[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27994-27998]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11871]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-918]


First Administrative Review of Steel Wire Garment Hangers From 
the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Final Partial 
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 9, 2010, the Department of Commerce 
(``Department'') published in the Federal Register the preliminary 
results of the first administrative review of the antidumping duty 
order on steel wire garment hangers from the People's Republic of China 
(``PRC'').\1\ We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on 
the Preliminary Results. Based upon our analysis of the comments and 
information received, we made changes to the margin calculations for 
the final results. We continue to find that certain exporters have sold 
subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of 
review (``POR''), March 25, 2008, through November 30, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of 
China: Preliminary Results and Preliminary Rescission, in Part, of 
the First Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 68758 
(November 9, 2010) (``Preliminary Results'').

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: May 13, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Gorelik or Josh Startup, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
6905 or (202) 482-5260, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On November 9, 2010, the Department published in the Federal 
Register the Preliminary Results of this administrative review. On 
December 9, 2010, both M&B Metal Products Co., Inc. (``Petitioner'') 
and Shaoxing Dingli Metal Clotheshorse Co., Ltd., (``Dingli'') filed a 
request for a public hearing. On December 22, 2010, Petitioner 
submitted additional surrogate value (``SV'') information. On January 
3, 2011, Dingli filed comments rebutting Petitioner's December 22, 
2010, SV information. On January 7, 2011, the Department extended in 
the Federal Register the deadline for the final results by 60 days.

[[Page 27995]]

See Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China: 
Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review, 76 FR 1134 (January 7, 2011).
    On March 17, 2011, we reset the schedule for interested parties to 
submit case briefs and rebuttal briefs to March 24, 2011, and March 29, 
2011, respectively. On March 17, 2011, the Department placed certain 
entry data, obtained from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(``CBP'') with respect to Dingli, on the record and solicited comments 
from interested parties. Both Petitioner and Dingli filed comments 
regarding this data on March 21, 2011. Dingli filed rebuttal comments 
on March 23, 2011. On March 23, 2011, Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., 
Ltd.\2\ (``Wells'') filed its case brief. On March 24, 2011, 
Petitioner, Dingli, Fabricare (U.S. importer), and one of the separate 
rate respondents filed case briefs.\3\ On April 1, 2011, Petitioner, 
Dingli, and the Shaoxing Metal Companies filed rebuttal briefs. The 
Department did not hold a public hearing pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(d), 
as all hearing requests made by interested parties were withdrawn.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ In the Preliminary Results, we preliminarily found that 
Wells, Hong Kong Wells Limited (``HK Wells''), and Hong Kong Wells 
Limited (USA) (``Wells USA'') are affiliated, pursuant to sections 
771(33)(A), (E), and (F) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(``the Act''). We also preliminarily found that Wells and HK Wells 
should be treated as a single entity for the purposes of this 
administrative review. See Preliminary Results 76 FR at 68759. For 
the final results, we continue to find that Wells, HK Wells, and 
Wells USA are affiliated pursuant to sections 771(33)(A), (E), and 
(F) of the Act and that Wells and HK Wells comprise a single entity, 
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.401(f)(1) and (2). See id.
    \3\ See the ``Background'' section of the ``Steel Wire Garment 
Hangers from the People's Republic of China: Issues and Decision 
Memorandum for the Final Results of the First Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review,'' (``Decision Memo''), dated concurrently 
with this notice, for a discussion of the post-case brief letters 
submitted by Petitioner and Dingli regarding arguments of untimely 
filed factual information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Verification

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.307(b)(iv), we conducted a verification of 
Dingli's questionnaire responses.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ From February 22 to February 25, 2011, we verified Dingli's 
constructed export price (``CEP'') sales responses in the United 
States. See ``Memorandum to the File through Catherine Bertrand, 
Program Manager, Office 9, from Irene Gorelik, Senior Case Analyst, 
Office 9, and Joshua Startup, Analyst, Office 9, re: Verification of 
the Sales Response of Shaoxing Dingli Metal Clotheshorse Co., Ltd., 
in the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Steel Wire Garment 
Hangers from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''),'' dated March 
16, 2011 (``CEP Report''). Then, from March 7 to March 11, 2011, we 
verified Dingli's export price (``EP'') sales and factors of 
production (``FOP'') responses. See ``Memorandum to the File through 
Catherine Bertrand, Program Manager, Office 9 from Irene Gorelik, 
Senior Case Analyst, Office 9, and Joshua Startup, Analyst, Office 
9, re: Verification of the Sales and Factors Response of Shaoxing 
Dingli Metal Clotheshorse Co., Ltd. in the Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review of Steel Wire Garment Hangers from the 
People's Republic of China (``PRC''),'' dated March 17, 2011 (``EP 
Report'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to 
this review are addressed in the Decision Memo, which is dated 
concurrently with this notice. A list of the issues which parties 
raised and to which we respond in the Decision Memo is attached to this 
notice as an Appendix. The Decision Memo is a public document and is on 
file in the Central Records Unit (``CRU''), Main Commerce Building, 
Room 7046, and is accessible on the Department's Web site at http://www.trade.gov/ia. The paper copy and electronic version of the 
memorandum are identical in content.

Final Partial Rescission of Review

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the Department preliminarily 
rescinded the review, in part, with respect to five companies that 
stated that they made no shipments of subject merchandise during the 
POR. These companies are: Viet Anh Import-Export Joint Stock Company; 
Dong Nam A Co., Ltd.; Vietnam Hangers Joint Stock Company; Royal McGoun 
Chemicals Inc.; and NV Hanger Co., Ltd. See Preliminary Results at 
68759. Because the Department did not receive any information to the 
contrary, we continue to find that these companies did not make any 
shipments during the POR. Thus, for these final results, we are 
rescinding this review, in part, with respect to the five above-named 
companies, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on a review of the record, the verifications, and comments 
received from parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we have made 
changes to the surrogate financial ratio calculation and to the dumping 
margin calculations for Wells and Dingli in the final results. See 
Decision Memo at Comment 2. We have also corrected errors from the 
Preliminary Results alleged by Wells and Dingli. See Decision Memo at 
Comments 5 and 7. Lastly, we have made certain changes to a portion of 
Dingli's submitted sales data as a result of the verification findings 
and minor corrections presented at verification. For all detailed 
changes made to Dingli's reported sales and factor data, see Decision 
Memo at Comments 4B and 4F; see also ``Memorandum to the File from Josh 
Startup, Case Analyst: Program Analysis for the Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Steel Wire Garment Hangers 
from the People's Republic of China: Shaoxing Dingli Metal Clotheshorse 
Co., Ltd.,'' (``Dingli Final Analysis Memo''), dated concurrently with 
this notice.

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise that is subject to the order is steel wire garment 
hangers, fabricated from carbon steel wire, whether or not galvanized 
or painted, whether or not coated with latex or epoxy or similar 
gripping materials, and/or whether or not fashioned with paper covers 
or capes (with or without printing) and/or nonslip features such as 
saddles or tubes. These products may also be referred to by a 
commercial designation, such as shirt, suit, strut, caped, or latex 
(industrial) hangers. Specifically excluded from the scope of the order 
are wooden, plastic, and other garment hangers that are not made of 
steel wire. Also excluded from the scope of the order are chrome-plated 
steel wire garment hangers with a diameter of 3.4 mm or greater. The 
products subject to the order are currently classified under U.S. 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule
    (``HTSUS'') subheadings 7326.20.0020, 7323.99.9060, and 
7323.99.9080.
    Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and 
customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise is 
dispositive.

Separate Rates

    In proceedings involving NME countries, it is the Department's 
practice to begin with a rebuttable presumption that all companies 
within the country are subject to government control and thus should be 
assessed a single antidumping duty rate. See Policy Bulletin 5.1 \5\; 
see also Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 
Value, and Affirmative Critical Circumstances, In Part: Certain Lined 
Paper Products From the People's Republic of China, 71 FR 53079, 53080 
(September 8, 2006); and Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 
Value and Final Partial Affirmative Determination of Critical 
Circumstances: Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's 
Republic of China, 71 FR 29303, 29307 (May 22, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Separate Rates and Combination Rates in Antidumping 
Investigations involving Non-Market Economy Countries, 70 FR 17233 
(April 5, 2005), also available at: http://ia.ita.doc.gov/policy/index.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In our Preliminary Results, we determined that the following

[[Page 27996]]

companies met the criteria for separate rate status: (1) Shaoxing 
Gangyuan Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd.; Shaoxing Tongzhou Metal 
Manufactured Co. Ltd.; and Shaoxing Andrew Metal Manufactured Co., 
Ltd.\6\; (2) Shaoxing Shunji Metal Clotheshorse Co., Ltd.; (3) Yiwu Ao-
Si Metal Products Co., Ltd.; (4) Shangyu Baoxiang Metal Manufactured 
Co., Ltd.; (5) Jiaxing Boyi Medical Device Co., Ltd.; (6) Pu Jiang 
County Command Metal Products Co., Ltd.; (7) Shaoxing Meideli Metal 
Hanger Co., Ltd.; (8) Shaoxing Zhongbao Metal Manufactured Co., Ltd.; 
(9) Zhejiang Lucky Cloud Hanger Co., Ltd.; (10) Ningbo Dasheng Hanger 
Ind. Co., Ltd.; (11) Shaoxing Guochao Metallic Products Co., Ltd.; (12) 
Shanghai Jianhai International Trade Co., Ltd.; and (13) Shaoxing 
Liangbao Metal Manufactured Co., Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ In the Preliminary Results, we stated that these three 
companies all reported in their individual separate rate 
certifications that their affiliations with one another, legal 
structure, and ownership structure have not changed since the 
underlying investigation. For the final results, we continue to find 
that Shaoxing Gangyuan Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd., Shaoxing 
Tongzhou Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd., and Shaoxing Andrew Metal 
Manufactured Co., Ltd. comprise a single entity, as determined in 
the underlying investigation, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.401(f)(1) and 
(2). See Preliminary Results at 68766; see also Steel Wire Garment 
Hangers from the People's Republic of China: Final Determination of 
Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 73 FR 47587, 47589 (August 14, 2008) 
(``Hangers LTFV'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, in the Preliminary Results, we noted that the 
Department received completed responses to the Section A portion of the 
NME questionnaire from the individually reviewed respondents (Dingli 
and Wells), which contained information pertaining to the companies' 
eligibility for a separate rate. With respect to Wells, we 
preliminarily determined that there is no PRC ownership, and because 
the Department has no evidence indicating that Wells is under the 
control of the PRC, a separate rates analysis was not necessary to 
determine whether it is independent from government control. With 
respect to Dingli, we preliminarily granted separate rate status to it 
based on its submitted information. See Preliminary Results, 75 FR at 
68760-62.
    We did not receive any information since the issuance of the 
Preliminary Results that provides a basis for the reconsideration of 
these preliminary separate rate determinations. Therefore, the 
Department continues to find that Wells, Dingli, and the 13 above-
named, non-individually examined companies meet the criteria for a 
separate rate.

Separate Rate Calculation

    The separate rate is determined based on the estimated weighted-
average antidumping margins established for exporters and producers 
individually investigated, excluding zero and de minimis margins or 
margins based entirely on AFA.\7\ In this administrative review, one 
mandatory respondent, Dingli, has an estimated weighted-average 
antidumping margin which is above de minimis and which is not based 
entirely on AFA. Therefore, because there is only one weighted-average 
antidumping margin calculated for these final results that is neither 
zero, de minimis, nor based entirely on AFA, we have assigned Dingli's 
margin to the companies not selected for individual examination.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Decision Memo at Comment 3.
    \8\ See, e.g., Certain Steel Nails From the People's Republic of 
China: Final Results of the First Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, 76 FR 16379, 16381-16382 (March 23, 2011); Certain Frozen 
Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results 
of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper 
Reviews, 74 FR 11349, 11350 (March 17, 2009) (where the Department 
stated ``For the exporters subject to review that are determined to 
be eligible for separate-rate status, but were not selected as 
mandatory respondents, the Department normally establishes a 
weighted-average margin based on an average of the rates it 
calculated for the mandatory respondents, excluding any rates that 
are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. In this 
proceeding, there is only one such mandatory respondent, QVD. 
Accordingly, the rate calculated for QVD is applied as the rate for 
Agifish and Anvifish.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Facts Available

    Section 776(a) of the Act provides that if necessary information is 
not available on the record, or an interested party: (A) Withholds 
information that has been requested by the Department; (B) fails to 
provide such information in a timely manner or in the form or manner 
requested, subject to sections 782(c)(1) and (e) of the Act; (C) 
significantly impedes a proceeding under the antidumping statute; or 
(D) provides such information but the information cannot be verified; 
the Department shall, subject to subsection 782(d) of the Act, use 
facts otherwise available in reaching the applicable determination.
    Section 782(c)(1) of the Act provides that if an interested party 
``promptly after receiving a request from (the Department) for 
information, notifies (the Department) that such party is unable to 
submit the information requested in the requested form and manner, 
together with a full explanation and suggested alternative form in 
which such party is able to submit the information,'' the Department 
may modify its requirements to avoid imposing an unreasonable burden on 
that party.
    Section 782(d) of the Act provides that, if the Department 
determines that a response to a request for information does not comply 
with its request, the Department will inform the person submitting the 
response of the nature of the deficiency and shall, to the extent 
practicable, provide that person the opportunity to remedy or explain 
the deficiency. If that person submits further information that 
continues to be unsatisfactory, or this information is not submitted 
within the applicable time limits, the Department may, subject to 
section 782(e), disregard all or part of the original and subsequent 
responses.
    Section 782(e) of the Act states that the Department shall not 
decline to consider information deemed ``deficient'' under section 
782(d) if: (1) The information is submitted by the established 
deadline; (2) the information can be verified; (3) the information is 
not so incomplete that it cannot serve as a reliable basis for reaching 
the applicable determination; (4) the interested party has demonstrated 
that it acted to the best of its ability; and (5) the information can 
be used without undue difficulties.
    Furthermore, section 776(b) of the Act states that if the 
Department ``finds that an interested party has failed to cooperate by 
not acting to the best of its ability to comply with a request for 
information from the administering authority * * *, the administering 
authority * * *, in reaching the applicable determination under this 
title, may use an inference that is adverse to the interests of that 
party in selecting from among the facts otherwise available.'' The 
Department's determination is in accordance with sections 776(a)(2)(A), 
(B), and 776(b) of the Act.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See, e.g., Non-Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings from the 
People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review, 71 FR 69546 (December 1, 2006) and 
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 1. See also 
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of 
Vietnam: Preliminary Results of the First Administrative Review and 
New Shipper Review, 72 FR 10689, 10692 (March 9, 2007) (decision to 
apply total AFA to the NME-wide entity) unchanged in Certain Frozen 
Warmwater Shrimp From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final 
Results of the First Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 
First New Shipper Review, 72 FR 52052 (September 12, 2007) 
(``Vietnam Shrimp AR1'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the final results, in accordance with sections 776(a)(2)(A) and 
(B) of the Act, we have determined that the use of facts available 
(``FA'') is appropriate to account for Dingli's consumption of its 
hydrochloric acid (``HCL'') input in the production of subject 
merchandise. See

[[Page 27997]]

Decision Memo at Comment 4C. During the on-site verification of 
Dingli's sales and factors of production, we found that Dingli failed 
to report information requested by the Department; specifically, one 
month of HCL consumption, which is a direct material used to produce 
subject merchandise. Additionally, for the final results, in accordance 
with section 776(b) of the Act, we find that Dingli failed to cooperate 
by not acting to the best of its ability to comply with our request for 
information and, as a result, have determined that the application of 
an adverse inference is warranted for Dingli's unreported consumption 
of HCL. See id.; see also ``EP Report'' at 2 and 17. As an adverse 
inference, we are using the highest reported monthly consumption 
quantity of HCL during the POR as a proxy for the unreported month in 
the normal value calculation. See ``Dingli Final Analysis Memo'' for 
further details.

Final Results of Review

    The final weighted-average dumping margins for the POR are as 
follows:

     Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Weighted average
                      Exporter                            margin  (%)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd. and/or Hong Kong                    0.15
 Wells Limited \10\.................................
Shaoxing Dingli Metal Clotheshorse Co., Ltd.........                1.71
Shaoxing Gangyuan Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd \11\...                1.71
Shaoxing Andrew Metal Manufactured Co., Ltd.........                1.71
Shaoxing Tongzhou Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd........                1.71
Shaoxing Shunji Metal Clotheshorse Co. Ltd..........                1.71
Yiwu Ao-Si Metal Products Co., Ltd..................                1.71
Shangyu Baoxiang Metal Manufactured Co., Ltd........                1.71
Jiaxing Boyi Medical Device Co., Ltd................                1.71
Pu Jiang County Command Metal Products Co. Ltd......                1.71
Shaoxing Meideli Metal Hanger Co., Ltd..............                1.71
Shaoxing Zhongbao Metal Manufactured Co., Ltd.......                1.71
Zhejiang Lucky Cloud Hanger Co., Ltd................                1.71
Ningbo Dasheng Hanger Ind. Co., Ltd.................                1.71
Shaoxing Guochao Metallic Products Co. Ltd..........                1.71
Shanghai Jianhai International Trade Co., Ltd.......                1.71
Shaoxing Liangbao Metal Manufactured Co., Ltd.......                1.71
PRC-Wide Entity \12\................................              187.25
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ For the final results, we continue to find that Wells and HK Wells
  comprise a single entity, as determined in the Preliminary Results,
  pursuant to 19 CFR 351.401(f)(1) and (2). See Preliminary Results, 75
  FR at 68759.
\11\ For the final results, we continue to find that Shaoxing Gangyuan
  Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd., Shaoxing Tongzhou Metal Manufactured Co.
  Ltd., and Shaoxing Andrew Metal Manufactured Co., Ltd. comprise a
  single entity, as determined in the underlying investigation, pursuant
  to 19 CFR 351.401(f)(1) and (2). See Preliminary Results, 75 FR at
  68766; see also Hangers LTFV, 73 FR at 47589.
\12\ The PRC-Wide entity continues to include the 94 companies listed in
  footnote 17 of the Preliminary Results. See Preliminary Results, 75 FR
  at 68762.

Assessment

    Upon issuance of these final results, the Department will 
determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries covered by these reviews. The Department intends to issue 
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of 
the final results of this review excluding any reported sales that 
entered during the gap period. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 
we calculated exporter/importer (or customer)-specific assessment rates 
for the merchandise subject to this review. Where the respondent has 
reported reliable entered values, we calculated importer (or customer)-
specific ad valorem rates by aggregating the dumping margins calculated 
for all U.S. sales to each importer (or customer) and dividing this 
amount by the total entered value of the sales to each importer (or 
customer). See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where an importer (or customer)-
specific ad valorem rate is greater than de minimis, we will apply the 
assessment rate to the entered value of the importers'/customers' 
entries during the POR. See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
    Where we do not have entered values for all U.S. sales, we 
calculated a per-unit assessment rate by aggregating the antidumping 
duties due for all U.S. sales to each importer (or customer) and 
dividing this amount by the total quantity sold to that importer (or 
customer). See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). To determine whether the duty 
assessment rates are de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set 
forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we calculated importer (or customer)-
specific ad valorem ratios based on the estimated entered value. Where 
an importer (or customer)-specific ad valorem rate is zero or de 
minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without 
regard to antidumping duties. See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). For the 
companies receiving a separate rate that were not selected for 
individual review, we will calculate an assessment rate based on the 
simple average of the cash deposit rates calculated for the companies 
selected for individual review pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(B) of the 
Act.
    With respect to the companies upon which we have rescinded this 
review, we intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after 
publication of this notice. The Department will instruct CBP to assess 
antidumping duties at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated 
antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 
warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash-deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as 
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporters 
listed above, the cash deposit rate will be established in the final 
results of this review (except, if the rate

[[Page 27998]]

is zero or de minimis, i.e., less than 0.5 percent, no cash deposit 
will be required for that company); (2) for previously investigated or 
reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that have separate 
rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific 
rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all PRC exporters of 
subject merchandise which have not been found to be entitled to a 
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 
187.25 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject 
merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit 
rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporters that supplied 
that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.

Reimbursement of Duties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties has occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the 
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of 
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing this administrative review and notice 
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.213(d)(4).

    Dated: May 9, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

Appendix I--Decision Memorandum

General Issues

Comment 1: Treatment of Sales with Negative Margins
Comment 2: Surrogate Financial Ratios
Comment 3: Calculation of the Separate Rate Margin

Company-Specific Issues

Dingli

Comment 4: Whether to Assign Adverse Facts Available (``AFA'') to 
Dingli
    A. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') Data on the Record
    B. Hanger Quantity Conversions
    C. Hydrochloric Acid (``HCL'') Consumption
    D. Weight of Packing Cartons
    E. Sale of Machinery
    F. Changes to Margin Calculation Per Verification Findings
Comment 5: Calculation of Domestic Movement Expenses
Comment 6: Byproduct Offset for Scrap Iron Buckets

Wells

Comment 7: Calculation of Domestic Movement Expenses

[FR Doc. 2011-11871 Filed 5-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P