[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51002-51004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-20494]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-864]


Pure Magnesium In Granular Form from the People's Republic of 
China: Initiation of Changed Circumstances Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``Department'') has received 
information sufficient to warrant initiation of a changed circumstances 
review of the antidumping duty order on pure magnesium in granular form 
from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''). Specifically, based upon 
a request filed by China Minmetals Non-ferrous Metals Co., Ltd. 
(``CMN''), the Department is initiating a changed circumstances review 
to determine whether CMN is the successor-in-interest to Minmetals 
Precious &Rare Minerals Import and Export/China National Nonferrous

[[Page 51003]]

Metals Industry Trading Group Corp. (``Minmetals/CNNMIT''), a separate-
rate respondent in the original investigation.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 18, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eve Wang, AD/CVD Operations, Office 8, 
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 
20230; telephone: 202-482-6231.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On November 19, 2001, the Department published in the Federal 
Register an antidumping duty order on pure magnesium in granular form 
from the PRC.\1\ As part of that order, Minmetals/CNNMIT received a 
separate-rate of 24.67 percent.\2\ On June 28, 2010, CMN filed a 
submission with the Department requesting that it conduct a changed 
circumstances review of the antidumping duty order on pure magnesium in 
granular form from the PRC to determine whether it is the successor-in-
interest to Minmetals/CNNMIT.\3\ In its submission, CMN provided a copy 
of its Business License of Enterprise with Legal Person Status and 
Notification For Name Change issued by Minmetals/CNNMIT's supplier. In 
addition, CMN provided a narrative explanation describing its 
operations, production facilities, management, suppliers, customers, 
products and employees. As part of its June 28, 2010, submission, CMN 
requested that the Department conduct an expedited review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Antidumping Duty Order: Pure Magnesium in Granular Form 
From the People's Republic of China, 66 FR 57936 (November 19, 
2001).
    \2\ Id. at 57937.
    \3\ See Letter from CMN to the Department regarding Pure 
Magnesium in Granular Form From the People's Public of China Request 
for Changed Circumstances Review (June 28, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The scope of this order excludes pure magnesium that is already 
covered by an existing order \4\ on pure magnesium in ingot form, and 
currently classifiable under item numbers 8104.11.00 and 8104.19.00 of 
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Pure Magnesium From 
the People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation and Ukraine; 
Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 
Value: Antidumping Duty Investigation of Pure Magnesium From the 
Russian Federation, 60 FR 25691 (May 12, 1995).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The scope of this order includes imports of pure magnesium 
products, regardless of chemistry, including, without limitation, 
raspings, granules, turnings, chips, powder, and briquettes, except as 
noted above.
    Pure magnesium includes: (1) Products that contain at least 99.95 
percent primary magnesium, by weight (generally referred to as ``ultra-
pure'' magnesium); (2) products that contain less than 99.95 percent 
but not less than 99.8 percent primary magnesium, by weight (generally 
referred to as ``pure'' magnesium); (3) chemical combinations of pure 
magnesium and other material(s) in which the pure magnesium content is 
50 percent or greater, but less than 99.8 percent, by weight, that do 
not conform to an ``ASTM Specification for Magnesium Alloy''\5\ 
(generally referred to as ``off-specification pure'' magnesium); and 
(4) physical mixtures of pure magnesium and other material(s) in which 
the pure magnesium content is 50 percent or greater, but less than 99.8 
percent, by weight. Excluded from this order are mixtures containing 90 
percent or less pure magnesium by weight and one or more of certain 
non-magnesium granular materials to make magnesium-based reagent 
mixtures. The non-magnesium granular materials of which the Department 
is aware used to make such excluded reagents are: lime, calcium metal, 
calcium silicon, calcium carbide, calcium carbonate, carbon, slag 
coagulants, fluorspar, nephaline syenite, feldspar, aluminum, alumina 
(Al2O3), calcium aluminate, soda ash, hydrocarbons, graphite, coke, 
silicon, rare earth metals/mischmetal, cryolite, silica/fly ash, 
magnesium oxide, periclase, ferroalloys, dolomitic lime, and 
colemanite. A party importing a magnesium-based reagent which includes 
one or more materials not on this list is required to seek a scope 
clarification from the Department before such a mixture may be imported 
free of antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The meaning of this term is the same as that used by the 
American Society for Testing and Materials in its Annual Book of 
ASTM Standards: Volume 01.02 Aluminum and Magnesium Alloys.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The merchandise subject to this order is currently classifiable 
under item 8104.30.00 of the HTSUS. Although the HTSUS subheading is 
provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description 
of the scope of this order is dispositive.

Initiation of Changed Circumstances Review

    Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(``Act''), the Department will conduct a changed circumstances review 
upon receipt of information concerning, or a request from, an 
interested party for a review of an antidumping duty order which shows 
changed circumstances sufficient to warrant a review of the order.
    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.216(d), the Department has determined 
that the information submitted by CMN constitutes sufficient evidence 
to initiate a changed circumstances review. In an antidumping duty 
changed circumstances review involving a successor-in-interest 
determination, the Department typically examines several factors 
including, but not limited to, changes in: (1) management; (2) 
production facilities; (3) supplier relationships; and (4) customer 
base.\6\ Although no single factor will necessarily provide a 
dispositive indication that the requestor is the successor-in-interest 
to the predecessor company, generally, the Department will consider one 
company to be a successor-in-interest to another company if its 
resulting operation is essentially similar to that of its 
predecessor.\7\ Thus, if the record demonstrates that, with respect to 
the production and sale of the subject merchandise, the new company 
operates as the same business entity as the predecessor company, the 
Department may assign the new company the cash deposit rate of its 
predecessor.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Certain Activated Carbon from the People's Republic of 
China: Notice of Initiation of Changed Circumstances Review, 74 FR 
19934 (April 30, 2009).
    \7\ See, e.g., Notice of Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed 
Circumstances Review: Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges from 
India, 71 FR 327 (January 4, 2006).
    \8\ See Notice of Final Results of Changed Circumstances 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Polychloroprene Rubber from 
Japan, 67 FR 58 (January 2, 2002); see also Fresh and Chilled 
Atlantic Salmon from Norway; Final Results of Changed Circumstances 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 64 FR 9979 (March 1, 1999).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on the information provided in its submission, CMN has 
provided sufficient evidence to initiate a review to determine whether 
it is the successor-in-interest to Minmetals/CNNMIT. Therefore, 
pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216(d), we are 
initiating a changed circumstances review. Although CMN submitted 
documentation related to its business scope and some limited 
information and documentation regarding its supplier that the 
Department considers in its successor-in-interest analysis, it did not 
provide complete supporting documentation or conclusive evidence for 
the four factors listed above. Accordingly, the Department has 
determined that it is not expediting this action by combining the

[[Page 51004]]

preliminary results of review with this notice of initiation.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii); see also Notice of Initiation 
of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Pasta From 
Turkey, 74 FR 681 (January 7, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department will issue questionnaires requesting additional 
information for the review and will publish in the Federal Register a 
notice of the preliminary results of the antidumping duty changed 
circumstances review, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(2) and (4), 
and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(i). That notice will set forth the factual and 
legal conclusions upon which our preliminary results are based and a 
description of any action proposed. Pursuant to 19 CFR 
351.221(b)(4)(ii), interested parties will have an opportunity to 
comment on the preliminary results of review. In accordance with 19 CFR 
351.216(e), the Department will issue the final results of its 
antidumping duty changed circumstances review not later than 270 days 
after the date on which the review is initiated.
    This notice is published in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216.

    Dated: August 11, 2010.
Edward C. Yang,
Acting Deputy Assistant Sectary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010-20494 Filed 8-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S