[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 200 (Monday, October 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64105-64106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26666]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-410 (Third Review)]


Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe From Taiwan; Scheduling of an 
Expedited Five-Year Review Concerning the Antidumping Duty Order on 
Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe From Taiwan

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

[[Page 64106]]


ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of an 
expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation 
of the antidumping duty order on light-walled rectangular pipe from 
Taiwan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of 
material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. For further 
information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general 
application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 
part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).

DATES:  Effective Date: October 4, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stefania Pozzi Porter (202-205-3177), 
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need 
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact 
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information 
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its 
Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this 
review may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at 
http://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background.--On October 4, 2011, the 
Commission determined that the domestic interested party group response 
to its notice of institution (76 FR 38691, July 1, 2011) of the subject 
five-year review was adequate and that the respondent interested party 
group response was inadequate. The Commission did not find any other 
circumstances that would warrant conducting a full review.\1\ 
Accordingly, the Commission determined that it would conduct an 
expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ A record of the Commissioners= votes, the Commission's 
statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements 
will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 
Commission's Web site.
    \2\ Chairman Deanna Tanner Okun, Vice Chairman Irving A. 
Williamson, and Commissioners Daniel R. Pearson, Shara L. Aranoff, 
and Dean A. Pinkert found that the domestic group response was 
adequate and the respondent group response was inadequate and voted 
for an expedited review. Commissioner Charlotte R. Lane found that 
the domestic group response was adequate and the respondent group 
response was inadequate but that circumstances warranted a full 
review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Staff report.--A staff report containing information concerning the 
subject matter of the review will be placed in the nonpublic record on 
December 8, 2011, and made available to persons on the Administrative 
Protective Order service list for this review. A public version will be 
issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission's 
rules.
    Written submissions.--As provided in section 207.62(d) of the 
Commission's rules, interested parties that are parties to the review 
and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of 
institution,\3\ and any party other than an interested party to the 
review may file written comments with the Secretary on what 
determination the Commission should reach in the review. Comments are 
due on or before December 13 and may not contain new factual 
information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year review 
nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement (which 
shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the review 
by December 13. However, should the Department of Commerce extend the 
time limit for its completion of the final results of its reviews, the 
deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual information) 
on Commerce's final results is three business days after the issuance 
of Commerce's results. If comments contain business proprietary 
information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements of sections 
201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission's rules. Please consult the 
Commission's rules, as amended, 76 FR 61937 (Oct. 6, 2011) and the 
Commission's Handbook on Filing Procedures, 76 FR 62092 (Oct. 6, 2011), 
available on the Commission's Web site at http://edis.usitc.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Commission has found the responses submitted by Allied 
Tube, Bull Moose Tube, JMC Steel, Leavitt Tube, California Steel and 
Tube, Hannibal Industries, and Searing Industries to be individually 
adequate. Comments from other interested parties will not be 
accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission's rules do not authorize filing of submissions with 
the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent 
permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission's rules, as amended, 67 FR 
68036 (November 8, 2002). Even where electronic filing of a document is 
permitted, certain documents must also be filed in paper form, as 
specified in II (C) of the Commission's Handbook on Electronic Filing 
Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002).
    In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each 
document filed by a party to the review must be served on all other 
parties to the review (as identified by either the public or BPI 
service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The 
Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate 
of service.
    Determination.--The Commission has determined to exercise its 
authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B).

    Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of 
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: October 11, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-26666 Filed 10-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P