[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8832-8855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-03279]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 803
[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0393]
RIN 0910-AF86
Medical Device Reporting: Electronic Submission Requirements
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is revising its
postmarket medical device reporting regulation and making technical
corrections. This final rule requires device manufacturers and
importers to submit mandatory reports of individual medical device
adverse events, also known as medical device reports (MDRs), to the
Agency in an electronic format that FDA can process, review, and
archive. Mandatory electronic reporting will improve the Agency's
process for collecting and analyzing postmarket medical device adverse
event information. Electronic reporting is also available to user
facilities, but this rule permits user facilities to continue to submit
written reports to FDA. This final rule also identifies changes to the
content of required MDRs to reflect reprocessor information collected
on the Form FDA 3500A as required by the Medical Device User Fee and
Modernization Act of 2002 (MDUFMA).
DATES: This final rule is effective August 14, 2015 (see also section
IX of this document).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon E. Kapsch, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 3208, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-6104.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. History of the Medical Device Reporting Regulation
II. Overview of the Final Rule
A. Changes to the 2009 Proposed Rule
B. Highlights of the Final Rule
C. How do I submit MDRs in electronic format?
D. How have the MDR requirements changed?
III. Comments on the Proposed Rule
A. General
B. Submitting Initial and Supplemental or Followup Reports
(Sec. 803.12(a))
C. Establishing and Maintaining MDR Records (Sec. 803.18)
D. Copies Kept in MDR Files of All Reports Submitted (Sec.
803.18(b)(1)(ii))
E. Copies of All Electronic Acknowledgments (Sec.
803.18(b)(1)(iii))
F. Manufacturer Reporting Requirements (Sec. 803.50(a))
G. Report Date (Sec. 803.52(b)(4))
H. Product Code and Common Device Name (Sec. 803.52(c)(2))
I. Name and Address of the Reprocessor (Revised Sec.
803.52(c)(8) and (c)(9))
J. Premarket Approval Application (PMA)/Section 510(k) Number
and Combination Product Status (Sec. 803.52(e)(5))
K. New, Changed, or Corrected Information (Sec. 803.56(c))
L. Paper Responses to Requests for Additional Information
M. Analysis of Impact
N. Common Errors
O. Effective Date
P. General Comment Concerning Numeric Data Fields
Q. Receipt Date
R. Software Changes
S. System Outages
IV. What is the legal authority for this rule?
V. What is the environmental impact of this rule?
VI. What is the economic impact of this rule?
A. Benefits
B. Costs
C. Summary of Benefits and Costs
D. Regulatory Alternatives to the Final Rule
E. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
VII. How does this rule comply with the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) of 1995?
A. Reporting Requirements
B. Recordkeeping Requirements
C. Changes From the Proposed Rule
D. Total Annual Cost Burden
VIII. Does this final rule have federalism implications?
IX. What is the effective date?
X. What references are on display?
XI. Stayed CFR Text
I. History of the Medical Device Reporting Regulation
The MDR regulation was first published on September 14, 1984 (49 FR
36326), with requirements for manufacturer and importer reporting of
deaths, serious injuries, and malfunctions effective December 13,
1984.\1\ FDA's regulations governing medical device adverse event
reporting implement section 519 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360i). Section 519 of the FD&C Act has
undergone several changes since its enactment as part of the Medical
Device Amendments of 1976 (Pub. L. 94-295). As a result, FDA's
regulations at part 803 (21 CFR part 803) have also undergone multiple
revisions. The Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990 (SMDA) (Pub. L. 101-
629) amended the FD&C Act to require mandatory reporting of device
adverse events by user facilities (deaths reported to FDA and the
manufacturer, and serious injuries or illnesses reported to the
manufacturer) and domestic distributors (deaths and serious injuries or
illnesses reported to FDA and the manufacturer, and certain
malfunctions reported to the manufacturer). The SMDA also amended the
FD&C Act to require manufacturers and distributors (including
importers) to certify the number of MDRs submitted to the Agency each
year and to require user facilities to submit a semiannual report
summarizing reportable events. FDA published a tentative final rule on
November 26, 1991 (56 FR 60024), to implement the SMDA requirements for
reporting for device manufacturers, user facilities, and distributors,
including importers (the 1991 tentative final rule). By statute, user
facility reporting became effective on November 28, 1991, and
distributor reporting became effective on May 28, 1992.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 49 FR 36644, September 19, 1984 (correcting the
effective date).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On June 16, 1992, the Medical Device Amendments of 1992 (the 1992
amendments) (Pub. L. 102-300) further amended certain provisions of
section 519 of the FD&C Act relating to reporting of adverse device
events. The amendments adopted a single reporting standard and
definition for serious injury/serious illness for manufacturers,
importers, distributors, and user facilities. The changes under the
1992 amendments were effective on June 16, 1993.
On September 1, 1993, FDA published a final rule (58 FR 46514) that
collected the requirements for all wholesale distributors, importers as
well as domestic, under a new part 804 (21 CFR part 804).
On December 11, 1995 (60 FR 63578), FDA published a final rule for
manufacturers and user facilities (the 1995 final rule), with changes
from the 1991 tentative final rule, including a requirement for the use
of the Form
[[Page 8833]]
FDA 3500A for reporting. The proposed effective date of April 11, 1996,
for the 1995 final rule was extended to July 31, 1996 (61 FR 16043,
April 11, 1996).
On November 21, 1997, the Food and Drug Administration
Modernization Act of 1997 (FDAMA) (Pub. L. 105-115) was enacted. FDAMA
made changes regarding the reporting of adverse experiences related to
devices, including a stay of the requirement for Annual Certification
by manufacturers and distributors, elimination of the requirements for
adverse event reporting by domestic distributors, and a change from
semiannual reports to annual reports for user facility summary reports.
On May 12, 1998, FDA published a direct final rule (63 FR 26069) and a
companion proposed rule (63 FR 26129) to implement these changes to the
MDR requirements, which included transferring distributor requirements
back to part 803. FDA received significant adverse comments on the
direct final rule and companion proposed rule; therefore, FDA withdrew
the direct final rule and published a revised final rule in the Federal
Register of January 26, 2000 (65 FR 4112). Under the FD&C Act as
amended by FDAMA, distributors who were not importers were no longer
required to report adverse events but were still required to keep
records. Importers were still required to report adverse events related
to medical devices. Because of FDAMA's changes, FDA revised part 803
and removed part 804.
On February 28, 2005, FDA revised the MDR regulation (70 FR 9516)
by adopting plain language to make the requirements easier to
understand (the 2005 plain language MDR direct final rule).
On June 13, 2008, FDA published a direct final rule (73 FR 33692),
and a companion proposed rule (73 FR 33749) to remove the requirement
for baseline reports, which were determined largely to duplicate
information provided in individual adverse event reports. On September
17, 2008, FDA published a notice (73 FR 53686) confirming the effective
date for the direct final rule as October 27, 2008.
On August 21, 2009, FDA published a proposed rule (74 FR 42203) to
amend part 803 to require manufacturers, importers, and user facilities
to submit MDRs to the Agency in an electronic format (the 2009 proposed
rule). The 2009 proposed rule is now being finalized, subject to
certain revisions. Because of concerns over the cost of implementation
for user facilities, and the relatively low volume of reports FDA
receives from such facilities, the final rule does not require user
facilities to adopt electronic reporting. FDA believes that the
benefits of this rule can be achieved without applying the electronic
reporting requirement to user facilities. Although FDA encourages user
facilities to file reports electronically, they may continue to use
paper forms for reporting. The rule revises references to the use of
paper forms for reporting and makes electronic reporting mandatory for
manufacturers and importers. Additionally, the rule modifies the
existing regulation to list information for reprocessed single use
devices, in order to reflect changes already made to the Form FDA
3500A, in accordance with MDUFMA (Pub. L. 107-250).
II. Overview of the Final Rule
A. Changes to the 2009 Proposed Rule
The 2009 proposed rule included only the parts of the regulation
that contained amended and changed language. The final rule contains
part 803 in its entirety for ease of reading and clarity.
The 2009 proposed rule proposed to remove the definition for
``Five-day report'' from Sec. 803.3 as unnecessary since it merely
referred to a report under Sec. 803.53. Because there is still a
requirement for 5-day reports, we have concluded that removing the
definition could be confusing to reporting entities and have decided to
retain the definition.
The 2005 plain language MDR direct final rule removed the
enumeration of definitions under Sec. 803.3. Subsequent difficulties
when referencing specific definitions have suggested that we should
reinstitute numbering the definitions and have done so in this final
rule.
Certain terminology used in the proposed rule has changed in the
final rule. References to CeSub (CDRH eSubmitter) have been revised to
reflect the current FDA-wide term used for electronic submissions,
eSubmitter.
In addition, under this final rule, a manufacturer or importer
needs to request and obtain an exemption from electronic reporting to
continue to report via hardcopy past the effective date for electronic
reporting. The 2009 proposed rule used the term ``variance'' at the end
of section Sec. 803.19(b), but we have concluded that ``exemption''
more accurately describes the reporting change and have therefore used
the term ``exemption'' in the final rule. FDA's existing guidance for
requesting exemptions applies to such requests.
Technical changes to Sec. 803.11 provide the updated sources for
Form FDA 3500A.
Technical changes to Sec. 803.12 update the contact information
for the FDA/Office of Crisis Management when reporting a public health
emergency and conform language to other sections of the rule.
A change was made to Sec. 803.18(b)(1)(iii) to add the word MDR to
clarify the record retention requirement.
Technical changes to Sec. 803.19 update the contact information
for the FDA/CDRH/Office of Surveillance and Biometrics when submitting
an MDR Exemption Request.
A change was made to Sec. 803.20(c)(2)(ii) to correct an error,
such that ``30 days calendar'' in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of the current
rule was revised as ``30 calendar days'' in what is now paragraph
(c)(2)(ii).
Technical changes to Sec. 803.21 provide the current Web site
addresses for obtaining adverse event reporting codes information. This
part also provides the current contact information for the FDA/CDRH/
Division of Small Manufacturers, International, and Consumer Assistance
(DSMICA).
Technical changes to Sec. 803.33 provide the updated sources for
Form FDA 3419.
B. Highlights of the Final Rule
For over 20 years, FDA received postmarket MDRs in a paper format
through the mail. In 2008, FDA permitted manufacturers to submit
postmarket MDRs electronically, on a voluntary basis. This final rule
to require the electronic submission to FDA of manufacturer and
importer MDRs is an important step toward improving the Agency's
systems for collecting and analyzing postmarket MDRs. When
manufacturers and importers submit data elements to FDA in a paper
format, the information must be manually entered into our internal
electronic database before it can be effectively reviewed and analyzed.
Under the proposed rule, this data entry will be performed by the
manufacturers and importers and they will save the cost of submitting
the paper forms. More importantly, eliminating that step will make the
information available more quickly to FDA.
This final rule includes reports of deaths, serious injuries, and
malfunctions that must be reported to FDA in initial 5-day, 10-day, or
30-day individual MDRs as well as information that must be reported to
FDA in supplemental or followup reports. It does not change the
underlying reporting requirements, just the manner in which they are
submitted to FDA. This final rule will have the following benefits:
[[Page 8834]]
Reducing industry's time and costs associated with
transcribing data from internal data management systems to paper and
mailing the paper reports to the Agency;
Reducing the Agency's transcription errors, time, and
costs associated with receiving paper reports and transcribing data to
electronic format for review and analysis;
Expediting the Agency's access to safety information in a
format that supports efficient and comprehensive data analysis and
reviews; and
Enhancing the Agency's ability to rapidly communicate
information about suspected problems to the medical device industry,
health care providers, consumers, and other government Agencies.
C. How do I submit MDRs in electronic format?
Upon the effective date of this final rule, manufacturers and
importers are required to submit MDRs to the Agency in an electronic
format that FDA can process, review, and archive. The most specific and
updated information about how to create, format, and transmit reports
electronically using the eSubmitter software (for low volume reporting)
or the Health Level 7 Individual Case Safety Reports (HL7 ICSR) (for
high volume reporting), is provided on the Agency's Web site at the
address identified in the new Sec. 803.23. FDA is committed to
providing industry with adequate notice of any specifications changes.
To the extent possible, FDA will ensure previous versions of such
specifications can still be utilized to submit adverse events
electronically.
1. What are the options for electronic reporting?
FDA's CDRH has an MDR database that supports two options for
electronic submission of MDRs: One allows the submission of a single
report at a time and one allows submission of batches of reports.
a. eSubmitter. The Agency developed software (originally referred
to as CeSub or CDRH eSubmitter) that allows for the submission of one
MDR at a time. The software allows users to:
Save address and contact information,
Search for a Product Code,
Search for a Patient Problem Code or Device Problem Code,
Search for Manufacturer Evaluation Codes (method, result,
and conclusion codes),
Attach documents when additional information needs to be
provided, and
Produce a ``missing data report'' to help ensure that all
required information is supplied before submission to FDA.
Once the MDR is completed, the file is ``packaged for submission.''
The package generates an electronic version of the Form FDA 3500A,
which can be submitted to FDA using the FDA Electronic Submission
Gateway (ESG). The final eSubmitter-generated report can also be saved
or printed for recordkeeping or to provide reports to manufacturers or
other entities outside of FDA. The eSubmitter software and instructions
for installation are free and available at: http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/FDAeSubmitter/ucm108165.htm. FDA may make minor changes to
the submission format for maintenance purposes as needed to improve the
eSubmitter reporting experience.
b. HL7. Reporters with large numbers of MDRs to report, or those
that otherwise want to submit reports in batches, may prefer the second
option, called the HL7 ICSR. The HL7 ICSR was developed in conjunction
with the HL7 standards organization to support the exchange of
electronic data. This option allows for the extraction of information
directly from the reporter's database to populate an MDR, production of
the appropriate data output, and transmission of the MDR to the FDA
ESG. In addition, the HL7 ICSR supports the batch submission of more
than one individual MDR at a time. Reporters developing applications
using the HL7 ICSR standard may want to consider building functions for
saving or printing those reports and for attaching documents, such as
photos or labeling, to their records.
Additional information is also available at: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/PostmarketRequirements/ReportingAdverseEvents/eMDR-ElectronicMedicalDeviceReporting/default.htm.
2. What is the FDA ESG?
Both eSubmitter and HL7 reporting options transmit MDRs to FDA
using the FDA ESG, a secure entry point for all electronic submissions
to the Agency. To use the FDA ESG, reporters need to have a digital
certificate. A digital certificate is an attachment to an electronic
message that allows the recipient to authenticate the identity of the
sender via third-party verification from an independent certificate
authority. Digital certificates are used to identify encryption and
decryption codes between message senders and recipients. Information on
the FDA ESG and digital certificates is available at: http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/ElectronicSubmissionsGateway/ucm113223.htm.
3. How do I know FDA received my electronic submission and it was
successfully processed?
FDA's electronic submission processing system sends the submitter
three different acknowledgments (messages) for each submission. Each
acknowledgement indicates successful completion of a different
processing and validation stage for the MDR report and is needed for
diagnostic purposes. Acknowledgment 1 comes from the FDA ESG and
indicates your submission was received at the FDA ESG. Acknowledgment 2
also comes from the FDA ESG and indicates the submission reached CDRH.
Acknowledgment 3, sent by CDRH through the FDA ESG, notifies you that
your submission was either successfully loaded into CDRH's adverse
event database or that your submission contained errors (specified in
the Acknowledgment) that were identified during validation and loading.
If there are no errors, we anticipate that the three acknowledgment
letters will be generated the same day or within 24 hours of the
submission. If there were errors, you need to correct the errors and
resend the corrected report in order for your submission to be accepted
and loaded into the database.
4. How can I obtain an exemption from the requirement to submit a
report in electronic format?
Under Sec. 803.19, a manufacturer or importer may submit a written
request to FDA seeking an exemption from the Sec. 803.12(a)
requirement to submit reports to the Agency in an electronic format
that the Agency can process, review, and archive. The written request
for exemption from electronic format must comply with the requirements
of Sec. 803.19(b), as well as provide an explanation of why the
request is justified, including, with appropriate justification,
financial hardship, and a statement of how long the exemption is
needed. FDA anticipates receiving few exemption requests relating to
the electronic reporting requirement because of the availability of the
Internet, the commercial availability of digital certificates, and free
access to FDA's eSubmitter Internet software. If FDA grants such an
exemption, the manufacturer or importer would be allowed to submit
written MDRs for the period of time specified by FDA in the letter
authorizing the exemption.
[[Page 8835]]
D. How have the MDR requirements changed?
1. What has changed for user facilities and has annual reporting been
affected?
Section 803.30(a) requires user facilities to report information
required by Sec. 803.32 in accordance with Sec. 803.12(b). User
facility reports submitted to device manufacturers may also be in paper
format or an electronic format that includes all required data fields
to ensure that the manufacturer has all required information. Since
user facilities will continue to submit annual reports on the paper
Form FDA 3419, the rule amends Sec. 803.33 to specify where to obtain
the Form FDA 3419 and where to submit completed annual reports.
2. What has changed for importers?
The rule amends Sec. 803.40(a) to require submission to FDA of
information required by Sec. 803.42 in electronic format in accordance
with Sec. 803.12(a). The mandatory electronic format requirement does
not apply to importer reports submitted to device manufacturers, which
may be in paper format or an electronic format that includes all
required data fields to ensure that the manufacturer has all required
information.
3. What has changed for manufacturers?
The rule amends Sec. Sec. 803.50(a), 803.53, and 803.56 to require
submission of MDR and supplemental report information required by
Sec. Sec. 803.52, 803.53, and 803.56 in electronic format in
accordance with Sec. 803.12(a).
4. Are there changes for recordkeeping?
Section 803.18 contains requirements for establishing and
maintaining MDR files or records for manufacturers, user facilities,
and importers. The rule amends Sec. 803.18(b)(1)(ii) to require
keeping copies of all reports submitted under part 803, whether paper
or electronic. (Regulated entities may choose to maintain required
records, including copies of all reports, either in hardcopy or in
electronic form). We also are adding Sec. 803.18(b)(1)(iii), to
require the retention of all acknowledgments that FDA sends the
manufacturer, importer, or user facility in response to electronic MDR
submissions.
5. What other changes are in this final rule?
The final rule does the following:
Amends Sec. Sec. 803.32, 803.42, and 803.52 to reflect
the addition to the Form FDA 3500A of a question whether the device is
a single use device that has been reprocessed and reused on a patient
and, if so, asking for the name and address of the reprocessor (these
modifications were already made to Form FDA 3500A and its instructions,
with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA));
Changes language in Sec. Sec. 803.32(b)(4), 803.42(b)(4),
and 803.52(b)(4) from ``date of report by the initial reporter'' to
``[d]ate of this report,'' to make part 803 consistent with the way
that other FDA Centers interpret Form FDA 3500A, Block B4, and how
Block B4 appears on Form FDA 3500A; and
Makes minor updates to Sec. Sec. 803.32(c), 803.42(c),
and 803.52(c) and (e) to reflect the changes already made to the forms
and instructions, including references to the Product Code and PMA/
510(k) number.
III. Comments on the Proposed Rule
A. General
The Agency received 35 comments on the 2009 proposed rule. Some
comments expressed concern about the costs of the rule for entities
that submit only a few reports a year. Other comments expressed concern
over the effective date and how to handle system outages; others
included questions about the receipt date and FDA acknowledgments.
Below is a summary of the comments received, grouped by subject matter.
B. Submitting Initial and Supplemental or Followup Reports (Sec.
803.12(a))
(Comment 1) Two comments stated that firms that only submit a few
reports should be able to send reports on paper. One comment stated
that the part 11 (21 CFR part 11) electronic documents and signature
requirement is a burden for firms that never have needed to report
electronically. The commenters objected to the expense of installing
and validating the eSubmitter software. One suggested that PDF scans of
documents be allowed.
(Response) The Agency disagrees with these comments as they apply
to manufacturers and importers. Electronic reporting will improve the
Agency's process for collecting and analyzing postmarket medical device
adverse event information in a timely and efficient manner. If each
manufacturer and importer that only had a ``few reports'' was exempt
from the electronic reporting requirement, the cumulative effect would
leave FDA with potentially thousands of reports to enter manually.
Thus, the aggregate effect of exempting such manufacturers and
importers would significantly undermine the benefits of an electronic
system of adverse event reporting. The burden and expense of adopting
electronic reporting is minimal. The eSubmitter software has been
designed and validated by FDA and is being made available to users for
free. The user is expected to install and operate the software in
accordance with the instructions provided by FDA. Section VI provides
additional detail on the costs associated with this rule. For more
information regarding the FDA's current thinking and enforcement policy
relating to electronic records requirements under part 11, see the
Agency guidance document entitled ``Guidance for Industry: Part 11,
Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures--Scope and Application''
available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm072322.pdf5667fnl.pdf.
The Agency has reassessed the proposal as it applies to user
facilities, which are required to submit only device-related deaths
directly to FDA. FDA estimates that user facilities comprise
approximately two-thirds of all entities subject to reporting
requirements under part 803, but provide only 3 percent of mandatory
reports. In light of the anticipated cost for all user facilities to
implement electronic reporting, the relatively small number of reports
filed and correspondingly small savings to the Agency from mandating
electronic reporting by user facilities, FDA is not mandating
electronic reporting for user facilities at this time. Such facilities
will be allowed to file paper reports, although--as is the case now--
they can voluntarily choose to use electronic reporting, and the Agency
encourages them to adopt electronic filing.
(Comment 2) One comment stated that FDA should allow the
manufacturer to submit a supplemental report before issuing a request
for additional information.
(Response) The Agency disagrees with this comment. We issue a
request for additional information when our analysis of available
submissions from the manufacturer identifies a need for additional
information. Processing of paper submissions involves backlogs and
delays in entry of the information into the database. One advantage of
electronic reporting is that supplemental reports will be quickly
available for review. Ready access to supplemental report information
may reduce the need for additional information requests.
[[Page 8836]]
C. Establishing and Maintaining MDR Records (Sec. 803.18)
(Comment 3) Two comments considered the required .xml format to be
a problem. One said that FDA field investigators may not be able to
accurately interpret the electronic MDR .xml files to determine if the
MDR is adequate or if the MDR was submitted on time. The second said
that the .xml format is difficult for people to read and FDA should
provide guidance on creating acceptable MDR documents from submitted
.xml files that can be used by FDA field investigators.
(Response) The Agency does not believe that the .xml format is
inherently problematic, but the Agency has developed guidance to assist
entities with eMDR issues and a notice of availability for this
guidance appears elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register.
Reporting entities that develop applications using the HL7 ICSR
standard are encouraged to develop functions to save or print the
reports in a human readable format. The reporting entities will need to
validate that the human readable format is an accurate representation
of what was submitted.
D. Copies Kept in MDR Files of All Reports Submitted (Sec.
803.18(b)(1)(ii))
(Comment 4) One comment stated that the reference to paper is no
longer necessary and should be deleted from the phrase ``(whether paper
or electronic)''.
(Response) The Agency disagrees because paper copies will still be
used in certain circumstances. A reporting entity that files paper
copies of MDR reports with FDA or other entities could choose to
maintain a paper copy of the report in its MDR event files. A reporting
entity that uses HL7 to file an electronic MDR can maintain either an
electronic or paper copy of the MDR in its MDR files, but the HL7
application needs to have validated that any paper copy produced is an
accurate representation of the electronic copy filed with FDA. A
reporting entity that uses eSubmitter to file an electronic MDR can use
a feature of eSubmitter to produce a paper copy of the MDR when it is
needed and validation of the copy is not required. If a reporting
entity is granted an exemption from electronic reporting and the MDR
report is sent on paper, it is likely that the entity would maintain a
paper copy of the report sent to FDA in the MDR event file.
E. Copies of All Electronic Acknowledgments (Sec. 803.18(b)(1)(iii))
(Comment 5) One comment stated that FDA is requiring manufacturers
to keep all three of the acknowledgments sent by FDA even though the
MDR filing is not considered successful until the firm receives
Acknowledgment 3 and it shows the submission did not fail. The
commenter recommended changing the regulation to eliminate retaining
all of the acknowledgments sent by FDA. The commenter suggested
requiring manufacturers to retain only proof of the MDR being filed and
not the acknowledgments sent by FDA, or only the final acknowledgment.
According to the commenter, Acknowledgments 1 and 2 should be invisible
to the manufacturers; a single acknowledgment to the manufacturer
should suffice.
(Comment 6) One comment stated that the three acknowledgments sent
by FDA are cumbersome and difficult to link together. The commenter
suggested consolidating the acknowledgments.
(Response) The Agency disagrees. Each acknowledgment sent by FDA
indicates the stage of processing that has been reached (FDA ESG
received, CDRH received, CDRH loaded into database) and whether it has
been successfully processed. The date the report reaches the FDA ESG
(marked by Acknowledgment 1) is considered the date received only if
the report is successfully loaded into the CDRH database (marked by
Acknowledgment 3), and Acknowledgment 2 links the information from the
other two acknowledgments. If the submission has data errors, it will
not be loaded into the CDRH database, and the submission must be
corrected and resubmitted. All three acknowledgments are needed to
trace the reference numbers from the initial receipt at FDA's ESG to
the successful loading of the submission into the CDRH database, and
the comments do not indicate why retention of them would be
particularly burdensome. Until a report has been successfully
processed, the reporting entity has not satisfied the requirement for
submission of the MDR report. Moreover, in the event there is a
question or problem relating to a submission, the receipt or lack of
receipt of each of the three acknowledgments will assist the reporter
and CDRH in determining the status of the report and will allow a
reporter to identify and address any problems. For instance, failure to
receive Acknowledgment 1 would indicate that it was not successfully
received by the FDA ESG; if there was only one consolidated
acknowledgment, the reporter would not know which aspect of the
transmission failed and would not identify the problem as easily.
(Comment 7) One comment suggested that the Agency add a question,
``When can I expect to receive my three acknowledgment notices?'' to
the eMDR guidance document.
(Response) FDA has added the question ``How do I know FDA received
my Electronic Submission and it was successfully processed?'' to the
preamble (see section II, Overview of the Final Rule). Moreover, FDA
has addressed this question in the final guidance document for eMDR.
(Comment 8) One comment asked what to do if the firm does not
receive all of the acknowledgments.
(Response) FDA considers a submission to be complete when all three
acknowledgments have issued, indicating that the report has been
successfully loaded in the CDRH adverse event database. If you do not
receive Acknowledgments 1 or 2, and the ESG Web site does not indicate
that there are problems with the operation of the FDA ESG, you should
contact the FDA ESG staff. If you do not receive Acknowledgment 3, and
the electronic MDR (eMDR) status page does not indicate that there are
problems with the operation of eMDR, you should send an email message
to: [email protected]. If Acknowledgment 3 states that your report
failed to load, the letter will identify errors in your submission. You
will need to correct the errors and resubmit the report, at which time
you will receive another set of three acknowledgments.
FDA considers the receipt date for electronic adverse event report
submissions to be the date the submission arrived at the FDA ESG, but
only if the submission is successfully loaded in the CDRH database. If
a report is resubmitted and the resubmission is successfully loaded,
the receipt date will be the date that the resubmission arrived at the
FDA ESG.
Criteria that could cause a submission to fail include, but are not
limited to, failure to provide data in a required field, failure to use
the appropriate format for a field (e.g. an incorrect date format),
data that exceeds the number of characters allowed for a field, or an
invalid Report Number (e.g. the year and sequence number reversed or a
sequence number reused). If there is a problem with the ESG or eMDR,
FDA will post information concerning the problem on the appropriate Web
site. You would not need to contact FDA, but should keep records of
your attempt to submit MDR reports. FDA will use the Web site to advise
when to expect operations to return to normal so that resubmission can
be made. If you have questions during that time, send an
[[Page 8837]]
email in accordance with the instructions at the eMDR Web site: http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/FDAeSubmitter/ucm107903.htm or the ESG Web
site: http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/ElectronicSubmissionsGateway/default.htm.
F. Manufacturer Reporting Requirements (Sec. 803.50(a))
(Comment 9) Two commenters asked for clarification about what date
and time FDA will accept as timely submission. One comment stated that
the Agency should clarify when electronic MDRs are considered to be
reported, upon receipt into the FDA ESG or upon notification by CDRH
that the report has been successfully loaded into CDRH's adverse event
database. The second comment asked the Agency to specify what time zone
to use to determine the 30-day requirement and recommended that the
time zone of the submitter should be used.
(Response) For paper reports, FDA considers the postmark date or
the date shipped by a delivery service to be the date the event was
reported. For electronic reports, the date the eMDR submission is
received at the FDA ESG is identified as the receipt date (i.e. the
date the event was reported) for the MDR report, if the report is
successfully loaded in the CDRH database. If a report cannot be loaded
by CDRH, it is rejected and must be corrected and resubmitted. FDA does
not have the benefit of the report information until the report is
successfully loaded.
The time zone should not be a concern for timely reporting under
MDR. The FDA ESG acknowledgment letter (Acknowledgment 1) displays both
the date and time according to the Eastern Standard Time (EST)/Eastern
Daylight Time (EDT) zone; however, MDR considers only the date for the
purposes of calculating timely reporting. If the report is successfully
loaded, this processing should take no more than an hour. Although
Acknowledgment 1 displays EST/EDT, for purposes of timeliness FDA will
consider the local time of the submitter, just as a postmark date is
used for mailed paper reports. See section III.Q for further
information.
G. Report Date (Sec. 803.52(b)(4))
(Comment 10) One comment stated that to avoid confusion the Agency
should revise Sec. 803.52(b)(4) back to the language in the current
MDR regulation, to state: ``Date of the report by the initial
reporter.'' According to the comment, that date, plus the date required
under Sec. 803.52(e)(4), ``Date received by you'' would permit a clear
tracking of compliance with the regulation's reporting timeframes.
(Response) FDA disagrees. The date received by you is the date that
you become aware of the event, which is also reported elsewhere on Form
FDA 3500A. We are asking for the ``Date of this report'' to provide the
reporting entity with a means of documenting the date that the MDR is
submitted to FDA. This change will make the information requested for
device reports consistent with the information recorded by other
Centers for products that are reported using the Form FDA 3500A.
H. Product Code and Common Device Name (Sec. 803.52(c)(2))
(Comment 11) One comment stated that there is no need for both the
product code and the common device name. It was suggested that the
``and'' be replaced with an ``or.''
(Response) FDA disagrees. The product code does not always match
directly with a single common device name. Using both the product code
and common device name provides FDA more specific information
concerning the device that is the subject of the adverse event report.
The product code is information that was initially required for the
baseline report, and is needed as part of the information for Form FDA
3500A because the baseline report requirement has been removed from the
MDR regulation. (See section I).
I. Name and Address of the Reprocessor (Revised Sec. 803.52(c)(8) and
(c)(9))
(Comment 12) One comment stated that the Agency should revise or
clarify that these fields [Block D8 and 9 on Form FDA 3500A] apply only
to reprocessors. An original equipment manufacturer that receives
information about a reprocessed device for which the name and address
of the reprocessor is known will send that information to the
reprocessor because the reprocessor is the manufacturer for the
purposes of MDR reporting.
(Response) FDA disagrees. Form FDA 3500A was modified as a result
of the MDUFMA mandate. The form and instructions specify that under
Block D. Suspect Medical Device, field 8 should be answered to identify
single use devices that are reprocessed, and if the answer to field 8
is yes, field 9 should be completed to identify the name and address of
the reprocessor. With this final rule we are revising the regulation to
reflect the questions that are part of Form FDA 3500A. Because a
reprocessor of a single use device is considered a manufacturer, the
name and address of the reprocessor will also appear in Section G of
the report form. Although this may result in duplication of
information, changes to the form are beyond the scope of this
regulation.
J. Premarket Approval Application (PMA)/Section 510(k) Number and
Combination Product Status (Sec. 803.52(e)(5))
(Comment 13) One comment suggested deleting Sec. 803.52(e)(5)
because PMA/510(k) number and combination product status have never
been part of the MDR reporting provisions. This information was part of
the old baseline reports, but the burden for submitting this
information for each MDR is significantly more onerous than submitting
this information in one baseline report on the device model. Many
manufacturers would have to add systems to connect the complaint/MDR
systems with their submissions systems, significantly increasing the
economic burden of the rule and adversely affecting the ability to
comply with electronic MDR requirements timeframes.
(Response) FDA disagrees. The comment did not provide any support
for considering this to be a significant burden, and FDA believes there
is good reason for making this change. FDA added these elements to Form
FDA 3500A in 2005 because the Agency was removing the baseline
reporting requirement. The change in the regulation codifies the
previous changes to the form.
K. New, Changed, or Corrected Information (Sec. 803.56(c))
(Comment 14) Several comments stated that firms should be able to
send a new complete report when submitting supplemental reports. One
comment stated that submissions of additional information should be
submitted on paper if the initial report was not submitted
electronically.
(Response) FDA disagrees. The requirement to report only new,
changed, or corrected information is consistent with the current
regulation and the requirements and limitations of the CDRH database
used for MDRs. FDA is developing specifications for the new database,
however, and may be able to address this suggestion in the future. The
use of electronic reporting for supplemental reports will provide FDA
with more timely access to new, changed, or corrected information to
facilitate the evaluation of adverse events that are reported.
[[Page 8838]]
L. Paper Responses to Requests for Additional Information
(Comment 15) One comment asked if responses to requests for
additional information could be submitted on paper.
(Response) Yes, a response to a written request for additional
information under Sec. 803.15 can be submitted on paper. However, the
use of electronic reporting for responses to requests for additional
information provides FDA with more timely access to the information to
facilitate the evaluation of adverse events that are reported. An
additional information response should include the initial Report
Number, indicate that the type of followup is a ``Response to FDA
Request,'' and provide the additional information requested as
Additional Manufacturer Narrative. Any discrete data elements should
also be reported as additional manufacturer narrative. You can also
include a copy of the letter request sent by FDA as an attachment to
the response.
M. Analysis of Impact
(Comment 16) One comment stated that our estimate of 10 hours for
the burden to rewrite standard operating procedures (SOPs) and train
personnel is too low. In its discussion, the commenter stated that it
would take at least 40 hours to align a manufacturer's complaint
handling systems to work compatibly with FDA's eSubmitter software.
(Response) The comment referred to our burden estimate for setting
up systems for submission, which we estimated would require 8 to 16
hours. Our estimate was derived based on firms that maintained their
MDR records in paper form. Companies with electronic complaint handling
systems that do not intend to use HL7 ICSR could require approximately
40 hours to set up eSubmitter. We have amended our analysis of the
economic impact of this rule to reflect the burden on such companies
(see section VI).
N. Common Errors
(Comment 17) One comment suggested that the Agency add to the draft
guidance a section on common errors that prevent a report from getting
through the gateway or from being loaded successfully into the CDRH
database.
(Response) FDA agrees with this suggestion. Examples of common
errors include: Failure to provide data in a required field, failure to
use the appropriate format for a field (e.g. an incorrect date format),
data that exceeds the number of characters allowed for a field, or use
of an invalid Report Number. FDA has identified additional errors in a
guidance document on reporting under eMDR requirements http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/guidancedocuments/ucm175805.htm.
O. Effective Date
(Comment 18) Three comments stated that 1 year is not enough time
for firms to comply with the requirement to submit all MDRs
electronically. One commenter stated that large firms need adequate
time to design and implement the large volume option. Another said that
the activities required for manufacturers to be able to submit eMDRs
are considerable, particularly for companies with large numbers of
filings. According to the commenter, software code of internal
complaint tracking systems will need to be significantly redesigned,
developed, and validated to send eMDRs, provide attachments, and track
and retain FDA acknowledgments. Ensuring that implementation of the
electronic reporting system adheres to the firm's data encryption,
network, electronic message storage (for acknowledgments), and
application security policies and architecture will require significant
analysis and may require major reworking of existing network and server
architecture as well as security and electronic record retention
policies. Moreover, successful readiness to submit electronically is
also dependent upon FDA capacity. The firm recommended that FDA make
the final rule effective 2 years after the publication of the final
rule in the Federal Register.
(Response) FDA generally agrees with these comments. We have
extended the time to 18 months, which should be enough time for the
reporting entities to implement electronic reporting. A reporting
entity that intends to use the HL7 software option, but is unable to
develop and implement an HL7 application within 18 months of the
publication of the final rule, can use eSubmitter until the entity is
ready to use the HL7 application. Moreover, in special cases a firm
could seek a delay in adopting electronic reporting under Sec. 803.19.
A CDRH memorandum dated May 8, 2008, provided notice that CDRH was
ready to accept electronic submissions for MDR reports of individual
adverse events. The memorandum can be found in the part 11 docket
Docket No. FDA-1992-S-0039-0054 (formerly Docket No. 92S-0251),
available at http://www.regulations.gov. See also http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/PostmarketRequirements/ReportingAdverseEvents/eMDR-ElectronicMedicalDeviceReporting/default.htm. Voluntary use of electronic reporting has been available
to industry since that time and a number of manufacturers have already
adopted electronic reporting.
P. General Comment Concerning Numeric Data Fields
(Comment 19) One comment indicated that the software for completing
data fields A2 and A4 (patient age and weight) of the Form FDA 3500A
only accepts numeric entries. Without numeric information for these
fields, the report cannot be submitted. The commenter suggested
providing a mechanism to allow ``no information'' entry in fields A2
and A4.
(Response) FDA recognizes that some fields that are numeric do not
allow for a ``no information'' response, but we cannot change this
feature in eSubmitter. If a reporting entity using eSubmitter does not
have a numeric value to enter in an optional field such as A2 or A4,
and leaves the field blank, the report can be accepted by CDRH. The HL7
ICSR standard provides for several values for indicating ``no
information'': ASKU (asked but unavailable), NI (no information), and
NA (not applicable). Reporters developing applications using the HL7
standard can use these values.
Q. Receipt Date
(Comment 20) Three comments stated that the date of the first
acknowledgment confirming that the submission was received by the FDA
ESG should be considered the date received. The comments asked FDA to
confirm that this is the date the Agency will use for regulatory
purposes. One comment added the suggestion that the Agency combine the
acknowledgments or provide them in .xml format and link the
acknowledgments.
(Response) FDA agrees with the suggestion to clarify when the
report is considered received. FDA considers the receipt date for
electronic adverse event report submissions to be the date the
submission arrived at the FDA ESG, if the submission is ultimately
loaded successfully. If the submission cannot be loaded successfully,
Acknowledgment 3 sent to the reporting entity will identify the errors.
The reporter must correct the errors and resubmit the report. If a
report is resubmitted and the resubmission is successfully loaded, the
receipt date will be the date that the resubmission
[[Page 8839]]
arrived at the FDA ESG. Although we consider Acknowledgment 1 to be the
date received for a submission, if a report is subsequently rejected
due to errors and must be resubmitted, the date of receipt will be the
date the FDA ESG receives the resubmission (and a new Acknowledgment 1
is generated). The reporting entity can document its initial effort to
submit the report with the information from the first submission but if
the initial submission failed we would not consider the report received
until it has been successfully loaded into the CDRH adverse event
database. See section III.F for further information.
R. Software Changes
(Comment 21) Three comments questioned FDA's policy and provisions
for software change control and adequate notice of change. One
suggested that FDA establish a clear policy for managing and
communicating software changes and scheduled maintenance and noted that
high volume reporters would need at least 12 months to implement
software changes. Another asked FDA to clarify how we will communicate
changes to software, data fields, and code lists.
(Response) FDA is committed to providing industry with adequate
notice of any specification changes and, when possible, will ensure
previous versions of such specifications can still be utilized to
submit adverse events electronically. We will utilize our Web sites for
MDR, eMDR, and FDA ESG as well as Federal Register documents to provide
sufficient advance notification of changes to all stakeholders. We will
work with stakeholders on implementation of the changes and expect to
support previous specifications long enough to ensure that HL7 and
eSubmitter users are able to make the necessary changes. The FDA ESG
Web site provides notification of scheduled maintenance and a status
history that documents unscheduled down time for the FDA ESG.
S. System Outages
(Comment 22) Four comments stated that FDA has not adequately
addressed what firms should do when there are system outages and noted
there are no provisions for compliance when electronic systems ``go
down.'' Several comments said that FDA should accept paper reports when
there is a system outage. One comment said that the Agency should
explicitly provide instruction regarding what reporters need to do when
the FDA ESG is down. In that event, the comment indicated that
manufacturers should receive a comparable extension of time to file
their reports.
FDA has suggested firms should document attempts at timely filing
in Block H10 of the MDR form if the manufacturer's electronic systems
are down. One comment indicated that this expectation should be
explicitly set forth in the regulation. Doing so would put all firms on
an even playing field and clarify what must be documented to
demonstrate MDR compliance to FDA investigators.
(Response) FDA agrees that firms need to be advised how to document
problems with timely filing. If either the ESG or a firm's electronic
system experiences an outage affecting timely reporting, the reason for
the late submission can be documented by the manufacturer, importer, or
user facility in Block H10. FDA is not adding this to the rule because
firms are not required to submit this information.
The FDA ESG Web site provides notification of planned maintenance
and maintains a status history that documents times that the FDA ESG
was not operating. Typically, an ESG system outage has not lasted more
than 24 hours and should not require an extension of time. If a
reporting entity is unable to submit a report on time due to an ESG
outage, it should document its attempts at timely filing in Block H10
for the affected reports and submit reports electronically as soon as
the ESG is operational.
A reporting entity using an HL7 reporting option should plan for a
backup method of reporting for an outage affecting its own system. If a
reporting entity experiences an outage within its own system that will
affect timely reporting, it should contact FDA at the eMDR email
address: [email protected]. The email should provide FDA with
information on the problem, the number of reports affected, and an
estimate of how long it will take to resolve. We will respond
concerning alternatives for submission of the adverse event reports. A
description of the problem with the electronic submission should be
documented in Block H10 for the affected reports before they are
submitted.
IV. What is the legal authority for this rule?
FDA's legal authority to amend its regulations governing the
submission of postmarket medical device adverse event reports for
medical devices derives from 21 U.S.C. 352, 360, 360i, 360j, 371, and
374.
V. What is the environmental impact of this rule?
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.30(h) and (i) that this
action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an
environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is
required.
VI. What is the economic impact of this rule?
FDA has examined the impacts of the final rule under Executive
Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601-612), and the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104-4). Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct Agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and
equity). OMB has determined that this final rule is a significant
regulatory action under the Executive Order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires Agencies to analyze
regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule
on small entities. Because the eSubmitter program for electronic
submission of reports does not impose significant costs on small
entities, the Agency certifies that the final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that Agencies prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment
of anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing ``any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year.'' The current threshold after adjustment
for inflation is $141 million, using the most current (2012) Implicit
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product. FDA does not expect this
final rule to result in any 1-year expenditure that would meet or
exceed this amount.
The principal benefit of this final rule will be the public health
benefits associated with more rapid processing and analysis of the
initial individual MDRs currently submitted by manufacturers and
importers to FDA on a paper Form FDA 3500A (about
[[Page 8840]]
190,000 in 2011). In addition, requiring electronic submission of MDRs
is expected to reduce FDA's annual operating costs by $1.9 million and
generate annual industry savings of about $9.2 million.
The total one-time cost for modifying SOPs and establishing
electronic submission capabilities is estimated to range from $38.4
million to $42.8 million. Estimated annually recurring costs totaled
$3.0 million and included maintenance of electronic submission
capabilities, including renewing the electronic certificate, and for
some entities, the incremental cost to maintain high-speed Internet
access. The total annualized cost of the rule, using a 7-percent
discount rate over 10 years, would be from $8.5 million to $9.1
million; with a 3-percent discount rate, the annualized cost would be
$7.5 million to $8.0 million.
A. Need for Regulation
The purpose of this final rule is to require the submission of MDRs
in an electronic format the Agency can process, review, and archive. It
will affect all medical device manufacturers and importers.
The final rule is part of a greater Agency initiative to adopt
electronic technologies to improve the quality of our operations and to
use our resources more efficiently. The rule will reduce FDA's current
costs associated with processing MDRs that are currently received on
the paper Form FDA 3500A. By receiving MDRs electronically, FDA should
be able to access the adverse event information more quickly and at a
lower cost with anticipated reduced data entry errors by eliminating
the step of having manufacturers prepare and submit paper forms.
After considering various alternatives, FDA determined that user
facilities may continue to submit MDRs in paper form because their
reports account for only about 3 percent of reports annually. A
regulation is necessary for reports from manufacturers and importers
because the Agency receives around 190,000 paper reports from such
entities and it would be costly for the Agency to maintain the capacity
to continue to convert paper Form FDA 3500A MDRs to electronic MDR
records until all manufacturers and importers voluntarily adopted the
electronic submission format, possibly years in the future. Some
reporters might never adopt electronic reporting of their own volition.
B. Benefits
The most important benefit of this final rule will be to the public
health because the rule will enable the Agency to have quicker access
to the medical device adverse event reports information and thus more
quickly identify and act on any medical device problems. In 2011, FDA
received approximately 201,000 initial MDRs from all sources on the
paper Form FDA 3500A that needed to be processed and manually entered
into the FDA database. It can take from 3 days to more than 6 months
before an MDR submitted on a paper copy of the Form FDA 3500A is
available for analysis in the Manufacturer and User Facility Device
Experience (MAUDE) database. With a standardized electronic format, the
majority of medical device reports will be available for analysis
within a day or two after submission to the FDA ESG. With a significant
reduction in the time needed for MDRs to be included in the MAUDE
database, analysis and action, including feedback to manufacturers and
consumers, can be initiated sooner--with a corresponding benefit to
public health.
The public health benefits will be supplemented with operating cost
reductions within FDA. Assuming the number of MDRs remains fairly
constant over time, electronic reporting will save the Agency about
one-half of the cost of our data entry contract, which equals a savings
of $1.9 million annually.
C. Costs
There are about 20,100 medical device manufacturers and importers
identified in FDA's medical device registration database that will be
covered by the rule.
The incremental cost to each affected entity will vary by the size,
type, and corporate structure of the firm, as well as by its existing
electronic submission capability. The total costs associated with this
final rule will include one-time setup costs and annual operating
costs.
1. One-Time Costs
One-time costs will be the sum of the costs of:
Rewriting SOPs and training the appropriate personnel,
Installing and validating either:
[cir] The installation of the eSubmitter interface software or
[cir] The programming and configuration of a computer system to
transmit reports directly to the FDA ESG using the HL7 ICSR, and
Acquiring the electronic digital certificate required by
the FDA ESG.
a. Rewriting SOPs and training personnel. All entities subject to
the electronic reporting requirement will need to ensure that their
SOPs include the electronic submission requirement. We estimate that it
will require about 10 hours to make the modifications and train the
appropriate people on the new procedures. The estimated one-time
incremental cost for updating SOPs, assuming an average wage rate of
$63 per hour,\2\ is about $12.7 million (20,100 medical device
manufacturers and importers x 10 hours x $63/hour).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ $63 per hour wage is based on U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS) Occupational Employment and Wages, May 2010, for
Medical and Health Service Managers, Standard Occupational
Classification 11-9111. Forty percent was added to the mean hourly
wage of $45.03 to account for benefits and the total was rounded to
$63.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. Setting up systems for submission. MDRs will be submitted
through the FDA ESG using one of two methods: The eSubmitter software
or the HL7 ICSR. Because most entities are small and submit few if any
MDRs annually, we assume they will use the eSubmitter software, which
allows for the submission of one MDR at a time. To comply using this
submission method, manufacturers and importers will need high-speed
Internet connections \3\ and will have to download and install up to
three free software programs, validate the installation, and train the
appropriate personnel on the new procedures. Entities that have
dedicated information technology staff will be able to install and
validate the installation themselves. Smaller manufacturers and
importers will probably choose to hire an outside contractor for the
installation and the validation of the installation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ While it is possible to submit reports with a slower, dial-
up, connection, we believe most manufacturers and importers that do
not have high-speed connections already would upgrade their Internet
access because it is more efficient. The efficiencies of high speed
Internet access could also benefit other parts of firms' business
systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA does not have data on the amount of time required to install
and validate the installation of the software or the percentage of
entities that might need to contract out the installation. For this
analysis, FDA assumes that it will take 8 to 16 hours to install and
validate the installation of the eSubmitter software (and to install,
if necessary, Java Runtime Edition software and Java security policy
files for their Internet browser) for manufacturers and importers who
maintain paper records. FDA assumes it could take about 40 hours for
manufacturers and importers who maintain electronic records (and thus
need extra time to ensure that their systems can communicate with FDA
ESG). These time totals also include the time required to notify FDA,
run a test submission through the FDA ESG, and to train the appropriate
staff to use the new program. FDA also assumes that
[[Page 8841]]
almost all medical device manufacturers and importers will use this
method to submit MDRs. Using an average wage of $52 for computer and
mathematical occupations,\4\ we estimate the cost to install and use
the software to be between $25.2 million and $29.4 million [((8 hours x
$52 wage x 10,050 manufacturers and importers) + (40 hours x $52 wage x
10,050 manufacturers and importers)) to ((16 hours x $52 wage x 10,050
manufacturers and importers) + (40 hours x $52 wage x 10,050
manufacturers and importers))].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ BLS Occupational Employment and Wages, May 2010 by
occupation, for all industries (http://www.bls.gov). Wage ($52)
includes mean hourly wage of $37.13 for Standard Occupational
Classification 15-0000, computer and mathematics occupations, all
industries; we add 40 percent to account for benefits and rounded to
$52 for ease of calculations. (FDA has verified the Web site
address, but FDA is not responsible for any subsequent changes to
the Web site after this document publishes in the Federal Register.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Entities that submit a large number of MDRs each year may choose to
use the HL7 ICSR method to submit the reports. This method allows for
the batch submission of multiple MDRs at faster transmission rates. The
Agency does not know the threshold at which it becomes cost effective
for an entity to submit medical device reports using this method. An
analysis of FDA submission data for a 6-year period indicated that
about 20 medical device manufacturers submit 500 or more MDRs each year
and about 85 submit close to 100 medical device reports per year. We
assume that the actual number of entities that would begin using the
HL7 ICSR as a result of this rule would fall somewhere within this
range (20 to 105). We also assume that only entities that have existing
infrastructure to support HL7 ICSR transmissions would choose this
method to submit MDRs. We estimate that it will take about 50 hours to
set up their gateway to be compatible with the Agency's system. Using
the wage $52, the one-time cost for establishing HL7 ICSR submission
capabilities will range between $52 thousand and $273 thousand [($52 x
50 hours) x 20 entities) and ($52 x 50 hours) x 105 entities)].
c. Electronic certificates. All entities will need an electronic
certificate to submit any electronic regulatory document to the FDA
ESG. The electronic certificate identifies the sender and serves as an
electronic signature. Entities that have not submitted any electronic
documents to the Agency will incur a one-time cost to acquire the
certificate and recurring costs to keep the certificate active as a
result of this final rule. The certificates cost about $20 and are
valid for 1 year. We assume that the search and transactions costs
involved in the initial acquisition of the certificate doubles the cost
of the certificate to a total cost of $40 for the first year, half of
which would be setup costs. If all entities needed to acquire
electronic certificates, the one-time initial costs of the certificates
would be $402,000 ($20 initial acquisition cost x 20,100 entities).
d. Summary of one-time costs. In addition to the costs we have
estimated, manufacturers and importers affected by this final rule may
have to hire outside experts to install and validate the software
installation to comply with these requirements.
Table 1 summarizes the estimated one-time costs for this rule. The
estimate of the total one-time costs for all affected entities ranges
from $38.4 million to $42.8 million. Much of the cost involves
acquiring the electronic certificate to submit any regulatory document
to the FDA, including installation and validation of the eSubmitter
software or establishment of HL7 ICSR capabilities. For this analysis
we assume all manufacturers and importers will incur these costs when
in fact some already have electronic certificates and voluntarily
submit MDRs electronically.
Table 1--Summary of One-Time Costs
[$ million]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Install and validate Establish HL7 ICSR Total
Modifying eSubmitter software capability Acquiring e- -------------------------
Industry SOPs ---------------------------------------------------- Certificate
Low High Low High \1\ Low High
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One-time costs............................... 12.7 25.2 29.4 0.05 0.3 0.4 38.4 42.8
Annualized at 3-percent over 10 years........ ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .............. 4.5 5.0
Annualized at 7-percent over 10 years........ ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .............. 5.5 6.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This refers to the $20 initial cost to acquire the e-certificate; the rest of the cost of the certificate is captured in the calculation of annual
costs.
2. Annual Costs
The annual costs of this final rule will include the costs of:
Maintaining certificates and
High-speed Internet access.
a. Maintaining electronic certificates. Manufacturers and importers
will bear the cost of maintaining the electronic certificate that
identifies the sender. In addition to having to renew the certificate
on a regular basis, those entities who have not submitted MDRs will
also have to ensure that they are capable of transmitting electronic
MDRs to FDA should such a report submission be necessary. To add these
costs to the cost of the certificate itself, we assume that entities
will incur an additional annually recurring cost equal to one-half the
price of the certificate ($10), for a total annually recurring cost of
$30. If all manufacturers and importers need to acquire electronic
certificates, the annual cost would be $0.6 million ($30 acquisition
certificate renewal and acquisition cost x 20,100 entities).
b. High-speed Internet access. We have assumed that entities will
also use high-speed Internet access to use either of the submission
methods. A 2010 study of small businesses sponsored by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) found that essentially all small firms
had Internet access and about 80 percent had high-speed Internet access
(Columbia Telecommunications Corp., 2010). The average cost of high
speed access was about $40 per month more than dial-up access. Because
the average medical device manufacturer is very small and very small
firms had somewhat lower access than the average, we estimate that by
the time this final rule is in effect, about 75 percent of
manufacturers and importers will have high speed access. The average
annual recurring increase in cost for high speed Internet access for
the remaining 25 percent of the entities would be approximately $2.4
million
[[Page 8842]]
(($40 x 12 months) x 0.25 x 20,100 manufacturers and importers).
c. Summary of annual costs. The annual costs of the rule are $3
million ($0.6 million for electronic certificates + $2.4 million for
internet access). As with the one-time costs, only entities not already
making electronic regulatory document submissions of any kind to the
Agency when this rule is published will incur these costs. There will
be no change in the actual time required to research and prepare the
MDRs, nor will there be any additional reporting requirements as a
result of this final rule. Manufacturers and importers that maintain
Form FDA 3500A records in paper format for their internal MDR files can
still do so under this final rule.
d. Cost savings. FDA estimates an industry savings of about $9.2
million annually because electronic submission should reduce the time
it takes to submit documents and reduce postage or delivery
expenditures. The time savings estimate was derived using the estimated
savings (i.e., from reduced burdens) reported in section VII. Device
manufacturers and importers are expected to save a weighted average of
0.89 hours per submission. Savings from reduced postage costs will be
around $0.4 million. FDA assumed that without this rule the Agency
would continue to receive about 190,000 submissions in paper format.\5\
FDA calculated the total savings as 190,000 submissions x 0.89 hour
savings x $52 wage cost per hour + .8 x [(1,630 firms x 12 months x ($5
flat rate priority mail + $20 flat rate express mail))].\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The estimated 190,000 submissions from 1,630 firms are based
on the number of submissions for 2011.
\6\ This estimate differs from the paperwork estimates in
section VII because it measures the incremental change from current
practice rather than the time to comply with specific requirements.
Postage was calculated using flat rate charges by the U.S. Postal
Service and assuming that 80 percent of the firms submitting paper
MDRs in a given year would submit one express package and one
priority mail package per month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Regulatory Alternatives to the Final Rule
The Agency identified and assessed two additional regulatory
alternatives to this final rule. The first of these alternatives would
allow manufacturers and importers to voluntarily submit MDRs
electronically. This regulatory alternative would allow firms to choose
paper or electronic submissions, but would require any electronic
submissions to use either the eSubmitter or the HL7 ICSR. This
alternative would reduce the one-time set costs (see table 1) for firms
choosing not to make electronic submissions; those firms would also
fail to realize corresponding savings. For many firms, the expected
private costs of adopting electronic submissions will exceed expected
private benefits due to having higher discount rates, higher costs than
the averages presented here, or shorter planning horizons than the 10
years used in this analysis; FDA therefore expects that under this
alternative a number of medical device firms would resist changing
their procedures for a long period of time, perhaps indefinitely. If a
substantial number failed to voluntarily adopt electronic submission of
MDRs, FDA would not obtain the benefits of standardized formats and
quicker access to medical device adverse event data. The Agency would
also have to maintain significant capacity for accepting and processing
written MDRs. A voluntary system, therefore, would fail to achieve the
public health benefits and efficiency goals of the final rule.
The second regulatory alternative would allow small entities more
time to comply with the electronic submission requirements. This
alternative would allow small entities to delay compliance. Under this
alternative, FDA would not achieve meaningful data entry savings from
requiring electronic submissions or all the benefits of quicker access
to these reports until the small entity compliance date. Because so
many device companies are small entities, and in many cases their
private costs will exceed their private benefits, small entities would
likely postpone compliance, which would significantly postpone the
benefits the rule is intended to confer. As shown in the following
section, the estimated incremental costs per small entity from the
final rule are small, so the cost reduction per small entity from
delayed compliance would also be small. Moreover, postponing compliance
would not reduce the future setup costs once the later compliance date
is reached. In other words, postponing compliance would simply postpone
the costs and benefits with no change in their amounts.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
SBA defines a small medical device manufacturer as having fewer
than 500 employees (NAICS 325413, 334510, 334517, 339112, 339113,
339114, and 339115). Over 90 percent of registered device firms
affected by this final rule are considered small entities under this
definition. While this final rule will now require many MDR reports
submitted to the Agency to be in electronic format, the content of a
report is not being changed from that already addressed on the paper
Form FDA 3500A. The average costs for these manufacturers and importers
are listed in table 2. The average total annualized cost per small
entity, assuming a 7-percent discount rate over 10 years, would range
from $590 to $720 ($575 to $680 at a 3-percent discount rate).
Because the costs per affected entity are low compared to revenues,
FDA finds that although this final rule will affect a substantial
number of small entities, it will not have a significant economic
impact on those entities. For example, for a facility in NAICS 339114,
dental equipment and supplies, which have the lowest value of shipments
of all affected industries, $4.4 million, $721 in annualized costs
represents about 0.02 percent of revenues. We therefore certify that
the final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Table 2--Incremental Compliance Costs per Small Entity
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One-time costs Total annualized
-------------------------------- Annually -------------------------------
Low High recurring Low High
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rewriting SOPs.................. 123 613 .............. .............. ..............
Software Installation and 411 822 .............. .............. ..............
Validation of Installation.....
--------------------------------
Acquiring Electronic Certificate 40 .............. .............. ..............
--------------------------------
Maintaining Submission .............. .............. 30 .............. ..............
Capabilities...................
Upgrade Internet Access......... .............. .............. 480 .............. ..............
[[Page 8843]]
7-Percent Discount Rate......... .............. .............. .............. 590 720
3-Percent Discount Rate......... .............. .............. .............. 575 680
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VII. How does this rule comply with the PRA?
This final rule contains information collection provisions that are
subject to review by OMB under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The
title, description, and respondent description of the information
collection provisions are shown in the following paragraphs with an
estimate of the annual reporting and recordkeeping burden. Included in
the estimate is the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing
data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing
and reviewing each collection of information.
Title: Medical Device Reporting: Electronic Submission
Requirements.
Description: In accordance with this final rule, medical device
manufacturers, importers, and user facilities will be required to
submit electronic MDRs to FDA and to maintain records, and may also
seek exemption from these requirements. FDA is also amending Sec. Sec.
803.32, 803.42, and 803.52 by making minor revisions to reflect prior
modifications to Form FDA 3500A and its instructions. Manufacturers,
importers, and user facilities are currently submitting paper MDRs on
Form FDA 3500A, approved under OMB control number 0910-0291. User
facilities are currently submitting paper annual reports on Form FDA
3419, approved under OMB control number 0910-0437.
Section 519(a)(1) of the FD&C Act requires every manufacturer or
importer to report ``. . . whenever the manufacturer or importer
receives or otherwise becomes aware of information that reasonably
suggests that one of its marketed devices may have caused or
contributed to a death or serious injury, or has malfunctioned and that
such device or a similar device marketed by the manufacturer or
importer would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious
injury if the malfunction were to recur. . . .''
Section 519(b)(1)(A) of the FD&C Act requires that ``[w]henever a
device user facility receives or otherwise becomes aware of information
that reasonably suggests that a device has or may have caused or
contributed to the death of a patient of the facility, the facility . .
. shall, as soon as practicable but not later than 10 working days
after becoming aware of the information, report the information to the
Secretary and, if the identity of the manufacturer is known, to the
manufacturer of the device.''
Section 519(b)(1)(B) of the FD& C Act requires that ``[w]henever a
device user facility receives or otherwise becomes aware of: (i)
Information that reasonably suggests that a device has or may have
caused or contributed to the serious illness of, or serious injury to,
a patient of the facility . . . , shall, as soon as practicable but not
later than 10 working days after becoming aware of the information,
report the information to the manufacturer of the device or to the
Secretary if the identity of the manufacturer is not known.''
Complete, accurate, and timely adverse event information is
necessary for the identification of emerging device problems so the
Agency can protect the public health under section 519 of the FD&C Act.
FDA is requesting approval for the information collection requirements
contained in part 803 as revised by this final rule.
Description of Respondents: Manufacturers and importers of medical
devices and device user facilities. Device user facility means a
hospital, ambulatory surgical facility, nursing home, outpatient
diagnostic facility, or outpatient treatment facility as defined in
Sec. 803.3, which is not a physician's office (also defined in Sec.
803.3).
FDA received 35 comments on the 2009 proposed rule (74 FR 42203).
Thirteen comments were related to the collections of information. All
comments are discussed in detail in section III (see comments 1 through
6, 9 through 14, and 16.)
To calculate the annual reporting burden for table 3, the number of
reporting entities that had filed MDRs during 3 years (January 1, 2006,
through December 31, 2008) was identified along with the number of MDR
reports filed during that time period. The rate of increase in reports
and supplements filed was determined and projected for the next 3
years. The projected total annual responses were calculated by
multiplying the projected number of respondents by the annual frequency
per response for the reports and supplements, resulting in the
estimated total that would be filed by each entity.\7\ The figures
displayed in table 3 of the 2009 proposed rule were based on MDRs
processed during the year July 1, 2005, to June 30, 2006, but for this
final rule FDA has used data for the years 2006 to 2008. One exception
is the counts under exemption reporting (Sec. 803.19), which reflect
the number of firms that currently have an exemption and have submitted
quarterly reports in 2009. The annual burden for reporting calculated
in table 3 is 37,709 hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ In 2012, the actual number of MDR reports submitted was
712,000, higher than had been estimated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To calculate the cost figures in table 3, we based our estimates on
a count of all manufacturers, importers, and user facilities that filed
MDRs during the period 2006 to 2008. The estimate of capital costs
included:
Development of procedures for handling adverse events and
reporting MDRs,
Installation of eSubmitter and/or installation and
validation of H7, and
Acquiring an electronic certificate.
The maximum and minimum estimates for installation of eSubmitter
and HL7 were averaged in the calculations for capital costs. The
estimate of annual operating and maintenance costs included:
Renewal of electronic certificate and
Maintenance of high-speed Internet access.
The total annual estimated burden imposed by this collection of
information from tables 3 and 4 is 46,445 hours annually. The approved
MDR reporting and recordkeeping burden for paper submissions is 391,526
hours, as approved under OMB control number 0910-0437 (expires August
31, 2015). Based on 46,445 hours as the reporting and recordkeeping
burden for electronic submissions, there is a burden decrease of
345,081 hours. An
[[Page 8844]]
explanation for the burden decrease is provided in the following
paragraphs:
FDA estimates the burden of the collection of information as
follows:
Table 3--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total
annual
Number of Total Total operating
21 CFR Section Form FDA Number of responses annual Average burden Total hours capital and
No. respondents per responses per response costs (mil) maintenance
respondent costs
(mil)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
803.19....................................... ........... 56 4 224 1 224 ........... ...........
803.30 and 803.32............................ ........... 520 7 3,640 0.35 1,274 $5.9 $0.9
803.33....................................... 3419 520 1 520 1 520 ........... ...........
803.40 and 803.42............................ ........... 60 25 1,500 0.35 525 1.5 0.1
803.50 and 803.52............................ ........... 1,240 204 252,960 0.10 25,296 6.6 0.5
803.56....................................... ........... 1,050 94 98,700 0.10 9,870 ........... ...........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................................... ........... ........... ........... ........... .............. 37,709 14.0 1.5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 4--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden
21 CFR Section Number of records per Total annual per Total hours
recordkeepers recordkeeper records recordkeeping
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
803.17........................................................ 1,820 1 1,820 3.3 6,006
803.18(a) through (d)......................................... 1,820 1 1,820 1.5 2,730
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total..................................................... ................ ................ ................ ................ 8,736
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Reporting Requirements
The number of respondents for each applicable Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) reporting requirement in table 3 was identified from
the MDRs reported to FDA's internal databases during the period January
1, 2006, through December 31, 2008. The annual frequency per response
and total annual responses shown were based on the number of MDRs
reported during the same period (January 1, 2006, through December 31,
2008) with a calculated increase for the next 3 years. FDA estimates
that electronic submission will decrease the burden associated with
Sec. Sec. 803.19, 803.30, 803.32, 803.40, 803.42, 803.50, 803.52, and
803.56.
B. Recordkeeping Requirements
The number of respondents for each CFR section in table 4 was
identified from the MDRs reported to FDA's internal databases during
the period January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2008. The Agency
believes that the majority of manufacturers, user facilities, and
importers has already established written procedures and MDR files to
document complaints and information to meet the MDR requirements as
part of their internal quality control system, but will need to modify
their practices to address the electronic reporting process.
C. Changes From the Proposed Rule
The total burden hours for the proposed rule were 15,200 and total
burden hours for the final rule are 37,709. This is an increase of
22,509. The proposed rule calculations were based on MDRs processed
during the year July 1, 2005, to June 30, 2006. The final rule
calculations were based on MDR data for the period January 1, 2006,
through December 31, 2008. The hours per response were adjusted to
simplify calculations. These changes resulted in an increase in burden
between the proposed rule and the final rule. The following table 5
identifies the burden changes from the proposed rule to the final rule.
Table 5--Changes From the Proposed Rule
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of respondents Number of responses per Average burden per Total burden hours
-------------------------- respondent response -------------------------
21 CFR Section ----------------------------------------------------
Proposed Final Proposed Final Proposed Final Proposed Final
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
803.19.......................................... 55 56 4 4 1 1 220 224
803.30 and 803.32............................... 411 520 2 7 0.33 0.35 271 1,274
803.33.......................................... 411 520 1 1 1 1 411 520
803.40 and 803.42............................... 44 60 20 25 0.33 0.35 290 525
803.50 and 803.52............................... 1,304 1,240 58 204 .011 0.10 8,248 25,296
803.56.......................................... 1,200 1,050 48 94 0.10 0.10 5,760 9,870
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 15,272 37,709
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following table 6 summarizes FDA's burden estimates and how
they will change due to electronic submission. Table 7 summarizes our
recordkeeping burden estimates and how we believe they will change due
to electronic submission.
[[Page 8845]]
Table 6--Estimated Reporting Burden Program Change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average burden per
response under current Average burden per Burden change reduction
21 CFR Section paper submission response as a result of (hours)
process electronic submission
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
803.19............................... 3 1 2
803.30 and 803.32.................... 1 0.35 0.65
803.33............................... 1 1 (*)
803.40 and 803.42.................... 1 0.35 0.65
803.50 and 803.52.................... 1 0.10 0.9
803.56............................... 1 0.10 .9
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* No change.
As previously described, there are two reporting options. The first
one is eSubmitter for low volume reporters, and the second one is HL7
ICSR for high volume reporters. FDA is basing its hours per response
estimates on industry's voluntary use of the two systems since May
2008.
Table 7--Estimated Recordkeeping Burden Program Change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average burden per Average burden per
recordkeeping under recordkeeping as a Burden change reduction
21 CFR Section current paper result of electronic (hours)
submission process submission
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
803.17............................... 10.0 3.3 6.7
803.18(a) through (d)................ 1.5 1.5 (*)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* No change.
D. Total Annual Cost Burden
The conversion from paper to electronic submissions will result in
a burden to reporting entities due to both capital costs (one-time
setup costs) and annual operating and maintenance costs, as
demonstrated in table 3 and discussed in section VI. The one-time
capital costs include the cost to develop procedures for handling
adverse events and reporting MDRs, installing the eSubmitter software
and/or installing gateway to gateway submission capabilities (HL7), and
acquiring electronic certificates; these costs have been estimated at
$14.0 million. Once the procedures have been modified, there is an
operating and maintenance cost to renew the digital certificate and
maintain high-speed internet access, which has been estimated at $1.5
million each year.
This final rule refers to previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations. These collections of information
are subject to review by OMB under the PRA. The revised Form FDA 3500A
is approved under the PRA, under OMB control number 0910-0291. The
collections of information in part 803 have been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0437.
The information collection provisions in this final rule have been
submitted to OMB for review as required by section 3507(d) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Before the effective date of this final rule, FDA will publish a
notice in the Federal Register announcing OMB's decision to approve,
modify, or disapprove the information collection provisions in this
final rule. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
VIII. Does this final rule have federalism implications?
FDA has analyzed this final rule in accordance with the principles
set forth in Executive Order 13132. FDA has determined that the rule
does not contain policies that have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Accordingly, the Agency has concluded
that the rule does not contain policies that have federalism
implications as defined in the Executive order and, consequently, a
federalism summary impact statement is not required.
IX. What is the effective date?
This final rule is effective August 14, 2015 (see DATES section).
Reporting entities that are unable to comply with this date should
request an exemption following the process described elsewhere in this
document and in the MDR regulation under Sec. 803.19.
X. What references are on display?
The following references have been placed on display in the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852 and may be seen by
interested persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
and are available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov. (FDA
has verified the Web site addresses, but is not responsible for any
subsequent changes to the Web sites after this document publishes in
the Federal Register.)
1. U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 Economic Census Industry Series: NAICS
Code 62, Health Care and Social Assistance, (http://www.census.gov),
April 1, 2011.
2. BLS Occupational Employment and Wages, May 2010 for Medical and
Health Service Managers, Standard Occupational Classification, 11-
19111, (http://www.bls.gov), April 1, 2011.
3. Columbia Telecommunications Corp., The Impact of Broadband Speed
and Price on Small Business, SBA Office of Advocacy Contract Number
SBAHQ-09-C-0050, (http://archive.sba.gov/advo/research/rs373tot.pdf), November 2010.
XI. Stayed CFR Text
FDA has many revisions for 21 CFR part 803; therefore, we are
revising the entire part. At 73 FR 33692, published June 13, 2008, FDA
amended the MDR regulation to remove Sec. 803.55, which
[[Page 8846]]
established the requirement for baseline reports. Section 803.58, which
is currently under indefinite stay (published at 61 FR 38346, July 23,
1996), includes in subsection (b)(1) a reference to the former Sec.
803.55. For purposes of this rulemaking, FDA is temporarily lifting the
stay of Sec. 803.58 in order to remove the reference to Sec. 803.55.
Because FDA is only lifting the stay for this purpose, we are also
reimposing the indefinite stay of Sec. 803.58 in this final rule. FDA
intends to consider the Sec. 803.58 requirements for U.S.-designated
agents in a separate rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 803
Imports, Medical devices, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
803 is amended as follows:
Sec. 803.58 [Amended]
0
1. The stay of Sec. 803.58 published at 61 FR 38346, July 23, 1996, is
lifted.
0
2. Revise part 803 to read as follows:
PART 803--MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTING
Subpart A--General Provisions
Sec.
803.1 What does this part cover?
803.3 How does FDA define the terms used in this part?
803.9 What information from the reports do we disclose to the
public?
803.10 Generally, what are the reporting requirements that apply to
me?
803.11 What form should I use to submit reports of individual
adverse events and where do I obtain these forms?
803.12 How do I submit initial and supplemental or followup reports?
803.13 Do I need to submit reports in English?
803.15 How will I know if you require more information about my
medical device report?
803.16 When I submit a report, does the information in my report
constitute an admission that the device caused or contributed to the
reportable event?
803.17 What are the requirements for developing, maintaining, and
implementing written MDR procedures that apply to me?
803.18 What are the requirements for establishing and maintaining
MDR files or records that apply to me?
803.19 Are there exemptions, variances, or alternative forms of
adverse event reporting requirements?
Subpart B--Generally Applicable Requirements for Individual Adverse
Event Reports
803.20 How do I complete and submit an individual adverse event
report?
803.21 Where can I find the reporting codes for adverse events that
I use with medical device reports?
803.22 What are the circumstances in which I am not required to file
a report?
803.23 Where can I find information on how to prepare and submit an
MDR in electronic format?
Subpart C--User Facility Reporting Requirements
803.30 If I am a user facility, what reporting requirements apply to
me?
803.32 If I am a user facility, what information must I submit in my
individual adverse event reports?
803.33 If I am a user facility, what must I include when I submit an
annual report?
Subpart D--Importer Reporting Requirements
803.40 If I am an importer, what reporting requirements apply to me?
803.42 If I am an importer, what information must I submit in my
individual adverse event reports?
Subpart E--Manufacturer Reporting Requirements
803.50 If I am a manufacturer, what reporting requirements apply to
me?
803.52 If I am a manufacturer, what information must I submit in my
individual adverse event reports?
803.53 If I am a manufacturer, in which circumstances must I submit
a 5-day report?
803.56 If I am a manufacturer, in what circumstances must I submit a
supplemental or followup report and what are the requirements for
such reports?
803.58 Foreign manufacturers.
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 352, 360, 360i, 360j, 371, 374.
Subpart A--General Provisions
Sec. 803.1 What does this part cover?
(a) This part establishes the requirements for medical device
reporting for device user facilities, manufacturers, importers, and
distributors. If you are a device user facility, you must report deaths
and serious injuries that a device has or may have caused or
contributed to, establish and maintain adverse event files, and submit
summary annual reports. If you are a manufacturer or importer, you must
report deaths and serious injuries that your device has or may have
caused or contributed to, you must report certain device malfunctions,
and you must establish and maintain adverse event files. If you are a
manufacturer, you must also submit specified followup. These reports
help us to protect the public health by helping to ensure that devices
are not adulterated or misbranded and are safe and effective for their
intended use. If you are a medical device distributor, you must
maintain records (files) of incidents, but you are not required to
report these incidents.
(b) This part supplements and does not supersede other provisions
of this chapter, including the provisions of part 820 of this chapter.
(c) References in this part to regulatory sections of the Code of
Federal Regulations are to chapter I of title 21, unless otherwise
noted.
Sec. 803.3 How does FDA define the terms used in this part?
Some of the terms we use in this part are specific to medical
device reporting and reflect the language used in the statute (law).
Other terms are more general and reflect our interpretation of the law.
This section defines the following terms as used in this part:
(a) Ambulatory surgical facility (ASF) means a distinct entity that
operates for the primary purpose of furnishing same day outpatient
surgical services to patients. An ASF may be either an independent
entity (i.e., not a part of a provider of services or any other
facility) or operated by another medical entity (e.g., under the common
ownership, licensure, or control of an entity). An ASF is subject to
this regulation regardless of whether it is licensed by a Federal,
State, municipal, or local government or regardless of whether it is
accredited by a recognized accreditation organization. If an adverse
event meets the criteria for reporting, the ASF must report that event
regardless of the nature or location of the medical service provided by
the ASF.
(b) Become aware means that an employee of the entity required to
report has acquired information that reasonably suggests a reportable
adverse event has occurred.
(1) If you are a device user facility, you are considered to have
``become aware'' when medical personnel, as defined in this section,
who are employed by or otherwise formally affiliated with your
facility, obtain information about a reportable event.
(2) If you are a manufacturer, you are considered to have become
aware of an event when any of your employees becomes aware of a
reportable event that is required to be reported within 30 calendar
days or that is required to be reported within 5 work days because we
had requested reports in accordance with Sec. 803.53(b). You are also
considered to have become aware of an event when any of your employees
with management or supervisory responsibilities over persons with
regulatory, scientific, or technical responsibilities, or whose duties
relate
[[Page 8847]]
to the collection and reporting of adverse events, becomes aware, from
any information, including any trend analysis, that a reportable MDR
event or events necessitates remedial action to prevent an unreasonable
risk of substantial harm to the public health.
(3) If you are an importer, you are considered to have become aware
of an event when any of your employees becomes aware of a reportable
event that is required to be reported by you within 30 days.
(c) Caused or contributed means that a death or serious injury was
or may have been attributed to a medical device, or that a medical
device was or may have been a factor in a death or serious injury,
including events occurring as a result of:
(1) Failure,
(2) Malfunction,
(3) Improper or inadequate design,
(4) Manufacture,
(5) Labeling, or
(6) User error.
(d) Device user facility means a hospital, ambulatory surgical
facility, nursing home, outpatient diagnostic facility, or outpatient
treatment facility as defined in this section, which is not a
physician's office, as defined in this section. School nurse offices
and employee health units are not device user facilities.
(e) Distributor means any person (other than the manufacturer or
importer) who furthers the marketing of a device from the original
place of manufacture to the person who makes final delivery or sale to
the ultimate user, but who does not repackage or otherwise change the
container, wrapper, or labeling of the device or device package. If you
repackage or otherwise change the container, wrapper, or labeling, you
are considered a manufacturer as defined in this section.
(f) Expected life of a device means the time that a device is
expected to remain functional after it is placed into use. Certain
implanted devices have specified ``end of life'' (EOL) dates. Other
devices are not labeled as to their respective EOL, but are expected to
remain operational through activities such as maintenance, repairs, or
upgrades, for an estimated period of time.
(g) FDA, we, us, or Agency means the Food and Drug Administration.
(h) Five-day report means a medical device report that must be
submitted by a manufacturer to us under Sec. 803.53 within 5 work
days.
(i) Hospital means a distinct entity that operates for the primary
purpose of providing diagnostic, therapeutic (such as medical,
occupational, speech, physical), surgical, and other patient services
for specific and general medical conditions. Hospitals include general,
chronic disease, rehabilitative, psychiatric, and other special-purpose
facilities. A hospital may be either independent (e.g., not a part of a
provider of services or any other facility) or may be operated by
another medical entity (e.g., under the common ownership, licensure, or
control of another entity). A hospital is covered by this regulation
regardless of whether it is licensed by a Federal, State, municipal or
local government or whether it is accredited by a recognized
accreditation organization. If an adverse event meets the criteria for
reporting, the hospital must report that event regardless of the nature
or location of the medical service provided by the hospital.
(j) Importer means any person who imports a device into the United
States and who furthers the marketing of a device from the original
place of manufacture to the person who makes final delivery or sale to
the ultimate user, but who does not repackage or otherwise change the
container, wrapper, or labeling of the device or device package. If you
repackage or otherwise change the container, wrapper, or labeling, you
are considered a manufacturer as defined in this section.
(k) Malfunction means the failure of a device to meet its
performance specifications or otherwise perform as intended.
Performance specifications include all claims made in the labeling for
the device. The intended performance of a device refers to the intended
use for which the device is labeled or marketed, as defined in Sec.
801.4 of this chapter.
(l) Manufacturer means any person who manufactures, prepares,
propagates, compounds, assembles, or processes a device by chemical,
physical, biological, or other procedure. The term includes any person
who either:
(1) Repackages or otherwise changes the container, wrapper, or
labeling of a device in furtherance of the distribution of the device
from the original place of manufacture;
(2) Initiates specifications for devices that are manufactured by a
second party for subsequent distribution by the person initiating the
specifications;
(3) Manufactures components or accessories that are devices that
are ready to be used and are intended to be commercially distributed
and intended to be used as is, or are processed by a licensed
practitioner or other qualified person to meet the needs of a
particular patient; or
(4) Is the U.S. agent of a foreign manufacturer.
(m) Manufacturer or importer report number. This number uniquely
identifies each individual adverse event report submitted by a
manufacturer or importer. This number consists of the following three
parts:
(1) The FDA registration number for the manufacturing site of the
reported device, or the registration number for the importer. If the
manufacturing site or the importer does not have an establishment
registration number, we will assign a temporary MDR reporting number
until the site is registered in accordance with part 807 of this
chapter. We will inform the manufacturer or importer of the temporary
MDR reporting number;
(2) The four-digit calendar year in which the report is submitted;
and
(3) The five-digit sequence number of the reports submitted during
the year, starting with 00001. (For example, the complete number will
appear as follows: 1234567-2011-00001.)
(n) MDR means medical device report.
(o) MDR reportable event (or reportable event) means:
(1) An event that user facilities become aware of that reasonably
suggests that a device has or may have caused or contributed to a death
or serious injury or
(2) An event that manufacturers or importers become aware of that
reasonably suggests that one of their marketed devices:
(i) May have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury, or
(ii) Has malfunctioned and that the device or a similar device
marketed by the manufacturer or importer would be likely to cause or
contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction were to
recur.
(p) Medical personnel means an individual who:
(1) Is licensed, registered, or certified by a State, territory, or
other governing body, to administer health care;
(2) Has received a diploma or a degree in a professional or
scientific discipline;
(3) Is an employee responsible for receiving medical complaints or
adverse event reports; or
(4) Is a supervisor of these persons.
(q) Nursing home means:
(1) An independent entity (i.e., not a part of a provider of
services or any other facility) or one operated by another medical
entity (e.g., under the common ownership, licensure, or control of an
entity) that operates for the primary purpose of providing:
[[Page 8848]]
(i) Skilled nursing care and related services for persons who
require medical or nursing care;
(ii) Hospice care to the terminally ill; or
(iii) Services for the rehabilitation of the injured, disabled, or
sick.
(2) A nursing home is subject to this regulation regardless of
whether it is licensed by a Federal, State, municipal, or local
government or whether it is accredited by a recognized accreditation
organization. If an adverse event meets the criteria for reporting, the
nursing home must report that event regardless of the nature or
location of the medical service provided by the nursing home.
(r) Outpatient diagnostic facility means:
(1) A distinct entity that:
(i) Operates for the primary purpose of conducting medical
diagnostic tests on patients,
(ii) Does not assume ongoing responsibility for patient care, and
(iii) Provides its services for use by other medical personnel.
(2) Outpatient diagnostic facilities include outpatient facilities
providing radiography, mammography, ultrasonography,
electrocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, computerized axial
tomography, and in vitro testing. An outpatient diagnostic facility may
be either independent (i.e., not a part of a provider of services or
any other facility) or operated by another medical entity (e.g., under
the common ownership, licensure, or control of an entity). An
outpatient diagnostic facility is covered by this regulation regardless
of whether it is licensed by a Federal, State, municipal, or local
government or whether it is accredited by a recognized accreditation
organization. If an adverse event meets the criteria for reporting, the
outpatient diagnostic facility must report that event regardless of the
nature or location of the medical service provided by the outpatient
diagnostic facility.
(s) Outpatient treatment facility means a distinct entity that
operates for the primary purpose of providing nonsurgical therapeutic
(medical, occupational, or physical) care on an outpatient basis or in
a home health care setting. Outpatient treatment facilities include
ambulance providers, rescue services, and home health care groups.
Examples of services provided by outpatient treatment facilities
include the following: Cardiac defibrillation, chemotherapy,
radiotherapy, pain control, dialysis, speech or physical therapy, and
treatment for substance abuse. An outpatient treatment facility may be
either independent (i.e., not a part of a provider of services or any
other facility) or operated by another medical entity (e.g., under the
common ownership, licensure, or control of an entity). An outpatient
treatment facility is covered by this regulation regardless of whether
it is licensed by a Federal, State, municipal, or local government or
whether it is accredited by a recognized accreditation organization. If
an adverse event meets the criteria for reporting, the outpatient
treatment facility must report that event regardless of the nature or
location of the medical service provided by the outpatient treatment
facility.
(t) Patient of the facility means any individual who is being
diagnosed or treated and/or receiving medical care at or under the
control or authority of the facility. This includes employees of the
facility or individuals affiliated with the facility who, in the course
of their duties, suffer a device-related death or serious injury that
has or may have been caused or contributed to by a device used at the
facility.
(u) Physician's office means a facility that operates as the office
of a physician or other health care professional for the primary
purpose of examination, evaluation, and treatment or referral of
patients. Examples of physician offices include: Dentist offices,
chiropractor offices, optometrist offices, nurse practitioner offices,
school nurse offices, school clinics, employee health clinics, or
freestanding care units. A physician's office may be independent, a
group practice, or part of a Health Maintenance Organization.
(v) Remedial action means any action other than routine maintenance
or servicing of a device where such action is necessary to prevent
recurrence of a reportable event.
(w) Serious injury means an injury or illness that:
(1) Is life-threatening,
(2) Results in permanent impairment of a body function or permanent
damage to a body structure, or
(3) Necessitates medical or surgical intervention to preclude
permanent impairment of a body function or permanent damage to a body
structure. Permanent means irreversible impairment or damage to a body
structure or function, excluding trivial impairment or damage.
(x) User facility report number means the number that uniquely
identifies each report submitted by a user facility to manufacturers
and to us. This number consists of the following three parts:
(1) The user facility's 10-digit Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services (CMS) number (if the CMS number has fewer than 10 digits, fill
the remaining spaces with zeros);
(2) The four-digit calendar year in which the report is submitted;
and
(3) The four-digit sequence number of the reports submitted for the
year, starting with 0001. (For example, a complete user facility report
number will appear as follows: 1234560000-2011-0001. If a user facility
has more than one CMS number, it must select one that will be used for
all of its MDR reports. If a user facility has no CMS number, it should
use all zeros in the appropriate space in its initial report (e.g.,
0000000000-2011-0001). We will assign a number for future use and send
that number to the user facility. This number is used in our record of
the initial report, in subsequent reports, and in any correspondence
with the user facility. If a facility has multiple sites, the primary
site may submit reports for all sites and use one reporting number for
all sites if the primary site provides the name, address, and CMS
number for each respective site.)
(y) Work day means Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
(z) [Reserved]
Sec. 803.9 What information from the reports do we disclose to the
public?
(a) We may disclose to the public any report, including any FDA
record of a telephone report, submitted under this part. Our
disclosures are governed by part 20 of this chapter.
(b) Before we disclose a report to the public, we will delete the
following:
(1) Any information that constitutes trade secret or confidential
commercial or financial information under Sec. 20.61 of this chapter;
(2) Any personal, medical, and similar information, including the
serial number of implanted devices, which would constitute an invasion
of personal privacy under Sec. 20.63 of this chapter. However, if a
patient requests a report, we will disclose to that patient all the
information in the report concerning that patient, as provided in Sec.
20.61 of this chapter; and
(3) Any names and other identifying information of a third party
that voluntarily submitted an adverse event report.
(c) We may not disclose the identity of a device user facility that
makes a report under this part except in connection with:
(1) An action brought to enforce section 301(q) of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 331(q)), including the failure
or refusal to furnish material or information required by section 519
of the Federal
[[Page 8849]]
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360i));
(2) A communication to a manufacturer of a device that is the
subject of a report required to be submitted by a user facility under
Sec. 803.30; or
(3) A disclosure to employees of the Department of Health and Human
Services, to the Department of Justice, or to the duly authorized
committees and subcommittees of the Congress.
Sec. 803.10 Generally, what are the reporting requirements that apply
to me?
(a) If you are a device user facility, you must submit reports
(described in subpart C of this part), as follows:
(1) Submit reports of individual adverse events no later than 10
work days after the day that you become aware of a reportable event:
(i) Submit reports of device-related deaths to us and to the
manufacturer, if known, or
(ii) Submit reports of device-related serious injuries to the
manufacturers or, if the manufacturer is unknown, submit reports to us.
(2) Submit annual reports (described in Sec. 803.33) to us.
(b) If you are an importer, you must submit reports (described in
subpart D of this part), as follows:
(1) Submit reports of individual adverse events no later than 30
calendar days after the day that you become aware of a reportable
event:
(i) Submit reports of device-related deaths or serious injuries to
us and to the manufacturer or
(ii) Submit reports of device-related malfunctions to the
manufacturer.
(2) [Reserved]
(c) If you are a manufacturer, you must submit reports (described
in subpart E of this part) to us, as follows:
(1) Submit reports of individual adverse events no later than 30
calendar days after the day that you become aware of a reportable
death, serious injury, or malfunction.
(2) Submit reports of individual adverse events no later than 5
work days after the day that you become aware of:
(i) A reportable event that requires remedial action to prevent an
unreasonable risk of substantial harm to the public health or
(ii) A reportable event for which we made a written request.
(3) Submit supplemental reports if you obtain information that you
did not submit in an initial report.
Sec. 803.11 What form should I use to submit reports of individual
adverse events and where do I obtain these forms?
(a) If you are a manufacturer or importer, you must submit reports
of individual adverse events to FDA in an electronic format in
accordance with Sec. 803.12(a) and Sec. 803.20, unless granted an
exemption under Sec. 803.19.
(b) Importer reports submitted to device manufacturers may be in
paper format or an electronic format that includes all required data
fields to ensure that the manufacturer has all required information.
(c) If you are a user facility, you must submit reports of
individual adverse events in accordance with Sec. 803.12(b) and Sec.
803.20.
(d) Form FDA 3500A is available on the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/getforms.htm or from Division of Small
Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance, Office of
Communication and Education, Center for Devices and Radiological
Health, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 4621, Silver Spring, MD
20993-0002, by email: [email protected], FAX: 301-847-8149, or
telephone: 800-638-2041.
Sec. 803.12 How do I submit initial and supplemental or followup
reports?
(a) Manufacturers and importers must submit initial and
supplemental or followup reports to FDA in an electronic format that
FDA can process, review, and archive.
(b) User facilities that submit their reports and additional
information to FDA electronically must use an electronic format that
FDA can process, review, and archive. User facilities that submit their
reports to FDA on paper must submit any written report or additional
information required under this part to FDA, CDRH, Medical Device
Reporting, P.O. Box 3002, Rockville, MD 20847-3002, using Form FDA
3500A. Each report must be identified (e.g., ``User Facility Report''
or ``Annual Report'').
(c) If you are confronted with a public health emergency, this can
be brought to FDA's attention by contacting FDA's Office of Crisis
Management, Emergency Operations Center by telephone, 24-hours a day,
at 301-796-8240 or toll free at 866-300-4374, followed by the
submission of an email to: [email protected].
Note: This action does not satisfy your obligation to report
under part 803.
(d) You may submit a voluntary telephone report to the MedWatch
office at 800-FDA-1088. You may also obtain information regarding
voluntary reporting from the MedWatch office at 800-FDA-1088. You may
also find the voluntary Form FDA 3500 and instructions to complete it
at: http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/HowToReport/DownloadForms/default.htm.
Sec. 803.13 Do I need to submit reports in English?
Yes. You must submit all reports required by this part in English.
Sec. 803.15 How will I know if you require more information about my
medical device report?
(a) We will notify you in writing if we require additional
information and will tell you what information we need. We will require
additional information if we determine that protection of the public
health requires additional or clarifying information for medical device
reports submitted to us and in cases when the additional information is
beyond the scope of FDA reporting forms or is not readily accessible to
us.
(b) In any request under this section, we will state the reason or
purpose for the information request, specify the due date for
submitting the information, and clearly identify the reported event(s)
related to our request. If we verbally request additional information,
we will confirm the request in writing.
Sec. 803.16 When I submit a report, does the information in my report
constitute an admission that the device caused or contributed to the
reportable event?
No. A report or other information submitted by you, and our release
of that report or information, is not necessarily an admission that the
device, or you or your employees, caused or contributed to the
reportable event. You do not have to admit and may deny that the report
or information submitted under this part constitutes an admission that
the device, you, or your employees, caused or contributed to a
reportable event.
Sec. 803.17 What are the requirements for developing, maintaining,
and implementing written MDR procedures that apply to me?
If you are a user facility, importer, or manufacturer, you must
develop, maintain, and implement written MDR procedures for the
following:
(a) Internal systems that provide for:
(1) Timely and effective identification, communication, and
evaluation of events that may be subject to MDR requirements;
(2) A standardized review process or procedure for determining when
an event meets the criteria for reporting under this part; and
(3) Timely transmission of complete medical device reports to
manufacturers or to us, or to both if required.
(b) Documentation and recordkeeping requirements for:
(1) Information that was evaluated to determine if an event was
reportable;
[[Page 8850]]
(2) All medical device reports and information submitted to
manufacturers and/or us;
(3) Any information that was evaluated for the purpose of preparing
the submission of annual reports; and
(4) Systems that ensure access to information that facilitates
timely followup and inspection by us.
Sec. 803.18 What are the requirements for establishing and
maintaining MDR files or records that apply to me?
(a) If you are a user facility, importer, or manufacturer, you must
establish and maintain MDR event files. You must clearly identify all
MDR event files and maintain them to facilitate timely access.
(b)(1) For purposes of this part, ``MDR event files'' are written
or electronic files maintained by user facilities, importers, and
manufacturers. MDR event files may incorporate references to other
information (e.g., medical records, patient files, engineering
reports), in lieu of copying and maintaining duplicates in this file.
Your MDR event files must contain:
(i) Information in your possession or references to information
related to the adverse event, including all documentation of your
deliberations and decision making processes used to determine if a
device-related death, serious injury, or malfunction was or was not
reportable under this part;
(ii) Copies of all reports submitted under this part (whether paper
or electronic), and of all other information related to the event that
you submitted to us or other entities such as an importer, distributor,
or manufacturer; and
(iii) Copies of all electronic acknowledgments FDA sends you in
response to electronic MDR submissions.
(2) If you are a user facility, importer, or manufacturer, you must
permit any authorized FDA employee, at all reasonable times, to access,
to copy, and to verify the records required by this part.
(c) If you are a user facility, you must retain an MDR event file
relating to an adverse event for a period of 2 years from the date of
the event. If you are a manufacturer or importer, you must retain an
MDR event file relating to an adverse event for a period of 2 years
from the date of the event or a period of time equivalent to the
expected life of the device, whichever is greater. If the device is no
longer distributed, you still must maintain MDR event files for the
time periods described in this paragraph (c).
(d)(1) If you are a device distributor, you must establish and
maintain device complaint records (files). Your records must contain
any incident information, including any written, electronic, or oral
communication, either received or generated by you, that alleges
deficiencies related to the identity (e.g., labeling), quality,
durability, reliability, safety, effectiveness, or performance of a
device. You must also maintain information about your evaluation of the
allegations, if any, in the incident record. You must clearly identify
the records as device incident records and file these records by device
name. You may maintain these records in written or electronic format.
You must back up any file maintained in electronic format.
(2) You must retain copies of the required device incident records
for a period of 2 years from the date of inclusion of the record in the
file or for a period of time equivalent to the expected life of the
device, whichever is greater. You must maintain copies of these records
for this period even if you no longer distribute the device.
(3) You must maintain the device complaint files established under
this section at your principal business establishment. If you are also
a manufacturer, you may maintain the file at the same location as you
maintain your complaint file under part 820 of this chapter. You must
permit any authorized FDA employee, at all reasonable times, to access,
to copy, and to verify the records required by this part.
(e) If you are a manufacturer, you may maintain MDR event files as
part of your complaint file, under part 820 of this chapter, if you
prominently identify these records as MDR reportable events. We will
not consider your submitted MDR report to comply with this part unless
you evaluate an event in accordance with the quality system
requirements described in part 820 of this chapter. You must document
and maintain in your MDR event files an explanation of why you did not
submit or could not obtain any information required by this part, as
well as the results of your evaluation of each event.
Sec. 803.19 Are there exemptions, variances, or alternative forms of
adverse event reporting requirements?
(a) We exempt the following persons from the adverse event
reporting requirements in this part:
(1) A licensed practitioner who prescribes or administers devices
intended for use in humans and manufactures or imports devices solely
for use in diagnosing and treating persons with whom the practitioner
has a ``physician-patient'' relationship;
(2) An individual who manufactures devices intended for use in
humans solely for this person's use in research or teaching and not for
sale. This includes any person who is subject to alternative reporting
requirements under the investigational device exemption regulations
(described in part 812 of this chapter), which require reporting of all
adverse device effects; and
(3) Dental laboratories or optical laboratories.
(b) If you are a manufacturer, importer, or user facility, you may
request an exemption or variance from any or all of the reporting
requirements in this part, including the requirements of Sec. 803.12.
You must submit the request to us in writing at the following address:
MDR Exemption Requests, Office of Surveillance and Biometrics, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 3217, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002.
Your request must include information necessary to identify you and the
device; a complete statement of the request for exemption, variance, or
alternative reporting; and an explanation why your request is
justified. If you are requesting an exemption from the requirement to
submit reports to FDA in electronic format under Sec. 803.12(a), your
request should indicate for how long you will require this exemption.
(c) If you are a manufacturer, importer, or user facility, we may
grant in writing an exemption or variance from, or alternative to, any
or all of the reporting requirements in this part, and may change the
frequency of reporting to quarterly, semiannually, annually or other
appropriate time period. We may grant these modifications in response
to your request, as described in paragraph (b) of this section, or at
our discretion. When we grant modifications to the reporting
requirements, we may impose other reporting requirements to ensure the
protection of public health.
(d) We may revoke or modify in writing an exemption, variance, or
alternative reporting requirement if we determine that revocation or
modification is necessary to protect the public health.
(e) If we grant your request for a reporting modification, you must
submit any reports or information required in our approval of the
modification. The conditions of the approval will replace and supersede
the regular reporting requirement specified in this part until such
time that we revoke or modify the alternative reporting requirements in
accordance with paragraph (d) of this
[[Page 8851]]
section or until the date specified in our response granting your
variance, at which time the provisions of this part will again apply.
Subpart B--Generally Applicable Requirements for Individual Adverse
Event Reports
Sec. 803.20 How do I complete and submit an individual adverse event
report?
(a) What form must I complete and submit?
(1) If you are a health professional or consumer or other entity,
you may submit voluntary reports to FDA regarding devices or other FDA-
regulated products using the Form FDA 3500.
(2) To submit a mandatory report in written form, a user facility
must use Form FDA 3500A.
(3) An electronic submission of a mandatory report from a user
facility, importer, or manufacturer must contain the information from
the applicable blocks of Form FDA 3500A. All electronic submissions
must include information about the patient, the event, the device, and
the ``initial reporter.'' An electronic submission from a user facility
or importer must include the information from block F. An electronic
submission from a manufacturer must include the information from blocks
G and H. If you are a manufacturer and you receive a report from a user
facility or importer, you must incorporate that information in your
electronic submission and include any corrected or missing information.
(b) To whom must I submit reports and when?
(1) If you are a user facility, you must submit MDR reports to:
(i) The manufacturer and to us no later than 10 work days after the
day that you become aware of information that reasonably suggests that
a device has or may have caused or contributed to a death or
(ii) The manufacturer no later than 10 work days after the day that
you become aware of information that reasonably suggests that a device
has or may have caused or contributed to a serious injury. If the
manufacturer is not known, you must submit this report to us.
(2) If you are an importer, you must submit MDR reports to:
(i) The manufacturer and to us, no later than 30 calendar days
after the day that you become aware of information that reasonably
suggests that a device has or may have caused or contributed to a death
or serious injury or
(ii) The manufacturer, no later than 30 calendar days after
receiving information that a device you market has malfunctioned and
that this device or a similar device that you market would be likely to
cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction
were to recur.
(3) If you are a manufacturer, you must submit MDR reports to us:
(i) No later than 30 calendar days after the day that you become
aware of information that reasonably suggests that a device may have
caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or
(ii) No later than 30 calendar days after the day that you become
aware of information that reasonably suggests a device has
malfunctioned and that this device or a similar device that you market
would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if
the malfunction were to recur; or
(iii) Within 5 work days if required by Sec. 803.53.
(c) What kind of information reasonably suggests that a reportable
event has occurred?
(1) Any information, including professional, scientific, or medical
facts, observations, or opinions, may reasonably suggest that a device
has caused or may have caused or contributed to an MDR reportable
event. An MDR reportable event is a death, a serious injury, or, if you
are a manufacturer or importer, a malfunction that would be likely to
cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction
were to recur.
(2) If you are a user facility, importer, or manufacturer, you do
not have to report an adverse event if you have information that would
lead a person who is qualified to make a medical judgment reasonably to
conclude that a device did not cause or contribute to a death or
serious injury, or that a malfunction would not be likely to cause or
contribute to a death or serious injury if it were to recur. Persons
qualified to make a medical judgment include physicians, nurses, risk
managers, and biomedical engineers. You must keep in your MDR event
files (described in Sec. 803.18) the information that the qualified
person used to determine whether or not a device-related event was
reportable.
Sec. 803.21 Where can I find the reporting codes for adverse events
that I use with medical device reports?
(a) The MedWatch Medical Device Reporting Code Instruction Manual
contains adverse event codes for use with Form FDA 3500A. You may
obtain the coding manual from FDA's Web site at: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/FormsandInstructions/default.htm;
and from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and
Consumer Assistance, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 4621, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,
FAX: 301-847-8149, or email to [email protected].
(b) We may sometimes use additional coding of information on the
reporting forms or modify the existing codes. If we do make
modifications, we will ensure that we make the new coding information
available to all reporters.
Sec. 803.22 What are the circumstances in which I am not required to
file a report?
(a) If you become aware of information from multiple sources
regarding the same patient and same reportable event, you may submit
one medical device report.
(b) You are not required to submit a medical device report if:
(1) You are a user facility, importer, or manufacturer, and you
determine that the information received is erroneous in that a device-
related adverse event did not occur. You must retain documentation of
these reports in your MDR files for the time periods specified in Sec.
803.18.
(2) You are a manufacturer or importer and you did not manufacture
or import the device about which you have adverse event information.
When you receive reportable event information in error, you must
forward this information to us with a cover letter explaining that you
did not manufacture or import the device in question.
Sec. 803.23 Where can I find information on how to prepare and submit
an MDR in electronic format?
(a) You may obtain information on how to prepare and submit reports
in an electronic format that FDA can process, review, and archive at:
http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/FDAeSubmitter/ucm107903.htm.
(b) We may sometimes update information on how to prepare and
submit reports electronically. If we do make modifications, we will
ensure that we alert reporters by updating the eMDR Web page.
Subpart C--User Facility Reporting Requirements
Sec. 803.30 If I am a user facility, what reporting requirements
apply to me?
(a) You must submit reports to the manufacturer or to us, or both,
as specified in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section as
follows:
(1) Reports of death. You must submit a report to us as soon as
practicable but
[[Page 8852]]
no more than 10 work days after the day that you become aware of
information, from any source, that reasonably suggests that a device
has or may have caused or contributed to the death of a patient of your
facility. You must also submit the report to the device manufacturer,
if known. You must submit the information required by Sec. 803.32.
Reports sent to the Agency must be submitted in accordance with the
requirements of Sec. 803.12(b).
(2) Reports of serious injury. You must submit a report to the
manufacturer of the device no later than 10 work days after the day
that you become aware of information, from any source, that reasonably
suggests that a device has or may have caused or contributed to a
serious injury to a patient of your facility. If the manufacturer is
not known, you must submit the report to us. You must report
information required by Sec. 803.32. Reports sent to the Agency must
be submitted in accordance with the requirements of Sec. 803.12 (b).
(b) What information does FDA consider ``reasonably known'' to me?
You must submit all information required in this subpart C that is
reasonably known to you. This information includes information found in
documents that you possess and any information that becomes available
as a result of reasonable followup within your facility. You are not
required to evaluate or investigate the event by obtaining or
evaluating information that you do not reasonably know.
Sec. 803.32 If I am a user facility, what information must I submit
in my individual adverse event reports?
You must include the following information in your report, if
reasonably known to you, as described in Sec. 803.30(b). These types
of information correspond generally to the elements of Form FDA 3500A:
(a) Patient information (Form FDA 3500A, Block A). You must submit
the following:
(1) Patient name or other identifier;
(2) Patient age at the time of event, or date of birth;
(3) Patient gender; and
(4) Patient weight.
(b) Adverse event or product problem (Form FDA 3500A, Block B). You
must submit the following:
(1) Identification of adverse event or product problem;
(2) Outcomes attributed to the adverse event (e.g., death or
serious injury). An outcome is considered a serious injury if it is:
(i) A life-threatening injury or illness;
(ii) A disability resulting in permanent impairment of a body
function or permanent damage to a body structure; or
(iii) An injury or illness that requires intervention to prevent
permanent impairment of a body structure or function;
(3) Date of event;
(4) Date of this report;
(5) Description of event or problem, including a discussion of how
the device was involved, nature of the problem, patient followup or
required treatment, and any environmental conditions that may have
influenced the event;
(6) Description of relevant tests, including dates and laboratory
data; and
(7) Description of other relevant history, including preexisting
medical conditions.
(c) Device information (Form FDA 3500A, Block D). You must submit
the following:
(1) Brand name;
(2) Product Code, if known, and Common Device Name;
(3) Manufacturer name, city, and state;
(4) Model number, catalog number, serial number, lot number, or
other identifying number, and expiration date;
(5) Operator of the device (health professional, lay user/patient,
other);
(6) Date of device implantation (month, day, year), if applicable;
(7) Date of device explantation (month, day, year), if applicable;
(8) Whether the device is a single-use device that was reprocessed
and reused on a patient (Yes, No)?
(9) If the device is a single-use device that was reprocessed and
reused on a patient (yes to paragraph (c)(8) of this section), the name
and address of the reprocessor;
(10) Whether the device was available for evaluation and whether
the device was returned to the manufacturer; if so, the date it was
returned to the manufacturer; and
(11) Concomitant medical products and therapy dates. (Do not report
products that were used to treat the event.)
(d) Initial reporter information (Form FDA 3500A, Block E). You
must submit the following:
(1) Name, address, and telephone number of the reporter who
initially provided information to you, or to the manufacturer or
distributor;
(2) Whether the initial reporter is a health professional;
(3) Occupation; and
(4) Whether the initial reporter also sent a copy of the report to
us, if known.
(e) User facility information (Form FDA 3500A, Block F). You must
submit the following:
(1) An indication that this is a user facility report (by marking
the user facility box on the form);
(2) Your user facility number;
(3) Your address;
(4) Your contact person;
(5) Your contact person's telephone number;
(6) Date that you became aware of the event (month, day, year);
(7) Type of report (initial or followup); if it is a followup, you
must include the report number of the initial report;
(8) Date of your report (month, day, year);
(9) Approximate age of device;
(10) Event problem codes--patient code and device code (refer to
the ``MedWatch Medical Device Reporting Code Instructions'');
(11) Whether a report was sent to us and the date it was sent
(month, day, year);
(12) Location where the event occurred;
(13) Whether the report was sent to the manufacturer and the date
it was sent (month, day, year); and
(14) Manufacturer name and address, if available.
Sec. 803.33 If I am a user facility, what must I include when I
submit an annual report?
(a) You must submit to us an annual report on Form FDA 3419. You
must submit an annual report by January 1, of each year. You may obtain
this form from the following sources:
(1) On the Internet at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/Forms/UCM080796.pdf or
(2) Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer
Assistance, Office of Communication and Education, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 4621,
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, by email: [email protected], FAX: 301-
847-8149, or telephone: 800-638-2041.
(b) You must clearly identify your annual report as such. You must
submit your annual report to FDA, CDRH, Medical Device Reporting, P.O.
Box 3002, Rockville, MD 20847-3002. Your annual report must include:
(1) Your CMS provider number used for medical device reports, or
the number assigned by us for reporting purposes in accordance with
Sec. 803.3;
(2) Reporting year;
(3) Your name and complete address;
(4) Total number of reports attached or summarized;
(5) Date of the annual report and report numbers identifying the
range of medical device reports that you
[[Page 8853]]
submitted during the report period (e.g., 1234567890-2011-0001 through
1000);
(6) Name, position title, and complete address of the individual
designated as your contact person responsible for reporting to us and
whether that person is a new contact for you; and
(7) Information for each reportable event that occurred during the
annual reporting period including:
(i) Report number;
(ii) Name and address of the device manufacturer;
(iii) Device brand name and common name;
(iv) Product model, catalog, serial and lot number;
(v) A brief description of the event reported to the manufacturer
and/or us; and
(vi) Where the report was submitted, i.e., to the manufacturer,
importer, or us.
(c) In lieu of submitting the information in paragraph (b)(7) of
this section, you may submit a copy of each medical device report that
you submitted to the manufacturers and/or to us during the reporting
period.
(d) If you did not submit any medical device reports to
manufacturers or us during the time period, you do not need to submit
an annual report.
Subpart D--Importer Reporting Requirements
Sec. 803.40 If I am an importer, what reporting requirements apply to
me?
(a) Reports of deaths or serious injuries. You must submit a report
to us, and a copy of this report to the manufacturer, as soon as
practicable, but no later than 30 calendar days after the day that you
receive or otherwise become aware of information from any source,
including user facilities, individuals, or medical or scientific
literature, whether published or unpublished, that reasonably suggests
that one of your marketed devices may have caused or contributed to a
death or serious injury. You must submit the information required by
Sec. 803.42. Reports sent to the Agency must be submitted in
accordance with the requirements of Sec. 803.12(a).
(b) Reports of malfunctions. You must submit a report to the
manufacturer as soon as practicable but no later than 30 calendar days
after the day that you receive or otherwise become aware of information
from any source, including user facilities, individuals, or through
your own research, testing, evaluation, servicing, or maintenance of
one of your devices, that reasonably suggests that one of your devices
has malfunctioned and that this device or a similar device that you
market would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious
injury if the malfunction were to recur. You must submit the
information required by Sec. 803.42. Reports to manufacturers may be
made in accordance with Sec. 803.11(b).
Sec. 803.42 If I am an importer, what information must I submit in my
individual adverse event reports?
You must include the following information in your report, if the
information is known or should be known to you, as described in Sec.
803.40. These types of information correspond generally to the format
of Form FDA 3500A:
(a) Patient information (Form FDA 3500A, Block A). You must submit
the following:
(1) Patient name or other identifier;
(2) Patient age at the time of event, or date of birth;
(3) Patient gender; and
(4) Patient weight.
(b) Adverse event or product problem (Form FDA 3500A, Block B). You
must submit the following:
(1) Identification of adverse event or product problem;
(2) Outcomes attributed to the adverse event (e.g., death or
serious injury). An outcome is considered a serious injury if it is:
(i) A life-threatening injury or illness;
(ii) A disability resulting in permanent impairment of a body
function or permanent damage to a body structure; or
(iii) An injury or illness that requires intervention to prevent
permanent impairment of a body structure or function;
(3) Date of event;
(4) Date of this report;
(5) Description of the event or problem, including a discussion of
how the device was involved, nature of the problem, patient followup or
required treatment, and any environmental conditions that may have
influenced the event;
(6) Description of relevant tests, including dates and laboratory
data; and
(7) Description of other relevant patient history, including
preexisting medical conditions.
(c) Device information (Form FDA 3500A, Block D). You must submit
the following:
(1) Brand name;
(2) Product Code, if known, and Common Device Name;
(3) Manufacturer name, city, and state;
(4) Model number, catalog number, serial number, lot number, or
other identifying number, and expiration date;
(5) Operator of the device (health professional, lay user/patient,
other);
(6) Date of device implantation (month, day, year), if applicable;
(7) Date of device explanation (month, day, year), if applicable;
(8) Whether the device is a single-use device that was reprocessed
and reused on a patient (Yes, No)?
(9) If the device is a single-use device that was reprocessed and
reused on a patient (yes to paragraph (c)(8) of this section), the name
and address of the reprocessor;
(10) Whether the device was available for evaluation, and whether
the device was returned to the manufacturer, and if so, the date it was
returned to the manufacturer; and
(11) Concomitant medical products and therapy dates. (Do not report
products that were used to treat the event.)
(d) Initial reporter information (Form FDA 3500A, Block E). You
must submit the following:
(1) Name, address, and telephone number of the reporter who
initially provided information to the manufacturer, user facility, or
distributor;
(2) Whether the initial reporter is a health professional;
(3) Occupation; and
(4) Whether the initial reporter also sent a copy of the report to
us, if known.
(e) Importer information (Form FDA 3500A, Block F). You must submit
the following:
(1) An indication that this is an importer report (by marking the
importer box on the form);
(2) Your importer report number;
(3) Your address;
(4) Your contact person;
(5) Your contact person's telephone number;
(6) Date that you became aware of the event (month, day, year);
(7) Type of report (initial or followup). If it is a followup
report, you must include the report number of your initial report;
(8) Date of your report (month, day, year);
(9) Approximate age of device;
(10) Event problem codes--patient code and device code (refer to
FDA MedWatch Medical Device Reporting Code Instructions);
(11) Whether a report was sent to us and the date it was sent
(month, day, year);
(12) Location where event occurred;
(13) Whether a report was sent to the manufacturer and the date it
was sent (month, day, year); and
(14) Manufacturer name and address, if available.
[[Page 8854]]
Subpart E--Manufacturer Reporting Requirements
Sec. 803.50 If I am a manufacturer, what reporting requirements apply
to me?
(a) If you are a manufacturer, you must report to us the
information required by Sec. 803.52 in accordance with the
requirements of Sec. 803.12(a), no later than 30 calendar days after
the day that you receive or otherwise become aware of information, from
any source, that reasonably suggests that a device that you market:
(1) May have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or
(2) Has malfunctioned and this device or a similar device that you
market would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious
injury, if the malfunction were to recur.
(b) What information does FDA consider ``reasonably known'' to me?
(1) You must submit all information required in this subpart E that
is reasonably known to you. We consider the following information to be
reasonably known to you:
(i) Any information that you can obtain by contacting a user
facility, importer, or other initial reporter;
(ii) Any information in your possession; or
(iii) Any information that you can obtain by analysis, testing, or
other evaluation of the device.
(2) You are responsible for obtaining and submitting to us
information that is incomplete or missing from reports submitted by
user facilities, importers, and other initial reporters.
(3) You are also responsible for conducting an investigation of
each event and evaluating the cause of the event. If you cannot submit
complete information on a report, you must provide a statement
explaining why this information was incomplete and the steps you took
to obtain the information. If you later obtain any required information
that was not available at the time you filed your initial report, you
must submit this information in a supplemental report under Sec.
803.56 in accordance with the requirements of Sec. 803.12(a).
Sec. 803.52 If I am a manufacturer, what information must I submit in
my individual adverse event reports?
You must include the following information in your reports, if
known or reasonably known to you, as described in Sec. 803.50(b).
These types of information correspond generally to the format of Form
FDA 3500A:
(a) Patient information (Form FDA 3500A, Block A). You must submit
the following:
(1) Patient name or other identifier;
(2) Patient age at the time of event, or date of birth;
(3) Patient gender; and
(4) Patient weight.
(b) Adverse event or product problem (Form FDA 3500A, Block B). You
must submit the following:
(1) Identification of adverse event or product problem;
(2) Outcomes attributed to the adverse event (e.g., death or
serious injury). An outcome is considered a serious injury if it is:
(i) A life-threatening injury or illness;
(ii) A disability resulting in permanent impairment of a body
function or permanent damage to a body structure; or
(iii) An injury or illness that requires intervention to prevent
permanent impairment of a body structure or function;
(3) Date of event;
(4) Date of this report;
(5) Description of the event or problem, including a discussion of
how the device was involved, nature of the problem, patient followup or
required treatment, and any environmental conditions that may have
influenced the event;
(6) Description of relevant tests, including dates and laboratory
data; and
(7) Other relevant patient history including preexisting medical
conditions.
(c) Device information (Form FDA 3500A, Block D). You must submit
the following:
(1) Brand name;
(2) Product Code, if known, and Common Device Name;
(3) Manufacturer name, city, and state;
(4) Model number, catalog number, serial number, lot number, or
other identifying number, and expiration date;
(5) Operator of the device (health professional, lay user/patient,
other);
(6) Date of device implantation (month, day, year), if applicable;
(7) Date of device explantation (month, day, year), if applicable;
(8) Whether the device is a single-use device that was reprocessed
and reused on a patient (Yes, No)?
(9) If the device is a single-use device that was reprocessed and
reused on a patient (yes to paragraph (c)(8) of this section), the name
and address of the reprocessor;
(10) Whether the device was available for evaluation, and whether
the device was returned to the manufacturer, and if so, the date it was
returned to the manufacturer; and
(11) Concomitant medical products and therapy dates. (Do not report
products that were used to treat the event.)
(d) Initial reporter information (Form FDA 3500A, Block E). You
must submit the following:
(1) Name, address, and telephone number of the reporter who
initially provided information to you, or to the user facility or
importer;
(2) Whether the initial reporter is a health professional;
(3) Occupation; and
(4) Whether the initial reporter also sent a copy of the report to
us, if known.
(e) Reporting information for all manufacturers (Form FDA 3500A,
Block G). You must submit the following:
(1) Your reporting office's contact name and address and device
manufacturing site;
(2) Your contact person's telephone number;
(3) Your report sources;
(4) Date received by you (month, day, year);
(5) PMA/510k Number and whether or not the product is a combination
product;
(6) Type of report being submitted (e.g., 5-day, initial,
followup); and
(7) Your report number.
(f) Device manufacturer information (Form FDA 3500A, Block H). You
must submit the following:
(1) Type of reportable event (death, serious injury, malfunction,
etc.);
(2) Type of followup report, if applicable (e.g., correction,
response to FDA request, etc);
(3) If the device was returned to you and evaluated by you, you
must include a summary of the evaluation. If you did not perform an
evaluation, you must explain why you did not perform an evaluation;
(4) Device manufacture date (month, day, year);
(5) Whether the device was labeled for single use;
(6) Evaluation codes (including event codes, method of evaluation,
result, and conclusion codes) (refer to FDA MedWatch Medical Device
Reporting Code Instructions);
(7) Whether remedial action was taken and the type of action;
(8) Whether the use of the device was initial, reuse, or unknown;
(9) Whether remedial action was reported as a removal or correction
under section 519(f) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and
if it was, provide the correction/removal report number; and
(10) Your additional narrative; and/or
(11) Corrected data, including:
(i) Any information missing on the user facility report or importer
report, including any event codes that were not
[[Page 8855]]
reported, or information corrected on these forms after your
verification;
(ii) For each event code provided by the user facility under Sec.
803.32(e)(10) or the importer under Sec. 803.42(e)(10), you must
include a statement of whether the type of the event represented by the
code is addressed in the device labeling; and
(iii) If your report omits any required information, you must
explain why this information was not provided and the steps taken to
obtain this information.
Sec. 803.53 If I am a manufacturer, in which circumstances must I
submit a 5-day report?
You must submit a 5-day report to us with the information required
by Sec. 803.52 in accordance with the requirements of Sec. 803.12(a)
no later than 5 work days after the day that you become aware that:
(a) An MDR reportable event necessitates remedial action to prevent
an unreasonable risk of substantial harm to the public health. You may
become aware of the need for remedial action from any information,
including any trend analysis or
(b) We have made a written request for the submission of a 5-day
report. If you receive such a written request from us, you must submit,
without further requests, a 5-day report for all subsequent events of
the same nature that involve substantially similar devices for the time
period specified in the written request. We may extend the time period
stated in the original written request if we determine it is in the
interest of the public health.
Sec. 803.56 If I am a manufacturer, in what circumstances must I
submit a supplemental or followup report and what are the requirements
for such reports?
If you are a manufacturer, when you obtain information required
under this part that you did not provide because it was not known or
was not available when you submitted the initial report, you must
submit the supplemental information to us within 30 calendar days of
the day that you receive this information. You must submit the
supplemental or followup report in accordance with the requirements of
Sec. 803.12(a). On a supplemental or followup report, you must:
(a) Indicate that the report being submitted is a supplemental or
followup report;
(b) Submit the appropriate identification numbers of the report
that you are updating with the supplemental information (e.g., your
original manufacturer report number and the user facility or importer
report number of any report on which your report was based), if
applicable; and
(c) Include only the new, changed, or corrected information.
Sec. 803.58 Foreign manufacturers.
(a) Every foreign manufacturer whose devices are distributed in the
United States shall designate a U.S. agent to be responsible for
reporting in accordance with Sec. 807.40 of this chapter. The U.S.
designated agent accepts responsibility for the duties that such
designation entails. Upon the effective date of this regulation,
foreign manufacturers shall inform FDA, by letter, of the name and
address of the U.S. agent designated under this section and Sec.
807.40 of this chapter, and shall update this information as necessary.
Such updated information shall be submitted to FDA, within 5 days of a
change in the designated agent information.
(b) U.S.-designated agents of foreign manufacturers are required
to:
(1) Report to FDA in accordance with Sec. Sec. 803.50, 803.52,
803.53, and 803.56;
(2) Conduct, or obtain from the foreign manufacturer the necessary
information regarding, the investigation and evaluation of the event to
comport with the requirements of Sec. 803.50;
(3) Forward MDR complaints to the foreign manufacturer and maintain
documentation of this requirement;
(4) Maintain complaint files in accordance with Sec. 803.18; and
(5) Register, list, and submit premarket notifications in
accordance with part 807 of this chapter.
Sec. 803.58 [Amended]
3. Section 803.58 is stayed indefinitely.
Dated: February 11, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-03279 Filed 2-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P