[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72173-72178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30158]



[[Page 72173]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-533-853, C-523-802, C-520-806, and C-552-810]


Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe From India, the 
Sultanate of Oman, the United Arab Emirates, and the Socialist Republic 
of Vietnam: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigations

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

DATES: Effective Date: November 22, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua Morris, AD/CVD Operations, 
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1779.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Petitions

    On October 26, 2011, the Department of Commerce (``Department'') 
received petitions filed in proper form by Allied Tube and Conduit, JMC 
Steel Group, Wheatland Tube, and United States Steel Corporation 
(collectively, ``Petitioners''), who are domestic producers of circular 
welded carbon-quality steel pipe (``certain steel pipe''). See 
Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing Duties 
on Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from India, Oman, the 
United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam, dated October 26, 2011 (hereinafter, 
``the Petitions''). In response to the Department's requests, 
Petitioners provided timely information supplementing the Petitions on 
November 7, 2011 (hereinafter, the ``Supplement to the AD/CVD 
Petitions''), November 9, 2011, and November 10, 2011.
    In accordance with section 702(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (``the Act''), Petitioners allege that manufacturers, 
producers, or importers of certain steel pipe from India, the Sultanate 
of Oman (``Oman''), the United Arab Emirates (``the UAE''), and the 
Socialist Republic of Vietnam (``Vietnam''), receive countervailable 
subsidies within the meaning of section 701 of the Act, and that such 
imports are materially injuring, or threatening material injury to, the 
domestic industry producing certain steel pipe in the United States.
    The Department finds that Petitioners filed the Petitions on behalf 
of the domestic industry because they are interested parties as defined 
in section 771(9)(C) of the Act, and Petitioners have demonstrated 
sufficient industry support with respect to the Petitions (see 
``Determination of Industry Support for the Petitions'' section below).

Period of Investigation

    The period of investigation is January 1, 2010, through December 
31, 2010.

Scope of Investigations

    The products covered by these investigations are certain steel pipe 
from India, Oman, the UAE, and Vietnam. For a full description of the 
scope of the investigations, see ``Scope of the Investigations,'' in 
Appendix I of this notice.

Comments on Scope of Investigations

    During our review of the Petitions, we discussed the scope with 
Petitioners to ensure that it is an accurate reflection of the products 
for which the domestic industry is seeking relief. Moreover, as 
discussed in the preamble to the Department's regulations, we are 
setting aside a period for interested parties to raise issues regarding 
product coverage. See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties; Final 
Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997). Interested parties that wish 
to submit comments on the scope should do so by December 5, 2011, 
twenty calendar days from the signature date of this notice. All 
comments must be filed on the records of the India, Oman, the UAE, and 
Vietnam antidumping duty investigations and the India, Oman, the UAE, 
and Vietnam countervailing duty (``CVD'') investigations. All comments 
and submissions to the Department must be filed electronically using 
Import Administration's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized 
Electronic Service System (``IA ACCESS''). An electronically filed 
document must be received successfully in its entirety by the 
Department's electronic records system, IA ACCESS, by the time and date 
noted above. Documents excepted from the electronic submission 
requirements must be filed manually (i.e., in paper form) with the 
Import Administration's APO/Dockets Unit, Room 1870, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20230, and stamped with the date and time of receipt by the deadline 
noted above.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-07-06/pdf/2011-16352.pdf for details of the Department's Electronic Filing 
Requirements, which went into effect on August 5, 2011. Information 
on help using IA ACCESS can be found at https://iaaccess.trade.gov/help.aspx and a handbook can be found at https://iaaccess.trade.gov/help/Handbook%20on%20Electronic%20Filling%20Procedures.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consultations

    Pursuant to section 702(b)(4)(A)(ii) of the Act, on October 27, 
2011, the Department invited representatives of the Indian, Omani, UAE, 
and Vietnamese governments to consult with respect to the Petitions.
    On November 9, 2011, the Indian government asked the Department to 
postpone initiation of the investigation so that the Department could 
hold consultations with representatives of the Indian government after 
November 15, 2011. See Letter from Embassy of India to the Department 
of Commerce (November 9, 2011). On November 10, 2011, the Department 
advised the Indian government that we were statutorily obligated to 
initiate an investigation or dismiss the Petitions no later than 
November 15, 2011, and could only extend this period under section 
702(b)(4)(A)(ii) of the Act in circumstances where the Department finds 
that the Petitions alone do not establish support of domestic producers 
or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of the total production 
of the domestic like product and, as a result, the Department is 
required to poll or otherwise determine support for the Petitions by 
the industry. Since the Department was not faced with those 
circumstances, the Indian government was notified that we would be 
available to meet with them after initiation. See Letter from Nancy 
Decker to the Embassy of India (November 10, 2011). On November 15, 
2011, the Indian government submitted comments objecting to the 
allegations made by Petitioners and arguing that we should not initiate 
a CVD investigation. See Memorandum to File (November 15, 2011). On 
November 15, 2011, we sent a response to the Indian government. See 
Letter from Nancy Decker to the Embassy of India (November 15, 2011).
    The Omani government was unable to participate in consultations 
prior to initiation.
    Consultations with the Vietnamese and UAE governments were held in 
Washington, DC, on November 7, 2011, and November 14, 2011, 
respectively. See Ex-Parte Memorandum on Consultations regarding the 
Petition for Imposition of Countervailing Duties on Circular Welded 
Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam 
(November 15, 2011); and Ex-Parte Memorandum on Consultations regarding 
the Petition for Imposition of Countervailing Duties on Circular Welded 
Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from

[[Page 72174]]

the United Arab Emirates (November 14, 2011). All memoranda are on file 
electronically via IA ACCESS. Access to IA ACCESS is available in the 
Central Records Unit (``CRU''), Room 7046, of the main Department of 
Commerce building.

Determination of Industry Support for the Petitions

    Section 702(b)(1) of the Act requires that a petition be filed on 
behalf of the domestic industry. Section 702(c)(4)(A) of the Act 
provides that a petition meets this requirement if the domestic 
producers or workers who support the petition account for: (i) At least 
25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and 
(ii) more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like 
product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support 
for, or opposition to, the petition. Moreover, section 702(c)(4)(D) of 
the Act provides that, if the petition does not establish support of 
domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of 
the total production of the domestic like product, the Department 
shall: (i) Poll the industry or rely on other information in order to 
determine if there is support for the petition, as required by 
subparagraph (A); or (ii) determine industry support using a 
statistically valid sampling method to poll the industry.
    Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines the ``industry'' as the 
producers as a whole of a domestic like product. Thus, to determine 
whether a petition has the requisite industry support, the statute 
directs the Department to look to producers and workers who produce the 
domestic like product. The International Trade Commission (``ITC''), 
which is responsible for determining whether ``the domestic industry'' 
has been injured, must also determine what constitutes a domestic like 
product in order to define the industry. While both the Department and 
the ITC must apply the same statutory definition regarding the domestic 
like product (see section 771(10) of the Act), they do so for different 
purposes and pursuant to a separate and distinct authority. In 
addition, the Department's determination is subject to limitations of 
time and information. Although this may result in different definitions 
of the like product, such differences do not render the decision of 
either agency contrary to law. See USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F. 
Supp. 2d 1, 8 (CIT 2001) (citing Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United 
States, 688 F. Supp. 639, 644 (CIT 1988)), aff'd 865 F.2d 240 (Fed. 
Cir. 1989).
    Section 771(10) of the Act defines the domestic like product as ``a 
product which is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in 
characteristics and uses with, the article subject to an investigation 
under this title.'' Thus, the reference point from which the domestic 
like product analysis begins is ``the article subject to an 
investigation'' (i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to be 
investigated, which normally will be the scope as defined in the 
petition).
    With regard to the domestic like product, Petitioners do not offer 
a definition of domestic like product distinct from the scope of the 
investigations. Based on our analysis of the information submitted on 
the record, we have determined that certain steel pipe constitutes a 
single domestic like product and we have analyzed industry support in 
terms of that domestic like product. For a discussion of the domestic 
like product analysis in this case, see Countervailing Duty 
Investigation Initiation Checklist: Circular Welded Carbon-Quality 
Steel Pipe from India (``India CVD Checklist''), Countervailing Duty 
Investigation Initiation Checklist: Circular Welded Carbon-Quality 
Steel Pipe from Oman (``Oman CVD Checklist''), Countervailing Duty 
Investigation Initiation Checklist: Circular Welded Carbon-Quality 
Steel Pipe from the United Arab Emirates (``UAE CVD Checklist''), and 
Countervailing Duty Investigation Initiation Checklist: Circular Welded 
Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam 
(``Vietnam CVD Checklist'') at Attachment II, Analysis of Industry 
Support for the Petitions Covering Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel 
Pipe, on file electronically in the CRU via IA ACCESS.
    In determining whether Petitioners have standing under section 
702(c)(4)(A) of the Act, we considered the industry support data 
contained in the Petitions with reference to the domestic like product 
as defined in the ``Scope of Investigations,'' in Appendix I of this 
notice. To establish industry support, Petitioners provided their 
shipments of the domestic like product in 2010, and compared their 
shipments to the estimated total shipments of the domestic like product 
for the entire domestic industry. Because total industry production 
data for the domestic like product for 2010 is not reasonably available 
and Petitioners have established that shipments are a reasonable proxy 
for production data, we have relied upon the shipment data provided by 
Petitioners for purposes of measuring industry support. For further 
discussion, see India CVD Checklist, Oman CVD Checklist, UAE CVD 
Checklist, and Vietnam CVD Checklist, at Attachment II.
    Our review of the data provided in the Petitions, supplemental 
submissions, and other information readily available to the Department 
indicates that Petitioners have established industry support. First, 
the Petitions established support from domestic producers accounting 
for more than 50 percent of the total shipments \2\ of the domestic 
like product and, as such, the Department is not required to take 
further action in order to evaluate industry support (e.g., polling). 
See Section 702(c)(4)(D) of the Act and India CVD Checklist, Oman CVD 
Checklist, UAE CVD Checklist, and Vietnam CVD Checklist, at Attachment 
II. Second, the domestic producers have met the statutory criteria for 
industry support under section 702(c)(4)(A)(i) of the Act because the 
domestic producers who support the Petitions account for at least 25 
percent of the total shipments of the domestic like product. See India 
CVD Checklist, Oman CVD Checklist, UAE CVD Checklist, and Vietnam CVD 
Checklist, at Attachment II. Finally, the domestic producers have met 
the statutory criteria for industry support under section 
702(c)(4)(A)(ii) of the Act because the domestic producers who support 
the Petitions account for more than 50 percent of the shipments of the 
domestic like product produced by that portion of the industry 
expressing support for, or opposition to, the Petitions. See India CVD 
Checklist, Oman CVD Checklist, UAE CVD Checklist, and Vietnam CVD 
Checklist, at Attachment II. Accordingly, the Department determines 
that the Petitions were filed on behalf of the domestic industry within 
the meaning of section 702(b)(1) of the Act. See India CVD Checklist, 
Oman CVD Checklist, UAE CVD Checklist, and Vietnam CVD Checklist, at 
Attachment II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ As mentioned above, Petitioners have established that 
shipments are a reasonable proxy for production data. Section 
351.203(e)(1) of the Department's regulations states ``production 
levels may be established by reference to alternative data that the 
Secretary determines to be indicative of production levels.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department finds that Petitioners filed the Petitions on behalf 
of the domestic industry because they are interested parties as defined 
in section 771(9)(C) of the Act and they have demonstrated sufficient 
industry support with respect to the countervailing duty investigations 
they are requesting the Department initiate. See India CVD Checklist, 
Oman CVD Checklist, UAE CVD Checklist, and

[[Page 72175]]

Vietnam CVD Checklist, at Attachment II.

Injury Test

    Because India, Oman, the UAE, and Vietnam all are a ``Subsidies 
Agreement country'' within the meaning of section 701(b) of the Act, 
section 701(a)(2) of the Act applies to this investigation. 
Accordingly, the ITC must determine whether imports of the subject 
merchandise from India, Oman, the UAE, and Vietnam materially injure, 
or threaten material injury to, a U.S. industry.

Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation

    Petitioners allege that imports of the subject merchandise are 
benefitting from countervailable subsidies and that such imports are 
causing, or threaten to cause, material injury to the U.S. industry 
producing the domestic like product. In addition, Petitioners allege 
that subject imports exceed the negligibility threshold provided for 
under section 771(24)(A) of the Act.
    Petitioners contend that the industry's injured condition is 
illustrated by reduced market share; reduced production, shipments, 
capacity, and capacity utilization; reduced employment, hours worked, 
and wages paid; underselling and price depression or suppression; 
decline in financial performance; lost sales and revenue; and increase 
in the volume of imports and import penetration despite overall 
declining demand. See India CVD Initiation Checklist, Oman CVD 
Initiation Checklist, UAE CVD Initiation Checklist, and Vietnam CVD 
Initiation Checklist, at ``Analysis of Allegations and Evidence of 
Material Injury and Causation for the Petitions Covering Circular 
Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from India, Oman, the UAE, and 
Vietnam'' in Attachment III. We have assessed the allegations and 
supporting evidence regarding material injury, threat of material 
injury, and causation, and we have determined that these allegations 
are properly supported by adequate evidence and meet the statutory 
requirements for initiation. See India CVD Initiation Checklist, Oman 
CVD Initiation Checklist, UAE CVD Initiation Checklist, and Vietnam CVD 
Initiation Checklist, at Attachment III.

Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigations

    Section 702(b) of the Act requires the Department to initiate a CVD 
proceeding whenever an interested party files a petition on behalf of 
an industry that: (1) Alleges the elements necessary for an imposition 
of a duty under section 701(a) of the Act; and (2) is accompanied by 
information reasonably available to Petitioner(s) supporting the 
allegations. The Department has examined the Petitions on certain steel 
pipe from India, Oman, the UAE, and Vietnam and finds that it complies 
with the requirements of section 702(b) of the Act. Therefore, in 
accordance with section 702(b) of the Act, we are initiating CVD 
investigations to determine whether manufacturers, producers, or 
exporters of certain steel pipe in India, Oman, the UAE, and Vietnam 
receive countervailable subsidies. For a discussion of evidence 
supporting our initiation determination, see India CVD Initiation 
Checklist, Oman CVD Initiation Checklist, UAE CVD Initiation Checklist, 
and Vietnam CVD Initiation Checklist.

I. India

    We are including in our investigation the following programs 
alleged in the Petitions to have provided countervailable subsidies to 
producers and exporters of the subject merchandise in India:

A. Export Oriented Unit Schemes
    1. Duty-free import of all types of goods, including capital goods 
and raw materials
    2. Reimbursement of Central Sales Tax (``CST'') paid on goods 
manufactured in India
    3. Duty drawback on fuel procured from domestic oil companies
    4. Exemption from income tax under Section 10A and 10B of Income 
Tax Act
    5. Exemption from payment of Central Excise Duty on goods 
manufactured in India and procured from a Domestic Tariff Area
    6. Reimbursement of CST on goods manufactured in India and procured 
from a Domestic Tariff Area
B. Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme
C. Duty Exemption/Remission Schemes
D. Pre-shipment and Post-shipment Export Financing
E. Market Development Assistance
F. Market Access Initiative
G. Government of India Loan Guarantees
H. Status Certificate Program
I. Steel Development Fund Loans
J. Research and Technology Scheme Under Empowered Committee Mechanism 
with Steel Development Fund Support
K. Special Economic Zones (``SEZ'') Programs
    1. Duty-Free Importation of Capital Goods and Raw Materials, 
Components, Consumables, Intermediates, Spare Parts and Packing 
Material
    2. Exemption from Payment of CST on Purchases of Capital Goods and 
Raw Materials, Components, Consumables, Intermediates, Spare Parts and 
Packing Material
    3. Exemption from Electricity Duty and Cess thereon on the Sale or 
Supply to the SEZ Unit
    4. SEZ Income Tax Exemption Scheme (Section 10A)
    5A. Discounted Land and Related Fees in an SEZ
    5B. Land Provided at Less Than Adequate Remuneration in an SEZ
L. Input Programs
    1. Provision of Hot-Rolled Steel by the Steel Authority of India 
For Less Than Adequate Remuneration (``LTAR'')
    2. Provision of Captive Mining Rights
    3. Captive Mining Rights of Coal
    4. Provision of High-Grade Ore for LTAR
M. State Government of Maharashtra (``SGOM'') Programs
    1. Sales Tax Program
    2. Value-Added Tax Refunds under SGOM Package Scheme
    3. Electricity Duty Scheme under Package Scheme Incentives 1993
    4. Octroi Refunds
    5. Octroi Loan Guarantees
    6. Infrastructure Assistance for Mega Projects
    7. Provision of Land for LTAR
    8. Investment Subsidies

For further information explaining why the Department is investigating 
these programs, see India CVD Initiation Checklist.

II. Oman

    We are including in our investigation the following programs 
alleged in the Petitions to have provided countervailable subsidies to 
producers and exporters of the subject merchandise in Oman:

A. Tariff Exemptions on Imported Equipment, Machinery, Raw Materials 
and Packaging Materials
B. Government Provision of Goods and Services for LTAR
    1. Land and Buildings for LTAR
    2. Electricity, Water, and Natural Gas for LTAR
C. Preferential Loans
    1. Soft Loans for Industrial Projects
    2. Post-Shipment Financing Loans
    3. Pre-Shipment Export Credit Guarantees

For further information explaining why the Department is investigating 
these programs, see Oman CVD Initiation Checklist.
    We are not including in our investigation the following programs

[[Page 72176]]

alleged to benefit producers and exporters of the subject merchandise 
in Oman:

A. Profit/Income Tax Exemption
B. Export Credit Insurance

For further information explaining why the Department is not 
investigating these programs, see Oman CVD Initiation Checklist.

III. UAE

    We are including in our investigation the following programs 
alleged in the Petitions to have provided countervailable subsidies to 
producers and exporters of the subject merchandise in the UAE:

A. Profit Tax Exemptions
B. Tariff Exemptions on Imported Equipment, Spare Parts, and Building 
Materials
C. Government Provision of Goods and Services for LTAR
    1. Electricity for LTAR
    2. Water for LTAR
    3. Land and/or Buildings for LTAR
D. Preferential Lending
    1. Preferential Export Lending
    2. Dubai Commodity Receipts

For further information explaining why the Department is investigating 
these programs, see UAE CVD Initiation Checklist.
    We are not including in our investigation the following program 
alleged to benefit producers and exporters of the subject merchandise 
in the UAE:

A. Gas for LTAR

For further information explaining why the Department is not 
investigating this program, see UAE CVD Initiation Checklist.

IV. Vietnam

    We are including in our investigation the following programs 
alleged in the Petitions to have provided countervailable subsidies to 
producers and exporters of the subject merchandise in Vietnam:

A. Policy Lending
    1. Preferential Lending for Exporters
    2. Preferential Lending to the Steel Industry
B. Government Provision of Goods and Services for LTAR
    1. Land Rent Reduction or Exemption for Exporters
    2. Land Rent Reduction or Exemption for Foreign-Invested 
Enterprises (``FIEs'')
    3. Land Preferences for Enterprises in Encouraged Industries or 
Industrial Zones
    4. Provision of Water LTAR in Industrial Zones
C. Grant Programs
    1. Export Promotion Program
    2. New Product Development Program
D. Tax Programs
    1. Import Duty Exemptions for Imported Raw Materials for Exported 
Goods
    2. Income Tax Preferences for Encouraged Industries
    3. Income Tax Preferences for FIEs
    4. Exemption of Import Duties on Imports of Fixed Assets, Spare 
Parts and Accessories for Industrial Zones
    5. Income Tax Preferences for Enterprises in Industrial Zones
    6. Tax Refund for Reinvestment by FIEs
    7. Import Duty Preferences for FIEs
    8. Duty Exemptions on Goods for the Creation of Fixed Assets for 
Encouraged Projects
    9. Income Tax Preferences for Exporters

For further information explaining why the Department is investigating 
these programs, see Vietnam CVD Initiation Checklist.

Respondent Selection

    For these investigations, the Department expects to select 
respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') data 
for U.S. imports during the period of investigation under the following 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'') numbers: 
7306.30.10.00, 7306.30.50.25, 7306.30.50.32, 7306.30.50.40, 
7306.30.50.55, 7306.30.50.85, and 7306.30.50.90. These HTSUS numbers 
closely match the subject merchandise, and are those used by 
Petitioners to calculate aggregate import totals.\3\ We intend to 
release the CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (``APO'') to 
all parties with access to information protected by APO within five 
days of publication of this Federal Register notice. Interested parties 
may submit comments regarding the CBP data and respondent selection 
within seven calendar days of publication of this notice. Comments 
should be filed electronically using IA ACCESS. An electronically filed 
document must be received successfully in its entirety by the 
Department's electronic records system, IA ACCESS, by the time and date 
noted above. Documents excepted from the electronic submission 
requirements must be filed manually (i.e., in paper form) with the 
Import Administration's APO/Dockets Unit, Room 1870, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20230, and stamped with the date and time of receipt by the deadline 
noted above. We intend to make our decision regarding respondent 
selection within 20 days of publication of this Federal Register 
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See, e.g., Supplement to the AD/CVD Petitions at Attachment 
3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(b). Instructions for filing such 
applications may be found on the Department's Web site at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/apo.

Distribution of Copies of the Petitions

    In accordance with section 702(b)(4)(A)(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.202(f), copies of the public version of the Petitions have been 
provided to representatives of the Governments of India, Oman, the UAE, 
and Vietnam. Because of the large number of producers/exporters 
identified in the Petitions, the Department considers the service of 
the public version of the Petitions to the foreign producers/exporters 
satisfied by the delivery of the public versions of the Petitions to 
the Governments of India, Oman, the UAE, and Vietnam, consistent with 
19 CFR 351.203(c)(2).

ITC Notification

    We have notified the ITC of our initiation, as required by section 
702(d) of the Act.

Preliminary Determinations by the ITC

    The ITC will preliminarily determine, no later than 45 days after 
the date the Petitions were filed, whether there is a reasonable 
indication that imports of certain steel pipe from India, Oman, the 
UAE, and Vietnam are materially injuring, or threatening material 
injury to a U.S. industry. A negative ITC determination with respect to 
any country will result in the investigation being terminated for that 
country; otherwise, these investigations will proceed according to 
statutory and regulatory time limits.

Notification to Interested Parties

    Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(b). On January 22, 2008, the 
Department published Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Documents Submission Procedures; APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January 
22, 2008). Parties wishing to participate in these investigations 
should ensure that they meet the requirements of these procedures 
(e.g., the filing of letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 
351.103(d)).

[[Page 72177]]

    Any party submitting factual information in a CVD proceeding must 
certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information. See 
section 782(b) of the Act. Parties are hereby reminded that revised 
certification requirements are in effect for company/government 
officials as well as their representatives in all segments of any AD/
CVD proceedings initiated on or after March 14, 2011. See Certification 
of Factual Information to Import Administration During Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Interim Final Rule, 76 FR 7491 
(February 10, 2011) (Interim Final Rule) (amending 19 CFR 351.303(g)(1) 
and (2)). The formats for the revised certifications are provided at 
the end of the Interim Final Rule. The Department intends to reject 
factual submissions in any proceeding segments initiated on or after 
March 14, 2011, if the submitting party does not comply with the 
revised certification requirements.
    This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 777(i) of 
the Act.

     Dated: November 15, 2011.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

Appendix I

Scope of the Investigations

    These investigations cover welded carbon-quality steel pipes and 
tube, of circular cross-section, with an outside diameter (``O.D.'') 
not more than 16 inches (406.4 mm), regardless of wall thickness, 
surface finish (e.g., black, galvanized, or painted), end finish (plain 
end, beveled end, grooved, threaded, or threaded and coupled), or 
industry specification (e.g., American Society for Testing and 
Materials International (``ASTM''), proprietary, or other) generally 
known as standard pipe, fence pipe and tube, sprinkler pipe, and 
structural pipe (although subject product may also be referred to as 
mechanical tubing). Specifically, the term ``carbon quality'' includes 
products in which: (a) Iron predominates, by weight, over each of the 
other contained elements; (b) the carbon content is 2 percent or less, 
by weight; and (c) none of the elements listed below exceeds the 
quantity, by weight, as indicated:
    (i) 1.80 percent of manganese;
    (ii) 2.25 percent of silicon;
    (iii) 1.00 percent of copper;
    (iv) 0.50 percent of aluminum;
    (v) 1.25 percent of chromium;
    (vi) 0.30 percent of cobalt;
    (vii) 0.40 percent of lead;
    (viii) 1.25 percent of nickel;
    (ix) 0.30 percent of tungsten;
    (x) 0.15 percent of molybdenum;
    (xi) 0.10 percent of niobium;
    (xii) 0.41 percent of titanium;
    (xiii) 0.15 percent of vanadium;
    (xiv) 0.15 percent of zirconium.
    Subject pipe is ordinarily made to ASTM specifications A53, A135, 
and A795, but can also be made to other specifications. Structural pipe 
is made primarily to ASTM specifications A252 and A500. Standard and 
structural pipe may also be produced to proprietary specifications 
rather than to industry specifications. Fence tubing is included in the 
scope regardless of certification to a specification listed in the 
exclusions below, and can also be made to the ASTM A513 specification. 
Sprinkler pipe is designed for sprinkler fire suppression systems and 
may be made to industry specifications such as ASTM A53 or to 
proprietary specifications. These products are generally made to 
standard O.D. and wall thickness combinations. Pipe multi-stenciled to 
a standard and/or structural specification and to other specifications, 
such as American Petroleum Institute (``API'') API-5L specification, is 
also covered by the scope of these investigations when it meets the 
physical description set forth above, and also has one or more of the 
following characteristics: is 32 feet in length or less; is less than 
2.0 inches (50mm) in outside diameter; has a galvanized and/or painted 
(e.g., polyester coated) surface finish; or has a threaded and/or 
coupled end finish.
    The scope of these investigations does not include: (a) Pipe 
suitable for use in boilers, superheaters, heat exchangers, refining 
furnaces and feedwater heaters, whether or not cold drawn; (b) finished 
electrical conduit; (c) finished scaffolding; \4\ (d) tube and pipe 
hollows for redrawing; (e) oil country tubular goods produced to API 
specifications; (f) line pipe produced to only API specifications; and 
(g) mechanical tubing, whether or not cold-drawn. However, products 
certified to ASTM mechanical tubing specifications are not excluded as 
mechanical tubing if they otherwise meet the standard sizes (e.g., 
outside diameter and wall thickness) of standard, structural, fence and 
sprinkler pipe. Also, products made to the following outside diameter 
and wall thickness combinations, which are recognized by the industry 
as typical for fence tubing, would not be excluded from the scope based 
solely on their being certified to ASTM mechanical tubing 
specifications:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Finished scaffolding is defined as component parts of a 
final, finished scaffolding that enters the United States 
unassembled as a ``kit.'' A ``kit'' is understood to mean a packaged 
combination of component parts that contain, at the time of 
importation, all the necessary component parts to fully assemble a 
final, finished scaffolding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1.315 inch O.D. and 0.035 inch wall thickness (gage 20)
1.315 inch O.D. and 0.047 inch wall thickness (gage 18)
1.315 inch O.D. and 0.055 inch wall thickness (gage 17)
1.315 inch O.D. and 0.065 inch wall thickness (gage 16)
1.315 inch O.D. and 0.072 inch wall thickness (gage 15)
1.315 inch O.D. and 0.083 inch wall thickness (gage 14)
1.315 inch O.D. and 0.095 inch wall thickness (gage 13)
1.660 inch O.D. and 0.047 inch wall thickness (gage 18)
1.660 inch O.D. and 0.055 inch wall thickness (gage 17)
1.660 inch O.D. and 0.065 inch wall thickness (gage 16)
1.660 inch O.D. and 0.072 inch wall thickness (gage 15)
1.660 inch O.D. and 0.083 inch wall thickness (gage 14)
1.660 inch O.D. and 0.095 inch wall thickness (gage 13)
1.660 inch O.D. and 0.109 inch wall thickness (gage 12)
1.900 inch O.D. and 0.047 inch wall thickness (gage 18)
1.900 inch O.D. and 0.055 inch wall thickness (gage 17)
1.900 inch O.D. and 0.065 inch wall thickness (gage 16)
1.900 inch O.D. and 0.072 inch wall thickness (gage 15)
1.900 inch O.D. and 0.095 inch wall thickness (gage 13)
1.900 inch O.D. and 0.109 inch wall thickness (gage 12)
2.375 inch O.D. and 0.047 inch wall thickness (gage 18)
2.375 inch O.D. and 0.055 inch wall thickness (gage 17)
2.375 inch O.D. and 0.065 inch wall thickness (gage 16)
2.375 inch O.D. and 0.072 inch wall thickness (gage 15)
2.375 inch O.D. and 0.095 inch wall thickness (gage 13)
2.375 inch O.D. and 0.109 inch wall thickness (gage 12)
2.375 inch O.D. and 0.120 inch wall thickness (gage 11)
2.875 inch O.D. and 0.109 inch wall thickness (gage 12)
2.875 inch O.D. and 0.134 inch wall thickness (gage 10)
2.875 inch O.D. and 0.165 inch wall thickness (gage 8)
3.500 inch O.D. and 0.109 inch wall thickness (gage 12)
3.500 inch O.D. and 0.148 inch wall thickness (gage 9)
3.500 inch O.D. and 0.165 inch wall thickness (gage 8)
4.000 inch O.D. and 0.148 inch wall thickness (gage 9)

[[Page 72178]]

4.000 inch O.D. and 0.165 inch wall thickness (gage 8)
4.500 inch O.D. and 0.203 inch wall thickness (gage 7)
    The pipe subject to these investigations are currently classifiable 
in Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'') 
statistical reporting numbers 7306.19.1010, 7306.19.1050, 7306.19.5110, 
7306.19.5150, 7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, 
7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, 7306.30.5090, 7306.50.1000, 7306.50.5050, 
and 7306.50.5070. However, the product description, and not the HTSUS 
classification, is dispositive of whether the merchandise imported into 
the United States falls within the scope of the investigations.

[FR Doc. 2011-30158 Filed 11-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P