[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 53 (Friday, March 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13319-13320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-6063]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-443; NRC-2010-0108]
NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, et al.,* Seabrook Station, Unit No.
1 Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC is authorized to act as agent for
the Hudson Light & Power Department, Massachusetts Municipal
Wholesale Electric Company, and Taunton Municipal Light and has
exclusive responsibility and control over the physical construction,
operation and maintenance of the facility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of an Exemption, pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) Section 73.5, ``Specific exemptions,'' from the
implementation date for certain new requirements of 10 CFR Part 73,
``Physical protection of plants and materials,'' for Facility Operating
License No. NPF-86, issued to NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (the
licensee), for operation of the Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1
(Seabrook), located in Rockingham County, New Hampshire. In accordance
with 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC prepared an environmental assessment
documenting its finding. The NRC concluded that the proposed actions
will have no significant environmental impact.
Environmental Assessment
Identification of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would exempt Seabrook from the required
implementation date of March 31, 2010, for several new requirements of
10 CFR Part 73. Specifically, Seabrook would be granted an exemption
from being in full compliance with certain new requirements contained
in 10 CFR 73.55 by the March 31, 2010, deadline. Seabrook has proposed
an alternate full compliance implementation date of June 4, 2010,
approximately 2 months beyond the date required by 10 CFR Part 73. The
proposed action, an extension of the schedule for completion of certain
actions required by the revised 10 CFR Part 73, does not involve any
physical changes to the reactor, fuel, plant structures, support
structures, water, or land at the Seabrook site.
The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's
application dated February 25, 2010, as supplemented by letter dated
March 5, 2010.
The Need for the Proposed Action
The proposed action is needed to provide the licensee with
additional time to perform the required upgrades to
[[Page 13320]]
the Seabrook security system due primarily to the impacts of the spring
2010 adverse weather conditions and other factors.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
The NRC has completed its environmental assessment of the proposed
exemption. The staff has concluded that the proposed action to extend
the implementation deadline would not significantly affect plant safety
and would not have a significant adverse effect on the probability of
an accident occurring.
The proposed action would not result in an increased radiological
hazard beyond those previously analyzed in the environmental assessment
and finding of no significant impact made by the Commission in
promulgating its revisions to 10 CFR Part 73 as discussed in a Federal
Register notice dated March 27, 2009 (74 FR 13967). There would be no
change to radioactive effluents that affect radiation exposures to
plant workers and members of the public. Therefore, no changes or
different types of radiological impacts are expected as a result of the
proposed exemption.
The proposed action would not result in changes to land use or
water use, or result in changes to the quality or quantity of non-
radiological effluents. No changes to the National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System permit are needed. No effects on the aquatic or
terrestrial habitat in the vicinity of the plant, or to threatened,
endangered, or protected species under the Endangered Species Act, or
impacts to essential fish habitat covered by the Magnuson-Stevens Act
are expected. There are no impacts to the air or ambient air quality.
There would be no impacts to historical and cultural resources.
There would be no impact to socioeconomic resources. Therefore, no
changes to or different types of non-radiological environmental impacts
are expected as a result of the proposed exemption.
Accordingly, the NRC concludes that there are no significant
environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. In addition,
in promulgating its revisions to 10 CFR Part 73, the Commission
prepared an environmental assessment and published a finding of no
significant impact [Part 73, Power Reactor Security Requirements, 74 FR
13926, 13967 (March 27, 2009)].
The NRC staff's safety evaluation will be provided in the exemption
that will be issued as part of the letter to the licensee approving the
exemption to the regulation, if granted.
Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed action, the NRC staff considered
denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative).
Denial of the exemption request would result in no change in current
environmental impacts. If the proposed action was denied, the licensee
would have to comply with the March 31, 2010, implementation deadline.
The environmental impacts of the proposed exemption and the ``no
action'' alternative are similar.
Alternative Use of Resources
The action does not involve the use of any different resources than
those considered in the Final Environmental Statement for the Seabrook
Station, Unit No. 1, NUREG-0895, dated December 1982.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
In accordance with its stated policy, on March 5, 2010, the staff
consulted with the New Hampshire and Massachusetts State officials,
Messrs. M. Nawoj and J. Giarrusso, respectively, regarding the
environmental impact of the proposed action. Neither State official had
any comments.
Finding of No Significant Impact
On the basis of the environmental assessment, the NRC concludes
that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the
quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the NRC has determined
not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed
action.
For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the
licensee's letter dated February 25, 2010, as supplemented by letter
dated March 5, 2010. Portions of each of the submittals contain
security-related information and, accordingly, some enclosures are not
available to the public. Other parts of these documents may be
examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room
(PDR), located at One White Flint North, Public File Area O-1F21, 11555
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland 20852. Publicly
available records will be accessible electronically from the Agencywide
Document Access and Management System (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading
Room on the Internet at the NRC Web site: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems
in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR
Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, or send
an e-mail to [email protected].
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day of March 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Dennis Egan,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch 1-2, Division of
Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2010-6063 Filed 3-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P