[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 188 (Friday, September 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59651-59652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23636]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-580-816]


Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products From the 
Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decisions Not in Harmony With Final 
Results of Administrative Review and Notice of Amended Final Results of 
Administrative Review; 2006-2007

SUMMARY: On August 8, 2013, the United States Court of International 
Trade (``CIT'' or ``Court'') enter final judgments sustaining the 
Department of Commerce's (``Department'') final results of the remand 
redeterminations \1\ relating to the fourteenth administrative review 
of the antidumping duty order on certain corrosion-resistant carbon 
steel flat products (``CORE'') from the Republic of Korea (``Korea''), 
pursuant to the CIT's remand orders in Union Steel v. United States, 
755 F. Supp. 2d 1304 (CIT 2011) (``Union I''), and United States Steel 
Corp. v. United States, 759 F. Supp. 2d 1349 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2011) 
(``U.S. Steel I''). Consistent with the decision of the United States 
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (``CAFC'') in Timken Co. v. 
United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (``Timken''), as clarified 
by Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 
(Fed. Cir. 2010) (``Diamond Sawblades''), the Department is notifying 
the public that the final CIT judgments in this case are not in harmony 
with the Department's final results of administrative review and is 
amending its final results of the administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on CORE from Korea covering the period of review 
(``POR'') of August 1, 2006 through July 31, 2007, with respect to the 
weighted-average dumping margin assigned to Union Steel Manufacturing 
Co., Ltd. (``Union'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Final Remand Results of Redetermination Pursuant to 
Remand, CIT Court No. 09-00130 (July 15, 2011) (``Union Remand 
Results''); Final Remand Results of Redetermination Pursuant to 
Remand, CIT Court No. 09-00156 (July 15, 2011) (``U.S. Steel Remand 
Results'').

DATES: Effective August 19, 2013.

[[Page 59652]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Hargett, Office 8, AD/CVD 
Operations, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4161.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The Department published the final results of the fourteenth 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on CORE from Korea 
on March 16, 2009.\2\ Union, United States Steel Corporation, and Nucor 
Corporation respectively filed timely complaints with the CIT to 
challenge various aspects of the Final Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products 
from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Final Results of the 
Fourteenth Administrative Review and Partial Rescission, 74 FR 11082 
(March 16, 2009) (``Final Results''), amended by Certain Corrosion-
Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: 
Notice of Amended Final Results of the Fourteenth Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review, 74 FR 19199 (April 28, 2009) (amending with 
respect to Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd., Hyundai HYSCO, Pohang Iron & 
Steel Co., Ltd., and Pohang Coated Steel Co., Ltd.).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On February 15, 2011, the Court remanded for the Department to 
reconsider its positions with regard to the model-match criteria as 
applied to Union, the major input adjustment as applied to Union, and 
certain adjustments to Union's substrate purchases.\3\ On July 15, 
2011, the Department filed remand redeterminations in which it revised 
its position with regard to the model-match criteria and purchases of 
substrate steel and material purchases as applied to Union.\4\ 
Accordingly, the Department recalculated Union's weighted-average 
margin from 7.56 percent in the Final Results to 7.45 percent.\5\ On 
April 25, 2012, the Court sustained the Department's remand 
redeterminations regarding the model-match criteria and substrate steel 
and material purchases as applied to Union.\6\ On August 8, 2013, after 
disposition of remaining issues, the Court entered final judgments.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Union I and U.S. Steel I.
    \4\ See Union Remand Results and U.S. Steel Remand Results.
    \5\ Id.
    \6\ See Union Steel v. United States, 836 F. Supp. 2d 1382 (CIT 
2012); United States Steel Corp. v. United States, 844 F. Supp. 2d 
1334 (CIT 2012).
    \7\ See Union Steel v. United States, Court No. 09-00130, Slip 
Op. 13-104 (CIT August 8, 2013); United States Steel Corp. v. United 
States, Consol. Court No. 09-00156, Slip Op. 13-103 (CIT August 8, 
2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Timken Notice

    In its decision in Timken, as clarified by Diamond Sawblades, the 
CAFC held that, pursuant to section 516A(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 
as amended (``the Act''), the Department must publish a notice of a 
court decision that is not ``in harmony'' with a Department 
determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a 
``conclusive'' court decision. The CIT's August 8, 2013, judgments in 
this case constitute final decisions of that court that are not in 
harmony with the Department's final results of the administrative 
review. This notice is published in fulfillment of the publication 
requirements of Timken. Accordingly, the Department will continue the 
suspension of liquidation of the subject merchandise pending expiration 
of the period of appeal or, if appealed, pending a final and conclusive 
court decision. Because the antidumping duty order on CORE from Korea 
has been revoked effective February 14, 2012, cash deposits are no 
longer in effect.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from 
Germany and the Republic of Korea: Revocation of Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Orders, 78 FR 16832 (March 19, 2013)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Results

    Because there are now final court decisions with respect to this 
case, the Department is amending its Final Results with respect to 
Union's weighted-average dumping margins for the period August 1, 2006 
through July 31, 2007.\9\ The revised weighted-average dumping margin 
is as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The remaining weighted-average dumping margins from the 
Final Results, as subsequently amended, remain unchanged.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Weighted-average
                Manufacturer/exporter                   dumping margin
                                                           (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Union Steel.........................................                7.45
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the event that the CIT's ruling is not appealed, or if appealed, 
upheld by the CAFC, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate 
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(b).\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Final Results, 74 FR 11083.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
516A(e)(1), 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

     Dated: September 19, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-23636 Filed 9-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P