[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 145 (Tuesday, July 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44036-44038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17871]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services


Notice of Hearing: Reconsideration of Disapproval; Louisiana 
Medicaid State Plan Amendments (SPAs) 13-23, 13-25 and 13-28

AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

ACTION: Notice of Hearing: Reconsideration of Disapproval.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces an administrative hearing to be held on 
September 9, 2014, at the Department of Health and Human Services, 
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Division of Medicaid & 
Children's Health, Dallas Regional Office, 1301 Young Street, Room 
801, 8th Floor Dallas, Texas 75202 to reconsider CMS' decision 
to disapprove Louisiana's Medicaid SPAs 13-23, 13-25 and 13-28.
    Closing Date: Requests to participate in the hearing as a party 
must be received by the presiding officer by August 13, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin R. Cohen, Presiding Officer, 
CMS, 2520 Lord Baltimore Drive, Suite L, Baltimore, Maryland 21244, 
Telephone: (410) 786-3169.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice announces an administrative 
hearing to reconsider CMS' decision to disapprove the Louisiana 
Medicaid SPAs 13-23, 13-25 and 13-28. CMS received Louisiana SPAs 13-23 
and 13-25 on June 27, 2013, and 13-28 on July 12, 2013 with proposed 
effective dates of June 24, 2013 and October 1, 2013, respectively. The 
amendments propose to provide for supplemental Medicaid inpatient 
hospital payments and disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payments to 
private hospitals participating in public-private partnerships. These 
SPAs were disapproved on May 2, 2014.
    The issues to be considered at the hearing are:
     Whether the state established that Louisiana SPAs 13-23, 
13-25 and 13-28 comply with section 1903(w) of the Social Security Act 
(the Act) which generally provides that state expenditures are not 
allowable to the extent that the state receives certain provider-
related donations and taxes As set forth in implementing regulations at 
42 Code of the Federal Register (CFR) 433.54, expenditures are not 
allowable, and federal financial participation (FFP) is not available, 
to the extent that the state receives provider-related donations and 
there is a ``hold harmless arrangement'' under which providers (or the 
provider class) could be effectively repaid for a provider-related tax 
or donation through any direct or indirect payment, offset, or waiver.
    [cir] Specifically, at issue is whether (1) the state established 
that certain payments from providers to the state (characterized by the 
state as advance lease payments) were not provider donations, when the 
state did not document such payments to be consistent with ordinary 
market business practices for leasing property;

[[Page 44037]]

(2) whether the state established that the supplemental and DSH 
payments made under the SPAs were not linked to Cooperative Endeavor 
Agreements that provide, among other things, for of the advance lease 
payments from privately owned hospitals that are at issue when such 
agreements were entered into with entities qualifying for increased 
Medicaid payments under the SPA; and (3) whether the state established 
that there was no hold harmless arrangement despite the apparent return 
of donated funds back to the private hospitals in the form of increased 
Medicaid payments.
    As noted in this statement of the issues set forth above, the 
burden is on the state to demonstrate that the ``advance lease 
payments'' were not a donation, were not linked to Medicaid payments, 
and that there is no hold harmless arrangement. CMS is authorized under 
section 1902(b) of the Act, as implemented by 42 CFR Part 430, Subpart 
B, to approve state plan amendments only based on a determination that 
the amendments comply with the requirements of relevant federal 
statutes and regulations and can serve as a basis for FFP.
     Whether Louisiana SPAs 13-23, 13-25 and 13-28 comply with 
the requirements of 1902(a)(2) and 1902(a)(4) of the Act which requires 
that the state plan provide for the non-federal share of expenditures 
under the state plan, from either state or local funding. Because the 
SPAs at issue propose to claim for FFP without adjustment to reflect 
unallowable expenditures resulting from the provider related donation 
and hold harmless arrangement discussed above, they would result in a 
non-federal share that would be insufficient to meet the requirements 
of section 1902(a)(2). Moreover, section 1902(a)(4) of the Act requires 
that the state plan comply with methods of administration as are found 
necessary by the Secretary for the proper and efficient operation of 
the plan. Among the implementing regulations for section 1902(a)(4) of 
the Act is the requirement at 42 CFR 430.10 that a state plan contain 
all information necessary for CMS to determine that the plan can be 
approved to serve as a basis for FFP in the state program. Because the 
state has not established that the supplemental payments are not part 
of a hold harmless arrangement that would result in a reduction in FFP, 
the state has not established that the SPAs are consistent with section 
1902(a)(4) and the implementing regulations at 42 CFR 430.10.
     Whether the state has established that the supplemental 
payments set forth in Louisiana SPA 13-23, 13-25, and 13.28 are 
consistent with the statutory requirement at section 1902(a)(30)(A) of 
the Act that payments must be ``consistent with efficiency, economy, 
and quality of care''.
     Whether Louisiana SPAs 13-23, 13-25 and 13-28 comport with 
the broad principles of the federal-state partnership embodied in 
section 1903(a) of the Act, because they indicate circumstances in 
which the federal government would pay more than its share of the net 
expenditures, after accounting for claimed expenditures that are 
effectively repaid by the provider-related donations.
    Section 1116 of the Act and federal regulations at 42 CFR Part 430, 
establish Department procedures that provide an administrative hearing 
for reconsideration of a disapproval of a state plan or plan amendment. 
CMS is required to publish a copy of the notice to a state Medicaid 
agency that informs the agency of the time and place of the hearing, 
and the issues to be considered. If we subsequently notify the agency 
of additional issues that will be considered at the hearing, we will 
also publish that notice.
    Any individual or group that wants to participate in the hearing as 
a party must petition the presiding officer within 15 days after 
publication of this notice, in accordance with the requirements 
contained at 42 CFR 430.76(b)(2). Any interested person or organization 
that wants to participate as amicus curiae must petition the presiding 
officer before the hearing begins in accordance with the requirements 
contained at 42 CFR 430.76(c). If the hearing is later rescheduled, the 
presiding officer will notify all participants.
    The notice to Louisiana announcing an administrative hearing to 
reconsider the disapproval of its SPAs reads as follows:

Ms. J. Ruth Kennedy, Medicaid Director, Department of Health and 
Hospitals, 628 North 4th Street, P.O. Box 91030, Baton Rouge, LA 70821-
9030.

    Dear Ms. Kennedy: I am responding to your request for 
reconsideration of the decision to disapprove Louisiana State Plan 
Amendments (SPAs) 13-23, 13-25 and 13-28. The Centers for Medicare & 
Medicaid Services (CMS) received SPAs 13-23 and 13-25 on June 27, 2013, 
and 13-28 on July 12, 2013 with proposed effective dates of June 24, 
2013 and October 1, 2013, respectively. The amendments propose to 
provide for supplemental Medicaid inpatient hospital payments and 
disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payments to private hospitals 
participating in public-private partnerships. These SPAs were 
disapproved on May 2, 2014.
    I am scheduling a hearing on your request for reconsideration to be 
held on September 9, 2014, at the Department of Health and Human 
Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Division of 
Medicaid & Children's Health, Dallas Regional Office, 1301 Young 
Street, Room 801, Dallas, Texas 75202. The issues to be 
considered at the hearing are:
     Whether the state established that Louisiana SPAs 13-23, 
13-25 and 13-28 comply with section 1903(w) of the Social Security Act 
(the Act) which generally provides that state expenditures are not 
allowable to the extent that the state receives provider-related 
donations and taxes. As set forth in implementing regulations at 42 
Code of the Federal Register (CFR) 433.54, expenditures are not 
allowable, and federal financial participation (FFP) is not available, 
to the extent that the state receives provider-related donations and 
there is a ``hold harmless arrangement'' under which providers (or the 
provider class) could be effectively repaid for a provider-related tax 
or donation through any direct or indirect payment, offset, or waiver.
    [cir] Specifically, at issue is whether (1) the state established 
that certain payments from providers to the state (characterized by the 
state as advance lease payments) were not provider donations, when the 
state did not document such payments to be consistent with ordinary 
market business practices for leasing property; (2) whether the state 
established that the supplemental and DSH payments made under the SPAs 
were not linked to Cooperative Endeavor Agreements that provide, among 
other things, for the advance lease payments from privately owned 
hospitals that are at issue when such agreements were entered into with 
entities qualifying for increased Medicaid payments under the SPAs; and 
(3) whether the state established that there was no hold harmless 
arrangement despite the apparent return of donated funds back to the 
private hospitals in the form of increased Medicaid payments.
    [cir] As noted in this statement of the issues set forth above, the 
burden is on the state to demonstrate that the ``advance lease 
payments'' were not a donation, were not linked to Medicaid payments, 
and that there is no hold harmless arrangement. CMS is authorized under 
section 1902(b) of the Act, as implemented by 42 CFR Part 430, Subpart 
B, to approve state plan

[[Page 44038]]

amendments only based on a determination that the amendments comply the 
requirements of relevant federal statutes and regulations and can serve 
as a basis for FFP.
     Whether Louisiana SPAs 13-23, 13-25 and 13-28 comply with 
the requirements of 1902(a)(2) and 1902(a)(4) of the Act which requires 
that the state plan provide for the non-federal share of expenditures 
under the state plan, from either state or local funding. Because the 
SPAs at issue propose to claim for FFP without adjustment to reflect 
unallowable expenditures resulting from the provider related donation 
and hold harmless arrangement discussed above, they would result in a 
non-federal share that would be insufficient to meet the requirements 
of section 1902(a)(2). Moreover, section 1902(a)(4) of the Act requires 
that the state plan comply with methods of administration as are found 
necessary by the Secretary for the proper and efficient operation of 
the plan. Among the implementing regulations for section 1902(a)(4) of 
the Act is the requirement at 42 CFR 430.10 that a state plan contain 
all information necessary for CMS to determine that the plan can be 
approved to serve as a basis for FFP in the state program. Because the 
state has not established that the supplemental payments are not part 
of a hold harmless arrangement that would result in a reduction in FFP, 
t the state has not established that the SPAs are consistent with 
section 1902(a)(4) and the implementing regulations at 42 CFR 430.10.
     Whether the state has established that the supplemental 
payments set forth in Louisiana SPAs 13-23, 13-25, and 13-28 are 
consistent with the statutory requirement at section 1902(a)(30)(A) of 
the Act that payments must be ``consistent with efficiency, economy, 
and quality of care''.
     Whether Louisiana SPAs 13-23, 13-25 and 13-28 comport with 
the broad principles of the federal-state partnership embodied in 
section 1903(a) of the Act, because they indicate circumstances in 
which the federal government would pay more than its share of the net 
expenditures, after accounting for claimed expenditures that are 
effectively repaid by the provider-related donations.
    If the hearing date is not acceptable, I would be glad to set 
another date that is mutually agreeable to the parties. The hearing 
will be governed by the procedures prescribed by federal regulations at 
42 CFR Part 430.
    I am designating Mr. Benjamin R. Cohen as the presiding officer. If 
these arrangements present any problems, please contact Mr. Cohen at 
(410) 786 3169. In order to facilitate any communication that may be 
necessary between the parties prior to the hearing, please notify the 
presiding officer to indicate acceptability of the hearing date that 
has been scheduled and provide names of the individuals who will 
represent the state at the hearing.

 Sincerely,

Marilyn Tavenner

cc: Benjamin R. Cohen

    Section 1116 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. section 1316; 42 
CFR section 430.18)

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program No. 13.714, Medicaid 
Assistance Program.)

    Dated: July 23, 2014.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2014-17871 Filed 7-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P