[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 166 (Monday, August 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51754-51758]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21043]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-890]


Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results and Final Rescission in Part

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On October 24, 2011, the Department of Commerce (Department) 
published in the Federal Register its preliminary results of the 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on wooden bedroom 
furniture from the People's Republic of China (PRC), covering the 
period January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010.\1\ We gave interested 
parties an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Results. Based on 
the analysis of the record and the comments received, the Department is 
rescinding the review with respect to Tube-Smith Enterprises 
(ZhangZhou) Co., Ltd., Tube-Smith Enterprise (Haimen) Co., Ltd., and 
Billionworth Enterprise, Ltd. (collectively, Tube-Smith).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of 
China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review 
and Intent to Rescind Review in Part, 76 FR 65684 (October 24, 2011) 
(Preliminary Results).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: August 27, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Pandolph, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 4, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3627.

Background

    On November 23, 2011, Petitioners \2\ and Amini Innovation Corp. 
(Amini) submitted case briefs to the Department. On November 28, 2011, 
Tube-Smith filed a letter in lieu of a rebuttal brief with the 
Department.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Petitioners are the American Furniture Manufactures 
Committee for Legal Trade and Vaughan-Bassett Furniture Company, 
Inc. (Petitioners).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On November 23, 2011, Amini requested that the Department conduct a 
hearing in the above-referenced review.\3\ On December 8, 2011, Amini 
informed the Department that it no longer requested a hearing and 
counsel for Amini requested a meeting with Christian Marsh, Deputy 
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.\4\ On December 14, 2011, counsel for Amini met with the 
Department.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See letter from Amini to the Honorable John Bryson, Acting 
Secretary of Commerce regarding, ``Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 
People's Republic of China; Administrative Review for the Period 
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010,'' dated November 23, 2011.
    \4\ See Memorandum to the File from Rebecca Pandolph, 
International Trade Compliance Analyst, Office 4, AD/CVD Operations, 
regarding, ``Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Wooden 
Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China for the 
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 period,'' dated December 9, 
2011.
    \5\ See Memorandum to the File regarding 2010 Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review of Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's 
Republic of China: Ex Parte Meeting,'' dated December 14, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 20, 2011, the Department received a separate rate 
certification from Baigou Crafts Factory of Fengkai. On December 29, 
2011, the Department rejected the separate rate certification as 
untimely.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See letter from Abdelali Elouaradia, Director, Office 4, AD/
CVD Operations to Baigou Crafts Factory of Fengkai regarding, dated 
December 29, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in 
this review are addressed in the Memorandum from Christian Marsh, 
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import 
Administration, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results 
of the 2010 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on 
Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China,'' dated 
August 20, 2012, which is hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and 
Decision Memorandum). A list of the issues which parties raised and to 
which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached to 
this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 
public document and is on file in the Central Records Unit, Main 
Commerce Building, Room 7046, and is accessible on the Web at <http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn>. The paper copy and electronic version of the 
memorandum are identical in content.

Period of Review

    The period of review (POR) is January 1, 2010, through December 31, 
2010.

Scope of the Order

    The product covered by the order is wooden bedroom furniture. 
Wooden bedroom furniture is generally, but not exclusively, designed, 
manufactured, and offered for sale in coordinated groups, or bedrooms, 
in which all of the individual pieces are of approximately the same 
style and approximately the same material and/or finish. The subject 
merchandise is made substantially of wood products, including both 
solid wood and also engineered wood products made from wood particles, 
fibers, or other wooden materials such as plywood, strand board, 
particle board, and fiberboard, with or without wood veneers, wood 
overlays, or laminates, with or without non-wood components or trim 
such as metal, marble, leather, glass, plastic, or other resins, and 
whether or not assembled, completed, or finished.
    The subject merchandise includes the following items: (1) Wooden 
beds such as loft beds, bunk beds, and other beds; (2) wooden 
headboards for beds (whether stand-alone or attached to side rails), 
wooden footboards for beds,

[[Page 51755]]

wooden side rails for beds, and wooden canopies for beds; (3) night 
tables, night stands, dressers, commodes, bureaus, mule chests, 
gentlemen's chests, bachelor's chests, lingerie chests, wardrobes, 
vanities, chessers, chifforobes, and wardrobe-type cabinets; (4) 
dressers with framed glass mirrors that are attached to, incorporated 
in, sit on, or hang over the dresser; (5) chests-on-chests,\7\ 
highboys,\8\ lowboys,\9\ chests of drawers,\10\ chests,\11\ door 
chests,\12\ chiffoniers,\13\ hutches,\14\ and armoires;\15\ (6) desks, 
computer stands, filing cabinets, book cases, or writing tables that 
are attached to or incorporated in the subject merchandise; and (7) 
other bedroom furniture consistent with the above list.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ A chest-on-chest is typically a tall chest-of-drawers in two 
or more sections (or appearing to be in two or more sections), with 
one or two sections mounted (or appearing to be mounted) on a 
slightly larger chest; also known as a tallboy.
    \8\ A highboy is typically a tall chest of drawers usually 
composed of a base and a top section with drawers, and supported on 
four legs or a small chest (often 15 inches or more in height).
    \9\ A lowboy is typically a short chest of drawers, not more 
than four feet high, normally set on short legs.
    \10\ A chest of drawers is typically a case containing drawers 
for storing clothing.
    \11\ A chest is typically a case piece taller than it is wide 
featuring a series of drawers and with or without one or more doors 
for storing clothing. The piece can either include drawers or be 
designed as a large box incorporating a lid.
    \12\ A door chest is typically a chest with hinged doors to 
store clothing, whether or not containing drawers. The piece may 
also include shelves for televisions and other entertainment 
electronics.
    \13\ A chiffonier is typically a tall and narrow chest of 
drawers normally used for storing undergarments and lingerie, often 
with mirror(s) attached.
    \14\ A hutch is typically an open case of furniture with shelves 
that typically sits on another piece of furniture and provides 
storage for clothes.
    \15\ An armoire is typically a tall cabinet or wardrobe 
(typically 50 inches or taller), with doors, and with one or more 
drawers (either exterior below or above the doors or interior behind 
the doors), shelves, and/or garment rods or other apparatus for 
storing clothes. Bedroom armoires may also be used to hold 
television receivers and/or other audio-visual entertainment 
systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The scope of the order excludes the following items: (1) Seats, 
chairs, benches, couches, sofas, sofa beds, stools, and other seating 
furniture; (2) mattresses, mattress supports (including box springs), 
infant cribs, water beds, and futon frames; (3) office furniture, such 
as desks, stand-up desks, computer cabinets, filing cabinets, 
credenzas, and bookcases; (4) dining room or kitchen furniture such as 
dining tables, chairs, servers, sideboards, buffets, corner cabinets, 
china cabinets, and china hutches; (5) other non-bedroom furniture, 
such as television cabinets, cocktail tables, end tables, occasional 
tables, wall systems, book cases, and entertainment systems; (6) 
bedroom furniture made primarily of wicker, cane, osier, bamboo or 
rattan; (7) side rails for beds made of metal if sold separately from 
the headboard and footboard; (8) bedroom furniture in which bentwood 
parts predominate; \16\ (9) jewelry armories; \17\ (10) cheval mirrors; 
\18\ (11) certain metal parts; \19\ (12) mirrors that do not attach to, 
incorporate in, sit on, or hang over a dresser if they are not designed 
and marketed to be sold in conjunction with a dresser as part of a 
dresser-mirror set; (13) upholstered beds \20\ and (14) toy boxes.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ As used herein, bentwood means solid wood made pliable. 
Bentwood is wood that is brought to a curved shape by bending it 
while made pliable with moist heat or other agency and then set by 
cooling or drying. See CBP's Headquarters Ruling Letter 043859, 
dated May 17, 1976.
    \17\ Any armoire, cabinet or other accent item for the purpose 
of storing jewelry, not to exceed 24 inches in width, 18 inches in 
depth, and 49 inches in height, including a minimum of 5 lined 
drawers lined with felt or felt-like material, at least one side 
door (whether or not the door is lined with felt or felt-like 
material), with necklace hangers, and a flip-top lid with inset 
mirror. See Issues and Decision Memorandum from Laurel LaCivita to 
Laurie Parkhill, Office Director, concerning ``Jewelry Armoires and 
Cheval Mirrors in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Wooden 
Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China,'' dated 
August 31, 2004. See also Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's 
Republic of China: Final Changed Circumstances Review, and 
Determination To Revoke Order in Part, 71 FR 38621 (July 7, 2006).
    \18\ Cheval mirrors are any framed, tiltable mirror with a 
height in excess of 50 inches that is mounted on a floor-standing, 
hinged base. Additionally, the scope of the order excludes 
combination cheval mirror/jewelry cabinets. The excluded merchandise 
is an integrated piece consisting of a cheval mirror, i.e., a framed 
tiltable mirror with a height in excess of 50 inches, mounted on a 
floor-standing, hinged base, the cheval mirror serving as a door to 
a cabinet back that is integral to the structure of the mirror and 
which constitutes a jewelry cabinet line with fabric, having 
necklace and bracelet hooks, mountings for rings and shelves, with 
or without a working lock and key to secure the contents of the 
jewelry cabinet back to the cheval mirror, and no drawers anywhere 
on the integrated piece. The fully assembled piece must be at least 
50 inches in height, 14.5 inches in width, and 3 inches in depth. 
See Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: 
Final Changed Circumstances Review and Determination To Revoke Order 
in Part, 72 FR 948 (January 9, 2007).
    \19\ Metal furniture parts and unfinished furniture parts made 
of wood products (as defined above) that are not otherwise 
specifically named in this scope (i.e., wooden headboards for beds, 
wooden footboards for beds, wooden side rails for beds, and wooden 
canopies for beds) and that do not possess the essential character 
of wooden bedroom furniture in an unassembled, incomplete, or 
unfinished form. Such parts are usually classified under HTSUS 
subheadings 9403.90.7005, 9403.90.7010, or 9403.90.7080.
    \20\ Upholstered beds that are completely upholstered, i.e., 
containing filling material and completely covered in sewn genuine 
leather, synthetic leather, or natural or synthetic decorative 
fabric. To be excluded, the entire bed (headboards, footboards, and 
side rails) must be upholstered except for bed feet, which may be of 
wood, metal, or any other material and which are no more than nine 
inches in height from the floor. See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from 
the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Changed 
Circumstances Review and Determination to Revoke Order in Part, 72 
FR 7013 (February 14, 2007).
    \21\ To be excluded the toy box must: (1) Be wider than it is 
tall; (2) have dimensions within 16 inches to 27 inches in height, 
15 inches to 18 inches in depth, and 21 inches to 30 inches in 
width; (3) have a hinged lid that encompasses the entire top of the 
box; (4) not incorporate any doors or drawers; (5) have slow-closing 
safety hinges; (6) have air vents; (7) have no locking mechanism; 
and (8) comply with American Society for Testing and Materials 
(ASTM) standard F963-03. Toy boxes are boxes generally designed for 
the purpose of storing children's items such as toys, books, and 
playthings. See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic 
of China: Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review and 
Determination to Revoke Order in Part, 74 FR 8506 (February 25, 
2009). Further, as determined in the scope ruling memorandum 
``Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China: 
Scope Ruling on a White Toy Box,'' dated July 6, 2009, the 
dimensional ranges used to identify the toy boxes that are excluded 
from the wooden bedroom furniture order apply to the box itself 
rather than the lid.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Imports of subject merchandise are classified under subheadings 
9403.50.9042 and 9403.50.9045 of the U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule 
(HTSUS) as ``wooden * * * beds'' and under subheading 9403.50.9080 of 
the HTSUS as ``other * * * wooden furniture of a kind used in the 
bedroom.'' In addition, wooden headboards for beds, wooden footboards 
for beds, wooden side rails for beds, and wooden canopies for beds may 
also be entered under subheading 9403.50.9042 or 9403.50.9045 of the 
HTSUS as ``parts of wood.'' Subject merchandise may also be entered 
under subheadings 9403.50.9041, 9403.60.8081, 9403.20.0018, or 
9403.90.8041. Further, framed glass mirrors may be entered under 
subheading 7009.92.1000 or 7009.92.5000 of the HTSUS as ``glass mirrors 
* * * framed.'' The order covers all wooden bedroom furniture meeting 
the above description, regardless of tariff classification. Although 
the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
purposes, our written description of the scope of this proceeding is 
dispositive.

Separate Rates

Companies Not Providing Separate Rate Certifications or Applications

    In the Preliminary Results, we stated that the following 14 
companies or

[[Page 51756]]

company groupings for which the Department initiated the instant review 
did not provide a separate rate certification or application and 
therefore have not demonstrated their eligibility for separate rate 
status in this administrative review:

 Dongguan Bon Ten Furniture Co., Ltd.
 Dongguan Grand Style Furniture Co. Ltd.; Hong Kong Da Zhi 
Furniture Co., Ltd.
 Dongguan Hero Way Woodwork Co., Ltd.; Dongguan Da Zhong 
Woodwork Co., Ltd.; Hero Way Enterprises Ltd.; Well Earth International 
Ltd.
 Dongguan Mu Si Furniture Co., Ltd.
 Hainan Jong Bao Lumber Co., Ltd.; Jibbon Enterprise Co., Ltd.
 Kuan Lin Furniture (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd.; Kuan Lin Furniture 
Factory; Kuan Lin Furniture Co., Ltd.
 Kunshan Lee Wood Product Co., Ltd.
 Leefu Wood (Dongguan) Co., Ltd.; King Rich International, Ltd.
 Meikangchi (Nantong) Furniture Company Ltd.
 Nantong Dongfang Orient Furniture Co., Ltd.
 Shanghai Fangjia Industry Co. Ltd.
 Winny Overseas, Ltd.; Zhongshan Winny Furniture Ltd.; Winny 
Universal Ltd.
 Zhong Shan Fullwin Furniture Co., Ltd.
 Zhongshan Gainwell Furniture Co. Ltd.

    In the Preliminary Results, we also found that (1) Baigou Crafts 
Factory of Fengkai, (2) Locke Furniture Factory; Kai Chan Furniture 
Co., Ltd.; Kai Chan (Hong Kong) Enterprise Ltd.; Taiwan Kai Chan Co., 
Ltd, (collectively, Locke Furniture Factory) and (3) Zhangjiang Sunwin 
Arts & Crafts Co., Ltd. (Sunwin) had shipped subject merchandise during 
the POR despite reporting that they made no shipments of subject 
merchandise to the United States during the POR. Because these 
companies had not timely filed separate rate certifications or 
applications, thereby failing to provide separate rate information and 
demonstrate their eligibility for a separate rate, we treated these 
companies as part of the PRC-wide entity. Since the Preliminary 
Results, no interested parties submitted comments regarding the 
companies listed above. Therefore, for the final results, we continue 
to treat these entities as part of the PRC-Wide entity.

Final Partial Rescission of Administrative Review

    The Department has reconsidered the facts of this case and the 
arguments made by interested parties. Based on the particular fact 
pattern present here, and for the reasons stated in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum, the Department is rescinding the administrative 
review with respect to Tube-Smith.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Issue 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the Preliminary Results, the Department stated its intent to 
rescind the administrative review with respect to the following 
companies because they all reported that they made no shipments during 
the POR.

 Hangzhou Cadman Trading Co., Ltd.
 Dongguan Huangsheng Furniture Co., Ltd.
 Golden Well International (HK) Ltd.
 Zhejiang Tianyi Scientific and Educational Equipment Co., Ltd.

    No parties commented on our intent to rescind. Because there is no 
information or argument on the record of the current review that 
warrants reconsidering our intent to rescind, we are rescinding this 
administrative review with respect to the above-listed companies.
    In the Preliminary Results, the Department also stated its intent 
to rescind the administrative review with respect to the following 
companies, which were part of the PRC-wide entity during the POR, 
because all requesting parties withdrew their respective requests for 
an administrative review within 90 days of the date of publication of 
the notice of initiation:

 Brother Furniture Manufacture Co., Ltd.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ Because Brother Furniture Manufacture Co., Ltd. lost its 
separate rate on August 18, 2010 (see 4th Review Final Results), and 
has not filed a separate rate application to establish its 
eligibility for a separate rate in this review, the Department is 
treating this company as part of the PRC-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 C.F. Kent Co., Inc.
 C.F. Kent Hospitality, Inc.
 Champion Sun Industries Limited
 Contact Co., Ltd.
 Denny's Furniture Associates Corp.
 Denny's International Co., Ltd.
 Der Cheng Furniture Co., Ltd.
 Der Cheng Wooden Works
 Dong Guan Golden Fortune Houseware Co., Ltd.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ Because Dong Guan Golden Fortune Houseware Co., Ltd. lost 
its separate rate on August 18, 2010 (see 4th Review Final Results), 
and has not filed a separate rate application to establish its 
eligibility for a separate rate in this review, the Department is 
treating this company as part of the PRC-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Dongguan Chunsan Wood Products Co., Ltd.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ Because Dongguan Chunsan Wood Products Co., Ltd. lost its 
separate rate on August 18, 2010 (see 4th Review Final Results), and 
has not filed a separate rate application to establish its 
eligibility for a separate rate in this review, the Department is 
treating this company as part of the PRC-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Dongguan Hua Ban Furniture Co., Ltd.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ Because Dongguan Hua Ban Furniture Co., Ltd. lost its 
separate rate on August 18, 2010 (see 4th Review Final Results), and 
has not filed a separate rate application to establish its 
eligibility for a separate rate in this review, the Department is 
treating this company as part of the PRC-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 DongGuan Sundart Timber Products Co., Ltd
 Ever Spring Furniture Company Ltd.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ Because Ever Spring Furniture Company Ltd.; S.Y.C. Family 
Enterprise Co., Ltd. lost its separate rate on August 18, 2010 (see 
4th Review Final Results), and has not filed a separate rate 
application to establish its eligibility for a separate rate in this 
review, the Department is treating this company as part of the PRC-
wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Evershine Enterprise Co.
 Fleetwood Fine Furniture LP
 Fujian Putian Jinggong Furniture Co., Ltd.
 Gainwell Industries Limited
 Green River Wood (Dongguan) Ltd.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ Because Green River Wood (Dongguan) Ltd. lost its separate 
rate on August 18, 2010 (see 4th Review Final Results), and has not 
filed a separate rate application to establish its eligibility for a 
separate rate in this review, the Department is treating this 
company as part of the PRC-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Guangdong Gainwell Industrial Furniture Co., Ltd.
 Hong Kong Jingbi Group
 Huasen Furniture Co., Ltd.
 Jiant Furniture Co., Ltd.
 King Kei Trading Company Limited \29\
 King's Way Furniture Industries Co., Ltd.\30\
 Kingsyear Ltd.\31\
 Longkou Huangshan Furniture Factory
 MoonArt Furniture Group
 MoonArt International Inc.
 Nanjing Jardine Enterprise, Ltd.
 Nanjing Nanmu Furniture Co., Ltd.\32\
 Nantong Wangzhuang Furniture Co., Ltd.

[[Page 51757]]

 Ningbo Fubang Furniture Industries Limited
 Ningbo Furniture Industries Company Ltd.
 Ningbo Techniwood Furniture Industries Limited
 Northeast Lumber Co., Ltd.
 Passwell Wood Corporation
 S.Y.C. Family Enterprise Co., Ltd.\33\
 Senyuan Furniture Group
 Shanghai Aosen Furniture Co., Ltd.\34\
 Shanghai Hospitality Product Mfg., Co., Ltd.
 Shanghai Industries Group
 Shanghai Kent Furniture Co., Ltd.
 Shanghai Season Industry & Commerce Co., Ltd.
 Shanghai Zhiyi (Jiashun) Furniture Co., Ltd.
 Shanghai Zhiyi Furniture and Decoration Co., Ltd.
 Shaoxing Mengxing Furniture Co., Ltd.
 Starwood Furniture Manufacturing Co., Ltd.\35\
 Sundart International, Ltd.
 Techniwood (Macao Commercial Offshore) Limited
 Tradewinds International Enterprise Ltd.
 Trendex Industries Ltd.
 Wan Bao Chen Group Hong Kong Co., Ltd.\36\
 World Design International Co., Ltd.
 Xilinmen Furniture Co., Ltd.
 Xingli Arts & Crafts Factory of Yangchun \37\
 Yuexing Group Co., Ltd.
 Zhejiang Shaoxing Huaweimei Furniture Co., Ltd.
 Zhong Shan Heng Fu Furniture Co.
 Zhongshan Fengheng Furniture Co., Ltd.
 Zhongshan Yiming Furniture Co., Ltd.

    \29\ Because King Kei Trading Company Limited lost its separate 
rate on August 18, 2010 (see 4th Review Final Results), and has not 
filed a separate rate application to establish its eligibility for a 
separate rate in this review, the Department is treating this 
company as part of the PRC-wide entity.
    \30\ Because King's Way Furniture Industries Co., Ltd.; 
Kingsyear Ltd. lost its separate rate on August 18, 2010 (see 4th 
Review Final Results), and has not filed a separate rate application 
to establish its eligibility or a separate rate in this review, the 
Department is treating this company as part of the PRC-wide entity.
    \31\ Because King's Way Furniture Industries Co., Ltd.; 
Kingsyear Ltd. lost its separate rate on August 18, 2010 (see 4th 
Review Final Results), and has not filed a separate rate application 
to establish its eligibility or a separate rate in this review, the 
Department is treating this company as part of the PRC-wide entity.
    \32\ Because Nanjing Nanmu Furniture Co., Ltd. lost its separate 
rate on August 18, 2010 (see 4th Review Final Results), and has not 
filed a separate rate application to establish its eligibility for a 
separate rate in this review, the Department is treating this 
company as part of the PRC-wide entity.
    \33\ Because Ever Spring Furniture Company Ltd.; S.Y.C. Family 
Enterprise Co., Ltd. lost its separate rate on August 18, 2010 (see 
4th Review Final Results), and has not filed a separate rate 
application to establish its eligibility for a separate rate in this 
review, the Department is treating this company as part of the PRC-
wide entity.
    \34\ Because Shanghai Aosen Furniture Co., Ltd. lost its 
separate rate on August 18, 2010 (see 4th Review Final Results), and 
has not filed a separate rate application to establish its 
eligibility for a separate rate in this review, the Department is 
treating this company as part of the PRC-wide entity.
    \35\ Because Starwood Furniture Manufacturing Co., Ltd. lost its 
separate rate on August 18, 2010 (see 4th Review Final Results), and 
has not filed a separate rate application to establish its 
eligibility for a separate rate in this review, the Department is 
treating this company as part of the PRC-wide entity.
    \36\ Because Wan Bao Chen Group Hong Kong Co., Ltd. lost its 
separate rate on August 18, 2010 (see 4th Review Final Results), and 
has not filed a separate rate application to establish its 
eligibility for a separate rate in this review, the Department is 
treating this company as part of the PRC-wide entity.
    \37\ Because Xingli Arts & Crafts Factory of Yangchun lost its 
separate rate on August 18, 2010 (see 4th Review Final Results), and 
has not filed a separate rate application to establish its 
eligibility for a separate rate in this review, the Department is 
treating this company as part of the PRC-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    No parties commented on our intent to rescind with respect to these 
companies. However, because as noted above, these companies were part 
of the PRC-wide entity during the POR, they have remained under review 
as part of the PRC-wide entity. Our determination with respect to the 
PRC-wide entity is explained below in the section entitled ``Adverse 
Facts Available (AFA).''

Adverse Facts Available (AFA)

    In the Preliminary Results, pursuant to sections 776(a)(2)(A) and 
(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department 
based the dumping margin of the PRC-wide entity on the facts otherwise 
available on the record. Additionally, the Department determined, 
pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act, that with respect to the PRC-
wide entity the use of an adverse inference is warranted in selecting 
from the facts otherwise available. Consistent with its practice, the 
Department assigned a rate of 216.01 percent, the highest margin from 
any prior segment of the proceeding, to the PRC-wide entity as AFA.\38\ 
No interested party commented on the rate assigned to the PRC-wide 
entity and we have made no changes from our Preliminary Results with 
respect to this issue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ See Preliminary Results, 76 FR 65684, 65691.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As explained in the Preliminary Results, the Department 
corroborated the 216.01 percent rate pursuant to section 776(c) and 
considers the rate to be reliable and relevant with respect to the PRC-
wide entity. Specifically, the Department found the rate to be reliable 
because it is a company-specific margin calculated in the 2004-2005 new 
shipper review of the wooden bedroom furniture order and no additional 
information was presented in the current review to call into question 
the reliability of the rate. We also found the rate to be relevant with 
respect to the PRC-wide entity because it is within the range of 
transaction-specific margins on the record of the two prior 
administrative reviews.\39\ No party has commented on the Department's 
corroboration of the selected total AFA rate for the PRC-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \39\ See Preliminary Results, 76 FR 65684, 65692.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of the Review

    We determine that the following weighted-average percentage margin 
exists for the POR:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Antidumping
                        Exporter                           duty percent
                                                              margin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRC-Wide Entity.........................................          216.01
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), 
the Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of 
subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this 
review. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 
15 days after the publication date of the final results of this review.
    For Tube-Smith and the other entities for which the Department has 
rescinded this review which are not part of the PRC-wide entity, 
antidumping duties shall be assessed on period of review entries at 
rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties 
required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for 
consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Antidumping 
duties shall be assessed on period of review entries from the PRC-wide 
entity at 216.01 percent.
    In addition, pursuant to an injunction issued in Legacy Classic 
Furniture, Inc. v. United States, CIT No. 10-00352 on December 28, 
2010, the Department must continue to suspend liquidations of entries 
of the heritage court bench (model 800-4800) which were imported by 
Legacy Classic Furniture, Inc. pending a conclusive court decision.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as 
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For previously 
investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above 
that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the 
exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (2) for 
all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be 
entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide 
rate of 216.01 percent; and (3) for all non-PRC exporters of subject 
merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit 
rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that supplied 
that non-PRC exporter. These deposit

[[Page 51758]]

requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further 
notice.

Notification of Interested Parties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction 
of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing these final results and notice in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: August 20, 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

Appendix

Issue 1: Whether the Department Should Rescind the Review of Tube-
Smith
Issue 2: The Appropriate Rate To Assign to Tube-Smith
Issue 3: Whether the Department Misspelled Tube-Smith's Name in the 
Cash Deposit Instruction
Issue 4: Whether the Department Should Make Corrections to the PRC-
Wide Liquidation Instructions.

[FR Doc. 2012-21043 Filed 8-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P