[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9363-9364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02911]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-924]


Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From the 
People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony 
With Final Results of Administrative Review and Notice of Amended Final 
Results of Administrative Review Pursuant to Court Decision

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On January 24, 2013 the United States Court of International 
Trade (``CIT'') sustained the Department of Commerce's (``the 
Department'') results of redetermination, pursuant to the CIT's remand 
order, in Fuwei Films (Shandong) Co., Ltd. v. United States, Slip Op. 
13-10 (CIT 2013).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court 
Remand, Court No. 11-00061, dated October 15, 2012, available at: 
http://ia.ita.doc.gov/remands (``PET Film Final Remand''); see also 
Fuwei Films (Shandong) Co., Ltd. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 
11-00061, Slip Op. 12-69 (CIT 2012) (``Remand Opinion and Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals 
for the Federal Circuit (``CAFC'') in Timken Co. v. United States, 893 
F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (``Timken''), as clarified by Diamond 
Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 
2010) (``Diamond Sawblades''), the Department is notifying the public 
that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with the 
Department's PET Film Final Results \2\ and is amending the final 
results with respect to Fuwei Films (Shandong) Co., Ltd. and Shaoxing 
Xiangyu Green Packing Co., Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From 
the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the First 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 9753 (February 22, 
2011) (``PET Film Final Results'').

DATES: Effective Date: (February 4, 2013) \3\.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Because the deadline, February 3, 2013, falls on a Sunday, 
the deadline is postponed until the next business day. See Notice of 
Clarification: Application of ``Next Business Day'' Rule for 
Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 
1930, as Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Hill, Office 4, Import 
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC, 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
20230; telephone: (202) 482-3518.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On June 1, 2012, the CIT remanded three issues with respect to the 
PET Film Final Results, two of which the Department requested for 
voluntary remand.\4\ Specifically, the CIT held that: (1) The 
Department must correct Shaoxing Xiangyu Green Packing Co. Ltd.'s 
(``Green Packing'') per unit water and electricity costs; (2) the 
Department must reconsider the surrogate value (``SV'') for labor 
expenses; and (3) the Department must clarify or reconsider the SV for 
polyethylene terephthalate (``PET'') chips.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Remand Opinion and Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to the CIT's remand instructions, the Department re-
examined record evidence and made the following changes. First, the 
Department revised its calculation of Green Packing's reported per-unit 
water and electricity consumption. To correct the error, the Department 
has assigned Green Packing's reported electricity factor to the 
calculated water input, and Green Packing's reported water factor to 
the calculated electricity input, in the calculation of Green Packing's 
cost of production.
    Next, the Department revised its calculation for the labor SV in 
accordance with Labor Methodologies by using the reported 2008 ILO 
Chapter 6A data provided under the International Standard Industrial 
Classification Revision.3-D standard, the most contemporaneous Chapter 
6A data that were available at the time the Department conducted the 
underlying review.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Antidumping Methodologies in Proceedings Involving Non-
Market Economies: Valuing the Factor of Production: Labor, 76 FR 
36092 (June 21, 2011) (``Labor Methodologies'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Department revised its calculation of the PET chip 
input SV by using import data exclusively from Indian harmonized tariff 
schedule category 3907.60.10.

Timken Notice

    In its decision in Timken, 893 F.2d at 341, as clarified by Diamond 
Sawblades, the CAFC has held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the ``Act''), the Department must 
publish a notice of a court decision that is not ``in harmony'' with a 
Department determination and must suspend liquidation of entries 
pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The CIT's January 24, 2013, 
judgment sustaining the PET Film Final Remand constitutes a final 
decision of that court that is not in harmony with the PET Film Final 
Results. This notice is published in fulfillment of the

[[Page 9364]]

publication requirements of Timken. Accordingly, the Department will 
continue the suspension of liquidation of the subject merchandise 
pending the expiration of the period of appeal or, if appealed, pending 
a final and conclusive court decision. The cash deposit rate will 
remain the company-specific rate established for the subsequent and 
most recent period during which each respondent was reviewed.

Amended Final Determination

    Because there is now a final court decision with respect to the PET 
Film Final Results, the revised dumping margins are as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Weighted-
                                                              average
                        Exporter                              margin
                                                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fuwei Films (Shandong) Co., Ltd.........................            0.27
Shaoxing Xiangyu Green Packing Co., Ltd.................            0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
516A(e)(1), 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: February 4, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-02911 Filed 2-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P