[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 18, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8524-8529]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03321]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Part 744
[Docket No. 141230999-4999-01]
RIN 0694-AG46
Addition of Certain Persons to the Entity List; and Removal of
Person From the Entity List Based on a Removal Request
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule amends the Export Administration Regulations (EAR)
by adding eleven persons to the Entity List. The eleven persons who are
added to the Entity List have been determined by the U.S. Government to
be acting contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests
of the United States. These eleven persons will be listed on the Entity
List under the destinations of People's Republic of China (China),
Pakistan, and United Arab Emirates (U.A.E.).
This final rule also removes one person from the Entity List, as
the result of a request for removal submitted by the person, a review
of information provided in the removal request in accordance with the
procedure for requesting removal or modification of an Entity List
entity, and further review conducted by the End-User Review Committee
(ERC).
DATES: This rule is effective February 18, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chair, End-User Review Committee,
Office of the Assistant Secretary, Export Administration, Bureau of
Industry and Security, Department of Commerce, Phone: (202) 482-5991,
Fax: (202) 482-3911, Email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Entity List (Supplement No. 4 to Part 744) notifies the public
about entities that have engaged in activities that could result in an
increased risk of the diversion of exported, reexported or transferred
(in-country) items to weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs. Since
its initial publication, grounds for inclusion on the Entity List have
expanded to include activities sanctioned by the State Department and
activities contrary to U.S. national security or foreign policy
interests. Certain exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) to
entities identified on the Entity List require licenses from BIS and
are usually subject to a policy of denial. The availability of license
exceptions in such transactions is very limited. The license review
policy for each entity is identified in the license review policy
column on the Entity List and the availability of license exceptions is
noted in the Federal Register notices adding persons to the Entity
List. BIS places entities on the Entity List based on certain sections
of part 744 (Control Policy: End-User and End-Use Based) and part 746
(Embargoes and Other Special Controls) of the EAR.
The ERC, composed of representatives of the Departments of Commerce
(Chair), State, Defense, Energy and, where appropriate, the Treasury,
makes all decisions regarding additions to, removals from, or other
modifications to the Entity List. The ERC makes all decisions to add an
entry to the Entity List by majority vote and all decisions to remove
or modify an entry by unanimous vote.
ERC Entity List Decisions
Additions to the Entity List
This rule implements the decision of the ERC to add eleven persons
under eleven entries to the Entity List. These eleven persons are being
added on the basis of Sec. 744.11 (License requirements that apply to
entities acting contrary to the national security or foreign policy
interests of the United States) of the EAR. The eleven entries added to
the Entity List consist of four entries in China, four in Pakistan, and
three in the U.A.E.
The ERC reviewed Sec. 744.11(b) (Criteria for revising the Entity
List) in making the determination to add these eleven persons to the
Entity List. Under that paragraph, persons for whom there is reasonable
cause to believe, based on specific and articulable facts, have been
involved, are involved, or pose a significant risk of being or becoming
involved in, activities that are contrary to the national security or
foreign policy interests of the United States and those acting on
behalf of such persons may be added to the Entity List. Paragraphs
(b)(1) through (b)(5) of Sec. 744.11 include an illustrative list of
activities that could be contrary to the national security or foreign
policy interests of the United States.
The ERC determined the following four persons being added to the
Entity List under the destination of China have been involved in
activities contrary to the national security and foreign policy
interests of the United States. The ERC determined that the National
University of Defense Technology (NUDT), the National Supercomputing
Center in Changsha (NSCC-CS), National Supercomputing Center in
Guangzhou (NSCC-GZ), and the National Supercomputing Center in Tianjin
(NSCC-TJ), all located in the People's Republic of China, meet the
guidelines listed under Sec. 744.11(b): Entities for which there is
reasonable cause to believe, based on specific and articulated facts,
that an entity has been involved, is involved, or poses a significant
risk of being or becoming involved in activities that are contrary to
the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States
and those acting on behalf of such entities may be added to the Entity
List pursuant to this
[[Page 8525]]
section. Specifically, NUDT has used U.S.-origin multicores, boards,
and (co)processors to produce the TianHe-1A and TianHe-2 supercomputers
located at the National Supercomputing Centers in Changsha, Guangzhou,
and Tianjin. The TianHe-1A and TianHe-2 supercomputers are believed to
be used in nuclear explosive activities as described in Sec. 744.2(a)
of the EAR.
The ERC also determined the seven persons being added to the Entity
List under the destinations of Pakistan (four additions) and the U.A.E.
(three additions) have been involved in activities contrary to the
national security and foreign policy interests of the United States.
The ERC determined that Pakistan's Hakim Noor (a.k.a., Hakim Nur) and
the United Arab Emirates' Ajab Noor (a.k.a., Ajab Nur) and entities
working with Hakim and Ajab meet the guidelines listed under Sec.
744.11(b). Specifically, Hakim Noor, Ajab Noor, Sher Qadir, Azad Motors
Property Choice, Hakim Nur Sarafa, Ajab Trading Co. LLC, and Perfect
Tyre Trading Co. LLC, have engaged in activities in support of the
Haqqani Network, a person designated by the Secretary of State as a
Foreign Terrorist Organization, and a number of transnational extremist
organizations.
Pursuant to Sec. 744.11(b)(1) and (b)(5) of the EAR, the ERC
determined that the conduct of these eleven persons raises sufficient
concern that prior review of exports, reexports, or transfers (in-
country) of items subject to the EAR involving these persons, and the
possible imposition of license conditions or license denials on
shipments to the persons, will enhance BIS's ability to prevent
violations of the EAR.
For the National University of Defense Technology (NUDT), National
Supercomputing Center in Changsha (NSCC-CS), National Supercomputing
Center in Guangzhou (NSCC-GZ), and the National Supercomputing Center
in Tianjin (NSCC-TJ), the ERC specified a license requirement for all
items subject to the EAR, and established a license application review
policy of case-by-case review for all items subject to the EAR. For the
other seven persons recommended for addition on the basis of Sec.
744.11, the ERC specified a license requirement for all items subject
to the EAR and a license review policy of presumption of denial.
The license requirements apply to any transaction in which items
are to be exported, reexported, or transferred (in-country) to any of
the persons or in which such persons act as purchaser, intermediate
consignee, ultimate consignee, or end-user. In addition, no license
exceptions are available for exports, reexports, or transfers (in-
country) to the persons being added to the Entity List in this rule.
This final rule adds the following eleven persons under eleven
entries to the Entity List:
China
(1) National Supercomputing Center Changsha (NSCC-CS), Changsha
City, Hunan Province, China;
(2) National Supercomputing Center Guangzhou (NSCC-GZ), Sun Yat-Sen
University, University City, Guangzhou, China;
(3) National Supercomputing Center Tianjin (NSCC-TJ), 7th Street,
Binhai New Area, Tianjin, China; and
(4) National University of Defense Technology (NUDT), Garden Road
(Metro West), Changsha City, Kaifu District, Hunan Province, China.
Pakistan
(1) Azad Motors Property Choice, a.k.a., the following four
aliases:
--Peshawar Master Azad Motors;
--Peshawar Motors Complex;
--Karakoram Azad Motors; and
--Azad Cars. Main GT Road, Hajji Camp, Peshawar, Pakistan;
(2) Hakim Noor, a.k.a., the following one alias:
--Hakim Nur. Sarafa Shop #10, Noor Muhammad Market, Miram Shaw,
Pakistan; and Mir Nasir Plaza, Sikandar Pura, Pakistan;
(3) Hakim Nur Sarafa, a.k.a., the following two aliases:
--Noor Muhammad Market; and
--Haji Hakim Noor Saraf. Sarafa Shop #10, Noor Muhammad Market, Miram
Shaw, Pakistan; and Market Shop Number 10, Sarafa Bazar Miram Shaw,
Pakistan; and
(4) Sher Qadir, Darpa Khel Village, Mirim Shaw, Pakistan.
United Arab Emirates
(1) Ajab Noor, a.k.a., the following one alias:
--Ajab Nur. Box No. 28715, Dubai, U.A.E.; and Dubai Tower, Al Maktoum
Rd, Al Rigga, Dubai, Near Baniyas Square Metro Station, U.A.E.;
(2) Ajab Trading Co. LLC, Box No. 28715, Dubai, U.A.E.; and Dubai
Tower, Al Maktoum Rd, Al Rigga, Dubai, Near Baniyas Square Metro
Station, U.A.E.; and
(3) Perfect Tyre Trading Co LLC, Al Ain--Al Sanaiya--Inh. Mohammed
Sultan Aldarmaki-Bld, Dubai, U.A.E.; and Post Box No. 67221, Abu Dhabi,
U.A.E.
Removal From the Entity List
This rule implements a decision of the ERC to remove one person,
SATCO GmbH, located in Germany, from the Entity List on the basis of a
removal request by a company of the same name as the listed person.
Based upon a review of the information provided in the removal request
in accordance with Sec. 744.16 (Procedure for requesting removal or
modification of an Entity List entity), the ERC determined that this
person should be removed from the Entity List.
SATCO GmbH was originally added to the Entity List on December 12,
2013 (78 FR 75458) for participating in a procurement ring headed by
Saeed Talebi (Talebi) that coordinated the supply and sale of U.S.-
origin items in violation of Department of Treasury, Office of Foreign
Assets Control regulations and the EAR. Based on a request from an
unrelated company of the same name being adversely impacted, and the
fact that SATCO GmbH is not a legally established corporate entity in
Bremen, Germany, and that BIS has no evidence of the use of this name
by Talebi network since their addition to the Entity List, the ERC
determined to remove SATCO GmbH from the Entity List.
In accordance with Sec. 744.16(c), the Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Export Administration has sent written notification to this person,
informing the person of the ERC's decision to remove the person from
the Entity List.
This final rule implements the decision to remove the following one
person located in Germany from the Entity List:
Germany
(1) SATCO GmbH, a.k.a., the following one alias:
--Satco Inc., Park Street 4, Bremen, Germany 28209.
The removal of the one entity referenced above, which was approved
by the ERC, eliminates the existing license requirements in Supplement
No. 4 to part 744 for exports, reexports and transfers (in-country) to
this entity. However, the removal of this entity from the Entity List
does not relieve persons of other obligations under part 744 of the EAR
or under other parts of the EAR. Neither the removal of an entity from
the Entity List nor the removal of Entity List-based license
requirements relieves persons of their obligations under General
Prohibition 5 in Sec. 736.2(b)(5) of the EAR which provides that,
``you may not, without a license, knowingly export or reexport any item
subject to the EAR to an end-user or
[[Page 8526]]
end-use that is prohibited by part 744 of the EAR.'' Additionally this
removal does not relieve persons of their obligation to apply for
export, reexport or in-country transfer licenses required by other
provisions of the EAR. BIS strongly urges the use of Supplement No. 3
to part 732 of the EAR, ``BIS's `Know Your Customer' Guidance and Red
Flags,'' when persons are involved in transactions that are subject to
the EAR.
Savings Clause
Shipments of items removed from eligibility for a License Exception
or export or reexport without a license (NLR) as a result of this
regulatory action that were en route aboard a carrier to a port of
export or reexport, on February 18, 2015, pursuant to actual orders for
export or reexport to a foreign destination, may proceed to that
destination under the previous eligibility for a License Exception or
export or reexport without a license (NLR).
Export Administration Act
Although the Export Administration Act expired on August 20, 2001,
the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR,
2001 Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by Executive Order 13637 of March
8, 2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013) and as extended by the Notice of
August 7, 2014, 79 FR 46959 (August 11, 2014), has continued the Export
Administration Regulations in effect under the International Emergency
Economic Powers Act. BIS continues to carry out the provisions of the
Export Administration Act, as appropriate and to the extent permitted
by law, pursuant to Executive Order 13222 as amended by Executive Order
13637.
Rulemaking Requirements
1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is
required to respond to nor be subject to a penalty for failure to
comply with a collection of information, subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA),
unless that collection of information displays a currently valid Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number. This regulation involves
collections previously approved by OMB under control number 0694-0088,
Simplified Network Application Processing System, which includes, among
other things, license applications and carries a burden estimate of
43.8 minutes for a manual or electronic submission. Total burden hours
associated with the PRA and OMB control number 0694-0088 are not
expected to increase as a result of this rule. You may send comments
regarding the collection of information associated with this rule,
including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Jasmeet K. Seehra,
Office of Management and Budget (OMB), by email to
[email protected], or by fax to (202) 395-7285.
3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications
as that term is defined in Executive Order 13132.
4. For the eleven persons added under eleven entries to the Entity
List in this final rule, the provisions of the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. 553) requiring notice of proposed rulemaking, the
opportunity for public comment and a delay in effective date are
inapplicable because this regulation involves a military or foreign
affairs function of the United States. (See 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). BIS
implements this rule to protect U.S. national security or foreign
policy interests by preventing items from being exported, reexported,
or transferred (in-country) to the persons being added to or the
entries being modified on the Entity List. If this rule were delayed to
allow for notice and comment and a delay in effective date, then
entities being added to the Entity List by this action would continue
to be able to receive items without a license and to conduct activities
contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the
United States. In addition, because these parties may receive notice of
the U.S. Government's intention to place these entities on the Entity
List if a proposed rule is published, doing so would create an
incentive for these persons to either accelerate receiving items
subject to the EAR to conduct activities that are contrary to the
national security or foreign policy interests of the United States, or
to take steps to set up additional aliases, change addresses, and other
measures to try to limit the impact of the listing on the Entity List
once a final rule was published. Further, no other law requires that a
notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment be
given for this rule. Because a notice of proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment are not required to be given for this
rule by 5 U.S.C. 553, or by any other law, the analytical requirements
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., are not
applicable. Accordingly, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required
and none has been prepared.
5. For the one removal from the Entity List in this final rule,
pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B), BIS finds good cause to waive requirements that this rule
be subject to notice and the opportunity for public comment because it
would be contrary to the public interest.
In determining whether to grant removal requests from the Entity
List, a committee of U.S. Government agencies (the End-User Review
Committee (ERC)) evaluates information about and commitments made by
listed persons requesting removal from the Entity List, the nature and
terms of which are set forth in 15 CFR part 744, Supplement No. 5, as
noted in 15 CFR 744.16(b). The information, commitments, and criteria
for this extensive review were all established through the notice of
proposed rulemaking and public comment process (72 FR 31005 (June 5,
2007) (proposed rule), and 73 FR 49311 (August 21, 2008) (final rule)).
This one removal has been made within the established regulatory
framework of the Entity List. If the rule were to be delayed to allow
for public comment, U.S. exporters may face unnecessary economic losses
as they turn away potential sales because the customer remained a
listed person on the Entity List even after the ERC approved the
removal pursuant to the rule published at 73 FR 49311 on August 21,
2008. By publishing without prior notice and comment, BIS allows the
applicant to receive U.S. exports immediately since this one applicant
already has received approval by the ERC pursuant to 15 CFR part 744,
Supplement No. 5, as noted in 15 CFR 744.16(b).
The removals from the Entity List granted by the ERC involve
interagency deliberation and result from review of public and non-
public sources, including sensitive law enforcement information and
classified information, and the measurement of such information against
the Entity List removal criteria. This information is extensively
reviewed according to the
[[Page 8527]]
criteria for evaluating removal requests from the Entity List, as set
out in 15 CFR part 744, Supplement No. 5 and 15 CFR 744.16(b). For
reasons of national security, BIS is not at liberty to provide to the
public detailed information on which the ERC relied to make the
decision to remove this entity. In addition, the information included
in the removal request is information exchanged between the applicant
and the ERC, which by law (section 12(c) of the Export Administration
Act), BIS is restricted from sharing with the public. Moreover, removal
requests from the Entity List contain confidential business
information, which is necessary for the extensive review conducted by
the U.S. Government in assessing such removal requests.
Section 553(d) of the APA generally provides that rules may not
take effect earlier than thirty (30) days after they are published in
the Federal Register. BIS finds good cause to waive the 30-day delay in
effectiveness under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1) because this rule is a
substantive rule which relieves a restriction. This rule's removal of
one person from the Entity List removes a requirement (the Entity-List-
based license requirement and limitation on use of license exceptions)
on this one person being removed from the Entity List. The rule does
not impose a requirement on any other person for this one removal from
the Entity List.
No other law requires that a notice of proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment be given for this final rule. Because a
notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment are
not required under the APA or by any other law, the analytical
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
are not applicable. As a result, no final regulatory flexibility
analysis is required and none has been prepared.
List of Subject in 15 CFR Part 744
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Terrorism.
Accordingly, part 744 of the Export Administration Regulations (15
CFR parts 730-774) is amended as follows:
PART 744--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 744 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22
U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 179;
E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59
FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O. 12947, 60 FR 5079, 3 CFR,
1995 Comp., p. 356; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p.
228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR 45167, 3 CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 208; E.O. 13222,
66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 13224, 66 FR 49079, 3
CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 786; Notice of January 21, 2014, 79 FR 3721
(January 22, 2014); Notice of August 7, 2014, 79 FR 46959 (August
11, 2014); Notice of September 17, 2014, 79 FR 56475 (September 19,
2014); Notice of January 21, 2015, 80 FR 3461 (January 22, 2015).
0
2. Supplement No. 4 to part 744 is amended:
0
a. By adding under China, in alphabetical order, four Chinese entities;
0
b. By removing under Germany, one German entity, ``Satco GmbH, a.k.a.,
the following one alias: -Satco Inc. Park Street 4, Bremen, Germany
28209.'';
0
c. By adding under Pakistan, in alphabetical order, four Pakistani
entities; and
0
d. By adding under United Arab Emirates, in alphabetical order, three
Emirati entities.
The additions read as follows:
Supplement No. 4 to Part 744--Entity List
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
License review Federal Register
Country Entity License requirement policy citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHINA, PEO- * * * * * *
PLE'S RE-
PUBLIC OF
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
National Supercomputing For all items Case-by-case 80 FR [INSERT FR
Center Changsha (NSCC-CS), subject to the basis. PAGE NUMBER 2/18/
Changsha City, Hunan EAR. (See Sec. 15].
Province, China 744.11 of the EAR)
National Supercomputing For all items Case-by-case 80 FR [INSERT FR
Center Guangzhou (NSCC-GZ), subject to the basis. PAGE NUMBER 2/18/
Sun Yat-Sen University, EAR. (See Sec. 15].
University City, Guangzhou, 744.11 of the EAR)
China
National Supercomputing For all items Case-by-case 80 FR [INSERT FR
Center Tianjin (NSCC-TJ), subject to the basis. PAGE NUMBER 2/18/
7th Street, Binhai New EAR. (See Sec. 15].
Area, Tianjin, China 744.11 of the EAR)
National University of For all items Case-by-case 80 FR [INSERT FR
Defense Technology (NUDT), subject to the basis. PAGE NUMBER 2/18/
Garden Road (Metro West), EAR. (See Sec. 15].
Changsha City, Kaifu 744.11 of the EAR)
District, Hunan Province,
China
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PAKISTAN * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Azad Motors Property Choice, For all items Presumption of 80 FR [INSERT FR
a.k.a., the following four subject to the denial. PAGE NUMBER 2/18/
aliases: EAR. (See Sec. 15].
--Peshawar Master Azad 744.11 of the EAR)
Motors;
--Peshawar Motors
Complex;
--Karakoram Azad Motors;
and
--Azad Cars
[[Page 8528]]
Main GT Road, Hajji Camp,
Peshawar, Pakistan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hakim Noor, a.k.a., the For all items Presumption of 80 FR [INSERT FR
following one alias: subject to the denial. PAGE NUMBER 2/18/
--Hakim Nur. EAR. (See Sec. 15].
744.11 of the EAR)
Sarafa Shop #10, Noor
Muhammad Market, Miram
Shaw, Pakistan; and
Mir Nasir Plaza, Sikandar
Pura, Pakistan.
Hakim Nur Sarafa, a.k.a., For all items Presumption of 80 FR [INSERT FR
the following two aliases: subject to the denial. PAGE NUMBER 2/18/
--Noor Muhammad Market; and EAR. (See Sec. 15].
744.11 of the EAR)
--Haji Hakim Noor Saraf.
Sarafa Shop #10, Noor
Muhammad Market, Miram
Shaw, Pakistan; and
Market Shop Number 10,
Sarafa Bazar Miram Shaw,
Pakistan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sher Qadir, Darpa Khel For all items Presumption of 80 FR [INSERT FR
Village, Mirim Shaw, subject to the EAR denial. PAGE NUMBER 2/18/
Pakistan 15].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ajab Noor, a.k.a., the For all items Presumption of 80 FR [INSERT FR
following one alias: subject to the denial. PAGE NUMBER 2/18/
--Ajab Nur. EAR. (See Sec. 15].
744.11 of the EAR)
Box No. 28715, Dubai,
U.A.E.; and
Dubai Tower, Al Maktoum Rd,
Al Rigga, Dubai, Near
Baniyas Square Metro
Station, U.A.E.
Ajab Trading Co. LLC, Box For all items Presumption of 80 FR [INSERT FR
No. 28715, Dubai, U.A.E.; subject to the denial. PAGE NUMBER 2/18/
and EAR. (See Sec. 15].
744.11 of the EAR)
Dubai Tower, Al Maktoum Rd,
Al Rigga, Dubai, Near
Baniyas Square Metro
Station, U.A.E.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Perfect Tyre Trading Co LLC, For all items Presumption of 80 FR [INSERT FR
Al Ain--Al Sanaiya--Inh. subject to the denial. PAGE NUMBER 2/18/
Mohammed Sultan Aldarmaki-- EAR. (See Sec. 15].
Bld, Dubai, U.A.E.; and 744.11 of the EAR)
Post Box No. 67221, Abu
Dhabi, U.A.E.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 8529]]
Dated: February 12, 2015.
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-03321 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P