[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58244-58245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24148]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-824]


Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip From India: 
Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.


DATES: Effective Date: September 20, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elfi Blum or Toni Page, Import 
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20230; telephone: (202) 482-0197 or (202) 482-1398, respectively.

Background

    On July 1, 2011, the Department of Commerce (Department) published 
a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the 
antidumping duty (AD) order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet 
and strip from India covering the period July 1, 2010, through June 30, 
2011. See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 
76 FR 38609, 38610 (July 1, 2010). The Department received a timely 
request for an AD administrative review from Petitioners \1\ for five 
companies: Ester Industries Limited, Garware Polyester Ltd., Jindal 
Poly Films Limited of India, Polyplex Corporation Ltd., and SRF 
Limited. The Department also received timely requests for an AD 
administrative review from Vacmet India Ltd. (Vacmet) and Polypacks 
Industries of India (Polypacks). On August 26, 2011, the Department 
published a notice of initiation of administrative review with respect 
to Ester Industries Limited, Garware Polyester Ltd., Jindal Poly Films 
Limited of India, Polyplex Corporation Ltd., SRF Limited, Vacmet and 
Polypacks. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty

[[Page 58245]]

Administrative Reviews and Deferral of Initiation of Administrative 
Review, 76 FR 53404 (August 26, 2011). On August 23, 2011, Vacmet and 
Polypacks withdrew their requests for an AD administrative review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Petitioners are DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi Polyester 
Film, Inc., SKC, Inc. and Toray Plastics (America), Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rescission, In Part

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind an 
administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party that requested 
the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of 
publication of notice of initiation of the requested review. Vacmet's 
and Polypacks' requests were submitted within the 90-day period and, 
thus, are timely. Because Vacmet's and Polypacks' withdrawals of 
request for an AD administrative review are timely and because no other 
party requested a review of Vacmet and Polypacks, in accordance with 19 
CFR 351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this AD administrative review with 
respect to Vacmet and Polypacks.

Assessment

    The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Vacmet 
and Polypacks shall be assessed antidumping duties at rates equal to 
the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time 
of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance 
with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department intends to issue 
appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of 
this notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the 
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of 
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
    This notice is issued and published in accordance with section 
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 
351.213(d)(4).

    Dated: September 14, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011-24148 Filed 9-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P