[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 855-859]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-31544]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2013-0287]
Biweekly Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility
Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant
Hazards Considerations
Background
Pursuant to Section 189a. (2) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended (the Act), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is
publishing this regular biweekly notice. The Act requires the
Commission to publish notice of any amendments issued, or proposed to
be issued and grants the Commission the authority to issue and make
immediately effective any amendment to an operating license or combined
license, as applicable, upon a determination by the Commission that
such amendment involves no significant hazards consideration,
notwithstanding the pendency before the Commission of a request for a
hearing from any person.
This biweekly notice includes all notices of amendments issued, or
proposed to be issued from December 12 to December 24, 2013. The last
biweekly notice was published on December 24, 2013 (78 FR 77729).
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods
(unless this document describes a different method for submitting
comments on a specific subject):
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2013-0287. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-287-
3422; email: [email protected].
Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Chief, Rules,
Announcements, and Directives Branch (RADB), Office of Administration,
Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-44, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555-0001.
For additional direction on accessing information and submitting
comments, see ``Accessing Information and Submitting Comments'' in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Accessing Information and Submitting Comments
A. Accessing Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2013-0287 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information regarding this document. You may
access publicly-available information related to this action by the
following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2013-0287.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may access publicly-available documents online in the NRC
Library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the
search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-
based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's
Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-
4737, or by email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number
for each document referenced in this notice (if that document is
available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is
referenced.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC-2013-0287 in the subject line of your
comment submission, in order to ensure that the NRC is able to make
your comment submission available to the public in this docket.
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact
information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your
comment submission. The NRC posts all comment submissions at http://www.regulations.gov as well as entering the comment submissions into
ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be
publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should
state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to
remove such information before making the comment submissions available
to the public or entering the comment submissions into ADAMS.
[[Page 856]]
Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendments to Facility Operating
Licenses and Combined Licenses, Proposed No Significant Hazards
Consideration Determination, and Opportunity for a Hearing
The Commission has made a proposed determination that the following
amendment requests involve no significant hazards consideration. Under
the Commission's regulations in Sec. 50.92 of Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR), this means that operation of the facility
in accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) involve a
significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident
previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new or
different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or
(3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. The basis
for this proposed determination for each amendment request is shown
below.
The Commission is seeking public comments on this proposed
determination. Any comments received within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice will be considered in making any final
determination.
Normally, the Commission will not issue the amendment until the
expiration of 60 days after the date of publication of this notice. The
Commission may issue the license amendment before expiration of the 60-
day period provided that its final determination is that the amendment
involves no significant hazards consideration. In addition, the
Commission may issue the amendment prior to the expiration of the 30-
day comment period should circumstances change during the 30-day
comment period such that failure to act in a timely way would result,
for example in derating or shutdown of the facility. Should the
Commission take action prior to the expiration of either the comment
period or the notice period, it will publish in the Federal Register a
notice of issuance. Should the Commission make a final No Significant
Hazards Consideration Determination, any hearing will take place after
issuance. The Commission expects that the need to take this action will
occur very infrequently.
Within 60 days after the date of publication of this notice, any
person(s) whose interest may be affected by this action may file a
request for a hearing and a petition to intervene with respect to
issuance of the amendment to the subject facility operating license or
combined license. Requests for a hearing and a petition for leave to
intervene shall be filed in accordance with the Commission's ``Agency
Rules of Practice and Procedure'' in 10 CFR Part 2. Interested
person(s) should consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.309, which is
available at the NRC's PDR, located at One White Flint North, Room O1-
F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland 20852. The
NRC regulations are accessible electronically from the NRC Library on
the NRC's Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/. If a request for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene is
filed by the above date, the Commission or a presiding officer
designated by the Commission or by the Chief Administrative Judge of
the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, will rule on the request
and/or petition; and the Secretary or the Chief Administrative Judge of
the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will issue a notice of a hearing
or an appropriate order.
As required by 10 CFR 2.309, a petition for leave to intervene
shall set forth with particularity the interest of the petitioner in
the proceeding, and how that interest may be affected by the results of
the proceeding. The petition should specifically explain the reasons
why intervention should be permitted with particular reference to the
following general requirements: (1) The name, address, and telephone
number of the requestor or petitioner; (2) the nature of the
requestor's/petitioner's right under the Act to be made a party to the
proceeding; (3) the nature and extent of the requestor's/petitioner's
property, financial, or other interest in the proceeding; and (4) the
possible effect of any decision or order which may be entered in the
proceeding on the requestor's/petitioner's interest. The petition must
also identify the specific contentions which the requestor/petitioner
seeks to have litigated at the proceeding.
Each contention must consist of a specific statement of the issue
of law or fact to be raised or controverted. In addition, the
requestor/petitioner shall provide a brief explanation of the bases for
the contention and a concise statement of the alleged facts or expert
opinion which support the contention and on which the requestor/
petitioner intends to rely in proving the contention at the hearing.
The requestor/petitioner must also provide references to those specific
sources and documents of which the petitioner is aware and on which the
requestor/petitioner intends to rely to establish those facts or expert
opinion. The petition must include sufficient information to show that
a genuine dispute exists with the applicant on a material issue of law
or fact. Contentions shall be limited to matters within the scope of
the amendment under consideration. The contention must be one which, if
proven, would entitle the requestor/petitioner to relief. A requestor/
petitioner who fails to satisfy these requirements with respect to at
least one contention will not be permitted to participate as a party.
Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding,
subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene,
and have the opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the
hearing.
If a hearing is requested, the Commission will make a final
determination on the issue of no significant hazards consideration. The
final determination will serve to decide when the hearing is held. If
the final determination is that the amendment request involves no
significant hazards consideration, the Commission may issue the
amendment and make it immediately effective, notwithstanding the
request for a hearing. Any hearing held would take place after issuance
of the amendment. If the final determination is that the amendment
request involves a significant hazards consideration, then any hearing
held would take place before the issuance of any amendment.
All documents filed in NRC adjudicatory proceedings, including a
request for hearing, a petition for leave to intervene, any motion or
other document filed in the proceeding prior to the submission of a
request for hearing or petition to intervene, and documents filed by
interested governmental entities participating under 10 CFR 2.315(c),
must be filed in accordance with the NRC's E-Filing rule (72 FR 49139;
August 28, 2007). The E-Filing process requires participants to submit
and serve all adjudicatory documents over the internet, or in some
cases to mail copies on electronic storage media. Participants may not
submit paper copies of their filings unless they seek an exemption in
accordance with the procedures described below.
To comply with the procedural requirements of E-Filing, at least 10
days prior to the filing deadline, the participant should contact the
Office of the Secretary by email at [email protected], or by
telephone at 301-415-1677, to request (1) a digital identification (ID)
certificate, which allows the participant (or its counsel or
representative) to digitally sign
[[Page 857]]
documents and access the E-Submittal server for any proceeding in which
it is participating; and (2) advise the Secretary that the participant
will be submitting a request or petition for hearing (even in instances
in which the participant, or its counsel or representative, already
holds an NRC-issued digital ID certificate). Based upon this
information, the Secretary will establish an electronic docket for the
hearing in this proceeding if the Secretary has not already established
an electronic docket.
Information about applying for a digital ID certificate is
available on the NRC's public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/apply-certificates.html. System requirements for accessing
the E-Submittal server are detailed in the NRC's ``Guidance for
Electronic Submission,'' which is available on the agency's public Web
site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. Participants
may attempt to use other software not listed on the Web site, but
should note that the NRC's E-Filing system does not support unlisted
software, and the NRC Meta System Help Desk will not be able to offer
assistance in using unlisted software.
If a participant is electronically submitting a document to the NRC
in accordance with the E-Filing rule, the participant must file the
document using the NRC's online, Web-based submission form. In order to
serve documents through the Electronic Information Exchange System,
users will be required to install a Web browser plug-in from the NRC's
Web site. Further information on the Web-based submission form,
including the installation of the Web browser plug-in, is available on
the NRC's public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html.
Once a participant has obtained a digital ID certificate and a
docket has been created, the participant can then submit a request for
hearing or petition for leave to intervene. Submissions should be in
Portable Document Format (PDF) in accordance with the NRC guidance
available on the NRC's public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. A filing is considered complete at the time the
documents are submitted through the NRC's E-Filing system. To be
timely, an electronic filing must be submitted to the E-Filing system
no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Upon receipt of
a transmission, the E-Filing system time-stamps the document and sends
the submitter an email notice confirming receipt of the document. The
E-Filing system also distributes an email notice that provides access
to the document to the NRC's Office of the General Counsel and any
others who have advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to
participate in the proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the
documents on those participants separately. Therefore, applicants and
other participants (or their counsel or representative) must apply for
and receive a digital ID certificate before a hearing request/petition
to intervene is filed so that they can obtain access to the document
via the E-Filing system.
A person filing electronically using the agency's adjudicatory E-
Filing system may seek assistance by contacting the NRC Meta System
Help Desk through the ``Contact Us'' link located on the NRC Web site
at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html, by email to
[email protected], or by a toll-free call at 1-866-672-7640. The
NRC Meta System Help Desk is available between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m.,
Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, excluding government holidays.
Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not
submitting documents electronically must file an exemption request, in
accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper filing
requesting authorization to continue to submit documents in paper
format. Such filings must be submitted by: (1) First class mail
addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or
expedited delivery service to the Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth
Floor, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland
20852, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Participants
filing a document in this manner are responsible for serving the
document on all other participants. Filing is considered complete by
first-class mail as of the time of deposit in the mail, or by courier,
express mail, or expedited delivery service upon depositing the
document with the provider of the service. A presiding officer, having
granted an exemption request from using E-Filing, may require a
participant or party to use E-Filing if the presiding officer
subsequently determines that the reason for granting the exemption from
use of E-Filing no longer exists.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in the
NRC's electronic hearing docket which is available to the public at
http://ehd1.nrc.gov/ehd/, unless excluded pursuant to an order of the
Commission, or the presiding officer. Participants are requested not to
include personal privacy information, such as social security numbers,
home addresses, or home phone numbers in their filings, unless an NRC
regulation or other law requires submission of such information.
However, a request to intervene will require including information on
local residence in order to demonstrate a proximity assertion of
interest in the proceeding. With respect to copyrighted works, except
for limited excerpts that serve the purpose of the adjudicatory filings
and would constitute a Fair Use application, participants are requested
not to include copyrighted materials in their submission.
Petitions for leave to intervene must be filed no later than 60
days from the date of publication of this notice. Requests for hearing,
petitions for leave to intervene, and motions for leave to file new or
amended contentions that are filed after the 60-day deadline will not
be entertained absent a determination by the presiding officer that the
filing demonstrates good cause by satisfying the three factors in 10
CFR 2.309(c)(1)(i)-(iii).
For further details with respect to this license amendment
application, see the application for amendment which is available for
public inspection at the NRC's PDR, located at One White Flint North,
Room O1-F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland
20852. Publicly available documents created or received at the NRC are
accessible electronically through ADAMS in the NRC Library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who do not have access to
ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in
ADAMS, should contact the NRC's PDR Reference staff at 1-800-397-4209,
301-415-4737, or by email to [email protected].
Duke Energy Florida, Inc. (DEF), Docket No. 50-302, Crystal River Unit
3 Nuclear Generating Plant (CR-3), Citrus County, Florida
Date of amendment request: September 26, 2013.
Description of amendment request: Revise the Radiological Emergency
Response Plan (RERP) and Emergency Action Level scheme, as necessary,
for the permanently defueled condition of the plant. The proposed CR-3
Permanently Defueled Emergency Plan (PDEP) discontinues offsite
emergency planning activities and reduces the scope of onsite emergency
planning
[[Page 858]]
based upon the substantially lower onsite and offsite radiological
consequences from accidents possible at CR-3.
Basis for proposed no significant hazards consideration
determination: As required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the licensee has
provided its analysis of the issue of no significant hazards
consideration, which is presented below:
(1) Does the proposed amendment involve a significant increase
in the probability or consequences of an accident previously
evaluated?
Crystal River Unit 3 (CR-3) has permanently ceased operation.
The proposed amendment would revise the Radiological Emergency
Response Plan (RERP) to correspond to the reduced scope of remaining
accidents and events. The proposed amendment has no effect on
structures, systems, and components (SSCs) and no effect on the
capability of any plant SSC to perform its design function. The
proposed amendment would not increase the likelihood of the
malfunction of any plant SSC.
With the reactor in a permanently defueled condition, the spent
fuel pool and its support systems are dedicated only to spent fuel
storage. It is expected that CR-3 will remain in a wet fuel storage
configuration for some time. In this condition, the spectrum of
postulated accidents is much smaller than for an operational plant.
As a result of the certifications submitted by DEF in accordance
with 10 CFR 50.82(a)(1), and the consequent removal of authorization
to operate the reactor or to place or retain fuel in the reactor in
accordance with 10 CFR 50.82(a)(2), most of the accident scenarios
postulated in the CR-3 Final Safety Analysis Report, acknowledged by
the RERP, are no longer possible.
The probability of occurrence of previously evaluated accidents
is not increased, since most previously analyzed accidents can no
longer occur and the probability of the few remaining are unaffected
by the proposed amendment.
Therefore, the proposed amendment does not involve a significant
increase in the probability or consequences of an accident
previously evaluated.
(2) Does the proposed amendment create the possibility of a new
or different kind of accident from any accident previously
evaluated?
The proposed amendment does not involve any change in the
plant's design, configuration, or operation. The proposed changes
have no impact on facility SSCs affecting the safe storage of
irradiated fuel, or on the methods of operation of such SSCs, or on
the handling and storage of irradiated fuel itself. Additionally,
the proposed changes have no impact on the Radioactive Waste
Handling Accident. The CR-3 PDEP is for the plant's defueled
condition. There is no impact on the prevention, diagnosis, or
mitigation of reactor-related transients. Accidents cannot result in
different or more adverse failure modes or accidents than previously
evaluated because the reactor is permanently shut down and defueled
and CR-3 is no longer authorized to operate the reactor.
The proposed deletion of certain requirements of the RERP does
not affect systems credited in the accident analysis for the Fuel
Handling Accident (FHA) in the Auxiliary Building at CR-3. The
analyses completed for the proposed PDEP presents a bounding
radioactive waste handling accident for the permanently defueled
condition of the plant. This accident is not new, but it was not
previously analyzed in detail because the Waste Gas Decay Tank
Rupture Accident assumed a bounding source term. This accident is a
rupture of a high integrity container, containing spent primary
resin beads, during movement and is the most limiting of the
remaining radioactive waste handling accidents. The proposed PDEP
continues to require proper control and monitoring of safety
significant parameters and activities.
The proposed amendment does not result in any new mechanisms
that could initiate damage to the remaining relevant safety barriers
for defueled plants (i.e., fuel cladding and spent fuel pool
inventory). Since extended operation in a defueled condition is the
only operation currently allowed, and therefore bounded by the
existing analyses, such a condition does not create the possibility
of a new or different kind of accident.
The proposed amendment does not introduce a new mode of plant
operation or new accident precursors, does not involve any physical
alterations to plant configuration, or make changes to system
setpoints that could initiate a new or different kind of accident.
Therefore, the proposed amendment does not create the
possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident
previously evaluated.
(3) Does the proposed amendment involve a significant reduction
in a margin of safety?
The proposed amendment does not involve a change in the plant's
design, configuration, or operation. The proposed amendment does not
affect either the way in which the plant SSCs perform their safety
function or its design and licensing bases.
Plant safety margins are established through Limiting Conditions
for Operation, Limiting Safety System Settings and Safety Limits
specified in the CR-3 Technical Specifications. Because there is no
change to the physical design of the plant, there is no change to
any of these margins.
Because the 10 CFR Part 50 license for CR-3 no longer authorizes
operation of the reactor or emplacement or retention of fuel into
the reactor vessel, as specified in 10 CFR 50.82(a)(2), the
occurrence of postulated accidents associated with reactor operation
is no longer credible. The only remaining accidents are a FHA and a
radioactive waste handling accident. The proposed amendment does not
adversely affect the inputs or assumptions of any of the design
basis analyses that impact a FHA and a radioactive waste handling
accident.
The proposed changes that are limited to the CR-3 PDEP do not
impact the safe storage of irradiated fuel. The revised PDEP does
not affect any requirements for SSCs credited in the remaining
analyses of applicable postulated accidents; and as such, does not
affect the margin of safety associated with these accident analyses.
Postulated design basis accidents involving the reactor are no
longer possible because the reactor is permanently shut down and
defueled and CR-3 is no longer authorized to operate the reactor.
Therefore, the proposed amendment does not involve a significant
reduction in a margin of safety.
The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis and, based on
this review, it appears that the three standards of 50.92(c) are
satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the
amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration.
Attorney for licensee: Lara S. Nichols, 550 South Tryon Street,
Charlotte, NC 28202.
NRC Branch Chief: Douglas A. Broaddus.
Notice of Issuance of Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and
Combined Licenses
During the period since publication of the last biweekly notice,
the Commission has issued the following amendments. The Commission has
determined for each of these amendments that the application complies
with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954,
as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations. The
Commission has made appropriate findings as required by the Act and the
Commission's rules and regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I, which are set
forth in the license amendment.
A notice of consideration of issuance of amendment to facility
operating license or combined license, as applicable, proposed no
significant hazards consideration determination, and opportunity for a
hearing in connection with these actions, was published in the Federal
Register as indicated.
Unless otherwise indicated, the Commission has determined that
these amendments satisfy the criteria for categorical exclusion in
accordance with 10 CFR 51.22. Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b),
no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be
prepared for these amendments. If the Commission has prepared an
environmental assessment under the special circumstances provision in
10 CFR 51.22(b) and has made a determination based on that assessment,
it is so indicated.
For further details with respect to the action see (1) the
applications for
[[Page 859]]
amendment, (2) the amendment, and (3) the Commission's related letter,
Safety Evaluation and/or Environmental Assessment as indicated. All of
these items are available for public inspection at the Commission's
Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, Room O1-
F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland 20852.
Publicly available documents created or received at the NRC are
accessible electronically through the Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS) in the NRC Library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there
are problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the
PDR's Reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737 or by email to
[email protected].
Duke Energy Progress, Inc., Docket No. 50-400, Shearon Harris Nuclear
Power Plant, Unit 1, Wake and Chatham Counties, North Carolina
Date of application for amendment: November 29, 2012, as
supplemented by letters dated January 3 and June 4, 2013.
Brief description of amendment: This amendment revises Technical
Specification (TS) Table 3.3-4 associated with 6.9 kV Emergency Bus
Secondary Undervoltage time delay values to resolve a nonconservative
TS.
Date of issuance: December 17, 2013.
Effective date: Date of Issuance, to be implemented within 90 days.
Amendment No.: 143.
Facility Operating License No. NPF-63: Amendment revises the TSs.
Date of initial notice in Federal Register: November 12, 2013 (78
FR 67405). The supplements dated January 3 and June 4, 2013, provided
additional information that clarified the application, did not expand
the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not change
the staff's original proposed no significant hazards consideration
determination as published in the Federal Register.
The Commission's related evaluation of the amendment is contained
in a Safety Evaluation dated December 17, 2013.
No significant hazards consideration comments received: No.
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Docket No. 50-247, Indian Point
Nuclear Generating Unit 2, Westchester County, New York
Date of application for amendment: April 15, 2013, as supplemented
by letter dated September 4, 2013.
Brief description of amendment: The amendment revises Technical
Specification 3.5.4, ``Refueling Water Storage Tank (RWST),'' to allow
for the temporary connection between the non-seismically qualified
piping of the Boric Acid Recovery System to the seismically qualified
piping of the RWST for the purpose of purifying the contents of the
RWST in advance of the spring 2014, refueling outage. Operation in this
mode will be under administrative controls and will only be applicable
for limited periods through the end of the spring 2016, refueling
outage.
Date of issuance: December 20, 2013.
Effective date: As of the date of issuance, and shall be
implemented within 30 days.
Amendment No.: 273.
Facility Operating License No. DPR-26: The amendment revised the
Facility Operating License and the Technical Specifications.
Date of initial notice in Federal Register: June 25, 2013 (78 FR
38082).
The September 4, 2013, supplement provided additional information
that clarified the application, did not expand the scope of the
application as originally noticed, and did not change the NRC staff's
original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination as
published in the Federal Register.
The Commission's related evaluation of the amendment is contained
in a Safety Evaluation dated December 20, 2013.
No significant hazards consideration comments received: No.
Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Docket No. 50-289, Three Mile Island
Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (TMI-1), Dauphin County, Pennsylvania
Date of application for amendment: December 14, 2012, as
supplemented by letters dated January 31, 2013, and August 13, 2013.
Brief description of amendment: The amendment modifies the
pressure-temperature limit curves and low-temperature overpressure
protection limits in the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1
Technical Specification (TS) Section 3.1.2, ``Pressurization Heatup and
Cooldown Limitations,'' TS Section 3.1.12, ``Pressurizer Power Operated
Relief Valve, Block Valve, and Low-Temperature Overpressure
Protection,'' and TS Section 4.5.2, ``Emergency Core Cooling System.''
The changes reflect revised fluence projections out to 50.2 effective
full-power years (EFPY), as compared to the current projections which
go to 29 EFPY.
Date of issuance: December 13, 2013.
Effective date: Immediately, and shall be implemented within 60
days.
Amendment No.: 281.
Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-50: Amendment revised
the Facility Operating License and the Technical Specifications.
Date of initial notice in Federal Register: March 19, 2013 (78 FR
16881). The supplemental letters dated January 31, 2013, and August 13,
2013, provided additional information that clarified the application,
did not expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and
did not change the staff's original proposed no significant hazards
consideration determination as published in the Federal Register.
The Commission's related evaluation of the amendment is contained
in a Safety Evaluation dated December 13, 2013.
No significant hazards consideration comments received: No.
ZionSolutions, LLC, Docket Nos. 50-295 and 50-304, Zion Nuclear Power
Station, Units 1 and 2, Lake County, Illinois
Date of application for amendment: June 18, 2012, supplemented by
letter dated June 5, 2013.
Brief description of amendment: The amendments approve the
Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Physical Security Plan.
Date of issuance: December 13, 2013.
Effective date: As of the date of issuance.
Amendment Nos.: 187 and 174.
Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-39 and DPR-48: These amendments
are effective on the date of issuance and shall be implemented prior to
the start of spent fuel transfer operations to the Zion Independent
Spent Fuel Storage Installation
Date of initial notice in Federal Register: August 6, 2013 (78 FR
47793).
The Commission's related evaluation of the amendment is contained
in a Safety Evaluation dated December 13, 2013.
No significant hazards consideration comments received: No.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day of December, 2013.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Michele G. Evans,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2013-31544 Filed 1-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P [FEDREG][VOL]*[/VOL][NO]*[/NO][DATE]*[/
DATE][NOTICES]