[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73389-73390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28869]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Availability for the Cal Black Memorial Airport Draft 
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (Draft SEIS) and Section 
4(f) Evaluation; Notice of Public Comment Period; and Notice of 
Opportunity for a Public Hearing

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

[[Page 73390]]


ACTION: Notice of availability, notice of comment period, and notice of 
opportunity for a public hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 
1969 (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and Council on Environmental 
Quality regulations (40 CFR part 1500-1508), the Federal Aviation 
Administration announces the availability and request for comment on a 
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (Draft SEIS) and 
Section 4(f) Evaluation for the Cal Black Memorial Airport. The Section 
4(f) Evaluation was prepared pursuant to Section 4(f) of the Department 
of Transportation Act of 1966 (recodified at 49 U.S.C. 303(c)).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before 45 days from the date of 
the publication of the Notice of Availability by the U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency in the Federal Register. Anyone interested in the 
project has up to 15 days from the date of EPA's publication of the 
Notice of Availability in the Federal Register to request a hearing.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the Draft SEIS may be viewed during regular 
business hours at the following locations:
    1. Federal Aviation Administration Airports Division, Suite 315, 
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057.
    2. Federal Aviation Administration, Airports District Office, Suite 
224, 26805 East 68th Avenue, Denver, CO 80249.
    3. San Juan County Courthouse, County Executive Office, 117 S Main, 
Monticello, Utah 84535.
    4. Web site: http://halls.crossing.airportnetwork.com/.
    Written requests for the Draft SEIS and Section 4(f) Evaluation, 
submittal of comments on the documents, and requests for a public 
hearing can be submitted to the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janell Barrilleaux, Environmental 
Program Manager, Federal Aviation Administration Airports Division, 
Northwest Mountain Region, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057. Mrs. 
Barrilleaux may be contacted during business hours at (425) 227-2611 
(phone), (425) 227-1600 (fax), or via email at 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Northwest Mountain Region of the Federal 
Aviation Administration (FAA) as lead agency and the National Park 
Service (NPS) and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) as a cooperating 
agencies have prepared a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact 
Statement (Draft SEIS) and Section 4(f) Evaluation to address issues 
arising from the 1993 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Decision 
concerning the development of Cal Black Memorial Airport. The U.S. 
National Park Service (NPS) and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) are 
cooperating agencies, by virtue of their jurisdictional authority and/
or resource management responsibilities. This Draft SEIS and Section 
4(f) Evaluation does not involve any new development or project at the 
airport. The Cal Black Memorial Airport opened in April 1992.
    Halls Crossing Airport was located within the boundary of the Glen 
Canyon National Recreation Area, a unit of the National Park Service 
(NPS). Due to safety issues with that airport, an Environmental Impact 
Statement (EIS) was prepared concerning the development of a 
replacement airport. In 1990, the FAA issued a Draft and Final EIS for 
the development of a replacement Airport. In August 1990, the FAA 
issued a record of decision approving the development of Cal Black 
Memorial Airport. The FAA determined in the record of decision that the 
use of the BLM lands upon which the airport was built was reasonably 
necessary for the project. Accordingly, the BLM issued a Patent for the 
airport land to San Juan County on September 25, 1990. In reaching its 
approval, the FAA determined that no significant impacts would result 
from the new airport to the recreational experience of visitors to the 
recreational area.
    In 1990, the National Parks and Conservation Association (NPCA), et 
al. brought suit against the FAA concerning the adequacy of the EIS and 
the adequacy of the BLM Plan Amendment and land transfer process. In 
its July 7, 1993, decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit, 
remanded the EIS decision back to the FAA and BLM for further 
environmental analysis of aircraft noise impacts to the recreational 
use of public lands and the BLM's plan amendment and transfer of land.
    On November 17, 2008 the BLM issued the Monticello Field Office 
Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan. The document 
provides guidance for the management of Federal lands administered by 
the BLM in San Juan County and a small portion of Grant County in 
southeast Utah and includes provisions for the disposal of the Cal 
Black Memorial Airport property.
    Thus, the purpose of the Draft SEIS and Section 4(f) Evaluation is 
to address the requirements of the U.S. Court of Appeals findings. The 
scope of the Draft SEIS and Section 4(f) Evaluation includes: (1) The 
measurement of actual aircraft noise levels in GCNRA and visitor 
survey, (2) an updated evaluation of existing and future aircraft noise 
levels; (3) a Section 4(f) evaluation using the updated noise analysis; 
and (4) an analysis on potential cumulative effects.
    The FAA encourages all interested parties to provide comments 
concerning the scope and content of the Draft SEIS. Comments should be 
as specific as possible and address the analysis of potential 
environmental impacts and the adequacy of the proposed action. 
Reviewers should organize their participation so that it is meaningful 
and makes the agency aware of the viewer's interests and concerns using 
quotations and other specific references to the text of the Draft SEIS 
and related documents. Matters that could have been raised with 
specificity during the comment period on the Draft SEIS may not be 
considered if they are raised for the first time later in the decision 
process. This commenting procedure is intended to ensure that 
substantive comments and concerns are made available to the FAA in a 
timely manner so that the FAA has the opportunity to address them.
    Before including your address, phone number, email address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, be advised that 
your entire comment--including your personal identifying information--
may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in 
your comment to withhold from public review your personal identifying 
information, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 3, 2014.
Carol Suomi,
Acting Division Manager, Airports Division, Northwest Mountain Region.
[FR Doc. 2014-28869 Filed 12-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P