[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 190 (Friday, September 30, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60871-60872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25281]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-740]


In the Matter of Certain Toner Cartridges and Components Thereof; 
Notice of Commission Final Determination of Violation of Section 337; 
Termination of Investigation; Issuance of General Exclusion Order and 
Cease and Desist Orders

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has found a violation of Section 337 in the above-captioned 
investigation. The Commission has determined to issue a general 
exclusion order and cease and desist orders. The investigation is 
terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2301. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on October 12, 2010, based on a complaint filed by Lexmark 
International, Inc. of Lexington, Kentucky (``Lexmark''). 75 FR 62564-
65 (Oct. 12, 2010). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of 
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (``Section 337''), 
in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, 
and the sale within the United States after importation of certain 
toner cartridges and components thereof by reason of infringement of 
certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,337,032 (``the `032 patent''); 
5,634,169 (``the `169 patent''); 5,758,233 (``the `233 patent''); 
5,768,661 (``the `661 patent''); 5,802,432 (``the `432 patent''); 
5,875,378 (``the `378 patent''); 6,009,291 (``the `291 patent''); 
6,078,771 (``the `771 patent''); 6,397,015 (``the `015 patent''); 
6,459,876 (``the `876 patent''); 6,816,692 (``the `692 patent''); 
6,871,031 (``the `031 patent''); 7,139,510 (``the `510 patent''); 
7,233,760 (``the `760 patent''); and 7,305,204 (``the `204 patent''). 
The complaint further alleges the existence of a domestic industry.
    The Commission's notice of investigation named as respondents 
Ninestar Image Co. Ltd., (a/k/a Ninestar Technology Co., Ltd.) of 
Guangdong, China (``Ninestar''); Ninestar Image Int'l, Ltd. of 
Guangdong, China (``Ninestar Image Int'l''); Seine Image International 
Co. Ltd. of New Territories, Hong Kong (``Seine Image''); Ninestar 
Technology Company, Ltd. of Piscataway, New Jersey (``Ninestar Tech''); 
Ziprint Image Corporation of Walnut, California (``Ziprint''); Nano 
Pacific Corporation of South San Francisco, California (``Nano 
Pacific''); IJSS Inc. (d/b/a TonerZone.com Inc. and Inkjet Superstore) 
of Los Angeles, California (``IJSS''); Chung Pal Shin (d/b/a Ink 
Master) of Cerritos, California (``Ink Master''); Nectron 
International, Inc. of Sugarland, Texas (``Nectron''); Quality 
Cartridges Inc. of Brooklyn, New York (``QCI''); Direct Billing 
International Incorporated (d/b/a Office Supply Outfitter and d/b/a The 
Ribbon Connection) of Carlsbad, California (``Direct Billing''); E-
Toner Mart, Inc. of South El Monte, California (``E-Toner''); Alpha 
Image Tech of South El Monte, California (``Alpha Image''); ACM 
Technologies, Inc. of Corona, California (``ACM''); Virtual Imaging 
Products Inc. of North York, Ontario; Acecom Inc.--San Antonio (d/b/a 
Inksell.com) of San Antonio, Texas (``Acecom''); Ink Technologies 
Printer Supplies, LLC (d/b/a Ink Technologies LLC) of Dayton, Ohio 
(``Ink Tech''); Jahwa Electronics Co., Ltd of Chungchongbuk-do, South 
Korea; Huizhou Jahwa Electronics Co., Ltd. of Guangdong Province, 
China; Copy Technologies, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia (``Copy Tech''); 
Laser Toner Technology, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia (``LTT''); C&R 
Service, Incorporated of Corinth, Texas (``C&R''); Print-Rite Holdings 
Ltd., of Chai Wan, Hong Kong (``Print-Rite''); and Union Technology 
Int'l (M.C.O.) Co., Ltd. of Rodrigo Rodrigues, Macao.
    The Commission determined not to review an initial determination 
terminating the investigation as to Print-Rite based on a settlement 
agreement. Commission Notice (Jan. 10, 2011) (Order No. 11). The 
Commission determined to review and affirm several initial 
determinations finding several

[[Page 60872]]

respondents in default under Commission Rules 210.16(a)(2) and (b)(2) 
based on those respondents' elections to default. Commission Notice 
(Mar. 3, 2011) (Order Nos. 15-16); Commission Notice (Mar. 11, 2011) 
(Order Nos. 17-18); Commission Notice (Mar. 11, 2011) (Order No. 19). 
The Commission determined not to review two other initial 
determinations finding the remaining respondents in default. Commission 
Notice (Mar. 23, 2011) (Order No. 23); Commission Notice (April 6, 
2011) (Order No. 24).
    On April 25, 2011, Lexmark filed a motion pursuant to Commission 
Rule 210.18 (19 CFR 210.18) for summary determination of violation of 
Section 337 and requesting issuance of a general exclusion order and 
cease and desist orders against defaulting respondents. On May 5, 2011, 
the Commission investigative attorney (``IA'') filed a response 
supporting the motion, on the condition that Lexmark submit the 
following: (1) A declaration from its expert, Charles Reinholtz, 
averring that the statements in his expert report are true and correct, 
and (2) a declaration from Andrew Gardner that the accused products do 
not have any substantial non-infringing uses. Lexmark filed the 
submissions per the IA's request.
    On June 1, 2011, the ALJ issued an initial determination (Order No. 
26) (``ID'') granting Lexmark's motion for summary determination of 
violation of Section 337. The ID also contained the ALJ's recommended 
determination on remedy and bonding. Specifically, the ALJ recommended 
issuance of a general exclusion order (``GEO'') and cease and desist 
orders (``CDOs'') against the defaulting respondents. The ALJ further 
recommended that the Commission set a bond of 100 percent during the 
period of Presidential review.
    On July 12, 2011, the Commission determined not to review the ID 
and called for briefing on remedy, the public interest, and bonding. 76 
FR 41822-24 (July 15, 2011). On August 1, 2011, Lexmark submitted an 
initial brief on remedy, the public interest, and bonding, requesting 
that the Commission issue a GEO and CDOs and set a bond of 100 percent 
during the period of Presidential review. The brief included a proposed 
GEO and a proposed CDO. Also on August 1, 2011, the IA submitted an 
initial brief on remedy, the public interest, and bonding, supporting 
Lexmark's request for a GEO and CDOs, as well as a bond of 100 percent. 
The IA's brief also included a proposed GEO and a proposed CDO.
    The Commission has determined that the appropriate form of relief 
is the following: (1) A GEO under 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(2), prohibiting the 
unlicensed entry of toner cartridges and components thereof that 
infringe one or more of claim 1 of the `032 patent; claims 1-3, 32, 33, 
36, and 42 of the `169 patent; claims 1 and 2 of the `233 patent; 
claims 1 and 2 of the `661 patent; claims 1-3 of the `432 patent; 
claims 1, 2, and 14 of the `378 patent; claims 1 and 2 of the `291 
patent; claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 10, and 15 of the `771 patent; claims 1, 2, 
7, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17, 22, and 24 of the `015 patent; claims 1-3 and 28 
of the `876 patent; claim 1 of the `692 patent; claims 1, 3, 5, 8, and 
10 of the `031 patent; claims 1 and 6 of the `510 patent; claims 11, 
12, and 14 of the `760 patent; and claims 1, 7, 14, and 15 of the `204 
patent; and (2) CDOs directed to defaulting domestic respondents E-
Toner, Alpha Image, Copy Tech, LTT, C&R, ACM, Ink Master, Direct 
Billing, Ink Tech, QCI, IJSS, Acecom, Ninestar Tech, Ziprint, Nano 
Pacific, and Nectron and defaulting foreign respondents Ninestar, 
Ninestar Image Int'l, and Seine Image.
    The Commission has further determined that the public interest 
factors enumerated in Section 337(d) and (f) (19 U.S.C. 1337(d), (f)) 
do not preclude issuance of the GEO and the CDOs. The Commission has 
determined that the bond for temporary importation during the period of 
Presidential review (19 U.S.C. 1337(j)) shall be in the amount of 100 
percent of the value of the imported articles that are subject to the 
order. The Commission's orders were delivered to the President and the 
United States Trade Representative on the day of their issuance.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in sections 210.42-50 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure (19 CFR 210.42-50).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: September 27, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-25281 Filed 9-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P