[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 135 (Wednesday, July 15, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41476-41479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17368]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-970]


Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final 
Results of New Shipper Review; 2012-2013

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On January 9, 2015, the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') published the preliminary results of a new shipper review 
(``NSR'') and the second administrative review (``AR'') of the 
antidumping duty (``AD'') order on multilayered wood flooring 
(``MLWF'') from the People's Republic of China (``the PRC''), in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B) and 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff 
Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act'').\1\ The period of review 
(``POR'') for the AR and NSR is December 1, 2012, through November 30, 
2013. The NSR covers one producer/exporter of subject merchandise: 
Linyi Anying Wood Co., Ltd., (``Anying'').\2\ The AR covers 69 
companies. The mandatory respondents in this review are: (1) Dalian 
Dajen Wood Co., Ltd. (``Dajen'') and (2) Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood 
Products Co., Ltd. (``Senmao''). We invited interested parties to 
comment on our NSR Preliminary Results and Preliminary Results. No 
parties commented on the NSR Preliminary Results. Accordingly, we 
continue to find that Anying has not made sales of subject merchandise 
at less than normal value. For the AR, we received comments from 
interested parties. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we 
made changes to the margin calculations for the final results of the AD 
AR. The final dumping margins are listed below in the ``Final Results'' 
section of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of 
China; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review; 
2012-2013, 80 FR 1391 (January 9, 2015) (``NSR Preliminary 
Results''), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum; 
Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of China: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-
2013, 80 FR 1388 (January 9, 2015) (``Preliminary Results'') and 
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
    \2\ See NSR Preliminary Results.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective date: July 15, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lilit Astvatsatrian, Maisha Cryor, or 
William Horn, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 
International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 14th Street 
and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 
482-6412, (202) 482-5831, or (202) 482-2615, respectively.

Background

    As noted above, on January 9, 2015, the Department published its 
NSR Preliminary Results and Preliminary Results. The Department invited 
parties to submit case briefs and hearing requests related to the NSR 
Preliminary Results and Preliminary Results. No briefs or hearing 
requests were received regarding the NSR Preliminary Results. On 
February 9, 2015, regarding the Preliminary Results, the Department 
received case briefs from Old Master Products Inc. (``Old Master''); 
Lumber Liquidators Services, LLC (``Lumber Liquidators''); Linyi Bonn 
Flooring Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (``Linyi Bonn''); Baishan Huafeng Wood 
Product Co. Ltd.,. (collectively, ``Baishan'');\3\ Fine Furniture 
(Shanghai) Limited (``Fine Furniture''); Dajen, Senmao, and various 
separate rate applicants (collectively, ``Dajen/Senmao''); Armstrong 
Wood Products (Kunshan) Co. Ltd. and Armstrong World Industries 
(collectively, ``Armstrong''); the Alliance for Free Choice and Jobs in 
Flooring; \4\ and the Coalition for American Hardwood Parity 
(``CAHP'').\5\ On February 18, 2015, the Department received rebuttal 
briefs from Fine Furniture, Dajen/Senmao, and CAHP. On February 25, 
2015 the Department received the resubmission of its February 18 
rebuttal brief from Lumber Liquidators. On February 9, 2015 the 
Department received requests for a hearing from Fine Furniture, CAHP, 
Old Master, and Dajen/Senmao regarding the second administrative 
review. Various interested parties participated in a public hearing on 
April 1, 2015. On April 22, 2015, we extended the time period for 
issuing the final results of the AR and NSR by 60 days, until July 8, 
2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ see Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to 
Lynn M. Fischer Fox Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy & 
Negotiation, dated and issued concurrently with this notice, 
regarding ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for Final Results of 
2012-2013 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Multilayered 
Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of China'' (``Issues and 
Decision Memorandum'') at 1 for a full list.
    \4\ The Alliance for Free Choice and Jobs in Flooring consists 
of the following domestic producers of the like product: Swiff Train 
Co.; Metropolitan Hardwood Floors, Inc.; Real Wood Floors, LLC.; 
Galleher Corp; Crescent Hardwood Supply; Custom Wholesale Floors, 
Inc.; Urban Global LLC; Pinnacle Interior Elements, Ltd.; Timeless 
Design Import LCC; CDC Distributors, Inc.; CLBY Inc. (dba D&M 
Flooring); Johnson's Premium Hardwood Flooring, Inc.; The Master's 
Craft Corp.; BR Custom Surface; Doma Source LLC; Wego Chemical & 
Chemical & Mineral Corp. and V.A.L. Floors, Inc.
    \5\ The member-companies of the CAHP are as follows: Anderson 
Hardwood Floors, LLC; From the Forest; Howell Hardwood Flooring; 
Mannington Mills, Inc.; Nydree Flooring; and Shaw Industries
    Group, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the order includes MLWF, subject to 
certain exceptions.\6\ Imports of the subject merchandise are provided 
for under the following subheadings of the HTSUS: 4412.31.0520; 
4412.31.0540; 4412.31.0560; 4412.31.2510; 4412.31.2520; 4412.31.4040; 
4412.31.4050; 4412.31.4060; 4412.31.4070; 4412.31.5125; 4412.31.5135; 
4412.31.5155; 4412.31.5165; 4412.31.6000; 4412.31.9100; 4412.32.0520; 
4412.32.0540; 4412.32.0560; 4412.32.2510; 4412.32.2520; 4412.32.3125; 
4412.32.3135; 4412.32.3155; 4412.32.3165; 4412.32.3175; 4412.32.3185; 
4412.32.5600; 4412.39.1000; 4412.39.3000; 4412.39.4011; 4412.39.4012; 
4412.39.4019; 4412.39.4031; 4412.39.4032; 4412.39.4039; 4412.39.4051; 
4412.39.4052; 4412.39.4059; 4412.39.4061; 4412.39.4062; 4412.39.4069; 
4412.39.5010; 4412.39.5030; 4412.39.5050; 4412.94.1030; 4412.94.1050; 
4412.94.3105; 4412.94.3111; 4412.94.3121; 4412.94.3131; 4412.94.3141; 
4412.94.3160; 4412.94.3171; 4412.94.4100; 4412.94.5100; 4412.94.6000; 
4412.94.7000; 4412.94.8000; 4412.94.9000; 4412.94.9500; 4412.99.0600; 
4412.99.1020; 4412.99.1030; 4412.99.1040; 4412.99.3110; 4412.99.3120; 
4412.99.3130; 4412.99.3140; 4412.99.3150; 4412.99.3160; 4412.99.3170; 
4412.99.4100; 4412.99.5100; 4412.99.5710;

[[Page 41477]]

4412.99.6000; 4412.99.7000; 4412.99.8000; 4412.99.9000; 4412.99.9500; 
4418.71.2000; 4418.71.9000; 4418.72.2000; 4418.72.9500; and 
9801.00.2500.\7\ While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience 
and customs purposes, the written description of the subject 
merchandise is dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see 
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
    \7\ On August 28, 2013, in consultation with CBP, the Department 
added the following HTSUS classification to the AD/CVD module for 
wood flooring: 9801.00.2500. See Letter to the File from Lilit 
Astvatsatrian, Case Analyst, Enforcement and Compliance, Office IV, 
regarding ``Multilayered Wood Flooring from the PRC, Modification of 
the Case Reference File in ACE,'' (November 18, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Determination of No Shipments

    In the Preliminary Results, we found that Anhui Longhua Bamboo 
Product Co., Ltd., Benxi Wood Company, Guangzhou Homebon Timber 
Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Jiaxing Brilliant Import & Export Co. Ltd., 
Pinge Timber Manufacturing (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd., Power Dekor Group Co., 
Ltd., and Shenyang Senwang Wooden Industry Co., Ltd. had no shipments 
during the POR.\8\ Additionally, we found that Dalian Huade Wood 
Product Co., Ltd. and Zhejiang Fuerjia Wooden Co., Ltd. did not have 
any qualifying shipments for the Department to review, due to their 
certification that their only POR shipments underwent review during 
their respective NSRs. We did not receive comments with respect to any 
of these companies. Thus, for these final results of review, we 
continue to find that those companies had no shipments during the POR. 
Consistent with our ``automatic assessment'' clarification, we will 
issue appropriate instructions with respect to these companies to U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') based on our final results.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Preliminary Results, 80 FR at 1389 n. 4.
    \9\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment 
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 4, 2011); see also the 
``Assessment'' section of this notice, below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs filed by parties 
in the AR are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is 
hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues that parties raised 
and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum follows 
as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 
public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and 
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic 
Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of 
the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The paper copy and electronic 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on a review of the record and comments received from 
interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we made revisions 
to the margin calculations for Dajen and Senmao.\10\ These changes are 
discussed in the relevant sections of the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum and company-specific analysis memoranda, as appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Separate Rates and Partial Rescission

    In our Preliminary Results, we determined that eight separate rate 
applicant companies and 60 separate rate certifier companies 
demonstrated their eligibility for separate rate status.\11\ Subsequent 
to the publication of the Preliminary Results, we received comments 
from Baroque Timber Industries (Zhongshan) Co., Ltd., Riverside Plywood 
Corporation, Samling Elegant Living Trading (Labuan) Limited, and 
Samling Riverside Co. Limited (collectively, the ``Samling Group'') 
noting that the Samling Group was recognized in the final results of 
the first administrative review to be excluded from the AD order on 
MLWF pursuant to court order.\12\ Samling Group further requested 
rescission of its administrative review for the second review period as 
its entries are not subject to the AD order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
    \12\ See Letter from Samling Group re: Samling Group Request for 
Correction of Preliminary Results (January 8, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department agrees that Samling Group and another company 
subject to this review, Zhejiang Layo Wood Industry Co., Ltd. (``Layo 
Wood''), have been excluded from the AD order on MLWF as a result of 
litigation.\13\ Further, both Samling Group and Layo Wood certified for 
this review that they did not export subject merchandise to the United 
States other than from the manufacturer/exporter combination 
specifically excluded from the order following the investigation, and 
the shipment data that we examined did not show U.S. entries of subject 
merchandise during the POR from other producer/exporter 
combinations.\14\ Therefore, we are rescinding the review with respect 
to the Samling Group and Layo Wood. No other changes have been made for 
the separate rate companies listed in the Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic 
of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Final 
Determination and Amended Final Determination of the Antidumping 
Duty Investigation, 79 FR 25109 (May 2, 2014).
    \14\ See Liquidation Instructions for MLWF from the PRC, 
produced and exported by the Samling Group, CBP Message No. 4143304 
(May, 23, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of the New Shipper Review and AR

    Regarding the NSR Preliminary Results, no interested parties filed 
case briefs in response to the Department's invitation to comment on 
the NSR Preliminary Results. Therefore, because the record contains no 
other information or evidence that calls into question our NSR 
Preliminary Results, for these final results, the Department has made 
no changes to its calculations announced in the NSR Preliminary 
Results. Therefore, for the final results of the NSR, the Department 
continues to determine that the following weighted-average dumping 
margin exists for the POR from December 1, 2012, through November 30, 
2013:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Weighted-
                                                               average
              Exporter                      Producer           dumping
                                                                margin
                                                              (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Linyi Anying Wood Co., Ltd.........  Linyi Anying Wood Co.,        0.00
                                      Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regarding the AR, we determine that the following weighted-average 
dumping margins exist for the POR from December 1, 2012, through 
November 30, 2013:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ The Initiation Notice (Initiation of Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for 
Revocation in Part, 79 FR 6147 (February 3, 2014)) included Hangzhou 
Dazhuang Floor Co. (dba Dasso Industrial Group Co., Ltd.); however, 
Dasso Industrial Group Co., Ltd. (``Dasso'') certified in its March 
21, 2014 separate-rate certification that it no longer uses the name 
Hangzhou Dazhuang Floor Co., Ltd., and did not use that name during 
the POR. Therefore, the separate-rate status applies only to Dasso.
    \16\ The following companies are collectively known as The 
Fusong Jinlong Group (``Fusong Jinlong Group''): Dalian Qianqiu 
Wooden Product Co., Ltd.; Fusong Jinlong Wooden Group Co., Ltd.; 
Fusong Jinqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd.; and Fusong Qianqiu Wooden 
Product Co., Ltd.
    \17\ The Department determined that Linyi Youyou Wood Co., Ltd. 
is the successor-in-interest to Shanghai Lizhong Wood Products Co., 
Ltd./The Lizhong Industry Limited Company of Shanghai. See 
Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review, 79 FR 58740 
(September 30, 2014).
    \18\ The following companies were named in the Initiation Notice 
but did not submit a certification of no shipment, separate rate 
application or separate rate certification; therefore they are part 
of the PRC-wide entity: Baiying Furniture Manufacturer Co., Ltd.; 
Dunhua Jisheng Wood Industry Co., Ltd.; Dunhua Shengda Wood Industry 
Co., Ltd.; Fu Lik Timber (HK) Co., Ltd.; Guangdong Fu Lin Timber 
Technology Limited, Guanghzhou Panyu Shatou Trading Co., Ltd.; 
Hunchun Xingjia Wooden Flooring Inc.; Huzhou Fuma Wood Bus. Co., 
Ltd.; Huzhou Ruifeng Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.; Jiazing Brilliant Import 
& Export Co., Ltd. Linyi Bonn; Sennorwell International Group (Hong 
Kong) Limited; Shenyang Sende Wood Co., Ltd.; Suzhou Anxin Weiguang 
Timber Co., Ltd.; Vicwood Industry (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.; Yekalon 
Industry, Inc.; Zhejiang AnJi XinFeng Bamboo & Wood Co., Ltd.; 
Zhejiang Desheng Wood Industry Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Haoyun Wood Co., 
Ltd.; and Zhejiang Jeson Wood Co., Ltd.

[[Page 41478]]



------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                          Exporter                              dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dalian Dajen Wood Co., Ltd..................................        0.00
Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood Industry Co., Ltd............       13.74
A&W (Shanghai) Woods Co., Ltd...............................       13.74
Armstrong Wood Products (Kunshan) Ltd.......................       13.74
Baishan Huafeng Wood Product Co., Ltd.......................       13.74
Changbai Mountain Development and Protection Zone Hongtu           13.74
 Wood Industrial Co., Ltd...................................
Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co., Ltd............................       13.74
Chinafloors Timber (China) Co., Ltd.........................       13.74
Dalian Huilong Wooden Products Co., Ltd.....................       13.74
Dalian Jiuyuan Wood Industry Co., Ltd.......................       13.74
Dalian Kemian Wood Industry Co., Ltd........................       13.74
Dalian Penghong Floor Products Co., Ltd.....................       13.74
Dalian T-Boom Wood Products Co., Ltd........................       13.74
Dasso Industrial Group Co., Ltd \15\........................       13.74
Dongtai Fuan Universal Dynamics, LLC........................       13.74
Dunhua City Dexin Wood Industry Co., Ltd....................       13.74
Dunhua City Hongyuan Wood Industry Co., Ltd.................       13.74
Dun Hua City Jisen Wood Industry Co., Ltd...................       13.74
Dunhua City Wanrong Wood Industry Co., Ltd..................       13.74
Dun Hua Sen Tai Wood Co., Ltd...............................       13.74
Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Limited or Double F Limited.......       13.74
Fusong Jinlong Wooden Group \16\............................       13.74
GTP International Ltd.......................................       13.74
Guangdong Yihua Timber Industry Co., Ltd....................       13.74
Guangzhou Panyu Kangda Board Co., Ltd.......................       13.74
Guangzhou Panyu Southern Star Co., Ltd......................       13.74
HaiLin LinJing Wooden Products, Ltd.........................       13.74
Hangzhou Hanje Tec Co., Ltd.................................       13.74
Hangzhou Zhengtian Industrial Co., Ltd......................       13.74
Hunchun Forest Wolf Wooden Industry Co., Ltd................       13.74
Huzhou Chenghang Wood Co., Ltd..............................       13.74
Huzhou Fulinmen Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd........................       13.74
Huzhou Jesonwood Co., Ltd...................................       13.74
Huzhou Sunergy World Trade Co., Ltd.........................       13.74
Jianfeng Wood (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.............................       13.74
Jiangsu Guyu International Trading Co., Ltd.................       13.74
Jiangsu Kentier Wood Co., Ltd...............................       13.74
Jiangsu Mingle Flooring Co., Ltd............................       13.74
Jiangsu Simba Flooring Co., Ltd.............................       13.74
Jiashan HuiJiaLe Decoration Material Co., Ltd...............       13.74
Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group Co., Ltd.......       13.74
Jilin Xinyuan Wooden Industry Co., Ltd......................       13.74
Karly Wood Product Limited..................................       13.74
Kemian Wood Industry (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.....................       13.74
Shanghai Lizhong Wood Products Co., Ltd./The Lizhong Wood          13.74
 Industry Limited Company of Shanghai/Linyi Youyou Wood Co.,
 Ltd \17\...................................................
Metropolitan Hardwood Floors, Inc...........................       13.74
Mudanjiang Bosen Wood Industry Co., Ltd.....................       13.74
Nakahiro Jyou Sei Furniture (Dalian) Co., Ltd...............       13.74
Nanjing Minglin Wooden Industry Co., Ltd....................       13.74
Puli Trading Limited........................................       13.74
Shanghai Eswell Timber Co., Ltd.............................       13.74
Shanghai Lairunde Wood Co., Ltd.............................       13.74
Shanghai New Sihe Wood Co., Ltd.............................       13.74
Shanghai Shenlin Corp.......................................       13.74
Shenyang Haobainian Wooden Co., Ltd.........................       13.74
Shenzhenshi Huanwei Woods Co., Ltd..........................       13.74
Suzhou Dongda Wood Co., Ltd.................................       13.74
Tongxiang Jisheng Import and Export Co., Ltd................       13.74
Xiamen Yung De Ornament Co., Ltd............................       13.74
Xuzhou Shenghe Wood Co., Ltd................................       13.74
Yingyi-Nature (Kunshan) Wood Industry Co., Ltd..............       13.74
Yixing Lion-King Timber Industry Co., Ltd...................       13.74
Zhejiang Biyork Wood Co., Ltd...............................       13.74
Zhejiang Dadongwu Greenhome Wood Co., Ltd...................       13.74
Zhejiang Fudeli Timber Industry Co., Ltd....................       13.74
Zhejiang Fuma Warm Technology Co., Ltd......................       13.74
Zhejiang Longsen Lumbering Co., Ltd.........................       13.74
Zhejiang Shiyou Timber Co., Ltd.............................       13.74
Zhejiang Tianzhen Bamboo & Wood Development Co., Ltd........       13.74
PRC-Wide Entity \18\........................................       58.84
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    The Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping 
duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. The 
Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 
after the publication date of these final results of this review. In 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we are calculating importer- (or 
customer-) specific assessment rates for the merchandise subject to 
this review. For any individually examined respondent whose weighted-
average dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), the 
Department will calculate importer- (or customer)-specific assessment 
rates for merchandise subject to this review. Where appropriate, we 
calculated an ad valorem rate for each importer (or customer) by 
dividing the total dumping margins for reviewed sales to that party by 
the total entered values associated with those transactions. For duty-
assessment rates calculated on this basis, we will direct CBP to assess 
the resulting ad valorem rate against the entered customs values for 
the subject merchandise. Where appropriate, we calculated a per-unit 
rate for each importer (or customer) by dividing the total dumping 
margins for reviewed sales to that party by the total sales quantity 
associated with those transactions. For duty-assessment rates 
calculated on this basis, we will direct CBP to assess the resulting 
per-unit rate against the entered quantity of the subject 
merchandise.\19\ We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on 
all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer-
specific assessment rate is above de minimis. Where either the 
respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or 
an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will 
instruct CBP to liquidate the

[[Page 41479]]

appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. For Anying, 
whose weighted average dumping margin is zero, the Department will 
instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to 
antidumping duties.\20\ We intend to instruct CBP to liquidate entries 
of subject merchandise exported by the PRC-wide entity at the PRC-wide 
rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumpin7g Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14, 
2012).
    \20\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If the Department determines that an exporter under review had no 
shipments of subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered 
under that exporter's case number will be liquidated at the PRC-wide 
rate.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market 
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the companies not selected for individual examination, we will 
instruct CBP to apply the rate listed above to the entries of subject 
merchandise exported by such companies and entered during the period 
from December 1, 2012 through November 30, 2013. This rate is the same 
as the rate for the one mandatory respondent with a weighted-average 
dumping margin that is above de minimis.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of these reviews for shipments of the 
subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the publication date in the Federal 
Register of the final results of review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. First, with respect to Anying, the new shipper 
respondent, the Department established a combination cash deposit rate 
for this company, consistent with its practice, as follows: (1) For 
subject merchandise produced and exported by Anying, a zero cash 
deposit will be required; (2) for subject merchandise exported by 
Anying, but not produced by Anying, the cash deposit rate will be the 
rate for the PRC-wide entity; (3) for subject merchandise produced by 
Anying, but not exported by Anying, the cash deposit rate will be the 
rate applicable to the exporter. For Dajen, Senmao, and the non-
examined, separate rate respondents, the cash deposit rate will be 
equal to their weighted-average dumping margins established in the 
final results of this review, except if the rate is zero or de minimis, 
then no cash deposit will be required. For Anhui Longhua Bamboo Product 
Co., Ltd., Benxi Wood Company, Guangzhou Homebon Timber Manufacturing 
Co., Ltd., Jiaxing Brilliant Import & Export Co. Ltd., Pinge Timber 
Manufacturing (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd., Power Dekor Group Co., Ltd., and 
Shenyang Senwang Wooden Industry Co., Ltd., which claimed no shipments, 
the cash deposit rate will remain unchanged from their rate assigned in 
the most recently completed review of the company. Likewise, for Dalian 
Huade Wood Product Co., Ltd. and Zhejiang Fuerjia Wooden Co., Ltd., the 
cash deposit rate will remain unchanged from the rate assigned in the 
recently completed new shipper reviews of these companies. For 
previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not 
listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this 
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the most-recently 
established exporter-specific rate. For all PRC exporters of subject 
merchandise that have not been found to be entitled a separate rate, 
the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity established 
in the final determination of the less than fair value investigation 
(i.e., 58.84 percent). For all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise 
which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be 
the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC 
exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in 
effect until further notice.

Disclosure

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed regarding these AR 
final results within five days of the date of publication of this 
notice in this proceeding in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ Regarding the NSR, there are no calculations to disclose 
for these final results, as no changes have been made to our 
analysis subsequent to our NSR Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties has occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order (``APO'')

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of 
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary 
information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or 
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which 
is subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing this AR, NSR, and notice in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1), 751(a)(2)(B), and 777(i) of the 
Act.

    Dated: July 8, 2015.
Lynn M. Fischer Fox,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy & Negotiation.

Appendix--Issues and Decision Memorandum

Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Differential Pricing
    1.A Cohen's D Test
    1.B Denial of Offsets with the Average-to-Transaction Comparison 
Method
Comment 2: Whether the VAT Adjustment is Correctly Applied
Comment 3: Fine Furniture's Status as a Voluntary Respondent
Comment 4: Whether Fine Furniture's Liquidation Instructions Should 
Include the Name of Its Affiliate Listed on the Import Documentation 
Submitted to U.S. CBP
Comment 5: Whether the Department Correctly Applied the PRC-Wide 
Rate to Linyi Bonn
Comment 6: Paint and Pigments
Comment 7: Surrogate Financial Ratios
Comment 8: Wood Input Conversion Factors
Comment 9: Truck Freight and Handling Surrogate Values
Comment 10: Surrogate Value for Electricity
Comment 11: Plywood
    A: AFA/PAFA
    B: Simple Average AUV
    C: Exclude Aberrational Imports from Taiwan and the United 
States
    D: Surrogate Value for Plywood
Comment 12: Surrogate Value for Wood Scrap
Comment 13: Surrogate Value for HDF
Comment 14: Surrogate Value for Glue
Comment 15: Senmao's Domestic Truck Freight Costs on Wood Inputs
Comment 16: Whether to Deny Senmao's By-Product Offset
Comment 17: Separate Rate Calculation
Recommendation
Table of Shortened Citations
Litigation Cite Table

[FR Doc. 2015-17368 Filed 7-14-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P