[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 247 (Friday, December 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80337-80338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32940]



[[Page 80337]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-928]


Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People's Republic of China: 
Rescission of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 4, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the 
``Department'') published the Preliminary Results for the new shipper 
review (``NSR'') of uncovered innerspring units (``innersprings'') from 
the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') covering the period of review 
(``POR'') February 1, 2010, through July 31, 2010.\1\ As discussed 
below, we preliminarily found that Foshan Nanhai Jiujiang Quan Li 
Spring Hardware Factory's (``Quan Li'') sale was non-bona fide, and 
announced our preliminary intent to rescind Quan Li's NSR. For the 
final results of this review, we continue to find Quan Li's sale to be 
non-bona fide. Therefore, because there were no other shipments or 
entries by Quan Li during the POR, we are rescinding this NSR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People's Republic 
of China: Preliminary Intent to Rescind New Shipper Review, 76 FR 
47151 (August 4, 2011) (``Preliminary Results'').

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: December 23, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Walker, AD/CVD Operations, Office 
IX, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone-(202) 482-0413.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    As noted above, on August 4, 2011, the Department published the 
Preliminary Results of this NSR. Between September 13, 2011 and 
September 30, 2011, we received case and rebuttal briefs from Leggett 
and Platt, Incorporated (the ``Petitioner'') and Quan Li. Thereafter, 
the Department extended the time period for issuing the final results 
to December 23, 2011.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People's Republic 
of China: Extension of Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper 
Review, 76 FR 65695 (October 24, 2011); Uncovered Innerspring Units 
from the People's Republic of China: Second Extension of Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 76 FR 73592 
(November 29, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the briefs by parties are addressed in the 
``Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People's Republic of China: 
Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of New Shipper 
Review,'' which is dated concurrently with this notice (``I&D Memo''). 
A list of the issues which parties raised, and to which we respond in 
the I&D Memo, is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The I&D Memo 
is a public document and is on file in the Central Records Unit 
(``CRU''), Main Commerce Building, Room 7046, and is accessible on the 
Department's Web site at http://www.trade.gov/ia. The paper copy and 
electronic version of the memorandum are identical in content.

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the order is uncovered innerspring units 
composed of a series of individual metal springs joined together in 
sizes corresponding to the sizes of adult mattresses (e.g., twin, twin 
long, full, full long, queen, California king and king) and units used 
in smaller constructions, such as crib and youth mattresses. All 
uncovered innerspring units are included in the scope regardless of 
width and length. Included within this definition are innersprings 
typically ranging from 30.5 inches to 76 inches in width and 68 inches 
to 84 inches in length. Innersprings for crib mattresses typically 
range from 25 inches to 27 inches in width and 50 inches to 52 inches 
in length.
    Uncovered innerspring units are suitable for use as the innerspring 
component in the manufacture of innerspring mattresses, including 
mattresses that incorporate a foam encasement around the innerspring.
    Pocketed and non-pocketed innerspring units are included in this 
definition. Non-pocketed innersprings are typically joined together 
with helical wire and border rods. Non-pocketed innersprings are 
included in this definition regardless of whether they have border rods 
attached to the perimeter of the innerspring. Pocketed innersprings are 
individual coils covered by a ``pocket'' or ``sock'' of a nonwoven 
synthetic material or woven material and then glued together in a 
linear fashion.
    Uncovered innersprings are classified under subheading 
9404.29.9010, 9404.29.9005 and 9404.29.9011 and have also been 
classified under subheadings 9404.10.0000, 7326.20.0070, 7320.20.5010, 
or 7320.90.5010 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(``HTSUS''). The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and 
customs purposes only; the written description of the scope of the 
order is dispositive.

Bona Fides Analysis

    In conducting an NSR, the Department examines price, quantity, and 
other circumstances associated with the sale to determine if the sale 
was based on normal commercial considerations and presents an accurate 
representation of the company's normal business practices, and provides 
a future indicator of its future selling practice.\3\ If the Department 
determines, for example, that the price was not based on normal 
commercial considerations or is atypical of the respondent's normal 
business practices, including other sales of comparable merchandise, 
the sale may be considered not bona fide, and, as such, cannot serve as 
a reasonable or reliable basis for calculating a dumping margin.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Shandong Chenhe Int'l Trading Co. v. United States, No. 
08-00373, Slip Op. 10-129 at 14 (CIT 2010); see also Tianjin 
Tiancheng Pharm. Co v. United States, 366 F. Supp. 2d 1246, 1250 
(CIT 2005); and Hebei New Donghua Amino Acid Co. v. United States, 
374 F. Supp. 2d 1333, 1342 (CIT 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the Preliminary Results, the Department analyzed the bona fides 
of Quan Li's sale and preliminarily found its sale to the United States 
to be non-bona fide.\4\ Based on the Department's complete analysis of 
all the information on the record of this review regarding the bona 
fides of Quan Li's NSR sale, the Department continues to find Quan Li's 
sale to be non-bona fide because (1) Quan Li's sale quantity is low and 
not typical of other normal innersprings transactions, (2) Quan Li's 
sale price is high and therefore atypical and not indicative of future 
sales, (3) the record does not demonstrate that the subject merchandise 
was consumed or resold, and (4) the record does not demonstrate that 
the innersprings are an ongoing concern for the importer. The 
Department's analysis was not based on any one factor but, instead, 
examined the totality of the evidence on the record of this review to 
determine that Quan Li's sale was not bona fide.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Memorandum to James C. Doyle, Director, Office IX, 
through Scot T. Fullerton, Program Manager, Office IX, from Paul 
Walker, Case Analyst, Office IX, ``First New Shipper Review of 
Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People's Republic of China: 
Bona Fide Analysis of Foshan Nanhai Jiujiang Quan Li Spring Hardware 
Factory's New Shipper Sale,'' date August 4, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rescission of New Shipper Review

    For the foregoing reasons, the Department finds that the sale of 
Quan Li is non-bona fide and that this sale

[[Page 80338]]

does not provide a reasonable or reliable basis for calculating a 
dumping margin. Because a non-bona fide sale was the only sale of 
subject merchandise during the POR, the Department is rescinding this 
NSR pursuant to section 351.214(f) of the Department's regulations.

Notifications to Importers

    The Department will notify U.S. Customs and Border Protection that 
bonding is no longer permitted to fulfill security requirements for 
shipments by Quan Li of innersprings from the PRC entered, or withdrawn 
from warehouse, for consumption in the United States on or after the 
publication of this rescission notice in the Federal Register. 
Furthermore, because the Department has not completed this review for 
Quan Li and Quan Li has not otherwise been reviewed by the Department, 
a cash deposit at the PRC-wide rate of 234.51% \5\ should be collected 
for all of Quan Li's shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or 
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication 
date of this notice until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People's Republic 
of China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 73 
FR 79443 (December 29, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    This notice is the only reminder to parties subject to the 
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under the APO in accordance with section 351.305(a)(3) of the 
Department's regulations. Timely written notification of the return or 
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order 
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the 
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
    This NSR and notice are issued and published in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i) of the Act and section 351.214(f)(3) 
of the Department's regulations.

    Dated: December 15, 2011.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-32940 Filed 12-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P