[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 101 (Tuesday, May 27, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 30168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12054]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

 Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-85,145]


AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company, a Subsidiary of AXA 
Financial, Inc., Including On-Site Leased Workers of Kelly Services, 
Charlotte, North Carolina; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding 
Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated May 5, 2014, a worker requested administrative 
reconsideration of the Department of Labor's negative determination 
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, 
applicable to workers and former workers of AXA Equitable Life 
Insurance Company, a subsidiary of AXA Financial, Inc., Charlotte, 
North Carolina (subject firm). The Department's Notice of determination 
was published in the Federal Register on May 5, 2014 (79 FR 25625).
    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under 
the following circumstances:

    (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously 
considered that the determination complained of was erroneous;
    (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based 
on a mistake in the determination of facts not previously 
considered; or
    (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a mis-
interpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of 
the decision.

    The negative determination was based on the Department's findings 
that the subject firm does not produce an article, within the meaning 
of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
    The request for reconsideration stated that services supplied by 
the subject workers shifted to a foreign country.
    The petitioner did not supply facts not previously considered; nor 
provide additional documentation indicating that there was either (1) a 
mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered or (2) 
a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justifying reconsideration 
of the initial determination. Based on these findings, the Department 
determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not been met.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application and investigative findings, 
I conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law 
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department 
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 15th day of May, 2014.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014-12054 Filed 5-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P