[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 94 (Monday, May 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28248-28249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11886]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-64439; File No. SR-BX-2011-023]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Modify 
Fees for Non Co-Location Services

May 9, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on April 28, 2011, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (``BX'' or ``Exchange'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the 
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which 
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing 
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from 
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to modify fees for non co-location services. 
While changes to the Fee Schedule pursuant to this proposal are 
effective upon filing, the Exchange has designated these changes to be 
operative on May 1, 2011. The text of the proposed rule change is 
available at http://nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the Exchange's 
principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange is amending Rule 7051 entitled ``Direct Connectivity 
to Nasdaq'' to establish pricing for customers who are not co-located 
in the Exchange's data center, but require shared cabinet space and 
power for optional routers, switches, or modems to support their direct 
circuit connections. The Exchange proposes to assess customers who are 
not co-located in the Exchange's data center monthly fees for space 
based on a height unit of approximately two inches high, commonly call 
a ``U'' space and a maximum power of 125 Watts per U space.
    Currently, non co-located customers are assessed fees for direct 
circuit connection to the Exchange, as well as installation of an 
optional on-site cable router.\3\ However, there is no charge to non 
co-located customers for the space and utility cost to maintain the 
optional router. As more and more non co-located customers seek to 
utilize the optional router, the Exchange must utilize more space and 
utilities to accommodate the influx. It has become a necessity for the 
Exchange to offset the space and utility cost to maintain the optional 
router in the same manner as has been established for co-located 
customers. Additionally, the optional router may include other networks 
devices (e.g., switches or modems) to operate the customer's business. 
While co-located customers are assessed the same per U fee, the co-
located customers are assessed in increments of a 4U Block at $600 per 
month. The Exchange seeks to establish and make transparent the fees 
imposed for space and utility costs to non co-located customers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See BX Rule 7051, Direct Connectivity to BX, Release No. 
62969 (September 22, 2010), 75 FR 59777 (September 28, 2010) (SR-BX-
2010-064).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\4\ in general, and with 
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\5\ in particular, in that it provides for 
the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges 
among members and issuers and other persons using any facility or 
system which the Exchange operates or controls. The Exchange believes 
the proposed fees are reasonable and equitable for the reasons below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which 
exchanges offer non co-location services as a means to facilitate the 
trading activities of those customers who believe that the non co-
location services enhance the efficiency of their trading. Accordingly, 
fees charged for non co-location services are constrained by the fees 
charged to co-located customers, as well as fees charged by other 
exchanges, taking into consideration the different costs associated 
with the two service types. It should be noted, however, that the costs 
associated with a co-located customer are primarily fixed costs that 
include the costs of renting or owning data center space and retaining 
a staff of technical personnel. Accordingly, the Exchange establishes a 
range of non co-location fees with the goal of covering these same 
fixed costs and covering less significant marginal costs, such as the 
cost of electricity.
    The Exchange proposes the same fee for non co-located customers and 
co-located customers because the space and utility cost are comparable. 
If a particular exchange charges excessive fees for non co-location 
services that are comparable to co-location services, affected members 
will opt to terminate their non co-location arrangements with that 
exchange, and pursue range of alternative trading strategies not 
dependent upon the Exchange's non co-location service. Accordingly, the 
exchange charging excessive fees would stand to lose not only non co-
location revenues and any other revenues associated with the non co-
located customer's operations. Moreover, all of the Exchange's fees for 
space and utility costs services are equitably allocated and non-
discriminatory in that all non co-location customers are offered the 
same space and utility service as the co-located customers, and, there 
is no differentiation among customers with regard to the fees charged 
for such costs.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.

[[Page 28249]]

As discussed above, the Exchange believes that proposed fees for non 
co-location services are comparable to the same service provided to co-
locations customers. Additionally, such costs are constrained by the 
robust competition for order flow among exchanges and non-exchange 
markets, because non co-location exists to advance that competition, 
and excessive fees for non co-location services would serve to impair 
an exchange's ability to compete for order flow rather than burdening 
competition.
    Other exchanges charge the customer for fixed costs to house 
routers and other equipment to conduct its business on the premises; 
however, they are in a co-location relationship. For instance, the 
International Stock Exchange (``ISE'') charges 4.75% of ISE's equipment 
costs for equipment lease maintenance.\6\ The Chicago Board Options 
Exchange (CBOE) charges $100 per month for each Shelf for Equipment.\7\ 
The Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX'') charges $45 per month plus a 
one-time set up of $150 for 1 U of space. An additional Rack Mount will 
cost an extra $45 per month and a one-time fee of $150.\8\ Since the 
Exchange seeks to charge a comparable price for its non co-located 
customers for the similar service, the Exchange believes, based on the 
charges of BX and the other exchanges mentioned above, that $150 per 
month is a comparable price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See ISE Schedule of Fees, page 10, at http://www.ise.com/assets/documents/OptionsExchange/legal/fee/fee_schedule.pdf.
    \7\ See CBOE Fee schedule, page 8 http://www.cboe.com/publish/feeschedule/CBOEFeeSchedule.pdf.
    \8\ See CHX Fee Schedule, page 9, at http://www.chx.com/content/participant_information/Downloadable_Docs/Rules/CHX_ Fee_
Schedule_04252011.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\9\ At any time within 60 days of the filing 
of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily 
suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such 
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the 
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of 
the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall 
institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be 
approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-BX-2011-023 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2011-023. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing will also be available for 
inspection and copying at the principal office of the self-regulatory 
organization. All comments received will be posted without change; the 
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from 
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make 
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-
2011-023 and should be submitted on or before June 6, 2011.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-11886 Filed 5-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P