[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 34 (Wednesday, February 20, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11886-11888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03891]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[30-Day-13-0941]


Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) publishes a 
list of information collection requests under review by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these requests, call 
(404) 639-7570 or send an email to [email protected]. Send written comments 
to CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 
20503 or by fax to (202) 395-5806. Written comments should be received 
within 30 days of this notice.

Proposed Project

    Evaluation of Dating Matters: Strategies to Promote Healthy Teen 
RelationshipsTM (OMB 0920-0941, Expiration 06/30/
2015)--REVISION--National Center for Injury Prevention and Control 
(NCIPC)--Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Background and Brief Description

    Dating Matters: Strategies to Promote Healthy Teen 
RelationshipsTM is the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention's new teen dating violence prevention initiative.
    To address the gaps in research and practice, CDC has developed 
Dating Matters, teen dating violence prevention program that includes 
programming for students, parents, educators, as well as policy 
development. Dating Matters is based on the current evidence about what 
works in prevention and focuses on high-risk, urban communities where 
participants include: Middle school students age 11 to 14 years; middle 
school parents; brand ambassadors; educators; school leadership; 
program implementers; community representatives; and local health 
department representatives in the following communities: Alameda 
County, California; Baltimore, Maryland; Broward County, Florida; and 
Chicago, Illinois.
    The primary goal of this revision is to expand and add a limited 
number of instruments to the approved outcome and implementation 
evaluation of Dating Matters in the four metropolitan cities to 
determine its feasibility, cost, and effectiveness. In the evaluation, 
a standard model of TDV prevention (Safe Dates administered in 8th 
grade) will be compared to a comprehensive model (programs administered 
in 6th, 7th, and 8th grade as well as parent, educator, policy, and 
communications interventions).

    The current revision request has two aims:
    (1) Request to revise follow-up outcome evaluation instruments 
and drop mid-year outcome evaluation student survey, and
    (2) Request to add process evaluation instruments to enhance 
implementation.

    Population. The study population includes students in 6th, 7th and 
8th grades at 44 schools in the four participating sites. At most, 
schools are expected to have 6 classrooms per grade, with an average of 
30 students per classroom yielding a population of 23,760 students (44 
schools x 3 grades x 6 classrooms per grade x 30 students per 
classroom). All student evaluation activities will take place during 
the school year. The sampling frame for parents, given that we would 
only include one parent per student, is also 23,760 for the three years 
of data collection covered by this package. If we assume 40 educators 
per school, the sampling frame for the educator sample is 1,760.
    Students: In each year of data collection, we will recruit 11,880 
students (30 students per classroom x 3 classrooms per grade x 3 grades 
x 44 schools). We assume a 95% participation rate (n = 11,286) for the 
baseline student survey and 90% participation rate (n = 10,692) at 
follow-up survey. In this revision, we request to drop the mid-term 
survey to reduce burden on schools.
    Parents: We will recruit a sample of 2,020 parents. We expect that 
95% of the 2,020 parents will agree to participate at baseline (n = 
1,919) and 90% will participate in the follow-up survey (n = 1,818) 
parents.
    Educators: We will attempt to recruit all educators in each school 
(44 schools x 40 educators per school = 1,760). We expect a 95% 
participation rate for an estimated sample of 1,672 educators at 
baseline and 90% participation rate at follow-up for an estimated 
sample of 1,584.
    School data extractors: We will attempt to recruit one data 
extractor per 44 schools to extract school data to be used in 
conjunction with the outcome data for the students. Data extractors in 
each school will access individual school-level data for those students 
in their school who consented and participated in the baseline student 
survey (3 x 4 x 30 x 95% = 342).
Implementation Evaluation
    For the student focus groups, we will recruit groups of 10 students 
per group. Two groups will be held per each of the 4 sites (10 x 2 x 4 
= 80 total student participants).
    Student implementer focus groups will be organized by site, with 
two annual focus groups per site with 10 implementers in each group (10 
x 2 x 4 = 80 total student program implementer participants).
    Communications focus groups will be organized by site with up to 
four groups

[[Page 11887]]

per site (4 x 4 x 6 = 96 total student participants).
    Parent program implementer focus groups will be organized by site, 
with two annual focus groups per site with 10 implementers in each 
group (10 x 2 x 4 = 80 total parent program implementer participants).
    School Leadership: Based on the predicted number of two school 
leadership per comprehensive school (21 schools), the number of 
respondents will be 42.
    Local Health Department representative: Based on the predicted 
number of four communities/sites and four local health department 
representatives working on Dating Matters per community, the number of 
respondents will be 16.
    Community Advisory Board Representative: Based on the predicted 
number of 20 community representatives per 4 communities/sites, the 
number of respondents will be 80.
    Parent Program Manager: With a maximum of one parent program 
manager per community/site, the number of program manager respondents 
will be 4. It is anticipated that they will receive up to 50 TA 
requests per year and complete the form 50 times.
    Student Program Master Trainer TA Form: With a maximum of 3 master 
trainers per community. There will be 12 master trainers. It is 
anticipated that they will receive up to 50 TA requests per year and 
complete the form 50 times.
    Parent Curricula Implementers: It is expected that each school 
implementing the comprehensive approach (n = 21) will have two 
implementers (or 42 parent program implementer respondents).
    Please note that on the burden table the number of respondents is 
multiplied by the number of sessions in each parent program.
    Student Curricula Implementers: Based on the predicted number of 20 
student curricula implementers per grade per site that will be 
completing fidelity instruments, the total number of respondents will 
be 80 per grade (20 x 4).
    Brand Ambassadors: The Brand Ambassador Implementation Survey will 
be provided to each brand ambassador (n = 20) in each community with a 
maximum of 80 brand ambassadors.
    Communications Implementers (``Brand Ambassador Coordinators''): 
The Communications Campaign Tracking form will be provided to each 
brand ambassador coordinator in each community. With a maximum of one 
brand ambassador coordinator per community (n = 4), the feedback form 
will be collected from a total of 4 brand ambassador coordinators.
    Parent Program Participants: The 6th and 7th grade parent 
satisfaction questionnaires will be completed by parent participating 
in the parent program in each community. There is a maximum number of 
parent respondents of 1,890 (18 x 5 x 21) for the 6th grade 
satisfaction questionnaire and 1,890 for the 7th grade satisfaction 
questionnaire.
    There are no costs to the respondents other than their time. The 
total estimated annual burden hours are 27923.

                                        Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                      Average
                                                                     Number of       Number of      burden per
          Type of respondent                    Form name           respondents    responses per     response
                                                                                    respondent        (hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Student Program Participant...........  Student Outcome Survey            11,286               1           45/60
                                         Baseline.
Student Program Participant...........  Student Outcome Survey            10,692               1           45/60
                                         Follow-up.
School data extractor.................  School Indicators.......              44             342           15/60
Parent Program Participant............  Parent Outcome Baseline            1,919               1               1
                                         Survey.
Parent Program Participant............  Parent Outcome Follow-up           1,818               1               1
                                         Survey.
Educator..............................  Educator Outcome Survey            1,672               1           30/60
                                         (baseline).
Student Brand ambassador..............  Brand Ambassador                      80               2           20/60
                                         Implementation Survey.
School leadership.....................  School Leadership                     42               1               1
                                         Capacity and Readiness
                                         Survey.
Parent Curricula Implementer..........  Parent Program Fidelity              210               3           15/60
                                         6th Grade Session 1-
                                         Session 6.
Parent Curricula Implementer..........  Parent Program Fidelity              126               3           15/60
                                         7th Grade Session 1, 3,
                                         5.
Student Curricula Implementer.........  Student Program Fidelity             480               1           15/60
                                         6th Grade Session 1-
                                         Session 6.
Student Curricula Implementer.........  Student Program Fidelity             560               1           15/60
                                         7th Grade Session 1-
                                         Session 7.
Student Curricula Implementer.........  Student Program Fidelity             800               1           15/60
                                         8th Grade Session 1-
                                         Session 10
                                         (comprehensive).
Communications Coordinator............  Communications Campaign                4               4           20/60
                                         Tracking.
Local Health Department Representative  Local Health Department               16               1               2
                                         Capacity and Readiness.
Student Program Participant...........  Student participant                   80               1             1.5
                                         focus group guide (time
                                         spent in focus group).
Student Curricula Implementer.........  Student curricula                     80               1               1
                                         implementer focus group
                                         guide (time spent in
                                         focus group).
Parent Curricula Implementer..........  Parent curricula                      80               1               1
                                         implementer focus group
                                         guide (time spent in
                                         focus group).
Student Curricula Implementer.........  Safe Dates 8th Grade                 800               1           15/60
                                         Session 1-Session 10
                                         (standard).
Student Master Trainer................  Student program master                12              50           10/60
                                         trainer TA form.
Educator..............................  Educator Outcome Survey             1584               1           30/60
                                         (follow-up).
Community Advisory Board Member.......  Community Capacity/                   80               1               1
                                         Readiness Assessment.
Students..............................  Communications Focus                  96               1             1.5
                                         Groups.
Parent Program Manager................  Parent Program Manager                 4              50           10/60
                                         TA Tracking Form.

[[Page 11888]]

 
Parent Program Participant............  6th Grade Curricula                 1890               1           10/60
                                         Parent Satisfaction
                                         Questionnaire.
Parent Program Participant............  7th Grade Curricula                 1890               1           10/60
                                         Parent Satisfaction
                                         Questionnaire.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated: February 12, 2013.
Ron A. Otten,
Director, Office of Scientific Integrity (OSI), Office of the Associate 
Director for Science (OADS), Office of the Director, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2013-03891 Filed 2-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P