[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73663-73665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29782]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0304]


Susan F. Knott; Denial of Hearing; Final Debarment Order

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is denying a request 
for a hearing submitted by Susan F. Knott and is issuing an order under 
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) debarring Knott 
for 2 years from providing services in any capacity to a person that 
has an approved or pending drug product application. FDA bases this 
order on a finding that Knott was convicted of a misdemeanor under 
Federal law for conduct relating to the regulation of a drug product 
under the FD&C Act and that the type of conduct underlying the 
conviction undermines the process for the regulation of drugs. In 
determining the appropriateness and period of Knott's debarment, FDA 
has considered the relevant factors listed in the FD&C Act. Knott has 
failed to file with the Agency information and analyses sufficient to 
create a basis for a hearing concerning this action.

DATES: The order is effective December 11, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit applications for termination of debarment to the 
Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: G. Matthew Warren, Office of 
Scientific Integrity, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire 
Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-4613.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Section 306(b)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 
335a(b)(2)(B)(i)(I)) permits FDA to debar an individual if it finds 
that the individual has been convicted of a misdemeanor under

[[Page 73664]]

Federal law for conduct relating to the regulation of drug products 
under the FD&C Act, and if FDA finds that the type of conduct that 
served as the basis for the conviction undermines the process for the 
regulation of drugs.
    On August 11, 2009, in the U.S. district court for the northern 
district of New York, Knott pled guilty to a misdemeanor under the FD&C 
Act, namely misbranding a drug in violation of sections 301(k), 
502(i)(3) and 303(a)(1) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 331(k), 352(i)(3), 
333(a)(1)) and 18 U.S.C. 2. The basis for this conviction was conduct 
surrounding her role in the injection of patients seeking treatment 
with BOTOX/BOTOX Cosmetic (BOTOX) with a product, TRI-toxin, 
distributed by Toxic Research International, Inc. (TRI). BOTOX is a 
biological product derived from botulinum toxin type A that is 
manufactured by Allergan, Inc., and was approved by FDA for use on 
humans for the treatment of facial wrinkles in 1991.
    According to the records of the criminal proceedings, Knott, in 
following a physician's instructions, ordered at least 31 vials of TRI-
toxin, an unapproved drug product, which was represented by its 
distributor as ``Botulinum Toxin Type A.'' Knott, a supervisory nurse 
in the medical practice, then instructed other nurses on how to dilute 
the TRI-toxin for injection into patients in accordance with orders 
from one or more physicians.
    Knott is subject to debarment based on a finding, under section 
306(b)(2)(B)(i) of the FD&C Act: (1) That she was convicted of a 
misdemeanor under Federal law for conduct relating to the regulation of 
a drug product under the FD&C Act and (2) that the type of conduct 
underlying the conviction undermines the process for the regulation of 
drugs. By letter dated November 30, 2010, FDA notified Knott of its 
proposal to debar her for 2 years from providing services in any 
capacity to a person having an approved or pending drug product 
application. In a letter dated February 3, 2011, through counsel, Knott 
requested a hearing on the proposal. In her request for a hearing, 
Knott acknowledges her conviction under Federal law, as alleged by FDA. 
However, she argues that she should not be debarred for several 
reasons, including several related to the factual basis set forth in 
the proposal to debar.
    We reviewed Knott's request for a hearing and find that Knott has 
not created a sufficient basis for a hearing. Hearings are granted only 
if there is a genuine and substantial issue of fact. Hearings will not 
be granted on issues of policy or law, on mere allegations, denials, or 
general descriptions of positions and contentions, or on data and 
information insufficient to justify the factual determination urged 
(see 21 CFR 12.24(b)).
    The Chief Scientist has considered Knott's arguments and concludes 
that they are unpersuasive and fail to raise a genuine and substantial 
issue of fact requiring a hearing.

II. Arguments

    In support of her hearing request, Knott first asserts that section 
306(b)(2)(B)(i) of the FD&C Act does not apply to her because she was 
never involved in the approval or regulation of drug products, nor was 
the underlying conduct of her conviction related to those activities. 
During her criminal proceedings, however, Knott pled guilty to 
misbranding and causing the misbranding of a drug in violation of 
sections 301(k), 502(i)(3) and 303(a)(1) of the FD&C Act by causing 
TRI-toxin, a drug not approved for use, to be offered for sale as an 
approved drug product, BOTOX. This conduct clearly relates to the 
regulation of drugs under the FD&C Act because it was in direct 
violation of the FD&C Act. The conduct also undermined the process for 
the regulation of drugs in that it permitted an unapproved drug to be 
substituted for an approved drug without the knowledge of the patient. 
As a result, Knott is subject to debarment under section 
306(b)(2)(B)(i).
    Knott next contends that she pled guilty to a misdemeanor violation 
under section 303(a)(1) of the FD&C Act, which is a strict liability 
offense, and that thus there was no demonstration or admission of 
criminal intent or knowledge underlying her conviction. She argues 
that, because she was not aware her conduct violated the FD&C Act, the 
conduct underlying her conviction could not undermine the process for 
regulation of drugs and she should not be debarred.
    With respect to Knott's assertion that her offense was strict 
liability, section 306(b)(2)(B)(i) of the FD&C Act specifically 
provides for the debarment of individuals convicted of Federal 
misdemeanors related to the regulation of drug products under the FD&C 
Act. Given that misdemeanor violations of the FD&C Act itself are 
strict liability offenses, it stands to reason that criminal intent is 
not a critical component to debar an individual under section 
306(b)(2)(B)(i). The charge to which Knott pled guilty did not hinge on 
supervisory liability or a technical violation of the FD&C Act. The 
charge in the information to which she pled guilty alleged that she 
caused a drug to be misbranded by offering it for sale under the name 
of another drug, BOTOX. The criminal information further establishes 
that, over the course of 9 months, she took the affirmative steps of 
ordering the drug and assisting in the formulation of the drug for 
injection to at least 150 patients. That the charge did not require a 
showing of intent has little to no bearing on whether Knott should be 
debarred. An individual need not have criminal intent for his or her 
conduct to undermine the process for the regulation of drugs. Knott's 
conduct undermined the process for the regulation of drugs in that it 
permitted an unapproved drug to be substituted for an approved drug 
without the knowledge of the patient. Knott has not presented any 
genuine and substantial issues of fact with respect to whether the 
conduct underlying her conviction undermines the process for the 
regulation of drugs.
    Finally, Knott argues that the considerations under section 
306(c)(3) of the FD&C Act weigh against imposing debarment of any 
length or debarment beyond a minimal period and that FDA should 
exercise discretion and decline to debar her for that reason. As set 
forth in the proposal and summarized in this document, Knott pled 
guilty to a misdemeanor under the FD&C Act for her role in offering a 
drug under the name of another. Consistent with the proposal to debar, 
therefore, we find that the consideration in section 306(c)(3)(A) of 
the FD&C Act with respect to the nature and seriousness of the offense 
involved weighs in favor of debarring Knott for some period of time.
    The record establishes that the medical practice of which Knott was 
a part ultimately took voluntary steps to mitigate the effect on the 
public health from its unlawful conduct (see section 306(c)(3)(C) of 
the FD&C Act). Moreover, the record reflects that she was merely 
following a physician's orders and that thus she did not serve a 
managerial role in the offense (see section 306(c)(3)(B) of the FD&C 
Act). Finally, it is undisputed that she had no previous criminal 
convictions related to matters within the jurisdiction of FDA (see 
section 306(c)(3)(F) of the FD&C Act). These considerations 
counterbalance the nature and seriousness of her offense sufficiently 
to warrant decreasing the period of debarment from 5 years to 2 years, 
as recommended in the proposal to debar.

III. Findings and Order

    Therefore, the Chief Scientist, under section 306(b)(2)(B)(i)(I) of 
the FD&C

[[Page 73665]]

Act and under authority delegated to him by the Commissioner of Food 
and Drugs, finds: (1) That Knott has been convicted of a misdemeanor 
under Federal law for conduct relating to the development or approval 
of a drug product or otherwise relating to the regulation of a drug 
product under the FD&C Act and (2) that the conduct underlying the 
conviction undermines the process for the regulation of drugs. FDA has 
considered the relevant factors listed in section 306(c)(3) of the FD&C 
Act and determined that a debarment of 2 years is appropriate.
    As a result of the foregoing findings, Knott is debarred for 2 
years from providing services in any capacity to a person with an 
approved or pending drug product application under section 505, 512, or 
802 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 355, 360b, or 382), or under section 351 
of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262), effective (see DATES) 
(see 21 U.S.C. 335a(c)(1)(B), (c)(2)(A)(iii), and 321(dd)). Any person 
with an approved or pending drug product application, who knowingly 
uses the services of Knott, in any capacity during her period of 
debarment, will be subject to civil money penalties (section 307(a)(6) 
of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 335b(a)(6))). If Knott, during her period of 
debarment, provides services in any capacity to a person with an 
approved or pending drug product application, she will be subject to 
civil money penalties (section 307(a)(7) of the FD&C Act). In addition, 
FDA will not accept or review any abbreviated new drug applications 
submitted by or with the assistance of Knott during her period of 
debarment (section 306(c)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act).
    Any application by Knott for termination of debarment under section 
306(d) of the FD&C Act should be identified with Docket No. FDA-2010-N-
0304 and sent to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). 
All such submissions are to be filed in four copies. The public 
availability of information in these submissions is governed by 21 CFR 
10.20(j).
    Publicly available submissions may be seen in the Division of 
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. 
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain documents in the Docket 
at http://www.regulations.gov/.

    Dated: November 29, 2012.
Jesse L. Goodman,
Chief Scientist.
[FR Doc. 2012-29782 Filed 12-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P