[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 153 (Friday, August 8, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46472-46474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18818]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2014-0187]
Treatment of Natural Phenomena Hazards in Fuel Cycle Facilities
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Draft generic letter; public meeting and request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is seeking public
comment on a draft generic letter to request information from licensees
to address the treatment of natural phenomena hazards in fuel cycle
facilities. The NRC has determined that facility-specific information
is necessary to confirm that fuel cycle facilities are in compliance
with appropriate regulatory requirements. The NRC will use information
submitted by licensees in response to the generic letter if additional
regulatory action is warranted.
DATES: Submit comments by November 6, 2014. Comments received after
this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the NRC
is able to assure consideration only for comments received on or before
this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods
(unless this document describes a different method for submitting
comments on a specific subject):
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2014-0187. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-287-
3422; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration,
Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555-0001.
For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting
comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Marcano, Office of Nuclear
Materials Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-287-9063, email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2014-0187 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain
publicly-available information related to this action by any of the
following methods:
Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2014-0187.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select
[[Page 46473]]
``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced in this document (if that document is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is referenced.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC-2014-0187 in the subject line of your
comment submission, in order to ensure that the NRC is able to make
your comment submission available to the public in this docket.
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact
information in comment submissions that you do not want to be publicly
disclosed in your comment submission. The NRC will post all comment
submissions at http://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment
submissions into ADAMS, and the NRC does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be
publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should
state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to
remove such information before making the comment submissions available
to the public or entering the comment into ADAMS.
II. Background
The NRC is issuing draft Generic Letter 2013 XX-XX: ``Treatment of
Natural Phenomena Hazards In Fuel Cycle Facilities'' (ADAMS Accession
No. ML13157A158), to request information from addressees to demonstrate
if compliance is being maintained with the regulatory requirements and
applicable license conditions regarding the treatment of natural
phenomena events in the facilities' safety assessments; and to
determine if additional NRC regulatory action is necessary to ensure
that licensees are in compliance with their current licensing basis and
existing NRC regulations.
On March 11, 2011, the Tohoku-Taiheiyou-Oki earthquake occurred
near the east coast of Honshu, Japan. This magnitude 9.0 earthquake and
the subsequent tsunami caused significant damage to at least four of
the six units of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power station and, as a
result, there was a loss of offsite and onsite electrical power
systems.
On March 23, 2011, the Chairman of the NRC, via Tasking
Memorandum--COMGBJ-11-0002, ``NRC Actions Following the Events in
Japan,'' directed the NRC's Executive Director for Operations to
establish the NRC Near-Term Task Force (NTTF) to evaluate available
technical and operational information from the events in Japan
following the March 11, 2011, earthquake and tsunami at the Fukushima
Dai-ichi nuclear power station. The NTTF was tasked to consider lessons
learned from the event and to develop recommendations to improve the
regulatory systems for reactors in the United States and their
applicability to licensed facilities other than power reactors.
On July 12, 2011, in light of the accident at the Fukushima Dai-
ichi nuclear power plant, the NTTF presented a set of recommendations
as a result of a systematic and methodical review of NRC processes and
regulations applicable to nuclear power reactors in the United States
(ADAMS Accession No. ML111861807). The NTTF recommendations are
intended to clarify and strengthen the regulatory framework for
protection against natural disasters, mitigation and emergency
preparedness of nuclear power reactors in the United States.
For fuel cycle facilities, in light of the lessons learned from the
accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant, the staff
performed a systematic evaluation and inspection of selected fuel cycle
facilities to confirm that licensees were in compliance with regulatory
requirements and license conditions; and to evaluate their readiness
under natural phenomena hazards (NPH) events and other licensing bases
events related to NPH. The staff's assessment considered the NTTF
recommendations to determine whether additional regulatory actions by
the NRC are warranted.
The staff completed inspections at selected fuel facilities and the
results were used to perform a systematic evaluation of the processes
and regulations applicable to fuel facilities. The results of the
evaluation allow the staff to conclude that the current regulatory
approach and requirements of these licensees continues to serve as a
basis for reasonable assurance of adequate protection of public health
and safety. However, the staff identified generic issues regarding
compliance with the current regulatory framework with regards to the
treatment of certain natural phenomena events in the facilities
(uranium conversion, enrichment and fuel fabrication) safety
assessments. The NRC is issuing this draft generic letter to request
information from licensees to verify that compliance is being
maintained with regulatory requirements and license conditions
regarding the treatment of natural phenomena events.
III. Cumulative Effects of Regulation
The NRC is considering the cumulative effects of regulation (CER)
as they relate to this Generic Letter. The CER considers the challenges
licensees face in addressing the implementation of new regulatory
positions, programs, and requirements (e.g., rulemaking, guidance,
backfits, inspections). The CER initiative stems from the total burden
imposed on licensees by the NRC from simultaneous or consecutive
regulatory actions that can adversely affect the licensee's capability
to implement those requirements while continuing to operate or
construct its facility in a safe and secure manner. The NRC proposed
several rulemaking process enhancements to address CER in SECY-11-0032,
``Consideration of the Cumulative Effects of Regulation in the
Rulemaking Process,'' dated October 11, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML112840466). In SECY-12-0137, ``Implementation of the Cumulative
Effects of Regulation Process Changes,'' dated October 5, 2012 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML12223A162) built upon the recommendations in SECY-11-
0032. In its Staff Requirements Memorandum to SECY-12-0137 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML13071A635), the Commission directed the staff to, among
other items, ``continue to develop and implement outreach tools that
will allow NRC to consider more completely the overall impacts of
multiple rules, orders, generic communications, advisories, and other
regulatory actions on licensees and their ability to focus effectively
on items of greatest safety importance.''
With regard to this generic letter, the NRC requests that licensees
comment about any CER challenges they may face. Specifically, the NRC
requests comment on the following questions:
a. In light of any current or projected cumulative effects, does
this generic letter request provide sufficient time for licensees to
respond with the information requested, including any
[[Page 46474]]
need to develop this information through supporting engineering
calculation or analyses?
b. If a current or projected cumulative effect poses a significant
challenge, what should be done to address it? For example, if more time
is required to develop and provide the information, what period of time
is sufficient? Are there equally effective alternatives to providing
the requested information to the NRC that reduce the cumulative
effects?
c. Do other (NRC or other regulatory agency) regulatory actions
(e.g., Orders, rules, generic letter, bulletins, 50.54(f) requests)
influence licensee responses to this draft generic letter? If so what
are they and do you have a suggested approach to reduce the cumulative
effects in light of these other regulatory actions?
d. Are there other projects that licensees are undertaking, plan to
undertake, or should be undertaking that provide greater safety
benefit, that might be displaced or delayed as a result of the
expenditure of effort and resources to respond to this generic letter?
e. Are there unintended consequences associated with responding to
this generic letter at this time?
f. Please comment on the NRC's supporting justification for this
generic letter.
IV. Public Meeting
The NRC is requesting public comments on the draft generic letter.
The NRC plans to hold a public meeting approximately 45 days into the
comment period to discuss draft Generic Letter 2013 XX-XX: ``Treatment
of Natural Phenomena Hazards In Fuel Cycle Facilities'' (ADAMS
Accession No. ML13157A158), to engage industry stakeholders and members
of the public in a discussion of this issue. This meeting is scheduled
during the comment period to allow industry stakeholders and members of
the public time to submit comments on the proposed generic
communication before the comment period closes. All comments that are
to receive consideration in the final generic letter must still be
submitted electronically or in writing as indicated in the ADDRESSES
section of this document.
Additional details regarding the meeting will be posted at least 10
days prior to the public meeting on the NRC's Public Meeting Schedule
Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/public-meetings/index.cfm. Information regarding topics to be discussed, changes to the
agenda, whether the meeting has been cancelled or rescheduled, and the
time allotted for public comments can be obtained from the Public
Meeting Schedule Web site.
Dated at North Bethesda, Maryland, this 1st day of August 2014.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Marissa Bailey,
Director, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, Office of
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2014-18818 Filed 8-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P