[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 162 (Tuesday, August 21, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50411-50414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20473]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-0856; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-093-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-
200B, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP
series airplanes; Model 767-200, -300, -300F, and -400ER series
airplanes; and Model 777-200, -200LR, -300, and -300ER series
airplanes. This proposed
[[Page 50412]]
AD was prompted by reports of burned Boeing Material Specification
(BMS) 8-39 urethane foam, and a report from the airplane manufacturer
that airplanes were assembled with seals throughout various areas of
the airplane (including flight deck and cargo compartments) made of BMS
8-39 urethane foam, a material with fire-retardant properties that
deteriorate with age. This proposed AD would require replacing seals
made of BMS 8-39 urethane foam in certain areas of the airplane. We are
proposing this AD to prevent the failure of urethane seals to maintain
sufficient Halon concentrations in the cargo compartments to extinguish
or contain fire or smoke, and to prevent penetration of fire or smoke
in areas of the airplane that are difficult to access for fire and
smoke detection or suppression.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 5, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.
O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-5000,
extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-
227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric M. Brown, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; phone: 425-917-6476; fax: 425-917-6590; email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-0856;
Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-093-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received reports of burned BMS 8-39 urethane foam
insulation on two Model 767-200 series airplanes. The airplane
manufacturer has also notified us that certain Model 747, 767, and 777
airplanes were assembled with seals throughout various areas of the
airplane (including flight deck and cargo compartments) made of BMS 8-
39 urethane foam. The fire retardants in BMS 8-39 urethane foam are
mixed into, but are not chemically connected with, the remaining
components of the foam. The fire-retardant properties of BMS 8-39
urethane foam deteriorate with age (5 to 10 years). This, along with
dust, dirt, and other carbon particulate contamination of the urethane
foam, adds an available fuel source for a potential fire. Once ignited,
the deteriorated foam emits noxious smoke, does not self-extinguish,
and drips droplets of liquefied urethane, which can further propagate a
fire. Deteriorated BMS 8-39 urethane foam seals in a cargo compartment
also compromise the Halon retention and smoke/fire-blocking
capabilities of the cargo compartment. These conditions, if not
corrected, could result in failure of urethane seals to maintain
sufficient Halon concentrations in the cargo compartments to extinguish
or contain fire or smoke, and could result in penetration of fire or
smoke in areas of the airplane that are difficult to access for fire
and smoke detection or suppression.
Other Relevant Rulemaking
We issued the following ADs to require reworking certain air
distribution ducts in the environmental control system (ECS) wrapped
with BMS 8-39 or Aeronautical Materials Specifications (AMS) 3570
urethane foam insulation. These ADs resulted from reports from the
airplane manufacturer that airplanes were assembled with duct
assemblies in the ECS wrapped with BMS 8-39 urethane foam insulation, a
material with fire-retardant properties that deteriorate with age, and
reports of duct assemblies in the ECS with burned BMS 8-39 urethane
foam insulation. We issued these ADs to prevent a potential electrical
arc from igniting the BMS 8-39 urethane foam insulation on the duct
assemblies of the ECS, which could propagate a small fire and lead to a
larger fire that might spread throughout the airplane through the ECS.
AD 2008-02-16, Amendment 39-15346 (73 FR 4061, January 24,
2008), applicable to certain Model 767-200 and 767-300 series
airplanes.
AD 2010-14-01, Amendment 39-16344 (75 FR 38007, July 1,
2010), applicable to certain Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD,
747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400F, 747SR, and
747SP series airplanes.
AD 2012-02-09, Amendment 39-16932 (77 FR 5996, February 7,
2012), for certain Model 737-100, -200, -200C, and -300 series
airplanes.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed the following Boeing service bulletins:
For Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-
200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP series
airplanes: Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 747-25-3381,
Revision 1, dated May 17, 2012. This service bulletin describes
procedures for replacing BMS 8-39 urethane foam seals with either BMS
8-371 insulation foam or BMS 1-68 silicone foam rubber seals. (The
required actions depend on requirements for use and location of the BMS
8-39 urethane foam in the airplane.) Procedures for the replacement
include, for some airplanes, doing a general visual
[[Page 50413]]
inspection of the airplane sidewalls for air baffles, and of the BMS 8-
39 urethane foam for penetrations (e.g., wire penetrations). The
replacement is to be done in the following areas of the airplane
(depending on airplane configuration):
Main deck system tube/wire foam seals (left/right
sidewalls)
Main deck foam air seal (left/right sidewalls)
Main deck air baffle foam (left/right sidewalls)
Main deck ceiling panel foam strip
Forward and aft cargo system tube/wire foam seal
Flight deck overheard electrical equipment panel/structure
and overhead drip-shield foam
E1/E2 rack wire integration unit cover assemblies
For Model 767-200, -300, -300F, and -400ER series
airplanes: Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-25-0381, dated
August 19, 2010. This service bulletin describes procedures for doing a
general visual inspection for BMS 8-39 urethane foam for certain
airplanes, covering the BMS 8-39 foam with cargo liner joint sealing
tape in certain areas, replacing certain BMS 8-39 foam pads with Nomex
felt in certain areas, and replacing BMS 8-39 urethane foam seals with
either BMS 8-371 insulation foam or BMS 1-68 silicone foam rubber
seals. (The required actions depend on requirements for use and
location of the BMS 8-39 urethane foam in the airplane.) The actions
are to be done in the following areas of the airplane (depending on
airplane configuration):
Forward and aft cargo compartments
Flight deck
Crown area (foam pad to be replaced with Nomex felt)
Over wing escape hatch (corner seals)
For Model 777-200, -200LR, -300, and -300ER series
airplanes: Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-25-0362, dated
August 19, 2010. This service bulletin describes procedures for
replacing BMS 8-39 urethane foam seals with BMS 1-68 silicone foam
rubber seals in the forward and aft cargo compartments of the airplane.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of these same type
designs.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information described previously.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 694 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement for Model 747 Up to 432 work- Up to $6,162...... Up to $42,882..... Up to $7,075,530.
airplanes, depending on hours x $85 per
airplane configuration (165 hour = $36,720.
airplanes).
Replacement for Model 767 Up to 72 work- Up to $3,967...... Up to $10,087..... Up to $4,024,713.
airplanes, depending on hours x $85 per
airplane configuration (399 hour = $6,120.
airplanes).
Replacement for Model 777 16 work-hours x $1,038............ $2,398............ $311,740.
airplanes (130 airplanes). $85 per hour =
$1,360.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2012-0856; Directorate Identifier
2012-NM-093-AD.
[[Page 50414]]
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by October 5, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company airplanes, certificated in
any category, identified in paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), and (c)(3) of
this AD.
(1) Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200F,
747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP series
airplanes, as identified in Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 747-25-3381, Revision 1, dated May 17, 2012.
(2) Model 767-200, -300, -300F, and -400ER series airplanes, as
identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-25-0381,
dated August 19, 2010.
(3) Model 777-200, -200LR, -300, and -300ER series airplanes, as
identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-25-0362,
dated August 19, 2010.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 25, Equipment/furnishings.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of burned Boeing Material
Specification (BMS) 8-39 urethane foam, and a report from the
airplane manufacturer that airplanes were assembled with seals
throughout various areas of the airplane (including flight deck and
cargo compartments) made of BMS 8-39 urethane foam, a material with
fire-retardant properties that deteriorate with age. We are issuing
this AD to prevent the failure of urethane seals to maintain
sufficient Halon concentrations in the cargo compartments to
extinguish or contain fire or smoke, and to prevent penetration of
fire or smoke in areas of the airplane that are difficult to access
for fire and smoke detection or suppression.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) BMS 8-39 Urethane Foam Seal Replacements
Within 72 months after the effective date of this AD, do the
actions specified in paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), or (g)(3) of this AD,
as applicable.
(1) For Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-
200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP series
airplanes: Replace the BMS 8-39 urethane foam seals (including doing
a general visual inspection of the airplane sidewalls for air
baffles, and of the BMS 8-39 urethane foam for penetrations (e.g.,
wire penetrations)) with BMS 8-371 insulation foam or BMS 1-68
silicone foam rubber seals, as applicable, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions and Appendix A, as applicable, of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 747-25-3381, Revision 1, dated
May 17, 2012.
(2) For Model 767-200, -300, -300F, and -400ER series airplanes:
Perform a general visual inspection for the presence of BMS 8-39
urethane foam, cover the BMS 8-39 foam with cargo liner joint
sealing tape in certain areas, replace certain BMS 8-39 foam pads
with Nomex felt in certain areas, and replace BMS 8-39 urethane foam
seals with BMS 8-371 insulation foam or BMS 1-68 silicone foam
rubber seals, as applicable, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions and Appendix A, as applicable, of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 767-25-0381, dated August 19, 2010.
(3) For Model 777-200, -200LR, -300, and -300ER series
airplanes: Replace BMS 8-39 urethane foam seals with BMS 1-68
silicone foam rubber seals in the forward and aft cargo compartments
of the airplane, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-25-0362, dated
August 19, 2010.
(h) Credit for Previous Actions
For Groups 4 and 5 airplanes, as identified in Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 747-25-3381, Revision 1, dated May 17,
2012: This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, if those actions were done before the
effective date of this AD using Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 747-25-3381, dated August 19, 2010.
(i) Parts Installation Prohibition
As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a BMS
8-39 urethane foam seal on any airplane.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(k) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Eric M. Brown,
Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch,
ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6476; fax: 425-
917-6590; email: [email protected].
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 9, 2012.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-20473 Filed 8-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P