[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 147 (Thursday, July 31, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44264-44267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18083]



[[Page 44264]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

10 CFR Part 72

[NRC-2013-0269]
RIN 3150-AJ30


List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: Transnuclear, Inc. 
NUHOMS[supreg] HD Cask System, Certificate of Compliance No. 1030, 
Amendment No. 2

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is amending its 
spent fuel storage regulations by revising the Transnuclear, Inc. 
NUHOMS[supreg] HD Cask System listing within the ``List of Approved 
Spent Fuel Storage Casks'' to include Amendment No. 2 to Certificate of 
Compliance (CoC) No. 1030.

DATES: The final rule is effective October 14, 2014, unless significant 
adverse comments are received by September 2, 2014 in response to the 
companion proposed rule published elsewhere in this issue of the 
Federal Register. Please see the companion proposed rule for detailed 
instructions on submitting comments. If this direct final rule is 
withdrawn as a result of such comments, timely notice of the withdrawal 
will be published in the Federal Register. Comments received after this 
date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the NRC staff 
is able to ensure consideration only for comments received on or before 
this date.

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2013-0269 when contacting the 
NRC about the availability of information for this action. You may 
access publicly-available information related to this action by any of 
the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to: http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2013-0269. Address 
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher, telephone: 301-287-
3422, email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact 
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of 
this document.
     NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the 
ADAMS Public Documents collection at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and 
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, 
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to: [email protected]. The 
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it is available 
in ADAMS) is provided the first time that it is mentioned in the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. The proposed CoC, Technical 
Specifications (TSs), and preliminary safety evaluation report (SER) 
are available in ADAMS under Package Accession No. ML13322B445. The 
ADAMS Accession No. for the Transnuclear, Inc. NUHOMS[supreg] Cask 
System Amendment No. 2 application dated September 28, 2012, is 
ML12283A012.
     NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public 
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O-1F21, One White Flint North, 11555 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory R. Trussell, Office of Federal 
and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone: 301-415-
6445, email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents

I. Procedural Background
II. Background
III. Discussion of Changes
IV. Voluntary Consensus Standards
V. Agreement State Compatibility
VI. Plain Writing
VII. Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant 
Environmental Impact
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
IX. Regulatory Flexibility Certification
X. Regulatory Analysis
XI. Backfitting and Issue Finality
XII. Congressional Review Act

I. Procedural Background

    This rule is limited to the changes contained in Amendment No. 2 to 
CoC No. 1030 and does not include other aspects of the Transnuclear, 
Inc. NUHOMS[supreg] HD Cask System design. The NRC is using the 
``direct final rule procedure'' to issue this amendment because it 
represents a limited and routine change to an existing CoC that is 
expected to be noncontroversial. Adequate protection of public health 
and safety continues to be ensured. The amendment to the rule will 
become effective on October 14, 2014. However, if the NRC receives a 
significant adverse comment by September 2, 2014 in response to the 
companion proposed rule published elsewhere in this issue of the 
Federal Register, then the NRC will publish a document that withdraws 
this action and will subsequently address the comments received in a 
final rule as a response to the companion proposed rule. Absent 
significant modifications to the proposed revisions requiring 
republication, the NRC will not initiate a second comment period on 
this action.
    A significant adverse comment is a comment where the commenter 
explains why the rule would be inappropriate, including challenges to 
the rule's underlying premise or approach, or would be ineffective or 
unacceptable without a change. A comment is adverse and significant if:
    (1) The comment opposes the rule and provides a reason sufficient 
to require a substantive response in a notice-and-comment process. For 
example, a substantive response is required when:
    (a) The comment causes the NRC staff to reevaluate (or reconsider) 
its position or conduct additional analysis;
    (b) The comment raises an issue serious enough to warrant a 
substantive response to clarify or complete the record; or
    (c) The comment raises a relevant issue that was not previously 
addressed or considered by the NRC staff.
    (2) The comment proposes a change or an addition to the rule, and 
it is apparent that the rule would be ineffective or unacceptable 
without incorporation of the change or addition.
    (3) The comment causes the NRC staff to make a change (other than 
editorial) to the rule, CoC, or TSs.
    For detailed instructions on filing comments, please see the 
companion proposed rule published in the Proposed Rules section of this 
issue of the Federal Register.

II. Background

    The NRC is amending its spent fuel storage regulations by revising 
the Transnuclear, Inc. NUHOMS[supreg] HD Cask System listing within the 
``List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks'' to include Amendment No. 
2 to CoC No. 1030. Amendment No. 2 includes changes to: Increase the 
soluble boron concentration to 2,800 ppm for criticality safety 
analyses and add maximum enrichments for Combustion Engineering 14x14 
fuel assemblies that were previously unauthorized for storage; improve 
clarity of certain TSs, such as heat load zoning configuration, fuel 
qualification table, fuel class, and intact fuel/damaged fuel 
definitions; allow for increased fuel assembly weight by 25 pounds; 
revise the definition of control components; include blended low 
enriched uranium fuel material; increase shielding effectiveness of the 
horizontal storage

[[Page 44265]]

module by adding optional dose reduction hardware; update licensing 
basis documents based on recent experience with ongoing licensing 
actions involving other NUHOMS[supreg] systems; and accommodate 
installation practices for a limiting gap size that was evaluated based 
on dose rates. In addition, the amendment makes editorial changes to 
the TSs.
    Section 218(a) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA) of 1982, as 
amended, requires that ``the Secretary [of the Department of Energy] 
shall establish a demonstration program, in cooperation with the 
private sector, for the dry storage of spent nuclear fuel at civilian 
nuclear power reactor sites, with the objective of establishing one or 
more technologies that the [Nuclear Regulatory] Commission may, by 
rule, approve for use at the sites of civilian nuclear power reactors 
without, to the maximum extent practicable, the need for additional 
site-specific approvals by the Commission.'' Section 133 of the NWPA 
states, in part, that ``[the Commission] shall, by rule, establish 
procedures for the licensing of any technology approved by the 
Commission under Section 219(a) [sic: 218(a)] for use at the site of 
any civilian nuclear power reactor.''
    To implement this mandate, the Commission approved dry storage of 
spent nuclear fuel in NRC-approved casks under a general license by 
publishing a final rule which added a new subpart K in part 72 of Title 
10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) entitled ``General 
License for Storage of Spent Fuel at Power Reactor Sites'' (55 FR 
29181; July 18, 1990). This rule also established a new subpart L 
within 10 CFR part 72 entitled, ``Approval of Spent Fuel Storage 
Casks,'' which contains procedures and criteria for obtaining NRC 
approval of spent fuel storage cask designs. The NRC subsequently 
issued a final rule on December 11, 2006 (71 FR 71463), that approved 
the NUHOMS[supreg] HD Cask System design and added it to the list of 
NRC-approved cask designs in 10 CFR 72.214 as CoC No. 1030.

III. Discussion of Changes

    On September 28, 2012, Transnuclear Inc. submitted a request to the 
NRC to amend CoC No. 1030. Transnuclear, Inc. supplemented its request 
on the following dates: December 20, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. 
ML12356A391) and July 25, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13210A074). 
Specifically, Transnuclear, Inc. requested changes to (1) increase the 
soluble boron concentration to 2,800 ppm for criticality safety 
analyses and add maximum enrichments for Combustion Engineering 14x14 
fuel assemblies that were previously unauthorized for storage; (2) 
improve clarity of certain TSs, such as heat load zoning configuration, 
fuel qualification table, fuel class, and intact fuel/damaged fuel 
definitions; (3) allow for increased fuel assembly weight by 25 pounds; 
(4) revise the definition of control components; (5) include blended 
low enriched uranium fuel material; (6) increase shielding 
effectiveness of the horizontal storage module by adding optional dose 
reduction hardware; (7) update licensing basis documents based on 
recent experience with ongoing licensing actions involving other 
NUHOMS[supreg] systems; and (8) accommodate installation practices for 
a limiting gap size that was evaluated based on dose rates. In 
addition, the amendment makes editorial changes to the TSs.
    As documented in the SER (ADAMS Accession No. ML13325B118), the NRC 
staff performed a detailed safety evaluation of the proposed CoC 
amendment request. There are no significant changes to cask design 
requirements in the proposed CoC amendment. Considering the specific 
design requirements for each accident condition, the design of the cask 
would prevent loss of containment, shielding, and criticality control. 
If there is no loss of containment, shielding, or criticality control, 
the environmental impacts would be insignificant. This amendment does 
not reflect a significant change in design or fabrication of the cask. 
In addition, any resulting occupational exposure or offsite dose rates 
from the implementation of Amendment No. 2 would remain well within the 
10 CFR part 20 limits. Therefore, the proposed CoC changes will not 
result in any radiological or non-radiological environmental impacts 
that significantly differ from the environmental impacts evaluated in 
the environmental assessment supporting the July 18, 1990, final rule. 
There will be no significant change in the types or significant 
revisions in the amounts of any effluent released, no significant 
increase in the individual or cumulative radiation exposure, and no 
significant increase in the potential for or consequences from 
radiological accidents.
    This direct final rule revises the NUHOMS[supreg] HD Cask System 
listing in 10 CFR 72.214 by adding Amendment No. 2 to CoC No. 1030. The 
amendment consists of the changes previously described, as set forth in 
the revised CoC and TSs. The revised TSs are identified in the SER.
    The amended NUHOMS[supreg] HD cask design, when used under the 
conditions specified in the CoC, the TSs, and the NRC's regulations, 
will meet the requirements of 10 CFR part 72; therefore, adequate 
protection of public health and safety will continue to be ensured. 
When this direct final rule becomes effective, persons who hold a 
general license under 10 CFR 72.210 may load spent nuclear fuel into 
NUHOMS[supreg] HD Cask Systems that meet the criteria of Amendment No. 
2 to CoC No. 1030 under 10 CFR 72.212.

IV. Voluntary Consensus Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-113) requires that Federal agencies use technical standards that 
are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies unless 
the use of such a standard is inconsistent with applicable law or 
otherwise impractical. In this direct final rule, the NRC will revise 
the NUHOMS[supreg] HD Cask System design listed in 10 CFR 72.214, 
``List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks.'' This action does not 
constitute the establishment of a standard that contains generally 
applicable requirements.

V. Agreement State Compatibility

    Under the ``Policy Statement on Adequacy and Compatibility of 
Agreement State Programs'' approved by the Commission on June 30, 1997, 
and published in the Federal Register on September 3, 1997 (62 FR 
46517), this direct rule is classified as Compatibility Category 
``NRC.'' Compatibility is not required for Category ``NRC'' 
regulations. The NRC program elements in this category are those that 
relate directly to areas of regulation reserved to the NRC by the 
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, or the provisions of 10 CFR. 
Although an Agreement State may not adopt program elements reserved to 
the NRC, it may wish to inform its licensees of certain requirements 
via a mechanism that is consistent with the particular State's 
administrative procedure laws, but does not confer regulatory authority 
on the State.

VI. Plain Writing

    The Plain Writing Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-274) requires Federal 
agencies to write documents in a clear, concise, well-organized manner. 
The NRC has written this document to be consistent with the Plain 
Writing Act as well as the Presidential Memorandum, ``Plain Language in 
Government Writing,'' published June 10, 1988 (63 FR 31883).

[[Page 44266]]

VII. Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant 
Environmental Impact

A. The Action

    The action is to amend 10 CFR 72.214 to revise the Transnuclear, 
Inc. NUHOMS[supreg] HD Cask System listing within the ``List of 
Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks'' to include Amendment No. 2 to CoC 
No. 1030.
    Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, 
and the NRC regulations in subpart A of 10 CFR part 51, ``Environmental 
Protection Regulations for Domestic Licensing and Related Regulatory 
Functions,'' the NRC has determined that this rule, if adopted, would 
not be a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of 
the human environment and, therefore, an environmental impact statement 
is not required. The NRC has made a finding of no significant impact on 
the basis of this environmental assessment.

B. The Need for the Action

    This direct final rule amends the CoC for the NUHOMS[supreg] HD 
Cask System design within the list of approved spent fuel storage casks 
that power reactor licensees can use to store spent fuel at reactor 
sites under a general license. Specifically, Transnuclear, Inc. 
requested changes to revise authorized contents to: increase the 
soluble boron concentration to 2,800 ppm for criticality safety 
analyses and add maximum enrichments for Combustion Engineering 14x14 
fuel assemblies that were previously unauthorized for storage; improve 
clarity of certain TSs, such as heat load zoning configuration, fuel 
qualification table, fuel class, and intact fuel/damaged fuel 
definitions; allow for increased fuel assembly weight by 25 pounds; 
revise the definition of control components; include blended low 
enriched uranium fuel material; increase shielding effectiveness of the 
horizontal storage module by adding optional dose reduction hardware; 
update licensing basis documents based on recent experience with 
ongoing licensing actions involving other NUHOMS[supreg] systems; and 
accommodate installation practices for a limiting gap size that was 
evaluated based on dose rates. In addition, the amendment makes 
editorial changes to the TSs.

C. Environmental Impacts of the Action

    On July 18, 1990 (55 FR 29181), the NRC issued an amendment to 10 
CFR part 72 to provide for the storage of spent nuclear fuel under a 
general license in cask designs approved by the NRC. The potential 
environmental impact of using NRC-approved storage casks was initially 
analyzed in the environmental assessment for the 1990 final rule. The 
environmental assessment for this Amendment No. 2 tiers off of the 
environmental assessment for the July 18, 1990, final rule. Tiering on 
past environmental assessments is a standard process under the National 
Environmental Policy Act.
    NUHOMS[supreg] HD Cask Systems are designed to mitigate the effects 
of design basis accidents that could occur during storage. Design basis 
accidents account for human-induced events and the most severe natural 
phenomena reported for the site and surrounding area. Postulated 
accidents analyzed for an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, 
the type of facility at which a holder of a power reactor operating 
license would store spent fuel in casks in accordance with 10 CFR part 
72, include tornado winds and tornado-generated missiles, a design 
basis earthquake, a design basis flood, an accidental cask drop, 
lightning effects, fire, explosions, and other incidents.
    Considering the specific design requirements for each accident 
condition, the design of the cask would prevent loss of containment, 
shielding, and criticality control. If there is no loss of containment, 
shielding, or criticality control, the environmental impacts would be 
insignificant. This amendment does not reflect a significant change in 
design or fabrication of the cask. There are no significant changes to 
cask design requirements in the proposed CoC amendment. In addition, 
any resulting occupational exposure or offsite dose rates from the 
implementation of Amendment No. 2 would remain well within the 10 CFR 
part 20 limits. Therefore, the proposed CoC changes will not result in 
any radiological or non-radiological environmental impacts that 
significantly differ from the environmental impacts evaluated in the 
environmental assessment supporting the July 18, 1990, final rule. 
There will be no significant change in the types or significant 
revisions in the amounts of any effluent released, no significant 
increase in the individual or cumulative radiation exposure, and no 
significant increase in the potential for or consequences from 
radiological accidents. The staff documented its safety findings in an 
SER which is available in ADAMS under Accession No. ML13325B118.

D. Alternative to the Action

    The alternative to this action is to deny approval of Amendment No. 
2 and end the direct final rule. Consequently, any 10 CFR part 72 
general licensee that seeks to load spent nuclear fuel into the 
NUHOMS[supreg] HD Cask System in accordance with the changes described 
in proposed Amendment No. 2 would have to request an exemption from the 
requirements of 10 CFR 72.212 and 72.214. Under this alternative, 
interested licensees would have to prepare, and the NRC would have to 
review, a separate exemption request, thereby increasing the 
administrative burden upon the NRC and the costs to each licensee. 
Therefore, the environmental impacts would be the same or less than the 
action.

E. Alternative Use of Resources

    Approval of Amendment No. 2 to CoC No. 1030 would result in no 
irreversible commitments of resources.

F. Agencies and Persons Contacted

    No agencies or persons outside the NRC were contacted in connection 
with the preparation of this environmental assessment.

G. Finding of No Significant Impact

    The environmental impacts of the action have been reviewed under 
the requirements in 10 CFR part 51.
    Based on the foregoing environmental assessment, the NRC concludes 
that this direct final rule entitled, ``List of Approved Spent Fuel 
Storage Casks: NUHOMS[supreg] HD Cask System,'' will not have a 
significant effect on the quality of the human environment. Therefore, 
the NRC has determined that an environmental impact statement is not 
necessary for this rule.

VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement

    This rule does not contain any information collection requirements 
and, therefore, is not subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing requirements were approved by the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Approval Number 3150-0132.
Public Protection Notification
    The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to 
respond to a request for information or an information collection 
requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid 
OMB control number.

IX. Regulatory Flexibility Certification

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), the 
NRC certifies that this rule will not, if issued, have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

[[Page 44267]]

This direct final rule affects only nuclear power plant licensees and 
Transnuclear, Inc. These entities do not fall within the scope of the 
definition of small entities set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act or the size standards established by the NRC (10 CFR 2.810).

X. Regulatory Analysis

    On July 18, 1990 (55 FR 29181), the NRC issued an amendment to 10 
CFR part 72 to provide for the storage of spent nuclear fuel under a 
general license in cask designs approved by the NRC. Any nuclear power 
reactor licensee can use NRC-approved cask designs to store spent 
nuclear fuel if it notifies the NRC in advance, the spent fuel is 
stored under the conditions specified in the cask's CoC, and the 
conditions of the general license are met. A list of NRC-approved cask 
designs is contained in 10 CFR 72.214. On December 11, 2006 (71 FR 
71463), the NRC issued an amendment to 10 CFR part 72 that approved the 
NUHOMS[supreg] HD Cask System design by adding it to the list of NRC-
approved cask designs in 10 CFR 72.214.
    On September 28, 2012, and as supplemented on December 20, 2012, 
and July 25, 2013, Transnuclear, Inc., submitted an application to 
amend the NUHOMS[supreg] HD Cask System as described in Section III, 
``Discussion of Changes,'' of this document.
    The alternative to this action is to withhold approval of Amendment 
No. 2 and to require any 10 CFR part 72 general licensee seeking to 
load spent nuclear fuel into NUHOMS[supreg] HD Cask Systems under the 
changes described in Amendment No. 2 to request an exemption from the 
requirements of 10 CFR 72.212 and 72.214. Under this alternative, each 
interested 10 CFR part 72 licensee would have to prepare, and the NRC 
would have to review, a separate exemption request, thereby increasing 
the administrative burden upon the NRC and the costs to each licensee.
    Approval of the direct final rule is consistent with previous NRC 
actions. Further, as documented in the SER and the environmental 
assessment, the direct final rule will have no adverse effect on public 
health and safety or the environment. This direct final rule has no 
significant identifiable impact or benefit on other Government 
agencies. Based on this regulatory analysis, the NRC concludes that the 
requirements of the direct final rule are commensurate with the NRC's 
responsibilities for public health and safety and the common defense 
and security. No other available alternative is believed to be as 
satisfactory, and therefore, this action is recommended.

XI. Backfitting and Issue Finality

    The NRC has determined that the backfit rule (10 CFR 72.62) does 
not apply to this direct final rule. Therefore, a backfit analysis is 
not required. This direct final rule revises CoC No. 1030 for the 
Transnuclear, Inc. NUHOMS[supreg] HD Cask System, as currently listed 
in 10 CFR 72.214, ``List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks.'' The 
revision consists of adding Amendment No. 2 to CoC No.1030, and 
Amendment No. 2 applies only to new casks fabricated and used under 
Amendment No. 2. These changes do not affect existing users of the 
NUHOMS[supreg] HD Cask System, and the current Amendment No. 1 
continues to be effective for existing users. While current CoC users 
may comply with the new requirements in Amendment No. 2, this would be 
a voluntary decision on the part of current users. For these reasons, 
Amendment No. 2 to CoC No. 1030 does not constitute backfitting under 
10 CFR 72.62, 10 CFR 50.109(a)(1), or otherwise represent an 
inconsistency with the issue finality provisions applicable to combined 
licenses in 10 CFR part 52. Accordingly, no backfit analysis or 
additional documentation addressing the issue finality criteria in 10 
CFR part 52 has been prepared by the staff.

XII. Congressional Review Act

    The Office of Management and Budget has not found this to be a 
major rule as defined in the Congressional Review Act.

List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 72

    Administrative practice and procedure, Criminal penalties, Manpower 
training programs, Nuclear materials, Occupational safety and health, 
Penalties, Radiation protection, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Security measures, Spent fuel, Whistleblowing.

    For the reasons set out in the preamble and under the authority of 
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; the Energy Reorganization 
Act of 1974, as amended; the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as 
amended; and 5 U.S.C. 552 and 553; the NRC is adopting the following 
amendments to 10 CFR part 72.

PART 72--LICENSING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE INDEPENDENT STORAGE OF 
SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL, HIGH-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND REACTOR-
RELATED GREATER THAN CLASS C WASTE

0
1. The authority citation for part 72 is revised to read as follows:

    Authority:  Atomic Energy Act secs. 51, 53, 57, 62, 63, 65, 69, 
81, 161, 182, 183, 184, 186, 187, 189, 223, 234, 274 (42 U.S.C. 
2071, 2073, 2077, 2092, 2093, 2095, 2099, 2111, 2201, 2232, 2233, 
2234, 2236, 2237, 2239, 2273, 2282, 2021); Energy Reorganization Act 
secs. 201, 202, 206, 211 (42 U.S.C. 5841, 5842, 5846, 5851); 
National Environmental Policy Act sec. 102 (42 U.S.C. 4332); Nuclear 
Waste Policy Act secs. 131, 132, 133, 135, 137, 141, 148 (42 U.S.C. 
10151, 10152, 10153, 10155, 10157, 10161, 10168); Government 
Paperwork Elimination Act sec. 1704 (44 U.S.C. 3504 note); Energy 
Policy Act of 2005, Pub. L. 109-58, 119 Stat. 788 (2005).
    Section 72.44(g) also issued under Nuclear Waste Policy Act 
secs. 142(b) and 148(c), (d) (42 U.S.C. 10162(b), 10168(c), (d)). 
Section 72.46 also issued under Atomic Energy Act sec. 189 (42 
U.S.C. 2239); Nuclear Waste Policy Act sec. 134 (42 U.S.C. 10154). 
Section 72.96(d) also issued under Nuclear Waste Policy Act sec. 
145(g) (42 U.S.C. 10165(g)). Subpart J also issued under Nuclear 
Waste Policy Act secs. 117(a), 141(h) (42 U.S.C. 10137(a), 
10161(h)). Subpart K also issued under Nuclear Waste Policy Act sec. 
218(a) (42 U.S.C. 10198).


0
2. In Sec.  72.214, Certificate of Compliance 1030 is revised to read 
as follows:


Sec.  72.214  List of approved spent fuel storage casks.

* * * * *
    Certificate Number: 1030.
    Initial Certificate Effective Date: January 10, 2007.
    Amendment Number 1 Effective Date: March 29, 2011.
    Amendment Number 2 Effective Date: October 14, 2014.
    SAR Submitted by: Transnuclear, Inc.
    SAR Title: Final Safety Analysis Report for the NUHOMS[supreg] HD 
Horizontal Modular Storage System for Irradiated Nuclear Fuel.
    Docket Number: 72-1030.
    Certificate Expiration Date: January 10, 2027.
    Model Number: NUHOMS[supreg] HD-32PTH.
* * * * *

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day of July, 2014.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Mark A. Satorius,
Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014-18083 Filed 7-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P