[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 153 (Monday, August 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47958-47959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-19585]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2015-0187]
Human Factors Engineering
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Standard review plan-draft section revision; request for
comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is requesting
public comment on draft NUREG-0800, ``Standard Review Plan for the
Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants: LWR
Edition,'' Section 18.0, ``Human Factors Engineering.''
DATES: Comments must be filed no later than October 9, 2015. Comments
received after this date will be considered, if it is practical to do
so, but the Commission is able to ensure consideration only for
comments received on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods
(unless this document describes a different method for submitting
comments on a specific subject):
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2015-0187. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration,
Mail Stop: O12-H08, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001.
For additional direction on accessing information and submitting
comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark D. Notich, Office of New
Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-
0001; telephone at 301-415-3053 or email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information.
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2015-0187 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information regarding this document. You may
obtain publicly-available information related to this action by the
following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2015-0187.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to [email protected]. The
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is referenced. The
proposed revision to SRP Section 18.0, ``Human
[[Page 47959]]
Factors Engineering.'' is available in ADAMS under Accession No.
ML13108A095. A redline strikeout comparing the proposed revision to the
current version can be found in ADAMS under Accession No. ML13108A098.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC-2015-0187 in the subject line of your
comment submission, in order to ensure that the NRC is able to make
your comment submission available to the public in this docket.
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact
information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your
comment submission. The NRC posts all comment submissions at http://www.regulations.gov as well as entering the comment submissions into
ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be
publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should
state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to
remove such information before making the comment submissions available
to the public or entering the comment submissions into ADAMS.
II. Further Information
The NRC's Office of New Reactors and Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation are revising SRP Section 18.0, ``Human Factors Engineering''
from the current Revision 2. Details of specific proposed changes are
included at the end of the revised section. The changes to this SRP
section reflect current staff reviews, methods and practices based on
lessons learned from NRC reviews of design certification and combined
license applications completed since the last revision of this section.
The changes also reflect updated regulatory guidance contained in
NUREG-0711, ``Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model,'' (ADAMS
Accession No. ML12324A013).
Changes to SRP Chapter 18 include: (1) Relocating to NUREG-0711
details regarding review of new applications and amendments to existing
licenses, (2) providing additional discussion and detail regarding
inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC) and
design acceptance criteria (DAC) for new reactor applications submitted
in accordance with requirements in part 52 of Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR), ``Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals
for Nuclear Power Plants,'' (3) clarifying expectations for 10 CFR part
52 combined license reviews, (4) providing additional details regarding
review interfaces, (5) making editorial and formatting revisions,
including revised section numbering, and (6) incorporating guidance
from the previously issued SRP Chapter 18, Appendix A, ``Manual
Operator Actions.''
Following the NRC staff's evaluation of public comments on the
proposed Revision 3, the NRC intends to finalize SRP Section 18.0
Revision 3 in ADAMS, and post it on the NRC's public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr0800/. The SRP
is guidance for the NRC staff. The SRP is not a substitute for the NRC
regulations, and compliance with the SRP is not required.
III. Backfitting and Issue Finality
The NRC is issuing a proposed revision to SRP Chapter 18.0. This
document is used by the NRC staff as regulatory guidance while
reviewing a control room design that reflects state-of-the-art human
factor principles before a licensee commits to fabrication, or revision
of fabricated control room panels and layouts. Issuance of this draft
SRP, if finalized, would not constitute backfitting as defined in 10
CFR 50.109 (the Backfit Rule) or otherwise be inconsistent with the
issue finality provisions in 10 CFR part 52. The NRC's position is
based upon the following considerations:
1. The draft SRP positions, if finalized, would not constitute
backfitting, inasmuch as the SRP is internal guidance to NRC staff.
The SRP provides internal guidance to the NRC staff on how to
review an application for NRC's regulatory approval in the form of
licensing. Changes in internal staff guidance are not matters for which
either nuclear power plant applicants or licensees are protected under
either the Backfit Rule or the issue finality provisions of 10 CFR part
52.
2. The NRC staff has no intention to impose the SRP positions on
existing nuclear power plant licensees or regulatory approvals either
now or in the future (absent a voluntary request for change from the
licensee, holder of a regulatory approval, or a design certification
applicant).
The NRC staff does not intend to impose or apply the positions
described in the draft SRP to existing licenses and regulatory
approvals. Hence, the issuance of a final SRP--even if considered
guidance within the purview of the issue finality provisions in 10 CFR
part 52--would not need to be evaluated as if it were a backfit or as
being inconsistent with issue finality provisions. If, in the future,
the NRC staff seeks to impose a position in the draft SRP (if
finalized) on holders of already issued licenses in a manner that does
not provide issue finality as described in the applicable issue
finality provision, then the staff must make the showing as set forth
in the Backfit Rule or address the criteria for avoiding issue finality
as described in the applicable issue finality provision.
3. Backfitting and issue finality do not--with limited exceptions
not applicable here--protect current or future applicants.
Applicants and potential applicants are not, with certain
exceptions, protected by either the Backfit Rule or any issue finality
provisions under 10 CFR part 52. Neither the Backfit Rule nor the issue
finality provisions under 10 CFR part 52--with certain exclusions--were
intended to apply to every NRC action that substantially changes the
expectations of current and future applicants. The exceptions to the
general principle are applicable whenever an applicant references a 10
CFR part 52 license (e.g., an early site permit) and/or NRC regulatory
approval (e.g., a design certification rule) with specified issue
finality provisions. The NRC staff does not at this time intend to
impose the positions represented in the draft SRP (if finalized) in a
manner that is inconsistent with any issue finality provisions.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day of July, 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph Colaccino,
Chief, New Reactor Rulemaking and Guidance Branch, Division of Advanced
Reactors and Rulemaking, Office of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2015-19585 Filed 8-7-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P