[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18869-18871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7430]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
[Docket No. 2011-1]
Cable Statutory License: Specialty Station List
AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Congress.
ACTION: Final specialty station list.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Copyright Office is publishing a final list of stations
listed in affidavits sent to the Copyright Office in which the owner or
licensee of the station attests that the station qualifies as a
specialty station in accordance with the Federal Communications
Commission's (``FCC'') definition of specialty station in effect on
June 24, 1981. The list shall be used to verify the specialty station
status of those stations identified as such by cable systems on their
semi-annual statements of account.
DATES: Effective Date: March 28, 2012.
Applicability Dates: The list is applicable to statements of
account filed with the Copyright Office beginning with the first
accounting period of 2012 covering January 1, 2012 to June 30, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben Golant, Assistant General Counsel,
and Tanya M. Sandros, Deputy General Counsel, Copyright GC/I&R, P.O.
Box 70400, Southwest Station, Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: (202)
707-8380. Telefax: (202) 707-8366.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the cable statutory license, 17 U.S.C.
111, a cable operator may retransmit the signal of a distant television
station identified as a specialty station at the base rate rather than
at the higher 3.75% rate that is incurred for the carriage of a non-
permitted signal. 37 CFR 256.2(c). Specialty station status is
determined by reference to the former regulations of the FCC which
defined a specialty station as ``a commercial television broadcast
station that generally carries foreign-language, religious, and/or
automated programming in one-third of the hours of an average broadcast
week and one-third of the weekly prime-time hours.'' 47 CFR 76.5(kk)
(1981). The specialty station designation was part of a complex
regulatory structure governing the carriage of distant network station
signals in the 1970s. However, the FCC no longer determines whether a
station qualifies as a specialty station. It repealed its distant
signal carriage rules in 1981 and has not reviewed its specialty
station policy since that time. Nevertheless, the Office still keeps an
active list because it is relevant to the calculation of royalties
under Section 111.
On this point, it should be noted that over twenty years ago, the
Office implemented policies and procedures concerning notice to the
public regarding specialty stations, the point of which was to provide
all interested parties with a chance to comment on those stations
claiming specialty status. It was the Office's intention at that time
that the notice, publication, and objection procedures would give all
parties a chance to cooperate in their assessment of the specialty
stations on the list. 54 FR 38461, 38464 (September 18, 1989). The
Office published its first specialty station list in 1990 under these
procedures which allowed the owner of
[[Page 18870]]
the station to file an affidavit with the Office attesting to the fact
that the station's programming comports with the 1981 FCC definition,
and hence, qualifies it as a specialty station. 55 FR 40021 (October 1,
1990). The Office noted at that time that it would periodically update
the list and has done so on several occasions.
Accordingly, on January 28, 2011, the Office again initiated a
proceeding to update the list with the publication of a Notice in the
Federal Register asking the owner, or a valid agent of the owner, to
file a sworn affidavit stating that the station's programming satisfies
the FCC's former requirements for specialty station status. 76 FR 5213
(January 28, 2011). The Office received affidavits from 63 broadcast
stations for which the owner or licensee of the television station had
filed the requested affidavit. The Office then published an initial
specialty station list in the Federal Register on April 22, 2011. 76 FR
22733 (April 22, 2011).
In the aforementioned Notice, the Office stated that any party
objecting to any claim to specialty station status must submit comments
with the Office stating his or her objections within thirty days of
publication of this Notice in the Federal Register. The Motion Picture
Association of America, Inc. (``MPAA'') made such a filing and objected
to the inclusion of certain television stations. MPAA also contended
that the Register has the authority to determine whether a particular
station is properly identified as a specialty station. In its
objection, MPAA referred to the standards set forth in 17 U.S.C.
411(b)(1) regarding the use of a registration certificate for purposes
of filing an infringement suit, noting that the certificate of
registration would not be valid for this purpose if the application
contained inaccurate information which, ``if known would have caused
the Register of Copyrights to refuse registration.'' MPAA maintained
that the same principle should apply in the case of specialty stations
where the Office has accurate information to make a final determination
as to whether a particular station should be characterized as a
specialty station.
In a subsequent notice, the Office provided an opportunity for the
television broadcast stations that had filed affidavits attesting to
their specialty station status the opportunity to rebut any objections
filed to their identification as a specialty station and clarify their
status for the purposes expressed herein. Moreover, the Office sought
comment on MPAA's contention that 17 U.S.C. 411(b)(1) provides
authority for, or is relevant to, whether the Office can make a final
determination on the classification of a broadcast station as a
specialty station. See 76 FR 69288 (Nov. 22, 2011). In addition, in
keeping with its earlier practices, the Office notified each station
directly of the objection to its filing and of the opportunity to file
reply comments in support of its affidavit.
Storefront Television, LLC d/b/a Caribbean Broadcasting Network
(``Storefront''), the licensee of WPRU-LP, WSJX-LP, and WVXF(TV)
responded to the objection of the MPAA to the inclusion of its three
stations in the specialty station list compiled by the Office. It
commented that the FCC determined that English language programming is
foreign language programming in Puerto Rico and English language
stations imported into the San Juan market are considered specialty
stations. See Cable Television Co. of Puerto Rico, 46 FCC 2d 1096
(1974); Cable TV Puerto Rico, 68 FCC 2d 609 (1978). It asserted that
WPRU-LP and WSJX-LP, as English language stations licensed in Puerto
Rico, qualified as specialty stations. With regard to WVXF(TV),
Storefront stated that this television station is licensed to the US
Virgin Islands, but its English language programming is imported into
Puerto Rico. It concluded that this station also qualified as a
specialty station under the circumstances. See Storefront Reply to
Opposition at 1-2.
Venture Technologies Group, LLC(``VTG'') (licensee of WNYA-CA,
KHTV-LP, WNJJ-LD, KEBK-LP, KFIQ-LP, KILA-LP, KMRZ-LP, KRMV-LP, KRPE-LP,
KRVD-LP, KSCZ-LP, KSGO-LP, WXOX-LP, KFMP-LP, KDBK-LP, W20CM, W26DB,
W34DI, W42CX, W46DQ, W49DK, W52DW, W59EA), Four Seasons Peoria, LLC
(licensee of WBQD-LP), World Television of Washington, LLC, and WLFM,
LLC (licensee of WLFM-LP) also filed a response to MPAA's objection to
the inclusion of several of their stations on the specialty station
list compiled by the Office. These four broadcast groups asserted that
their listed stations carry automated programming in at least one-third
of the hours of an average broadcast week and one third of the weekly
prime-time hours. They concluded that all listed stations qualified as
specialty stations under the FCC's former rules and the affidavits
submitted asserting the status of each station are accurate. They also
stated that the fact that a licensed station is temporarily off the air
because of technical or other considerations should not prevent that
station from being included on the Specialty Station list as long as
the station met the FCC's criteria for a specialty station prior to
going silent and will meet the criteria when it returns to the air. See
VTG et. al. Reply to Opposition at 1-3.
No one, however, filed comments responsive to the Office's request
regarding the Register's authority to resolve any dispute concerning
the identification of a particular station as a specialty station.
Nevertheless, the Office has considered MPAA's arguments and rejects
its contention that Section 411(b)(1) provides any basis for the
Register to make these determinations. Contrary to MPAA's claims, there
is no statutory authority under this provision for the Register to make
any substantive determinations with regard to specialty station status.
In 2008, Congress passed the Prioritizing Resources and
Organization for Intellectual Property Act, Public Law 110-403, which
inter alia added a new paragraph 411(b) to ensure that no court holds a
registration certificate invalid due to what it considers to be a
misstatement on an application without first obtaining input from the
Register as to whether the application was properly filed. The
legislative history states that Congress adopted this amendment ``to
prevent intellectual property thieves from exploiting th[e] potential
loophole'' that would allow them to argue that ``a mistake in the
registration documents, such as checking the wrong box on the
registration form, renders a registration invalid and thus forecloses
the availability of statutory damages.'' H.Rep. No. 110-617, at 24
(2008).
The language of this provision is solely directed at registration.
There are no words, phrases or terms that tie this provision in any way
to Section 111, much less specialty stations. Nor does it convey any
general authority on the Register to opine on the characterization of a
station as a specialty station under a defunct FCC regulation. Rather,
Section 411(b) is a narrowly crafted provision that provides a
mechanism for the court to seek an opinion from the Register on the
consequences of an error on the registration certificate under the
Copyright Office's policies and practices.
The Office also rejects MPAA's suggestion that the Office adopt the
principles of Section 411(b) to deny specialty station status based on
the information provided in the affidavit. Whereas the Office's
registration practices and policies provide a basis for the Office to
advise the court on the significance of an error on the certificate,
the same is not true with respect to the specialty station list. The
[[Page 18871]]
policies and procedures for creating this list are limited in scope and
do not establish a process by which the Office can resolve the
specialty station status of a particular station, regardless of the
purported facts. Since the inception of this process, the Office has
stated clearly that it would not play a role in determining the merits
of a specialty station claim, noting that ``it should not itself verify
the specialty station status of particular stations.'' 54 FR 38466
(September 18, 1989). The Office has also commented that it
periodically provides an updated annotated list so that ``cable systems
can make an informed decision as to whether MPAA or any other party
might contest the system's carriage of a particular station on a
specialty basis.'' 56 FR 61056 (November 29, 1991). In light of these
policies and practices, there is no support for MPAA's contention that
the Office can make determinations regarding the specialty status of a
particular station under the principles underlying Section 411(b).
As noted above, the Office received affidavits from 63 broadcast
stations for which the owner or licensee of the television station had
filed the requested affidavit. Since the publication of the initial
list, the Office received 24 additional affidavits, attesting to the
specialty station status of the 24 identified stations. Because the
Office received a substantial number of late filed affidavits, the
Office found it necessary to seek input from the public regarding the
asserted specialty station status of these particular stations and
allow any interested party to file an objection to these newly listed
stations. See 76 FR 69288 (November 8, 2011). No one filed any
objections to the television stations listed in this most recent
Federal Register publication. As such, these stations shall be duly
listed here.
The final list of specialty stations, as identified in the
affidavits and published herein, shall be applicable to accounting
periods beginning on January 1, 2012. Licensing examiners shall refer
to the final annotated list in examining a statement of account where a
cable system operator claims specialty station status for a particular
station. If a cable system operator claims specialty station status for
a station not on the published final list, the examiner shall determine
whether the owner of the station has filed an affidavit since
publication of the list.
With regard to the treatment of contested specialty stations after
this proceeding concludes, it is important to note that the Licensing
Division examiners will look at these stations in the same way they
have done in the past. That is, if a cable operator claims specialty
station status for a contested station on the list, the examiner will
inform the operator by letter that a particular party objects to the
``specialty station characterization.'' See 54 FR 38461, 38464
(September 18, 1989). The cable operator may then file an amended
Statement of Account and recalculate royalties, if the operator so
chooses.
Final Specialty Station List
CBAFT, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
CBFT, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
CBKFT, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
CBLFT, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
CBOFT, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
CBUFT, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
CBVT, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
CBWFT, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
CBXFT, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
CHLT-TV, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
CIMT, Riviere-du-Loup, Quebec, Canada
CJBR, Rimouski, Quebec, Canada
CKSH, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
CKTM, Trois-Rivieres, Quebec, Canada
CKTV, Saguenay, Quebec, Canada
K24IC-D, Bellingham, WA
KAZA-DTV, Avalon, CA
KBBC-TV, Bishop, CA
KBCB, Bellingham, WA
KBFD-DT, Honolulu, HI
KBKF-LP, San Jose, CA
KCGI-CA, Cape Girardeau, MO
KCSO-LD, Sacramento, CA
KDBK-LP, Caliente, CA
KEBK-LP, Bakersfield, CA
KEFM-LP, Chico, CA
KFIQ-LP, Lubbock, TX
KFMP-LP, Lubbock, TX
KHTV-LP, Los Angeles, CA
KILA-LP, Cherry Valley, CA
KMRZ-LP, Moreno Valley, CA
KNET-CA, Los Angeles, CA
KNLA-LP, Los Angeles, CA
KNNN-LP, Redding, CA
KRMV-LP, Walnut, CA
KRPE-LP, Banning, CA
KRVD-LP, Banning, CA
KSCZ-LP, Greenfield, CA
KSFV-CA, Los Angeles, CA
KSGO-LP, Chico, CA
KSXC-LP, S. Sioux City, NE
KTSF, San Francisco, CA
KWHY-TV, Los Angeles, CA
KWTA-LP, Tucson, AZ
W07DP-D35, Harrisburg, PA
W14DFD-TV14, Elliotsburg, PA
W16COD-TV16, Middleburg, PA
W20CM, Port Jervis, NY
W26DB, Port Jervis, NY
W29CO-TV29, Sharon, PA
W34DI, Port Jervis, NY
W42CX, Port Jervis, NY
W45BT-TV45, Brookville, PA
W46DQ, Port Jervis, NY
W46EJ-D21, Clarksburg, WV
W49DK, Port Jervis, NY
W52DW, Port Jervis, NY
W59EA, Port Jervis, NY
WAQP, Saginaw, MI
WBNF-CA, Buffalo, NY
WBPA-LP, Pittsburgh, PA
WBQD-LP, Davenport, IA
WCHU-LP, Chicago, IL
WDWO-CA, Detroit, MI
WDYR-CA, Dyersburg, TN
WHCT-LP, Hartford/Springfield, CT
WINM, Angola, IN
WKBS-TV47, Altoona, PA
WLFM-LP, Chicago, IL
WLJC-TV, Beattyville, KY
WLXI, Greensboro, NC
WMBC-TV, Newton, NJ
WNJJ-LD, Paterson, NJ
WNYA-CA, Kinderhook, NY
WNYB, Jamestown, NY
WPCB-TV40, Greensburg, PA
WPRU-LP, Aguadilla, P.R.
WRAY-TV, Wilson, NC
WRLM, Canton, OH
WSJP-LP, Aguadilla, P.R.
WSJX-LP, Aguadilla, P.R.
WTCT-Marion, IL
WTLJ, Muskegon, MI
WVXF(TV), Charlotte Amalie, USVI
WXLI, Greensboro, NC
WXOX-LP, Cleveland, OH
XERV-TV, Reynosa, Tamaulipas, Mexico
XHAB-TV, Matamoros, Tamaulipas, Mexico
Dated: March 21, 2012.
Maria A. Pallante,
Register of Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 2012-7430 Filed 3-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-P