[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 79 (Thursday, April 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22834-22835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09298]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-Ta-641 (Remand)]


Certain Variable Speed Wind Turbines and Components Thereof 
Commission Determination To Grant a Joint Motion To Terminate the 
Investigation on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined to grant a joint motion to terminate the 
investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James A. Worth, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3065. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted the original 
investigation on March 31, 2008, based upon a complaint filed on behalf 
of General Electric of Fairfield, Connecticut (``GE'') on February 7, 
2008. 73 FR 16910. The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of 
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the 
United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United 
States after importation of certain variable speed wind turbines and 
components thereof that infringe claims 121-125 of U.S. Patent No. 
5,083,039 (``the `039 patent'') and claims 1-12, 15-18, and 21-28 of 
U.S. Patent No. 6,921,985 (``the `985 patent''). The complaint named as 
respondents Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. of Tokyo, Japan and 
Mitsubishi Power Systems, Inc. of Lake Mary, Florida (collectively, 
``Mitsubishi''), and a third entity which was subsequently found not to 
import. On October 8, 2008, the Commission issued notice of its 
determination not to review an initial determination (``ID'') (Order 
No. 10) granting GE's motion to amend its complaint and the notice of 
investigation to add claims 1-19 of United States Patent No. 7,321,221 
(``the `221 patent'') to the investigation.
    On August 7, 2009, the ALJ issued his final ID finding a violation 
of section 337. The ALJ found a violation of section 337 with respect 
to the `039 patent and the `985 patent but not the `221 patent.
    On January 8, 2010, the Commission issued notice of its final 
determination of no violation of section 337 as to all of these 
patents. With respect to the `985 patent, the Commission found that GE 
failed to satisfy the technical prong of the domestic industry 
requirement.
    GE filed an appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal 
Circuit. On motion by the Commission, the Court dismissed the appeal as 
to the `039 patent and thereby vacated as moot the Commission 
determination as to that patent. Subsequently, the Court affirmed the 
Commission's determination as to the `221 patent, and reversed the 
Commission's determination that GE had not satisfied the domestic 
industry requirement as to the `985 patent. The opinion originally 
issued by the Court contained a further Part III, which commented on 
the Commission's authority to take no position on an issue pursuant to 
Beloit Corp. v. Valmet Oy, 742 F.2d 1421 (Fed. Cir. 1984). 
Subsequently, the panel granted a petition for rehearing, withdrawing 
Part III of its Opinion. General Electric Co. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, 
Order, 692 F.3d 1218 (Fed. Cir. 2012).
    The Federal Circuit issued its mandate on August 27, 2012. 
Subsequently, the Commission received numerous unsolicited submissions 
from the parties concerning the merits of the remand. The Commission 
also received a motion for sanctions by Mitsubishi against GE, a 
response thereto by GE, and motions for leave to file a reply and 
surreply.
    On January 2, 2014, GE and Mitsubishi filed a joint motion to 
terminate the investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement 
pursuant to Commission rule 210.21(b), 19 CFR 210.21(b). The parties 
stated that termination is in the interest of the public and 
administrative economy. On January 27, 2014, the Office of Unfair 
Import Investigations (``OUII'') filed a response in opposition, 
stating that the public version of the settlement agreement was overly 
redacted. On

[[Page 22835]]

February 7, 2014, the parties re-submitted the public version of the 
settlement agreement. On the same day, OUII wrote a letter to the 
Secretary to the Commission, withdrawing its opposition.
    After considering the joint motion, and the settlement agreement, 
the Commission agrees that the joint motion to terminate is in the 
interest of the public, and complies with the requirements of 
Commission rule 210.21(b). The Commission has therefore determined to 
grant the motion to terminate the investigation on the basis of a 
settlement agreement and to dismiss the motion for sanctions. The 
Commission has further determined to dismiss as moot the private 
parties' motions for leave to file a reply and to file a surreply and 
to not accept for filing any submissions not previously accepted given 
that the case has been mooted by settlement. The investigation is 
hereby terminated.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
Part 210).

    Issued: April 18, 2014.

    By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-09298 Filed 4-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P