[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 141 (Monday, July 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43084-43086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17882]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
[Notice-QDA-2012-01; Docket No. 2012-0002; Sequence 17]
Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) Program Continuous Open Season-
Operational Change
AGENCY: Federal Acquisition Service, GSA.
ACTION: Notice with a request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The General Services Administration (GSA), Federal Acquisition
Service (FAS) intends to institute a Demand Based Model (DBM) designed
to assess and improve the performance of the Multiple Award Schedule
(MAS) contracts operated by GSA. GSA is proposing this operational
change to enhance the performance of and modernize the MAS program in
three key program areas: Small business viability, operational
efficiency, and cost control. The DBM will realign suppliers under the
MAS program with current Federal marketplace demands. This will result
in directing suppliers, including small businesses, to where government
procurement needs are; thereby having a supplier base more focused on
providing innovative solutions to address the procurement needs of the
government, especially under these current fiscal challenges.
Operational efficiencies and cost control thus realized will restore
and maintain the MAS program's value to Federal agencies as a
streamlined acquisition vehicle through reduction in duplicative
contracts, better contract administration support by GSA as well as
other increased levels of customer support from GSA. Additionally, DBM
is intended to benefit participating members of industry, including
small businesses, by improving processing time for awards,
modifications and
[[Page 43085]]
contract options, and improving supplier relationship management.
Implementing the DBM will allow GSA and suppliers to focus on the
ongoing modernization of the Schedules aimed at adding innovative
solutions, improving pricing and simplifying the buying experience.
DATES: This change in operations will become effective September 21,
2012.
Comment Date: Interested parties should submit written comments to
the Regulatory Secretariat at one of the addressees shown below on or
before August 22, 2012. This will allow GSA sufficient time to consider
the comments prior to the effective date of this notice.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in response to Notice--QDA-2012-01 by any of
the following methods:
Regulations.gov: http://www.regulations.gov. Submit
comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by searching for ``Notice-
QDA-2012-01''. Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that corresponds
with ``Notice-QDA-2012-01.'' Follow the instructions provided at the
``Submit a Comment'' screen. Please include your name, company name (if
any), and ``Notice-QDA-2012-01'' on your attached document.
Fax: (202) 501-4067.
Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat (MVCB), Attn: Hada Flowers, 1275 First Street NE., 7th
Floor, Washington, DC 20417.
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite Notice-QDA-2012-
01, in all correspondence related to this case. All comments received
will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal and/or business confidential information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Angela Lehman, telephone 703-605-
9541, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Over the last 20 years, the MAS program has
expanded to encompass 31 Schedules with over 19,000 federal contractors
and generally, has operated under continuous open solicitations or
``seasons'' to receive new offers. Additional information about the MAS
program is available at www.gsa.gov/schedules.
Over time certain offerings and suppliers under the MAS program
have not aligned with the procurement needs of the government. FAS
projects that well over 50 percent of the MAS contracts awarded in 2011
will not have significant sales, and FAS will spend millions of dollars
to support and manage such low/no sales contracts. Additionally, the
Government estimates that industry incurs significant costs in applying
for and maintaining Schedules contracts.
To mitigate the costs and burdens associated with the current
process while maintaining the benefits of a program that facilitates
easy access to cost-effective competitive small and large businesses,
FAS is proposing to modify its current practice of a continuous open
season for all Schedules to a practice whereby the Schedules will be
individually assessed to determine whether a continuous open season
should continue or whether one of the variations described below would
be suitable.
GSA's plan for moving to a demand based model is built around
careful analysis before any action is taken and continually monitoring
the government's procurement demands. The tentative plan, which GSA
seeks comment on before finalizing, includes the following steps:
1. GSA will assess each Special Item Number (SIN) level
requirements from the standpoint of Federal demand, existing sources,
sales performance under existing contracts, changing market dynamics,
socio-economic considerations, and other available data.
2. Based on the assessment, GSA would determine whether to maintain
a continuous open season for an entire Schedule, maintain a continuous
open season for only certain SINs on a particular Schedule, or close
the Schedule or certain SINs on the Schedule on a temporary basis to
new offers.
3. GSA would publish its decision with regard to the affected
Schedule or SIN, in FedBizOpps. This might include, without limitation;
maintaining a continuous open season for the Schedule or SIN; a
temporary closure of the Schedule or SIN; temporarily re-opening after
a decision to close the Schedule or SIN temporarily; merging the
Schedule or SIN into one or more other Schedules or SINs; or the
cancellation of the Schedule or SINs.
4. Each temporary closure of a Schedule or SIN would be published
in FedBizOpps no fewer than 30 days prior to the effective date of the
temporary closure. During the interim period, new offers for Schedule
contracts and modification requests to add SINs to existing contracts
would be received and processed in the usual manner. No new offers
would be accepted after the effective date of the temporary closure,
except, contract holders may, during or after the last year of their
third contract option period, submit an offer for a new contract.
5. For any Schedule or SIN that is closed temporarily, the Schedule
or SIN would be assessed periodically and would re-open (via an open
season) at least once every 3 years. The open season would be published
in FedBizOpps effective immediately upon publication. In case of
cancellation or merger of a Schedule or SIN, affected MAS solicitations
would be amended (refreshed), and affected contracts would be cancelled
or modified accordingly.
The DBM is not intended to affect contracts or orders awarded prior
to a temporary closure. Holders of valid contracts under Schedules or
SINs that were open when the contract was awarded but which are later
closed temporarily under DBM would continue to be able to seek, accept,
and perform orders through the end of their contract's current period
of performance. Decisions on whether to exercise any remaining option
periods on such contracts would be made in the usual manner.
This measured approach will create a more effective environment for
managing the Schedules Program. It will also create a healthier
business environment for current and prospective suppliers. Combined
with tools such as order set-asides, authorized by section 1331 of the
Small Business Jobs Act, the Schedules Program should be even more
successful in meeting its obligation to maximize opportunities for its
small business partners and is fully committed to providing them with
the help they need to win work.
GSA is seeking comments, especially from small businesses. Detailed
and comprehensive responses are appreciated to ensure that GSA fully
understands the comments. GSA encourages comments that address specific
operational implementation recommendations and responses to the
specific questions below:
1. There are a wide range of considerations GSA should employ in
determining whether additional capacity is needed on a certain Special
Item Number (SIN). This includes considerations such as number of
contracts, sales trends, average sales per contractor, geography,
socio-economic status on the SIN, degree of innovation in the industry,
and views from other Federal Agencies. What else should GSA consider in
making this decision?
2. How much advance notice should GSA provide before making a
decision for temporary closure? What business factors drive the amount
of notice needed?
[[Page 43086]]
3. Once GSA makes an announcement for temporary closure, there is
potential for a high number of new offers before the effective date of
the temporary closure. It is highly likely that nearly all of these
offers will not generate business. What should GSA do with offers
received in this window?
4. To help industry best plan, should GSA's reassessment be
conducted annually, every two years, or every three years? What actions
can GSA take to assist industry with planning? For example, is it
better to know with certainty when a schedule or SIN will reopen even
if that means the duration of closure is longer, or is it better for
GSA to take a shorter term view of the question?
5. Currently, over 50 percent of schedule contracts will not meet
the sales retention criteria. Is reducing this percentage to 30 percent
an appropriately aggressive interim goal?
6. Are there other considerations on how to ensure minimum impact
to industry with the implementation?
Dated: July 18, 2012.
Houston Taylor,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of Acquisition Management, Federal
Acquisition Service, General Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-17882 Filed 7-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-89-P