[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 130 (Thursday, July 7, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39775-39777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16881]



=======================================================================

-----------------------------------------------------------------------



ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY



40 CFR Part 52



[EPA-R06-OAR-2010-0404; FRL-9430-2]




Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 

Louisiana; Determination of Termination of Section 185 Fees



AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).



ACTION: Final rule.



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



SUMMARY: The EPA has determined that the State of Louisiana is no 

longer required to submit a section 185 fee program State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision for the Baton Rouge ozone 

nonattainment area to satisfy anti-backsliding requirements for the 1-

hour ozone standard. This determination (``Termination Determination'') 

is based on complete, quality-assured monitoring data showing 

attainment of the 1-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

(NAAQS), which is due to permanent and enforceable emission reductions 

implemented in the area.



DATES: This rule is effective August 8, 2011.



ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket 

No. EPA-R06-OAR-2010-0404. All documents in the docket are listed in 

the http://www.regulations.gov index. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either electronically in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Planning Section (6PDL), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, 

Texas 75202-2733. The file will be made available by appointment for 

public inspection in the Region 6 FOIA Review Room between the hours of 

8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. weekdays except for legal holidays.

    Contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 

paragraph below to make an appointment. If possible, please make the 

appointment at least two working days in advance of your visit. There 

will be a fee of 15 cents per page for making photocopies of documents. 

On the day of the visit, please check in at the EPA Region 6 reception 

area at 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.



FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Sandra Rennie, Air Planning 

Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross 

Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone (214) 665-7367, 

fax (214)



[[Page 39776]]



665-7263, e-mail address [email protected].



SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' 

``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.

    Organization of this document. The following outline is provided to 

aid in locating information in this preamble.



I. What action is EPA taking?

II. What is the background and legal rationale for this final 

action?

III. What is the effect of this final action?

IV. What is EPA's final analysis?

    a. Attainment of the 1-Hour Ozone Standard

    b. Permanent and Enforceable Emission Reductions

V. What comments did EPA receive?

VI. Final Action

VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews



I. What action Is EPA taking?



    EPA has determined that Louisiana is no longer required to submit a 

Clean Air Act section 185 fee program SIP revision for the Baton Rouge 

1-hour ozone nonattainment area to satisfy anti-backsliding 

requirements associated with the transition from the 1-hour ozone 

standard to the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. This Termination 

Determination is based on EPA's determination that the area is 

attaining the 1-hour ozone standard due to permanent and enforceable 

emission reductions implemented in the area. EPA's determination 

terminates the area's obligation to submit a section 185 fee program 

SIP revision for the 1-hour ozone standard.



II. What is the background and legal rationale for this final action?



    For a detailed description of the background and legal rationale 

for this final action, see our proposed approval, published March 29, 

2011 (76 FR 17368).



III. What is the effect of this final action?



    By finalizing this action, we are terminating the requirement for 

the State of Louisiana to submit a CAA section 185 penalty fee 1-hour 

ozone anti-backsliding SIP revision, which would have required major 

stationary sources in the Baton Rouge area to pay fees as a penalty for 

failure to attain the 1-hour ozone standard by the area's 1-hour ozone 

attainment date.\1\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------



    \1\ For the reasons set forth in the proposal to this final 

action, a final approval of the Termination Determination for the 1-

hour standard section 185 measures will not be rescinded based on 

subsequent monitored nonattainment for the 1-hour ozone standard.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------



IV. What is EPA's final analysis?



    EPA's final Termination Determination is based upon EPA's 

determination that the BR area is attaining the 1-hour ozone standard 

due to permanent and enforceable emission reductions implemented in the 

area, as detailed in our proposal for this final action.



a. Attainment of the 1-Hour Ozone Standard



    As noted above, EPA determined that the Baton Rouge 1-hour ozone 

nonattainment area attained the 1-hour ozone NAAQS. For the details of 

that determination see our final action at 75 FR 6570 (February 10, 

2010). As discussed in our proposal, EPA has also determined that the 

area continues to monitor attainment of the 1-hour ozone standard, 

based on complete, quality-assured data for 2010. 76 FR 17368, March 

29, 2011.

    EPA notes that, on September 9, 2010, EPA determined that the Baton 

Rouge 1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment area also attained the 1997 8-

hour ozone NAAQS. For the details of that determination see our final 

action at 75 FR 54778 (September 9, 2010).\2\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------



    \2\ A final determination that attainment for the 8-hour 

standard is due to permanent and enforceable emissions reductions 

would provide an additional basis for a Termination Determination 

for Baton Rouge, but EPA has not yet made such a determination and 

therefore does not rely on that ground here.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------



b. Permanent and Enforceable Emission Reductions



    EPA is finalizing its determination that the BR area demonstrated 

that the observed air quality improvements with respect to the 1-hour 

ozone standard are due to permanent and enforceable emission reductions 

through the implementation of emission controls contained in the SIP 

and in federal control measures. For a detailed analysis of these 

permanent and enforceable measures, please see our proposal at 76 FR 

17371-17372.



V. What comments did EPA receive?



    EPA received thirteen comment letters in response to the proposed 

rulemaking. The comment letters are available for review in the docket 

for this rulemaking. All commenters expressed support for our proposed 

action, and no adverse comments were received. Comments were submitted 

by American Chemistry Council, American Petroleum Institute or ``API'', 

BASF, Entergy Gulf State Louisiana L.L.C, National Petrochemical & 

Refiners Association (``NPRA''), PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer, Shell 

Chemical LP, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Williams Olefins, LLC 

(Williams), ExxonMobil, Calpine Corporation (Calpine), Louisiana 

Chemical Association, the Baton Rouge Area Chamber, and the Louisiana 

Mid-Continent Oil and Gas Association, (collectively, the 

Associations), and Baker Botts (through the Section 185 Working Group 

(the ``Group''). In addition to expressing support, some comments also 

addressed additional points relating to requirements under section 185 

and triggers for applicability, as well as other issues which EPA 

considers to be outside the scope of this Termination Determination 

rulemaking, which-addresses only the circumstances relating to 

termination of the section 185 SIP obligation, and thus EPA need not 

address such comments here.



VI. Final Action



    For the reasons set forth in the proposed rulemaking and in this 

final rulemaking, EPA is finalizing its determination to terminate 

(Termination Determination) the section 185 fee penalty requirement for 

the Baton Rouge area for the 1-hour ozone standard. This final 

determination is based on EPA's determination that the area has 

attained and continues to attain the 1-hour ozone standard due to 

permanent and enforceable emissions reductions.



VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews



    This action makes a determination of termination of the CAA section 

185 penalty fee requirement based on attainment of the 1-hour ozone 

standard due to permanent and enforceable emission reductions, and 

results in the termination of the section 185 fee requirements for the 

1-hour standard, and does not impose any additional requirements. For 

that reason, this action:

     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 

review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 

12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);

     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);

     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 

on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);

     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 

uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 

Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);



[[Page 39777]]



     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in 

Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);

     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 

on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 

19885, April 23, 1997);

     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 

Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);

     [Igr]s not subject to the requirements of Section 12(d) of 

the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 

272 note) because application of those requirements would be 

inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and

     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 

address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 

effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 

Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), 

because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in 

the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 

provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 

the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 

to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 

United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and 

other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 

to publication of the rules in the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 

Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 

804(2).

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 

judicial review of these actions must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 6, 2011. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of these 

final rules does not affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the 

effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged 

later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).)



List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52



    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 

Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.



    Dated: June 23, 2011.

Al Armendariz,

Regional Administrator, Region 6.



    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:



PART 52--[AMENDED]



0

1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:



    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.



Subpart T--Louisiana



0

2. Section 52.977 is amended by adding paragraph (c) to read as 

follows:





Sec.  52.977  Control strategy and regulations: Ozone.



* * * * *

    (c) Determination to Terminate the Clean Air Act Section 185 

Penalty Fee Requirement. Effective September 6, 2011 EPA has determined 

that the State of Louisiana is no longer required to submit a section 

185 fee program State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision for the Baton 

Rouge ozone nonattainment area to satisfy anti-backsliding requirements 

for the 1-hour ozone standard. This determination is based on EPA's 

determination that the area has attained the 1-hour ozone standard due 

to permanent and enforceable emissions reductions.



[FR Doc. 2011-16881 Filed 7-6-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P