[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 137 (Monday, July 18, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42033-42036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17813]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0718; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-117-AD; 
Amendment 39-16756; AD 2011-15-09]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400 Series 
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the 
products listed above that would

[[Page 42034]]

supersede an existing AD. This AD results from mandatory continuing 
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of 
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an 
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    Two cases of the main landing gear (MLG) alternate extension 
system (AES) cam mechanism failure were found during line checks. 
The cam mechanism operates the cable to open the MLG door and 
releases the MLG uplock in sequence. In the case where it is 
necessary to deploy the MLG using the AES, the failure of the MLG 
AES cam mechanism on one side will lead to an unsafe asymmetrical 
landing configuration.
* * * * *

    The unsafe condition is possible loss of control during landing. 
This AD requires actions that are intended to address the unsafe 
condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: This AD becomes effective August 2, 2011.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by 
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of August 2, 
2011.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by 
reference of a certain other publication listed in the AD as of March 
25, 2011 (76 FR 13080, March 10, 2011).
    We must receive comments on this AD by September 1, 2011.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: (202) 493-2251.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office 
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, 
any comments received, and other information. The street address for 
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the 
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly 
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer, 
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft 
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New 
York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7318; fax (516) 794-5531.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    On February 22, 2011, we issued AD 2011-05-14, Amendment 39-16624 
(76 FR 13080, March 10, 2011). That AD required actions intended to 
address an unsafe condition on the products listed above.
    Since we issued AD 2011-05-14, we have received a report that the 
service information referenced in that AD as a source of accomplishment 
information was found to have inadequate inspection procedures. 
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation authority 
for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2011-01R1, 
dated May 20, 2011 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct 
an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

    Two cases of the main landing gear (MLG) alternate extension 
system (AES) cam mechanism failure were found during line checks. 
The cam mechanism operates the cable to open the MLG door and 
releases the MLG uplock in sequence. In the case where it is 
necessary to deploy the MLG using the AES, the failure of the MLG 
AES cam mechanism on one side will lead to an unsafe asymmetrical 
landing configuration.
    Preliminary investigation indicates that the cam mechanism 
failure may have occurred and remained dormant after a previous AES 
operation. The cam mechanism may not have fully returned to the 
normal rested position. With the cam mechanism out of normal rested 
position, normal powered landing gear door operation could introduce 
sufficient loads to fracture the cam mechanism or rupture the door 
release cable.
    This directive mandates the initial and subsequent [detailed] 
inspections for proper operation of the MLG AES cam mechanism, and 
rectify [repair or replace cam assembly with new or serviceable cam 
assembly] as necessary.
    Since the original issue of this [Canadian] directive, 
Bombardier Inc. has determined that the existing inspection 
procedure is insufficient for verification of proper MLG AES cam 
mechanism operation, and has superseded this inspection procedure. 
This revision of the [Canadian] directive mandates the use of the 
latest inspection [and rectification] procedure.

The unsafe condition is possible loss of control during landing. You 
may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Bombardier has issued Repair Drawing 8/4-32-0160, Issue 3, dated 
February 15, 2011. The actions described in this service information 
are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another 
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant 
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have 
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service 
information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we 
evaluated all pertinent information and determined the unsafe condition 
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same 
type design.

Differences Between the AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in 
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it 
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the 
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these 
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information 
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those 
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are 
highlighted in a Note within the AD.

FAA's Determination of the Effective Date

    An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of 
this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies 
waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because since 
we issued AD 2011-05-14, Bombardier has determined that the existing 
inspection procedure referenced in AD 2011-05-14 is insufficient for 
verification of proper MLG AES cam mechanism operation, and has 
provided a revised inspection procedure. In the case where it is 
necessary to deploy the MLG using the AES, the failure of the MLG AES 
cam mechanism on one side will lead to an unsafe asymmetrical landing 
configuration. An asymmetrical landing configuration could result in 
possible loss of control during landing. This AD mandates the use of 
the revised inspection procedures. Therefore, we determined that notice 
and opportunity

[[Page 42035]]

for public comment before issuing this AD are impracticable and that 
good cause exists for making this amendment effective in fewer than 30 
days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight 
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public 
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or 
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under 
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-0718; Directorate 
Identifier 2011-NM-117-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We 
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, 
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all 
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of 
those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We 
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we 
receive about this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation 
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's 
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications 
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct 
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national 
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ''significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 
12866;
    2. Is not a ''significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies 
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to 
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-16624 (76 FR 
13080, March 10, 2011) and adding the following new AD:

2011-15-09 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-16756. Docket No. FAA-
2011-0718; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-117-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective August 
2, 2011.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2011-05-14, Amendment 39-16624.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400, -401, 
and -402 airplanes, certificated in any category, serial numbers 
4001 and subsequent.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32: Landing 
Gear.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continued airworthiness information (MCAI) 
states:
    Two cases of the main landing gear (MLG) alternate extension 
system (AES) cam mechanism failure were found during line checks. 
The cam mechanism operates the cable to open the MLG door and 
releases the MLG uplock in sequence. In the case where it is 
necessary to deploy the MLG using the AES, the failure of the MLG 
AES cam mechanism on one side will lead to an unsafe asymmetrical 
landing configuration.
* * * * *
The unsafe condition is possible loss of control during landing.

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this 
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the 
actions have already been done.

Restatement of Requirements of AD 2011-05-14, With New Service 
Information

    (g) Within 50 flight hours or 10 days after March 25, 2011 (the 
effective date of AD 2011-05-14), whichever occurs first, do a 
detailed inspection for proper operation of the MLG AES cam 
mechanism, in accordance with paragraph A) of Bombardier Repair 
Drawing 8/4-32-0160, Issue 2, dated January 18, 2011; or Issue 3, 
dated February 15, 2011. Repeat the inspection thereafter at 
intervals not to exceed 50 flight hours or 10 days, whichever occurs 
first, until the inspection required by paragraph (i) of this AD is 
accomplished.
    (1) If the cam mechanism is found to reset to the normal rested 
position without any sticking or binding, it is operating properly.
    (2) If the cam mechanism has not reset to its normal rested 
position, or if any sticking or binding is observed, before further 
flight, remove the cam assembly, in accordance with paragraph A) of 
Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-0160, Issue 2, dated January 18, 
2011; or Issue 3, dated February 15, 2011; and do the actions in 
paragraph (g)(2)(i) or (g)(2)(ii) of this AD.
    (i) Repair the cam mechanism assembly, including doing detailed 
inspections for discrepancies (including an inspection to determine 
proper operation, an inspection for damage, an inspection for 
corrosion and cadmium coating degradation, and inspections to 
determine dimensions are within the limits specified in paragraph B) 
of Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-0160, Issue 2, dated January 18, 
2011; or Issue 3, dated February 15, 2011), in accordance with 
paragraph B) of Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-0160, Issue 2, 
dated January 18, 2011; or Issue 3, dated February 15, 2011; and 
install the repaired cam assembly in accordance with paragraph C) of 
Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-0160, Issue 2, dated January 18, 
2011; or Issue 3, dated February 15, 2011.
    (ii) Install a new or serviceable cam assembly, in accordance 
with paragraph C) of Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-0160, Issue 2, 
dated January 18, 2011; or Issue 3, dated February 15, 2011.
    (3) If the cam mechanism is found damaged or inoperative during 
the repair specified in paragraph (g)(2)(i) of this AD, or if any 
discrepancies are found and Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-0160, 
Issue 2, dated January 18, 2011; or Issue 3, dated February 15, 
2011; does not specify repairs for those discrepancies, or repairs 
specified in paragraph (g)(2)(i) of this AD cannot be accomplished: 
Before further flight, repair and reinstall using a method approved 
by the Manager, ANE-170, New York Aircraft Certification Office 
(ACO), FAA, or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) (or its 
delegated agent); or install a new or serviceable cam assembly, in

[[Page 42036]]

accordance with paragraph C) of Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-
0160, Issue 2, dated January 18, 2011; or Issue 3, dated February 
15, 2011.

Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service 
Information

    (h) Actions done before March 25, 2011, in accordance with 
Bombardier 8/4-32-0160, Issue 1, dated January 14, 2011, are 
acceptable for compliance with the corresponding requirements of 
this AD.

New Requirements of This AD

    (i) Within 50 flight hours or 10 days after the effective date 
of this AD, whichever occurs first, do a detailed inspection for 
proper operation of the MLG AES cam mechanism, in accordance with 
paragraph A) of Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-0160, Issue 3, 
dated February 15, 2011. Repeat the inspection thereafter at 
intervals not to exceed 50 flight hours or 10 days, whichever occurs 
first. Accomplishing this inspection terminates the requirements of 
paragraph (g) of this AD.
    (1) If the cam mechanism is found to reset to the normal rested 
position without any sticking or binding, it is operating properly.
    (2) If the cam mechanism has not reset to its normal rested 
position, or if any sticking or binding is observed, before further 
flight, remove the cam assembly, in accordance with paragraph A) of 
Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-0160, Issue 3, dated February 15, 
2011, and do the actions in paragraph (i)(2)(i) or (i)(2)(ii) of 
this AD.
    (i) Repair the cam mechanism assembly, including doing detailed 
inspections for discrepancies (including an inspection to determine 
proper operation, an inspection for damage, an inspection for 
corrosion and cadmium coating degradation, and inspections to 
determine dimensions are within the limits specified in paragraph B) 
of Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-0160, Issue 3, dated February 
15, 2011), in accordance with paragraph B) of Bombardier Repair 
Drawing 8/4-32-0160, Issue 3, dated February 15, 2011; and install 
the repaired cam assembly in accordance with paragraph C) of 
Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-0160, Issue 3, dated February 15, 
2011.
    (ii) Install a new or serviceable cam assembly, in accordance 
with paragraph C) of Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-0160, Issue 3, 
dated February 15, 2011.
    (3) If the cam mechanism is found damaged or inoperative during 
the repair specified in paragraph (i)(2)(i) of this AD, or if any 
discrepancies are found and Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-0160, 
Issue 3, dated February 15, 2011, does not specify repairs for those 
discrepancies, or repairs specified in paragraph (i)(2)(i) of this 
AD cannot be accomplished: Before further flight, repair and 
reinstall using a method approved by the Manager, ANE-170, New York 
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, or Transport Canada Civil 
Aviation (TCCA) (or its delegated agent); or install a new or 
serviceable cam assembly, in accordance with paragraph C) of 
Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-0160, Issue 3, dated February 15, 
2011.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 1:  This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service 
information as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (j) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, ANE-
170, New York ACO, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this 
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In 
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal 
inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. 
If sending information directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program 
Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone 516-
228-7300; fax 516-794-5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify 
your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal 
inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district 
office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter 
must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain 
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these 
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered 
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority 
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product 
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

Related Information

    (k) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2011-01R1, 
dated May 20, 2011; Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-0160, Issue 2, 
dated January 18, 2011; and Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-0160, 
Issue 3, dated February 15, 2011; for related information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (l) You must use Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-0160, Issue 2, 
dated January 18, 2011; or Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-0160, 
Issue 3, dated February 15, 2011; as applicable; to do the actions 
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The issue 
dates for Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-0160, Issue 3, dated 
February 15, 2011, are identified on only the first page of that 
document.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the 
incorporation by reference of Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-0160, 
Issue 3, dated February 15, 2011, under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 
part 51.
    (2) The Director of the Federal Register previously approved the 
incorporation by reference of Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-0160, 
Issue 2, dated January 18, 2011, on March 25, 2011 (76 FR 13080, 
March 10, 2011).
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact 
Bombardier, Inc., Q-Series Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt 
Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone 416-375-4000; 
fax 416-375-4539; e-mail [email protected]; Internet 
http://www.bombardier.com.
    (4) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA, 
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at 
the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
    (5) You may also review copies of the service information that 
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records 
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this 
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 6, 2011.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-17813 Filed 7-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P