[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 13 (Friday, January 20, 2012)]
[Pages 3010-3013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1060]



[NRC-2012-0005; IA-11-032]

In the Matter of Mr. Francis Guilbeau; Order Prohibiting 
Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities


    Mr. Francis Guilbeau was employed as a Radiographer at Accurate NDE 
& Inspection, LLC, (Accurate NDE or Licensee) located in Broussard, 
Louisiana, in March 2010. Accurate NDE is the holder of a general 
license issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the 
Commission) pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 
CFR) 150.20. This general license was granted to Accurate NDE at 
various times during calendar years between 2005 through 2011.


    On May 26, 2010, the NRC conducted a special inspection of licensed 
activities involving the use of byproduct material for industrial 
radiography conducted under a general license pursuant to the 
provisions of 10 CFR 150.20. The inspection was conducted in response 
to an event that occurred on March 15, 2010, involving the loss of a 
sealed source of iridium-192 while performing licensed activities in 
offshore Federal waters. On June 28, 2010, the NRC's Office of 
Investigations, Region IV, began an investigation (Case No. 4-2010-062) 
to determine, in part, whether Mr. Guilbeau: (1) Willfully failed to 
follow operating procedures by attempting to retrieve a disconnected 
source without making the proper notifications and obtaining 
authorization from the Accurate NDE radiation safety officer (RSO); and 
(2) willfully recorded an inaccurate number for a pocket dosimeter 
reading on the Accurate NDE Daily Radiation Report dated March 14, 
2010. By letter dated July 28, 2011 (ML11209B637), the NRC informed Mr. 
Guilbeau that the NRC was considering escalated enforcement action for 
two apparent violations of NRC's deliberate misconduct rule, 10 CFR 
30.10. The NRC offered Mr. Guilbeau the opportunity to request a 
predecisional enforcement conference or request alternative dispute 
resolution (ADR) with the NRC in an attempt to resolve issues 
associated with this matter. In response, Mr. Guilbeau requested a 
predecisional enforcement conference. A predecisional enforcement 
conference was held with Mr. Guilbeau on August 25, 2011, in an

[[Page 3011]]

effort to obtain Mr. Guilbeau's point of view on the violations.
    Based on the NRC review of the information obtained during the 
predecisional enforcement conference, the inspection and the 
investigation, two violations of the NRC's rule prohibiting deliberate 
misconduct, 10 CFR 30.10, were identified. First, Mr. Guilbeau engaged 
in deliberate misconduct in violation of 10 CFR 30.10(a)(1) by causing 
Accurate NDE to be in violation of 10 CFR 150.20(b)(5), which requires 
Accurate NDE to comply with the terms of its State license. Paragraph 
21A of the Louisiana State license required Accurate NDE to follow its 
operating procedures. Accurate NDE's operating procedures prohibit a 
radiographer from retrieving a disconnected source unless he contacts 
the radiation safety officer (RSO) first and obtains authorization. Mr. 
Guilbeau did not contact the RSO or obtain authorization from the RSO 
prior to attempting retrieval of the source. Therefore, Mr. Guilbeau's 
actions caused Accurate NDE to be in violation of its Louisiana State 
license, and 10 CFR 150.20. During an interview with the Office of 
Investigations, Mr. Guilbeau admitted that he tried to retrieve the 
source without first contacting the RSO. Mr. Guilbeau also stated in 
this interview that he knew radiographers were not supposed to retrieve 
a source. In a written test on Accurate NDE's procedures taken on March 
10, 2010, four days prior to going out on this job, Mr. Guilbeau chose 
the correct response to a question asking what to do in the event of a 
source disconnect--a further indication that he knew it was necessary 
to contact the RSO and that he was not supposed to attempt to put the 
source back in the camera.
    This incident occurred on Mr. Guilbeau's first job back with 
Accurate NDE after several years working elsewhere. During his previous 
tenure with Accurate NDE in 2004-2006, Mr. Guilbeau was involved in a 
similar incident and in that case, he immediately called the office. At 
the predecisional enforcement conference held on August 25, 2011, Mr. 
Guilbeau stated repeatedly that his primary aim was to get the ``pill'' 
hooked back up so he could start X-raying again. He also indicated that 
he should have contacted the office first, but it was his first job 
back with Accurate NDE, and he just wanted to get the work done without 
any complications.
    Because Mr. Guilbeau knew that he was supposed to contact the RSO 
before attempting to retrieve a source but did not do so, and because 
his actions caused the license to be in violation of 10 CFR 
150.20(b)(5), Mr. Guilbeau's actions constitute deliberate misconduct 
pursuant to 10 CFR 30.10(a)(1). During the attempted source retrieval, 
the licensee's conclusion was that the source fell through the grating 
on the deck of the platform into the Gulf of Mexico. Therefore, as a 
result of Mr. Guilbeau's actions, the source was lost.
    Second, Mr. Guilbeau engaged in deliberate misconduct in violation 
of 10 CFR 30.10(a)(2) by deliberately submitting to Accurate NDE, an 
NRC general licensee, information that he knew was inaccurate in some 
material respect. Specifically, Mr. Guilbeau recorded a number for a 
pocket dosimeter reading associated with work performed by another 
radiographer on March 14, 2010, on the Daily Radiation Report, that Mr. 
Guilbeau knew was inaccurate. During an interview by the Office of 
Investigations, Mr. Guilbeau admitted he did not know what the other 
radiographer's true radiographic dose exposure was for March 14, 2010, 
and estimated a number on the licensee's Daily Radiation Report for 
that shift. During the predecisional enforcement conference, Mr. 
Guilbeau stated that he could not remember receiving the other 
radiographer's radiographic dose exposure that would have been recorded 
at the end of the shift. This would indicate that Mr. Guilbeau did not 
enter the correct dose exposure reading for the other radiographer on 
the Daily Radiation Report. As a result, Mr. Guilbeau deliberately 
submitted information to Accurate NDE, an NRC general licensee, 
information that he knew to be inaccurate in some respect material to 
the NRC. This was a violation of 10 CFR 30.10(a)(2). In addition, 
because the Daily Radiation Report is a record that Accurate NDE is 
required to keep pursuant to 10 CFR 34.83 and 34.47(b), Mr. Guilbeau's 
actions caused Accurate NDE to be in violation of 10 CFR 30.9(a), which 
requires that information required by regulation to be maintained by a 
licensee must be accurate in all material respects.


    Based on the above, the NRC has concluded that Mr. Francis 
Guilbeau, a former employee of Accurate NDE, violated 10 CFR 
30.10(a)(1) by engaging in deliberate misconduct that caused Accurate 
NDE to be in violation of 10 CFR 150.20(b)(5) and 30.9. Further, Mr. 
Guilbeau deliberately provided to Accurate NDE information that he knew 
to be incomplete or inaccurate in some respect material to the NRC, in 
violation of 10 CFR 30.10(a)(2).
    The NRC must be able to rely on the Licensee and its employees to 
comply with NRC requirements, including the requirement that general 
licensees operating under the reciprocity provisions of 10 CFR 150.20 
comply with the terms and conditions of their Agreement State licenses 
and the requirement to provide information and maintain records that 
are complete and accurate in all material respects. Mr. Guilbeau's 
actions caused the Licensee to violate 10 CFR 150.20(b)(5) and 10 CFR 
30.9 and have raised serious doubt as to whether he can be relied upon 
to comply with NRC requirements and to provide complete and accurate 
information to the NRC.
    Consequently, I lack the requisite reasonable assurance that 
licensed activities can be conducted in compliance with the 
Commission's requirements and that the health and safety of the public 
will be protected if Mr. Guilbeau were permitted at this time to be 
involved in NRC-licensed activities. Therefore, the public health, 
safety and interest require that Mr. Guilbeau be prohibited from any 
involvement in NRC-licensed activities for a period of 1 year from the 
effective date of this Order, as defined in Section V. Additionally Mr. 
Guilbeau is required to notify the NRC of his first employment in NRC-
licensed activities for a period of 1 year following the prohibition 


    Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 81, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and 186 
of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's 
regulations in 10 CFR 2.202, 10 CFR 30.10, 10 CFR parts 20, 34, and 10 
CFR 150.20, It is hereby ordered that:
    1. Mr. Francis Guilbeau is prohibited for 1 year from the effective 
date of this Order, as defined in Section V, from engaging in NRC-
licensed activities. NRC-licensed activities are those activities that 
are conducted pursuant to a specific or general license issued by the 
NRC, including but not limited to, those activities of Agreement State 
licensees conducted pursuant to the authority granted by 10 CFR 150.20. 
Specifically, Mr. Guilbeau is prohibited from performing, supervising, 
assisting or otherwise engaging in (1) Industrial radiography for an 
Agreement State licensee that is conducted in non-Agreement States, in 
areas of exclusive federal jurisdiction within Agreement States, or in 
offshore waters under an NRC general license granted pursuant to 10 CFR 
150.20, (2) industrial radiography for an NRC licensee, including, but 
not limited to,

[[Page 3012]]

radiography conducted under the authority of a license issued pursuant 
to 10 CFR Part 34, and (3) any other licensed activity under NRC 
    2. As of the effective date of this Order, if Mr. Guilbeau is 
currently involved in NRC-licensed activities, he must immediately 
cease those activities, and inform the NRC of the name, address and 
telephone number of the employer, and provide a copy of this Order to 
the employer.
    3. For a period of 1 year after the 1-year period of prohibition 
has expired, Mr. Guilbeau shall, within 20 days of acceptance of his 
first employment offer involving NRC-licensed activities or his 
becoming involved in NRC-licensed activities, as defined in paragraph 
IV.1 above, provide notice to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U. 
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, of the 
name, address, and telephone number of the employer or the entity where 
he is, or will be, involved in the NRC-licensed activities. In the 
notification, Mr. Guilbeau shall include a statement of his commitment 
to compliance with NRC regulatory requirements and the basis for why 
the Commission should have confidence that he will now comply with 
applicable NRC requirements.
    The Director, Office of Enforcement, may, in writing, relax or 
rescind any of the above conditions upon demonstration by Mr. Guilbeau 
of good cause.


    In accordance with 10 CFR 2.202, Mr. Francis Guilbeau must, and any 
other person adversely affected by this Order may, submit an answer to 
this Order within 30 days of its issuance date. In addition, Mr. 
Guilbeau and any other person adversely affected by this Order may 
request a hearing on this Order within 30 days of its issuance date. 
Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the 
time to answer or request a hearing. A request for extension of time 
must be directed to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission, and include a statement of good cause for the 
    All documents filed in NRC adjudicatory proceedings, including a 
request for hearing, a petition for leave to intervene, any motion or 
other document filed in the proceeding prior to the submission of a 
request for hearing or petition to intervene, and documents filed by 
interested governmental entities participating under 10 CFR 2.315(c), 
must be filed in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule (72 FR 49139, 
August 28, 2007). The E-Filing process requires participants to submit 
and serve all adjudicatory documents over the Internet, or in some 
cases to mail copies on electronic storage media. Participants may not 
submit paper copies of their filings unless they seek an exemption in 
accordance with the procedures described below.
    To comply with the procedural requirements of E-Filing, at least 10 
days prior to the filing deadline, the participant should contact the 
Office of the Secretary by email at [email protected], or by 
telephone at (301) 415-1677, to request (1) a digital ID certificate, 
which allows the participant (or its counsel or representative) to 
digitally sign documents and access the E-Submittal server for any 
proceeding in which it is participating; and (2) advise the Secretary 
that the participant will be submitting a request or petition for 
hearing (even in instances in which the participant, or its counsel or 
representative, already holds an NRC-issued digital ID certificate). 
Based upon this information, the Secretary will establish an electronic 
docket for the hearing in this proceeding if the Secretary has not 
already established an electronic docket.
    Information about applying for a digital ID certificate is 
available on NRC's public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/apply-certificates.html. System requirements for accessing 
the E-Submittal server are detailed in NRC's ``Guidance for Electronic 
Submission,'' which is available on the agency's public Web site at 
http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. Participants may 
attempt to use other software not listed on the Web site, but should 
note that the NRC's E-Filing system does not support unlisted software, 
and the NRC Meta System Help Desk will not be able to offer assistance 
in using unlisted software.
    If a participant is electronically submitting a document to the NRC 
in accordance with the E-Filing rule, the participant must file the 
document using the NRC's online, web-based submission form. In order to 
serve documents through NRC's Electronic Information Exchange (EIE), 
users will be required to install a web browser plug-in from the NRC 
Web site. Further information on the web-based submission form, 
including the installation of the web browser plug-in, is available on 
the NRC's public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html.
    Once a participant has obtained a digital ID certificate and a 
docket has been created, the participant can then submit a request for 
hearing or petition for leave to intervene. Submissions should be in 
portable document format (PDF) in accordance with NRC guidance 
available on the NRC public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. A filing is considered complete at the time the 
documents are submitted through the NRC's E-Filing system. To be 
timely, an electronic filing must be submitted to the E-Filing system 
no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on the due date. Upon receipt of 
a transmission, the E-Filing system time-stamps the document and sends 
the submitter an email notice confirming receipt of the document. The 
E-Filing system also distributes an email notice that provides access 
to the document to the NRC's Office of the General Counsel and any 
others who have advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to 
participate in the proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the 
documents on those participants separately. Therefore, applicants and 
other participants (or their counsel or representative) must apply for 
and receive a digital ID certificate before a hearing request/petition 
to intervene is filed so that they can obtain access to the document 
via the E-Filing system.
    A person filing electronically using the agency's adjudicatory E-
Filing system may seek assistance by contacting the NRC Meta System 
Help Desk through the ``Contact Us'' link located on the NRC Web site 
at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html, by email at 
[email protected], or by a toll-free call at (866) 672-7640. The 
NRC Meta System Help Desk is available between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., 
Eastern time, Monday through Friday, excluding government holidays.
    Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not 
submitting documents electronically must file an exemption request, in 
accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper filing 
requesting authorization to continue to submit documents in paper 
format. Such filings must be submitted by: (1) First class mail 
addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: 
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or 
expedited delivery service to the Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth 
Floor, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 
20852, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Participants

[[Page 3013]]

filing a document in this manner are responsible for serving the 
document on all other participants. Filing is considered complete by 
first-class mail as of the time of deposit in the mail, or by courier, 
express mail, or expedited delivery service upon depositing the 
document with the provider of the service. A presiding officer, having 
granted an exemption request from using E-Filing, may require a 
participant or party to use E-Filing if the presiding officer 
subsequently determines that the reason for granting the exemption from 
use of E-Filing no longer exists.
    Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in 
NRC's electronic hearing docket, which is available to the public at 
http://ehd1.nrc.gov/ehd/, unless excluded pursuant to an order of the 
Commission, or the presiding officer. Participants are requested not to 
include personal privacy information, such as social security numbers, 
home addresses, or home phone numbers in their filings, unless an NRC 
regulation or other law requires submission of such information. With 
respect to copyrighted works, except for limited excerpts that serve 
the purpose of the adjudicatory filings and would constitute a Fair Use 
application, participants are requested not to include copyrighted 
materials in their submission.
    If a person other than Mr. Francis Guilbeau requests a hearing, 
that person shall set forth with particularity the manner in which his 
interest is adversely affected by this Order and shall address the 
criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.309(d).
    If a hearing is requested by Mr. Guilbeau or any other person whose 
interest is adversely affected, the Commission will issue an order 
designating the time and place of any hearings.
    If a hearing is held, the issue to be considered at such hearing 
shall be whether this Order should be sustained. In the absence of any 
request for hearing or ADR, or written approval of an extension of time 
in which to request a hearing, the effective date of this Order (the 
date that the provisions specified in Section IV above become final and 
effective) shall be 30 days from the issuance date of this Order 
without further order or proceedings. If an extension of time for 
requesting a hearing has been approved, the effective date of this 
Order shall be when the extension expires if a hearing request has not 
been received. If a hearing or ADR is requested, the effective date of 
this Order shall be determined in accordance with the hearing or ADR 

     Dated this 5th day of January 2012.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Roy P. Zimmerman,
Director, Office of Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2012-1060 Filed 1-19-12; 8:45 am]