[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 14 (Wednesday, January 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 3622]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01080]



[[Page 3622]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-887]


Certain Crawler Cranes and Components Thereof; Commission 
Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting In-Part 
Complainants' Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 10) granting in-part the motion of Complainants' to 
amend the complaint and notice of investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2737. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on July 17, 2013, based on a complaint filed by Manitowoc Cranes, LLC 
(``Manitowoc'') of Manitowoc, Wisconsin. 78 FR 42800-01 (July 17, 
2013). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff 
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, by reason of infringement of 
U.S. Patent No. 7,546,928 (``the '928 patent'') and U.S. Patent No. 
7,967,158, and that an industry in the United States exists or is in 
the process of being established as required by subsection (a)(2) of 
section 337. The complaint further alleges violations of section 337 by 
reason of trade secret misappropriation, the threat or effect of which 
is to destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United States 
or to prevent the establishment of such an industry. The Commission's 
notice of investigation named Sany Heavy Industry Co., Ltd. of 
Changsha, China, and Sany America, Inc. of Peachtree City, Georgia as 
respondents.
    On November 15, 2013, Manitowoc filed a motion seeking to amend the 
complaint and notice of investigation to assert (1) additional patent 
claims (i.e., claims 6, 8, 10, 11 and 23-26 of the '928 patent), (2) 
additional trade secrets, and (3) an additional unfair act. The 
additional trade secrets include: (1) Manitowoc's pricing of its cranes 
within the domestic industry targeted by the Sany SCC8500 crane, 
including distributor discounts, profit margins, unit and dollar 
volumes, and manufacturing costs; (2) certain of Manitowoc's 
manufacturing processes and procedures, including its boom fabrication 
procedures, its methods for processing large weldments, and its 
material testing standards; (3) Manitowoc's engineering design standard 
for electrical schematics; (4) Manitowoc's pricing arrangements with 
certain parts vendors; and (5) Manitowoc's quality assurance metrics.
    On November 27, 2013, the Office of Unfair Import Investigations 
(``OUII'') replied and supported the motion in-part. Also on November 
27, 2013, Respondents filed a response in which they did not oppose the 
addition of the patent claims, but opposed the remaining amendments to 
the complaint and notice of investigation.
    On December 13, 2013, the ALJ granted Complainants' motion in-part. 
The ALJ granted Complainants' motion with respect to the addition of 
the patent claims and the alleged trade secrets relating to (1) the 
pricing of Manitowoc's cranes; (2) certain manufacturing process and 
procedures, that include boom fabrication procedures, methods for 
processing large weldments, and material testing standards; (3) 
engineering design standards for electrical schematics; and (4) quality 
assurance metrics. The ALJ found that the parties would not be 
prejudiced by the addition of these claims. The ALJ denied 
Complainants' motion to assert the alleged trade secret relating to 
Manitowoc's pricing arrangements with certain parts vendors because 
Manitowoc was aware of the alleged misappropriation before it filed the 
original complaint. No petitions for review were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

     Issued: January 15, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-01080 Filed 1-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P