[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 105 (Thursday, May 31, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32013-32015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13020]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
23 CFR Part 658
[FHWA Docket No. FHWA-2012-0037]
RIN 2125-AF45
Truck Size and Weight; Technical Correction
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; technical correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule makes a technical correction to the regulations that
govern Longer Combination Vehicles (LCV) for the States of Oregon and
Nebraska. The amendments contained herein make no substantive changes
to FHWA regulations, policies, or procedures.
DATES: This rule is effective July 2, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Nicholas, Truck Size and Weight
Program Manager, Office of Freight Management and Operations, (202)
366-2317; or Bill Winne, Office of the Chief Counsel, (202) 366-1397.
Both are located at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Office hours for FHWA are from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., e.t., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded by accessing
the Office of the Federal Register's home page at: http://www.archives.gov or the Government Printing Office's Web page at:
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara.
Background
This rulemaking makes technical corrections to the regulations in
appendix C of 23 CFR part 658 that govern length of trailers in Oregon
and the length of permit duration in Nebraska. The regulations on LCV's
were frozen as of July 1, 1991, in accordance with Section 1023 of the
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) \1\ but a
provision was made available in 23 CFR 658.23(f) that requires the FHWA
Administrator to review petitions to correct any errors in Appendix C.
The States of Oregon and Nebraska have petitioned the Federal Highway
Administrator to make corrections to items they found to be incorrect
in accordance with 23 CFR 658.23(f), and certified those provisions
were in effect as of July 1, 1991.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Public Law 105-240, 105 Stat. 1914, 1951 (Dec. 18, 1991)
(codified at 23 U.S.C. 127(d)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oregon Department of Transportation petitioned the FHWA
Administrator that the section of Appendix C that describes operational
conditions for triple trailers on Oregon's Interstate highways is not
accurate. Oregon's law that was in effect at the time Appendix C was
adopted, June 1, 1991, required only that the trailers be ``* * *
reasonably uniform in length,'' rather than of ``equal length'' as
stated in Appendix C. The substitution of language, ``reasonably
uniform in length,'' for the current ``of equal length,'' will correct
the language and bring it into conformance with Oregon statutes of that
time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Oregon Vehicle Code 812.210 (1991-1992).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nebraska Department of Roads petitioned the FHWA Administrator to
change 120 days for the maximum duration of a permit, as currently
written in Appendix C, to allow 150 days for the maximum permit time as
included in Nebraska Statutes in July 1991. The substitution of 150
days for the current 120 days will correct the language and bring it
into conformance with Nebraska statutes of that time.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Neb. Rev. Stat. 39-6,181 (Cum. Supp. 1986).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rulemaking Analyses and Notice
Under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(b)), an agency
may waive the normal notice and comment requirements if it finds, for
good cause, that they are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to
the public interest. The FHWA finds that notice and comment for this
rule is unnecessary and contrary to the public interest because it will
have no substantive impact, is technical in nature, and relates only to
management, organization, procedure, and practice. The amendments to
the rule are based upon the explicit language of statutes that were
enacted subsequent to the promulgation of the rule. The FHWA does not
anticipate receiving meaningful comments. States, local governments,
motor carriers, and other transportation stakeholders rely upon the
regulations corrected by this action. These corrections will reduce
confusion
[[Page 32014]]
for these entities and should not be unnecessarily delayed.
Accordingly, for the reasons listed above, the agencies find good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) to waive notice and opportunity for
comment.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), Executive Order
13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and DOT Regulatory
Policies and Procedures
The FHWA has determined that this action is not a significant
regulatory action within the meaning of Executive Order 12866 or
significant within the meaning of DOT regulatory policies and
procedures. This action complies with Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
to improve regulation. It is anticipated that the economic impact of
this rulemaking will be minimal. This rule only makes minor corrections
that will not in any way alter the regulatory effect of 23 CFR part
658. Thus, this final rule will not adversely affect, in a material
way, any sector of the economy. In addition, these changes will not
interfere with any action taken or planned by another agency and will
not materially alter the budgetary impact of any entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354,
5 U.S.C. 60l-612) FHWA has evaluated the effects of this action on
small entities and has determined that the action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This final rule will not make any substantive changes to our
regulations or in the way that our regulations affect small entities;
it merely corrects technical errors. For this reason, the FHWA
certifies that this action will not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule does not impose unfunded mandates as defined by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4, March 22, 1995,
109 Stat. 48). This rule does not impose any requirements on State,
local, or tribal governments, or the private sector and, thus, will not
require those entities to expend any funds.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
This action has been analyzed in accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order 13132, and FHWA has determined
that this action does not have sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a federalism assessment. The FHWA has also
determined that this action does not preempt any State law or State
regulation or affect the States' ability to discharge traditional State
governmental functions.
Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities apply
to these programs.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not create any new information collection
requirements for which a Paperwork Reduction Act submission to the
Office of Management and Budget would be needed under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.
National Environmental Policy Act
The FHWA has analyzed this action for the purpose of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4347) and has
determined that this action will not have any effect on the quality of
the environment.
Executive Order 13175 (Tribal Consultation)
The FHWA has analyzed this action under Executive Order 13175,
dated November 6, 2000, and concluded that this rule will not have
substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes; will not
impose substantial direct compliance costs on Indian tribal government;
and will not preempt tribal law. There are no requirements set forth in
this rule that directly affect one or more Indian tribes. Therefore, a
tribal summary impact statement is not required.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children)
Under Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from
Environmental Health and Safety Risks, this final rule is not
economically significant and does not involve an environmental risk to
health and safety that may disproportionally affect children.
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of Private Property)
This final rule will not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
This final rule has been analyzed under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. The FHWA has determined that it is not a
significant energy action under that order because it is not a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866 and this
final rule is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy.
Regulation Identification Number
A regulation identification number (RIN) is assigned to each
regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations.
The Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda
in April and October of each year. The RINs contained in the heading of
this document can be used to cross reference this action with the
Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects in 23 CFR Part 658
Grant programs--transportation, Highways and roads, Motor carriers.
Issued on: May 17, 2012.
Victor M. Mendez,
Administrator.
In consideration of the foregoing, 23 CFR part 658 is amended as
set forth below.
PART 658--TRUCK SIZE AND WEIGHT, ROUTE DESIGNATIONS--LENGTH, WIDTH
AND WEIGHT LIMITATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 658 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 127 and 315; 49 U.S.C. 31111, 31112, and
31114; sec. 347, Pub. L. 108-7, 117 Stat. 419; sec. 756, Pub L. 109-
59, 119 Stat. 1219; sec. 115, Pub. L. 109-115, 119 Stat. 2408; 49
CFR 1.48(b)(19) and (c)(19).
Appendix C to Part 658 [Amended]
0
2. Amend Appendix C to Part 658 as follows:
0
A. Under ``State: Nebraska, Combination: Truck tractor and 2 trailing
unites--LCV'' entry by removing the number ``120'' under ``Permit:'' in
paragraph 4 and adding in its place the number ``150''.
0
B. Under ``State: Oregon, Combination: Truck tractor and 3
[[Page 32015]]
trailing units--LCV'' entry by removing the phrase ``equal length''
under ``Vehicle:'' in sentence 1 and adding in its place the phrase
``reasonably uniform in length''.
[FR Doc. 2012-13020 Filed 5-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P