[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 88 (Wednesday, May 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26207-26208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10516]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-882]


Refined Brown Aluminum Oxide From the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results of Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty 
Order

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset review, the Department of Commerce 
(the Department) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty order on 
refined brown aluminum oxide (RBAO) from the People's Republic of China 
(PRC) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping. 
The magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail is indicated in 
the ``Final Results of Sunset Review'' section of this notice.

DATES: Effective Date: May 7, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terre Keaton Stefanova or David 
Goldberger, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street & Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 
(202) 482-1280 or (202) 482-4136, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On November 19, 2003, the Department published in the Federal 
Register the antidumping duty order on RBAO from the PRC.\1\ On 
February 3, 2014, the Department published the notice of initiation of 
the second sunset review of the antidumping duty order on RBAO from the 
PRC pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act.\2\ On February 14, 2014, the 
Department received a Notice of Intent to Participate from the 
following domestic producers of RBAO: C-E Minerals, Inc., Imerys Fused 
Minerals Niagara Falls, Inc., U.S. Electrofused Minerals, Inc., and 
Washington Mills Group, Inc. (collectively ``the domestic interested 
parties''), within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). 
The domestic interested parties claimed interested party status under 
section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as manufacturers of

[[Page 26208]]

a domestic like product in the United States. We received a complete 
substantive response from the domestic interested parties within the 
30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). We received no 
substantive responses from any respondent interested parties. As a 
result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted an expedited (120-
day) sunset review of the order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Antidumping Duty Order: Refined Brown Aluminum Oxide 
(Otherwise Known as Refined Brown Artificial Corundum or Brown Fused 
Alumina) From the People's Republic of China, 68 FR 65249 (November 
19, 2003).
    \2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 79 FR 6163 
(February 3, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by this order is ground, pulverized or 
refined brown artificial corundum, also known as brown aluminum oxide 
or brown fused alumina, in grit size of \3/8\ inch or less. The 
merchandise covered by this order is currently classifiable under 
subheadings 2818.10.20.00 and 2818.10.20.90 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS numbers are 
provided for convenience and for customs purposes, the written 
description of the merchandise is dispositive.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ For a complete description of the Scope of the Order, see 
Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 
Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, titled ``Issues and 
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited Second 
Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Refined Brown 
Aluminum Oxide from the People's Republic of China,'' dated 
concurrently with and adopted by this notice (Decision Memo).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    A complete discussion of all issues raised in this review is 
provided in the accompanying Decision Memo. The issues discussed in the 
Decision Memo include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of 
dumping and the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the order 
were to be revoked. The Decision Memo is a public document and is on 
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). 
Access to IA ACCESS is available in the Central Records Unit, Room 7046 
of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the 
Decision Memo can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the Decision Memo are 
identical in content.

Final Results of Sunset Review

    We determine that revocation of the antidumping duty order on RBAO 
from the PRC would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of 
dumping at the following weighted-average percentage margins:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Weighted-
                                                              average
           Manufacturers/exporters/ producers                 margin
                                                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zibo Jinyu Abrasive Co., Ltd............................          135.18
PRC-wide................................................          135.18
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative an protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which 
is subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing the results and notice in accordance 
with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: April 30, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary, for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014-10516 Filed 5-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P