[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 216 (Friday, November 7, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66290-66291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26407]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Part 311

[Docket ID: DoD-2014-OS-0145]


Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DoD.

ACTION: Direct final rule with request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) is exempting 
records maintained in DMDC 17 DoD, entitled ``Continuous Evaluation 
Records for Personnel Security,'' from pertinent provisions of 5 U.S.C. 
552a. In the course of carrying out records checks for continuous 
evaluation, exempt records received from other systems of records may 
become part of this system. To the extent that copies of exempt records 
from those `other' systems of records are maintained in this system, 
OSD claims the same exemptions for the records from those `other' 
systems that are maintained in this system, as claimed for the original 
primary system of which they are a part.

DATES: The rule is effective on January 16, 2015 unless adverse 
comments are received by January 6, 2015. If adverse comment is 
received, the Department of Defense will publish a timely withdrawal of 
the rule in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 4800 Mark 
Center Drive, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350-3100.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

[[Page 66291]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Cindy Allard at (571) 372-0461.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This direct final rule makes nonsubstantive 
changes to the OSD Privacy Program rules. These changes will allow the 
Department to add an exemption rule to the OSD Privacy Program rules 
that will exempt applicable Department records and/or material from 
certain portions of the Privacy Act. This is being published as a 
direct final rule as the Department of Defense does not expect to 
receive any adverse comments, and so a proposed rule is unnecessary.

Direct Final Rule and Significant Adverse Comments

    DoD has determined this rulemaking meets the criteria for a direct 
final rule because it involves nonsubstantive changes dealing with 
DoD's management of its Privacy Programs. DoD expects no opposition to 
the changes and no significant adverse comments. However, if DoD 
receives a significant adverse comment, the Department will withdraw 
this direct final rule by publishing a notice in the Federal Register. 
A significant adverse comment is one that explains: (1) Why the direct 
final rule is inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's 
underlying premise or approach; or (2) why the direct final rule will 
be ineffective or unacceptable without a change. In determining whether 
a comment necessitates withdrawal of this direct final rule, DoD will 
consider whether it warrants a substantive response in a notice and 
comment process.

Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' and Executive 
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''

    It has been determined that this rule is not a significant rule. 
This rule does not (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 
million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy; a 
sector of the economy; productivity; competition; jobs; the 
environment; public health or safety; or State, local, or tribal 
governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or 
otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another Agency; 
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user 
fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of recipients 
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal 
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in 
these Executive orders.

Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C Chapter 6)

    It has been certified that this rule does not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because it is 
concerned only with the administration of Privacy Act systems of 
records within DoD. A Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required.

Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)

    It has been determined that this rule does not impose additional 
information collection requirements on the public under the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''

    It has been determined that this rule does not involve a Federal 
mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal 
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 
million or more and that it will not significantly or uniquely affect 
small governments.

Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''

    It has been determined that this rule does not have federalism 
implications. This rule does not have substantial direct effects on the 
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the 
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government.

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 311

    Privacy.

    Accordingly, 32 CFR part 311 is amended as follows:

PART 311--OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE AND JOINT STAFF 
PRIVACY PROGRAM

0
1. The authority citation for part 311 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 522a.


0
2. Section 311.8 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(23) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  311.8  Procedures for exemptions.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (23) System identifier and name: DMDC 17 DoD, Continuous Evaluation 
Records for Personnel Security.
    (i) Exemption: In the course of carrying out records checks for 
continuous evaluation, exempt records from other systems of records may 
in turn become part of the case records maintained in this system. To 
the extent that copies of exempt records from those `other' systems of 
records are maintained into this system, OSD claims the same exemptions 
for the records from those `other' systems that are entered into this 
system, as claimed for the original primary system of which they are a 
part.
    (ii) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), (k)(1), (k)(2), (k)(3), 
(k)(5), (k)(6), and (k)(7).
    (iii) Reasons: Records are only exempt from pertinent provisions of 
5 U.S.C. 552a to the extent that such provisions have been identified 
and an exemption claimed for the original record and the purposes 
underlying the exemption for the original record still pertain to the 
record which is now maintained in this system of records. In general, 
the exemptions were claimed in order to protect properly classified 
information relating to national defense and foreign policy; to avoid 
interference during the conduct of criminal, civil, or administrative 
actions or investigations; to ensure protective services provided the 
President and others are not compromised; to protect the identity of 
confidential sources incident to Federal employment, military service, 
contract, and security clearance determinations; to preserve the 
confidentiality and integrity of Federal testing materials; and to 
safeguard evaluation materials used for military promotions when 
furnished by a confidential source. The exemption rule for the original 
records will identify the specific reasons why the records are exempt 
from specific provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a.

    Dated: October 29, 2014.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2014-26407 Filed 11-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P