[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 861-862]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-31609]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Rule 17a-10 OMB Control No. 3235-0563, SEC File No. 270-507.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(the ``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collections of 
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit these 
existing collections of information to the Office of Management and 
Budget (``OMB'') for extension and approval.
    Section 17(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act''), 
generally prohibits affiliated persons of a registered investment 
company (``fund'') from borrowing money or other property from, or 
selling or buying securities or other property to or from, the fund or 
any company that the fund controls.\1\ Section 2(a)(3) of the Act 
defines ``affiliated person'' of a fund to include its investment 
advisers.\2\ Rule 17a-10 (17 CFR 270.17a-10) permits (i) a subadviser 
\3\ of a fund to enter into transactions with funds the subadviser does 
not advise but that are affiliated persons of a fund that it does 
advise (e.g., other funds in the fund complex), and (ii) a subadviser 
(and its affiliated persons) to enter into transactions and 
arrangements with funds the subadviser does advise, but only with 
respect to discrete portions of the subadvised fund for which the 
subadviser does not provide investment advice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 80a-17(a).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 80a-2(a)(3)(E).
    \3\ As defined in rule 17a-10(b)(2). 17 CFR 270.17a-10(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To qualify for the exemptions in rule 17a-10, the subadvisory 
relationship must be the sole reason why section 17(a) prohibits the 
transaction. In addition, the advisory contracts of the subadviser 
entering into the transaction, and any subadviser that is advising the 
purchasing portion of the fund, must prohibit the subadvisers from 
consulting with each other concerning securities transactions of the 
fund, and limit their responsibility to providing advice with respect 
to discrete portions of the fund's portfolio.\4\ Section 17(a) of the 
Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act''), generally prohibits 
affiliated persons of a registered investment company (``fund'') from 
borrowing money or other property from, or selling or buying securities 
or other property to or from, the fund or any company that the fund 
controls. Section 2(a)(3) of the Act defines ``affiliated person'' of a 
fund to include its investment advisers. Rule 17a-10 permits (i) a 
subadviser of a fund to enter into transactions with funds the 
subadviser does not advise but that are affiliated persons of a fund 
that it does advise (e.g., other funds in the fund complex), and (ii) a 
subadviser (and its affiliated persons) to enter into transactions and 
arrangements with funds the subadviser does advise, but only with 
respect to discrete portions of the subadvised fund for which the 
subadviser does not provide investment advice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 17 CFR 270.17a-10(a)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To qualify for the exemptions in rule 17a-10, the subadvisory 
relationship must be the sole reason why section 17(a) prohibits the 
transaction. In addition, the advisory contracts of the subadviser 
entering into the transaction, and any subadviser that is advising the 
purchasing portion of the fund, must prohibit the subadvisers from 
consulting with each other concerning securities transactions of the 
fund, and limit their responsibility to providing advice with respect 
to discrete portions of the fund's portfolio. This requirement 
regarding the prohibitions and limitations in advisory contracts of 
subadvisers relying on the rule constitutes a collection of information 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (``PRA'').\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 44 U.S.C. 3501.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The staff assumes that all existing funds with subadvisory 
contracts amended those contracts to comply with the adoption of rule 
17a-10 in 2003, which conditioned certain exemptions upon these 
contractual alterations, and therefore there is no continuing burden 
for those funds.\6\ However, the staff assumes that all newly formed 
subadvised funds, and funds that enter into new contracts with 
subadvisers, will incur the one-time burden by amending their contracts 
to add the terms required by the rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Transactions of Investment Companies With Portfolio and 
Subadviser Affiliates, Investment Company Act Release No. 25888 
(Jan. 14, 2003) [68 FR 3153, (Jan. 22, 2003)]. We assume that funds 
formed after 2003 that intended to rely on rule 17a-10 would have 
included the required provision as a standard element in their 
initial subadvisory contracts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on an analysis of fund filings, the staff estimates that 
approximately 775 fund portfolios enter into new subadvisory agreements 
each year. Based on discussions with industry representatives, the 
staff estimates that it will require approximately 3 attorney hours to 
draft and execute additional clauses in new subadvisory contracts in 
order for funds and subadvisers to be able to rely on the exemptions in 
rule 17a-10. Because these additional clauses are identical to the 
clauses that a fund would need to insert in their subadvisory contracts 
to rely on rules 10f-3, 12d3-1, and 17e-1, and because we believe that 
funds that use one such rule generally use all of these rules, we 
apportion this 3 hour time burden equally among all four rules. 
Therefore, we estimate that the burden allocated to rule 17a-10 for 
this contract change would be 0.75 hours.\7\ Assuming that all 775 
funds that enter into new subadvisory contracts each year make the 
modification to their contract required by the rule, we estimate that 
the rule's contract modification requirement will result in 581 burden

[[Page 862]]

hours annually, with an associated cost of approximately $220,199.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ This estimate is based on the following calculation: 3 hours 
/ 4 rules = 0.75 hours.
    \8\ These estimates are based on the following calculations: 
(0.75 hours x 775 portfolios = 581 burden hours); ($379 per hour x 
581 hours = $220,199 total cost). The Commission's estimates 
concerning the wage rates for attorney time are based on salary 
information for the securities industry compiled by the Securities 
Industry and Financial Markets Association. The estimated wage 
figure is based on published rates for in-house attorneys, modified 
to account for an 1,800-hour work-year and multiplied by 5.35 to 
account for bonuses, firm size, employee benefits, and overhead, 
yielding an effective hourly rate of $379. See Securities Industry 
and Financial Markets Association, Report on Management & 
Professional Earnings in the Securities Industry 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The estimate of average burden hours is made solely for the 
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act. The estimate is not derived 
from a comprehensive or even a representative survey or study of the 
costs of Commission rules. Complying with this collection of 
information requirement is necessary to obtain the benefit of relying 
on rule 17a-10. Responses will not be kept confidential. An agency may 
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a 
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control 
number.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the 
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) 
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will 
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 
days of this publication.
    Please direct your written comments to Thomas Bayer, Chief 
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Remi 
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549; or send an email 
to: [email protected].

    Dated: December 31, 2013.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-31609 Filed 1-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P [FEDREG][VOL]*[/VOL][NO]*[/NO][DATE]*[/
DATE][NOTICES]