side by one person, 
or be provided with a personnel door that can be opened from either 
side, 30 CFR 57.4760(a)(1)(vi). Although this requirement for control 
doors to have a method that allows miners to pass through them to reach 
the intake shaft makes sense from an entrapment standpoint, the fact 
that the doors may be opened during an emergency creates the potential 
for toxic gases to migrate from one side of the door to the other. In 
addition, opening and closing control doors or personnel doors during 
an emergency creates the potential for the door to be accidentally 
opened or left open.
    2. Tronox' implementation of mechanical ventilation reversal meets 
the criteria required by 30 CFR 44.4(a). As demonstrated by Tronox' 
testing, analysis, and Westvaco's layout, Tronox' ability to remotely 
reverse fan ventilation enables Tronox to direct, as opposed to simply 
restrict, the flow of air underground during a fire. Airflow reversal 
would be used only in emergencies, with the approval of the mine 
Manager/Disaster Director or his/her designee. In the event of an 
emergency, the Disaster Director will continually assess the location 
of the miners and the location of the fire and/or smoke source, and the 
8, 5, and 7 Shafts will be maintained as air intake shafts to provide 
fresh air underground. In the event that the Disaster Director 
determines that air reversal via the shutdown of airflow from one of 
these intake shafts is necessary to control the spread of fire, smoke, 
or toxic gases, and will not adversely affect the evacuation, the 
Disaster Director will coordinate with the Ventilation Coordinator the 
shutdown of a main fan to reverse the airflow in the desired area. The 
Safety Coordinator, pursuant to Westvaco' Emergency Control Plan, will 
inform MSHA of the airflow reversal.
    For example, the Disaster Director would order the fan at the 8 
Shaft to be turned off in the event there is a fire or smoke in the 
southern section of the mine, and miners are to the north of the fire 
or smoke source. If the Disaster Director determines that the drop in 
air pressure would force smoke and toxic gases to travel toward Shaft 
No. 8, and allow fresh air to flow from the 7 Shaft and 5 Shaft, the 
Disaster Director would direct the Ventilation Coordinator to shut down 
the 8 Shaft's main fan. During this reversal of airflow, the air in the 
east, and south passageways emanating from the 8 Shaft would now 
exhaust through the 8 Shaft as the miners underground continued to 
execute their trained response--to evacuate in fresh air by a secondary 
escape route.
    In contrast to control doors, which merely segregate the intake 
shafts and mine passageways into isolated or unventilated zones and can 
be accidently closed or left open. Tronox' use of mechanical 
ventilation reversal can provide beneficial affects to the entire mine. 
The ventilation reversal can draw air, smoke, and toxic gases near the 
fire away from the remainder of the mine on a continual basis as the 
miners egress.
    Ventilation reversal allows miners to arrive at each shaft station 
without having to stop to open a control/personnel door and then close 
it behind them. Moreover, the positive effects of the ventilation 
reversal are preserved as the miners reach the shaft stations. In

[[Page 67427]]

contrast, a control door's integrity and the isolation at each door's 
location are breached every time an egressing miner opens the control 
door.
    Notwithstanding the fact that Tronox' use of mechanical ventilation 
reversal is entirely consistent with 30 CFR 57.4760(a), Tronox 
recognizes that the benefits of this engineering solution will be 
maximized with additional training for its miners. If this petition is 
approved, Tronox proposes to provide additional training, beyond its 
current Part 48 training, that will instruct miners and supervisors on 
the ventilation reversal capability upgrades and the condition and 
procedures for their use during emergencies.
    Tronox continues to maintain that its engineering upgrades at 
Westvaco, along with its evacuation and escape plans, comply with the 
standard, 30 CFR 57.4760(a)(2), and the citations should be terminated. 
Nevertheless, in the alternative to the extent MSHA contends that 
control doors or other abatement means are required, Tronox 
respectfully requests MSHA grant this petition for modification of the 
standard. For the reasons discussed above, permitting Tronox to 
mechanically reverse the ventilation, in conjunction with the proposed 
additional training measures, provides equal or greater protection to 
the miners than installing control doors that will constrict airflow 
underground. In addition, the imposition of 30 CFR 57.4760(a)(1) at 
Westvaco, as applied by MSHA, as opposed to the application of 30 CFR 
57.4760(a)(2) as described herein, will result in a diminution of 
safety to the miners at Westvaco.
    The petitioner asserts that application of the existing standard 
will result in a diminution of safety to the miners and that the 
proposed alternative method will at all times guarantee no less than 
the same measure of protection afforded by the existing standard.

Sheila McConnell,
Acting Director, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances.
[FR Doc. 2015-27820 Filed 10-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4520-43-P