[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 146 (Tuesday, July 30, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45990-45992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18249]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 52-025 and 52-026; NRC-2008-0252]
Vogtle Electric Generating Station, Units 3 and 4; Southern
Nuclear Operating Company; Change to the Bracing Design in the Turbine
Building and Corresponding Change to Structural Design Code
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Exemption and combined license amendment: Issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is granting both
an exemption to allow a departure from the certification information of
Tier 1 of the generic design control document (DCD) and is issuing
License Amendment No. 8 to Combined Licenses (COL), NPF-91 and NPF-92.
The COLs were issued to Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc., and
Georgia Power Company, Oglethorpe Power Corporation, Municipal Electric
Authority of Georgia, and the City of Dalton, Georgia (the licensee);
for construction and operation of the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant
(VEGP), Units 3 and 4, located in Burke County, Georgia. The amendment
requests to revise the design of the bracing used to support the
Turbine Building structure. This request requires changing Tier 1
information found in the Design Description portion of Updated Final
Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) Section 3.3, ``Buildings.'' The granting
of the exemption allows the changes to Tier 1 information asked for in
the amendment. Because the acceptability of the exemption was
determined in part by the acceptability
[[Page 45991]]
of the amendment, the exemption and amendment are being issued
concurrently.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2008-0252 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may access information related to this document, which the NRC
possesses and is publicly available, using any of the following
methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2008-0252. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-287-
3422; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may access publicly available documents online in the NRC
Library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the
search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-
based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's
Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-
4737, or by email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number
for each document referenced in this document (if that document is
available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is
referenced. The request for the amendment and exemption were submitted
by letter dated February 8, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13043A075). The
licensee supplemented this request on February 15, 2013 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML13050A201).
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Minarik, Office of New
Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-
0001; telephone: 301-415-6185; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The NRC is granting an exemption from Paragraph B of Section III,
``Scope and Contents,'' of Appendix D, ``Design Certification Rule for
the AP1000,'' to part 52 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(10 CFR) and issuing License Amendment No. 8 to COLs, NPF-91 and NPF-
92, to the licensee. The exemption is required by Paragraph A.4 of
Section VIII, ``Processes for Changes and Departures,'' Appendix D to
10 CFR part 52 to allow the licensee to depart from Tier 1 information.
With the requested amendment, the licensee sought to revise UFSAR
information related to the design of the bracing used to support the
non-seismic portion of the Turbine Building. As part of this request,
the licensee needed to change Tier 1 information located in the
``Design Description'' portion of Section 3.3, ``Buildings'' of the
UFSAR. These changes sought to allow the licensee to use a mixed
bracing system of both eccentrically and concentrically braced framing
versus only eccentrically braced framing in the Turbine Building.
Part of the justification for granting the exemption was provided
by the review of the amendment. Because the exemption is necessary in
order to issue the requested license amendment, the NRC granted the
exemption and issued the amendment concurrently, rather than in
sequence. This included issuing a combined safety evaluation containing
the NRC staff's review of both the exemption request and the license
amendment. The exemption met all applicable regulatory criteria set
forth in 10 CFR 50.12, 10 CFR 52.7, and Section VIII.A.4. of Appendix D
to 10 CFR Part 52. The license amendment was found to be acceptable as
well. The combined safety evaluation is available in ADAMS under
Accession No. ML13121A421.
Identical exemption documents (except for referenced unit numbers
and license numbers) were issued to the licensee for Vogtle Units 3 and
4 (COLs NPF-91 and NPF-92). These documents can be found in ADAMS under
Accession Nos. ML13121A376 and ML13121A385. The exemption is reproduced
(with the exception of abbreviated titles and additional citations) in
Section II of this document. The amendment documents for COLs NPF-91
and NPF-92 are available in ADAMS under Accession Nos. ML13121A392 and
ML13121A397. A summary of the amendment documents is provided in
Section III of this document.
II. Exemption
Reproduced below is the exemption document issued to Vogtle Unit 3
and Unit 4. It makes reference to the combined safety evaluation that
provides the reasoning for the findings made by the NRC (and listed
under Item 1) in order to grant the exemption:
1. In a letter dated February 8, 2013, and as supplemented by
letter dated February 15, 2013, the licensee requested from the
Commission an exemption from the provisions of 10 CFR Part 52, Appendix
D, Section III.B, as part of license amendment request 13-005 ``Turbine
Building Eccentric and Concentric Bracing'' (LAR 13-005).
For the reasons set forth in Section 3.1, ``Evaluation of
Exemption,'' of the NRC staff's Safety Evaluation, which can be found
in ADAMS under Accession No. ML13121A421, the Commission finds that:
A. The exemption is authorized by law;
B. the exemption presents no undue risk to public health and
safety;
C. the exemption is consistent with the common defense and
security;
D. special circumstances are present in that the application of the
rule in this circumstance is not necessary to serve the underlying
purpose of the rule;
E. the special circumstances outweigh any decrease in safety that
may result from the reduction in standardization caused by the
exemption; and
F. the exemption will not result in a significant decrease in the
level of safety otherwise provided by the design.
2. Accordingly, the licensee is granted an exemption to the
provisions of 10 CFR part 52, Appendix D, Section III.B, to allow
deviations from the certified Design Control Document Tier 1 Section
3.3, as described in the licensee's request dated February 8, 2013, and
supplemented on February 15, 2013. This exemption is related to, and
necessary for the granting of License Amendment No. 8, which is being
issued concurrently with this exemption.
3. As explained in Section 3.1, ``Evaluation of Exemption,'' of the
NRC staff's Safety Evaluation (ADAMS Accession No. ML13121A421), this
exemption meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set
forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no
environmental impact statement or environmental assessment needs to be
prepared in connection with the issuance of the exemption.
4. This exemption is effective as of May 21, 2013.
III. License Amendment Request
By letter dated February 8, 2013, the licensee requested that the
NRC amend the COLs for VEGP, Units 3 and 4, COLs NPF-91 and NPF-92. The
licensee supplemented this application on February 15, 2013. The
licensee sought to change Tier 2 information previously incorporated
into the UFSAR. Additionally, these Tier 2 changes involved changes to
Tier 1 material in the UFSAR, and would revise the associated material
that has been
[[Page 45992]]
included in Appendix C of each of the VEGP, Units 3 and 4, COLs. The
Tier 2 changes modified sections of the UFSAR related to the design
information and code requirements regarding the supports used in the
Turbine Building. These Tier 2 changes require modifications to
particular Tier 1 information located in the ``Design Description''
portion of Section 3.3 ``Buildings'' of the UFSAR. In this section the
licensee sought to revise the original design of only using
eccentrically braced framing in the non-seismic portion of the Turbine
Building. Instead the licensee plans to use a mixed bracing system
consisting of both eccentrically and concentrically braced framing. The
staff determined that these changes did not alter any relevant
conclusions made for the AP1000 standard design.
The Commission has determined for these amendments that the
application complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules
and regulations. The Commission has made appropriate findings as
required by the Act and the Commission's rules and regulations in 10
CFR Chapter I, which are set forth in the license amendment.
A notice of consideration of issuance of amendment to facility
operating license or combined license, as applicable, proposed no
significant hazards consideration determination, and opportunity for a
hearing in connection with these actions, was published in the Federal
Register on March 4, 2013 (78 FR 14137). The February 15, 2013,
supplement revised the original no significant hazards consideration
determination, but this revision was captured in the March 4, 2013
Federal Register Notice. No other supplements were received after the
acceptance was noticed so the published no significant hazards
consideration determination was not affected and no comments were
received during the 60-day comment period.
The Commission has determined that these amendments satisfy the
criteria for categorical exclusion in accordance with 10 CFR 51.22.
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact
statement or environmental assessment need be prepared for these
amendments.
IV. Conclusion
Using the reasons set forth in the combined safety evaluation, the
staff granted the exemption and issued the amendment that the licensee
requested on February 8, 2013, and supplemented by letter dated
February 15, 2013. The exemption and amendment were issued on May 21,
2013 as part of a combined package to the licensee. (ADAMS Accession
No. ML13121A359).
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day of July 2013.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Lawrence Burkhart,
Chief, Licensing Branch 4, Division of New Reactor Licensing, Office of
New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2013-18249 Filed 7-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P