[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 166 (Friday, August 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44405-44409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20808]
[[Page 44405]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2009-0369; Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251]
Florida Power & Light Company; Notice of Consideration of
Issuance of Amendment to Facility Operating License, Proposed No
Significant Hazards Consideration Determination, and Opportunity for a
Hearing and Order Imposing Procedures for Access to Sensitive
Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information (SUNSI) for Contention
Preparation
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is
considering issuance of an amendment to Facility Operating License Nos.
DPR-31 and DPR-41, issued to Florida Power & Light Company (the
licensee), for operation of Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4 located in
Florida City, Florida.
The proposed amendment would revise the TS 6.8.4.j, Steam Generator
(SG) Surveillance Program and TS 6.9.1.8, Steam Generator Tube
Inspection Report. The purpose of these modifications is to revise the
scope of the inservice inspections required in the tubesheet regions of
the Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 SGs. The amendment application dated
July 23, 2009, contains sensitive unclassified non-safeguards
information (SUNSI).
Before issuance of the proposed license amendment, the Commission
will have made findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended (the Act), and the Commission's regulations.
The Commission has made a proposed determination that the amendment
request involves no significant hazards consideration. Under the
Commission's regulations in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(10 CFR), Sec. 50.92, this means that operation of the facility in
accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) involve a
significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident
previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new or
different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or
(3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. As required
by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the licensee has provided its analysis of the issue
of no significant hazards consideration, which is presented below:
1. The proposed changes do not involve a significant increase in
the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
Of the applicable accidents previously evaluated, the limiting
transients with consideration to the proposed change to the SG tube
inspection and repair criteria are the SG tube rupture (SGTR) event
and the steam line break (SLB) postulated accident.
During the SGTR event, the required structural integrity margins
of the SG tubes and the tube-to-tubesheet joint over the H* distance
will be maintained. Tube rupture in tubes with cracks within the
tubesheet is precluded by the constraint provided by the presence of
the tubesheet and the tube-to-tubesheet joint. Tube burst cannot
occur within the thickness of the tubesheet. The tube-to-tubesheet
joint constraint results from the hydraulic expansion process,
thermal expansion mismatch between the tube and tubesheet, and from
the differential pressure between the primary and secondary side,
and tubesheet rotation. Based on this design, the structural margins
against burst, as discussed in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.121, ``Bases
for Plugging Degraded PWR Steam Generator Tubes'' [Reference 7] and
NEI [Nuclear Energy Institute] 97-06, ``Steam Generator Program
Guidelines'' [Reference 3], are maintained for both normal and
postulated accident conditions. For the portion of the tube outside
of the tubesheet, the proposed change also has no impact on the
structural or leakage integrity. Therefore, the proposed change does
not result in a significant increase in the probability of the
occurrence of an SGTR accident.
At normal operating pressures, leakage from tube degradation
below the proposed limited inspection depth is limited by the tube-
to-tubesheet crevice. Consequently, negligible normal operating
leakage is expected from degradation below the inspected depth
within the tubesheet region. The consequences of an SGTR event are
not affected by the primary to secondary leakage flow during the
event as primary to secondary leakage flow through a postulated tube
that has been pulled out of the tubesheet, which would constitute a
failure to meet H*, is considered to be equivalent to a tube
rupture. Therefore, the proposed change does not result in a
significant increase in the consequences of an SGTR event. In
addition, the selected H* value envelopes the depth within the
tubesheet required to prevent a tube pullout.
The probability of a SLB is unaffected by the potential failure
of a SG tube as the failure of a tube is not an initiator for a SLB
event.
The leak rate factor of 1.82 for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4, for
a postulated SLB, has been calculated as shown in Table 9-7 of
Reference 2, Westinghouse Electric Company WCAP-17091-P, H*:
Alternative Repair Criteria for the tubesheet Expansion Region in
Steam Generators with Hydraulically Expanded Tubes (Model 44F).
Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 will apply the factor of 1.82 to the
normal operating leakage associated with the tubesheet expansion
region in the condition monitoring (CM) and operational assessment
(OA). Through application of the limited tubesheet inspection scope,
the existing operating leakage limit provides assurance that
excessive leakage (i.e., greater than accident analysis assumptions)
will not occur. Multiplying the leak rate factor of 1.82 by the TS
operational leak rate limit of 150 gpd (at room temperature) through
any one SG indicates that an assumed primary to secondary accident
induced leak rate of 273 gpd or greater through any one SG is
required to ensure that the limiting design basis accident
assumption is not exceeded. This condition is satisfied by the
current UFSAR [Updated Final Safety Analysis Report] assumed primary
to secondary accident induced leak rate of 500 gpd (355 gpd adjusted
to room temperature) through any one SG for SLB. Since the existing
limits on operational leakage continue to ensure that the SLB
assumed accident induced leakage will not be exceeded, the
consequences of a SLB accident are not increased.
For the CM assessment, the component of leakage from the prior
cycle from below the H* distance will be multiplied by a factor of
1.82 and added to the total leakage from any other source and
compared to the allowable accident induced leak rate. For the OA,
the difference in the leakage between the allowable leakage and the
calculated accident induced leakage from sources other than the
tubesheet expansion region will be divided by 1.82 and compared to
the observed operational leakage.
The previously analyzed accidents are initiated by the failure
of plant structures, systems, or components. The proposed change
that alters the SG inspection and reporting criteria does not have a
detrimental impact on the integrity of any plant structure, system,
or component that initiates an analyzed event. The proposed change
will not alter the operation of, or otherwise increase the failure
probability of any plant equipment that initiates an analyzed
accident.
Based on the above, the proposed change does not involve a
significant increase in the probability or consequences of an
accident previously evaluated.
2. The proposed changes do not create the possibility of a new
or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated.
The proposed change that alters the SG inspection and reporting
criteria does not introduce any new equipment, create new failure
modes for existing equipment, or create any new limiting single
failures. Plant operation will not be altered, and all safety
functions will continue to perform as previously assumed in accident
analyses.
Therefore, the proposed change does not create the possibility
of a new or different kind of accident from any previously
evaluated.
3. The proposed changes do not involve a significant reduction
in the margin of safety. The proposed change defines the safety
significant portion of the tube that must be inspected and repaired.
WCAP-17091-P identifies the specific inspection depth below which
any type of tube degradation is shown to have no impact on the
performance criteria in NEI 97-06 Rev. 2, ``Steam Generator Program
Guidelines'' [Reference 3] and TS 6.8.4.j, ``Steam Generator (SG)
Program.''
The proposed change that alters the SG inspection and reporting
criteria maintains the required structural margins of the SG tubes
for both normal and accident conditions. Nuclear Energy Institute
97-06, ``Steam Generator Program Guidelines''
[[Page 44406]]
[Reference 3], and NRC Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.121, ``Bases for
Plugging Degraded PWR Steam Generator Tubes'' [Reference 7], are
used as the bases in the development of the limited tubesheet
inspection depth methodology for determining that SG tube integrity
considerations are maintained within acceptable limits. RG 1.121
describes a method acceptable to the NRC for meeting General Design
Criteria (GDC) 14, ``Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary,'' GDC 15,
``Reactor Coolant System Design,'' GDC 31, ``Fracture Prevention of
Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary,'' and GDC 32, ``Inspection of
Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary,'' by reducing the probability and
consequences of a SGTR. RG 1.121 concludes that by determining the
limiting safe conditions for tube wall degradation, the probability
and consequences of a SGTR are reduced. This RG uses safety factors
on loads for tube burst that are consistent with the requirements of
Section III of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Code.
For axially oriented cracking located within the tubesheet, tube
burst is precluded due to the presence of the tubesheet. For
circumferentially oriented cracking, Westinghouse WCAP-17091-P
defines a length of degradation-free expanded tubing that provides
the necessary resistance to tube pullout due to the pressure induced
forces, with applicable safety factors applied. Application of the
limited hot and cold leg tubesheet inspection criteria will preclude
unacceptable primary to secondary leakage during all plant
conditions. The SLB leak rate factor for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4
is 1.82 (Table 9-7 in WCAP-17091-P). Multiplying this factor by the
room temperature TS operational leak rate limit of 150 gpd through
any one SG indicates that an assumed primary to secondary accident
induced leak rate of 273 gpd or greater through any one SG is
required to ensure that the limiting design basis accident
assumption is not exceeded (at room temperature). This condition is
satisfied by the current UFSAR assumed primary to secondary accident
induced leak rate of 500 gpd (355 gpd adjusted to room temperature)
through any one SG for SLB.
Therefore, the proposed change does not involve a significant
reduction in any margin of safety.
The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis and, based on
this review, it appears that the three standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are
satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the
amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration.
The Commission is seeking public comments on this proposed
determination. Any comments received within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice will be considered in making any final
determination.
Normally, the Commission will not issue the amendment until the
expiration of 60 days after the date of publication of this notice. The
Commission may issue the license amendment before expiration of the 60-
day period provided that its final determination is that the amendment
involves no significant hazards consideration. In addition, the
Commission may issue the amendment prior to the expiration of the 30-
day comment period should circumstances change during the 30-day
comment period such that failure to act in a timely way would result,
for example, in derating or shutdown of the facility. Should the
Commission take action prior to the expiration of either the comment
period or the notice period, it will publish in the Federal Register a
notice of issuance. Should the Commission make a final No Significant
Hazards Consideration Determination, any hearing will take place after
issuance. The Commission expects that the need to take this action will
occur very infrequently.
Written comments may be submitted by mail to the Chief, Rulemaking,
Directives and Editing Branch (RDB), TWB-05-B01M, Division of
Administrative Services, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, and should cite the
publication date and page number of this Federal Register notice.
Written comments may also be faxed to the RDB at 301-492-3446.
Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, Public File Area
O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland.
Within 60 days after the date of publication of this notice, any
person(s) whose interest may be affected by this action may file a
request for a hearing and a petition to intervene with respect to
issuance of the amendment to the subject facility operating license.
Requests for a hearing and a petition for leave to intervene shall be
filed in accordance with the Commission's ``Rules of Practice for
Domestic Licensing Proceedings'' in 10 CFR Part 2. Interested person(s)
should consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.309, which is available at
the Commission's PDR, located at One White Flint North, Public File
Area O1F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland.
Publicly available records will be accessible from the Agencywide
Documents Access and Management System's (ADAMS) Public Electronic
Reading Room on the Internet at the NRC Web site, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/. If a request for a hearing or petition
for leave to intervene is filed by the above date, the Commission or a
presiding officer designated by the Commission or by the Chief
Administrative Judge of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel,
will rule on the request and/or petition; and the Secretary or the
Chief Administrative Judge of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
will issue a notice of a hearing or an appropriate order.
As required by 10 CFR 2.309, a petition for leave to intervene
shall set forth with particularity the interest of the petitioner in
the proceeding, and how that interest may be affected by the results of
the proceeding. The petition should specifically explain the reasons
why intervention should be permitted with particular reference to the
following general requirements: (1) The name, address and telephone
number of the requestor or petitioner; (2) the nature of the
requestor's/petitioner's right under the Act to be made a party to the
proceeding; (3) the nature and extent of the requestor's/petitioner's
property, financial, or other interest in the proceeding; and (4) the
possible effect of any decision or order which may be entered in the
proceeding on the requestor's/petitioner's interest. The petition must
also identify the specific contentions which the petitioner/requestor
seeks to have litigated at the proceeding.
Each contention must consist of a specific statement of the issue
of law or fact to be raised or controverted. In addition, the
petitioner/requestor shall provide a brief explanation of the bases for
the contention and a concise statement of the alleged facts or expert
opinion which support the contention and on which the petitioner
intends to rely in proving the contention at the hearing. The
petitioner/requestor must also provide references to those specific
sources and documents of which the petitioner is aware and on which the
petitioner intends to rely to establish those facts or expert opinion.
The petition must include sufficient information to show that a genuine
dispute exists with the applicant on a material issue of law or fact.
Contentions shall be limited to matters within the scope of the
amendment under consideration. The contention must be one which, if
proven, would entitle the petitioner to relief. A petitioner/requestor
who fails to satisfy these requirements with respect to at least one
contention will not be permitted to participate as a party.
Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding,
subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene,
and have the opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the
hearing.
[[Page 44407]]
If a hearing is requested, the Commission will make a final
determination on the issue of no significant hazards consideration. The
final determination will serve to decide when the hearing is held. If
the final determination is that the amendment request involves no
significant hazards consideration, the Commission may issue the
amendment and make it immediately effective, notwithstanding the
request for a hearing. Any hearing held would take place after issuance
of the amendment. If the final determination is that the amendment
request involves a significant hazards consideration, any hearing held
would take place before the issuance of any amendment.
All documents filed in NRC adjudicatory proceedings, including a
request for hearing, a petition for leave to intervene, any motion or
other document filed in the proceeding prior to the submission of a
request for hearing or petition to intervene, and documents filed by
interested governmental entities participating under 10 CFR 2.315(c),
must be filed in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule, which the NRC
promulgated on August 28, 2007 (72 FR 49139). The E-Filing process
requires participants to submit and serve all adjudicatory documents
over the internet, or in some cases to mail copies on electronic
storage media. Participants may not submit paper copies of their
filings unless they seek a waiver in accordance with the procedures
described below.
To comply with the procedural requirements of E-Filing, at least
ten (10) days prior to the filing deadline, the petitioner/requestor
must contact the Office of the Secretary by e-mail at
[email protected], or by calling (301) 415-1677, to request (1) a
digital ID certificate, which allows the participant (or its counsel or
representative) to digitally sign documents and access the E-Submittal
server for any proceeding in which it is participating; and/or (2)
creation of an electronic docket for the proceeding (even in instances
in which the petitioner/requestor (or its counsel or representative)
already holds an NRC-issued digital ID certificate). Each petitioner/
requestor will need to download the Workplace Forms ViewerTM
to access the Electronic Information Exchange (EIE), a component of the
E-Filing system. The Workplace Forms ViewerTM is free and is
available at http://www.nrc.gov/sitehelp/esubmittals/installviewer.html. Information about applying for a digital ID
certificate is available on NRC's public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/sitehelp/esubmittals/apply-certificates.html.
Once a petitioner/requestor has obtained a digital ID certificate,
had a docket created, and downloaded the EIE viewer, it can then submit
a request for hearing or petition for leave to intervene. Submissions
should be in Portable Document Format (PDF) in accordance with NRC
guidance available on the NRC public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. A filing is considered complete at the
time the filer submits its documents through EIE. To be timely, an
electronic filing must be submitted to the EIE system no later than
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Upon receipt of a
transmission, the E-Filing system time-stamps the document and sends
the submitter an e-mail notice confirming receipt of the document. The
EIE system also distributes an e-mail notice that provides access to
the document to the NRC Office of the General Counsel and any others
who have advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to
participate in the proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the
documents on those participants separately. Therefore, applicants and
other participants (or their counsel or representative) must apply for
and receive a digital ID certificate before a hearing request/petition
to intervene is filed so that they can obtain access to the document
via the E-Filing system.
A person filing electronically using the agency's adjudicatory e-
filing system may seek assistance through the ``Contact Us'' link
located on the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html or by calling the NRC Meta-System Help Desk, which is
available between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through
Friday, excluding government holidays. The Meta-System Help Desk can be
contacted by telephone at 1-866-672-7640 or by e-mail at
[email protected].
Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not
submitting documents electronically must file a motion, in accordance
with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper filing requesting
authorization to continue to submit documents in paper format. Such
filings must be submitted by: (1) First class mail addressed to the
Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemaking and
Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or expedited
delivery service to the Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth Floor, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville, Pike, Rockville, Maryland, 20852,
Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Participants filing a
document in this manner are responsible for serving the document on all
other participants. Filing is considered complete by first-class mail
as of the time of deposit in the mail, or by courier, express mail, or
expedited delivery service upon depositing the document with the
provider of the service.
Non-timely requests and/or petitions and contentions will not be
entertained absent a determination by the Commission or the presiding
officer of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board that the petition and/
or request should be granted and/or the contentions should be admitted,
based on a balancing of the factors specified in 10 CFR 2.309(c)(1)(i)-
(viii).
Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in
NRC's electronic hearing docket which is available to the public at
http://ehd.nrc.gov/ehd_proceeding/home.asp, unless excluded pursuant
to an order of the Commission, an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, or
a Presiding Officer. Participants are requested not to include personal
privacy information, such as social security numbers, home addresses,
or home phone numbers in their filings, unless an NRC regulation or
other law requires submission of such information. With respect to
copyrighted works, except for limited excerpts that serve the purpose
of the adjudicatory filings and would constitute a Fair Use
application, participants are requested not to include copyrighted
materials in their submissions.
For further details with respect to this license amendment
application, see the application for amendment dated July 23, 2009,
which is available for public inspection at the Commission's PDR,
located at One White Flint North, File Public Area O1 F21, 11555
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available
records will be accessible electronically from the Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System's (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room
on the Internet at the NRC Web site, http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter
problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, should contact
the NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-
4737, or by e-mail to [email protected].
[[Page 44408]]
Order Imposing Procedures for Access to Sensitive Unclassified Non-
Safeguards Information (SUNSI) for Contention Preparation
1. This order contains instructions regarding how potential parties
to this proceeding may request access to documents containing sensitive
unclassified information.
2. Within ten (10) days after publication of this notice of
opportunity for hearing any potential party as defined in 10 CFR 2.4
who believes access to SUNSI is necessary for a response to the notice
may request access to such information. A ``potential party'' is any
person who intends or may intend to participate as a party by
demonstrating standing and the filing of an admissible contention under
10 CFR 2.309. Requests submitted later than ten (10) days will not be
considered absent a showing of good cause for the late filing,
addressing why the request could not have been filed earlier.
3. The requester shall submit a letter requesting permission to
access SUNSI to the Office of the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemakings and
Adjudications Staff, and provide a copy to the Associate General
Counsel for Hearings, Enforcement and Administration, Office of the
General Counsel, Washington, DC 20555-0001. The expedited delivery or
courier mail address for both offices is U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The e-mail
address for the Office of the Secretary and the Office of the General
Counsel are [email protected] and [email protected],
respectively.\1\ The request must include the following information:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See footnote 4. While a request for hearing or petition to
intervene in this proceeding must comply with the filing
requirements of the NRC's ``E-Filing Rule,'' the initial request to
access SUNSI under these procedures should be submitted as described
in this paragraph.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. A description of the licensing action with a citation to this
Federal Register notice of opportunity for hearing;
b. The name and address of the potential party and a description of
the potential party's particularized interest that could be harmed by
the potential licensing action;
c. The identity of the individual requesting access to SUNSI and
the requester's need for the information in order to meaningfully
participate in this adjudicatory proceeding, particularly why publicly
available versions of the application would not be sufficient to
provide the basis and specificity for a proffered contention;
4. Based on an evaluation of the information submitted under items
2 and 3.a through 3.c, above, the NRC staff will determine within ten
days of receipt of the written access request whether (1) there is a
reasonable basis to believe the petitioner is likely to establish
standing to participate in this NRC proceeding, and (2) there is a
legitimate need for access to SUNSI.
5. A request for access to SUNSI will be granted if:
a. The request has demonstrated that there is a reasonable basis to
believe that a potential party is likely to establish standing to
intervene or to otherwise participate as a party in this proceeding;
b. The proposed recipient of the information has demonstrated a
need for SUNSI;
c. The proposed recipient of the information has executed a Non-
Disclosure Agreement or Affidavit and agrees to be bound by the terms
of a Protective Order setting forth terms and conditions to prevent the
unauthorized or inadvertent disclosure of SUNSI; and
d. The presiding officer has issued a protective order concerning
the information or documents requested.\2\ Any protective order issued
shall provide that the petitioner must file SUNSI contentions 25 days
after receipt of (or access to) that information. However, if more than
25 days remain between the petitioner's receipt of (or access to) the
information and the deadline for filing all other contentions (as
established in the notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing), the
petitioner may file its SUNSI contentions by that later deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ If a presiding officer has not yet been designated, the
Chief Administrative Judge will issue such orders, or will appoint a
presiding officer to do so.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. If the request for access to SUNSI is granted, the terms and
conditions for access to such information will be set forth in a draft
protective order and affidavit of non-disclosure appended to a joint
motion by the NRC staff, any other affected parties to this
proceeding,\3\ and the petitioner(s). If the diligent efforts by the
relevant parties or petitioner(s) fail to result in an agreement on the
terms and conditions for a draft protective order or non-disclosure
affidavit, the relevant parties to the proceeding or the petitioner(s)
should notify the presiding officer within five (5) days, describing
the obstacles to the agreement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Parties/persons other than the requester and the NRC staff
will be notified by the NRC staff of a favorable access
determination (and may participate in the development of such a
motion and protective order) if it concerns SUNSI and if the party/
person's interest independent of the proceeding would be harmed by
the release of the information (e.g., as with proprietary
information).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. If the request for access to SUNSI is denied by the NRC staff,
the NRC staff shall briefly state the reasons for the denial. The
requester may challenge the NRC staff's adverse determination with
respect to access to SUNSI (including with respect to standing) by
filing a challenge within five (5) days of receipt of that
determination with (a) the presiding officer designated in this
proceeding; (b) if no presiding officer has been appointed, the Chief
Administrative Judge, or if he or she is unavailable, another
administrative judge, or an administrative law judge with jurisdiction
pursuant to Sec. 2.318(a); or (c) if another officer has been
designated to rule on information access issues, with that officer.
In the same manner, a party other than the requester may challenge
an NRC staff determination granting access to SUNSI whose release would
harm that party's interest independent of the proceeding. Such a
challenge must be filed within five (5) days of the notification by the
NRC staff of its grant of such a request.
If challenges to the NRC staff determinations are filed, these
procedures give way to the normal process for litigating disputes
concerning access to information. The availability of interlocutory
review by the Commission of orders ruling on such NRC staff
determinations (whether granting or denying access) is governed by 10
CFR 2.311.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ As of October 15, 2007, the NRC's final ``E-Filing Rule''
became effective. See Use of Electronic Submissions in Agency
Hearings (August 28, 2007; 72 FR 49139). Requesters should note that
the filing requirements of that rule apply to appeals of NRC staff
determinations (because they must be served on a presiding officer
or the Commission, as applicable), but not to the initial SUNSI
requests submitted to the NRC staff under these procedures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. The Commission expects that the NRC staff and presiding officers
(and any other reviewing officers) will consider and resolve requests
for access to SUNSI, and motions for protective orders, in a timely
fashion in order to minimize any unnecessary delays in identifying
those petitioners who have standing and who have propounded contentions
meeting the specificity and basis requirements in 10 CFR Part 2.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day of August 2009.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette L. Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
[[Page 44409]]
Attachment 1--General Target Schedule for Processing and Resolving
Requests for Access to Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards
Information (SUNSI) in This Proceeding
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Event
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0................................................... Publication of [Federal Register notice/other notice of
proposed action and opportunity for hearing], including
order with instructions for access requests.
10.................................................. Deadline for submitting requests for access to SUNSI with
information: Supporting the standing of a potential party
identified by name and address; and describing the need
for the information in order for the potential party to
participate meaningfully in an adjudicatory proceeding.
[20, 30 or 60]...................................... Deadline for submitting petition for intervention
containing: (i) Demonstration of standing; (ii) all
contentions whose formulation does not require access to
SUNSI (+25 Answers to petition for intervention; +7
petitioner/requestor reply).
20.................................................. NRC staff informs the requester of the staff's
determination whether the request for access provides a
reasonable basis to believe standing can be established
and shows need for SUNSI. NRC staff also informs any
party to the proceeding whose interest independent of the
proceeding would be harmed by the release of the
information. If NRC staff makes the finding of need for
SUNSI and likelihood of standing, NRC staff begins
document processing (preparation of redactions or review
of redacted documents).
25.................................................. If NRC staff finds no ``need'' for SUNSI or likelihood of
standing, the deadline for petitioner/requester to file a
motion seeking a ruling to reverse the NRC staff's denial
of access; NRC staff files copy of access determination
with the presiding officer (or Chief Administrative Judge
or other designated officer, as appropriate). If NRC
staff finds ``need'' for SUNSI, the deadline for any
party to the proceeding whose interest independent of the
proceeding would be harmed by the release of the
information to file a motion seeking a ruling to reverse
the NRC staff's grant of access.
30.................................................. Deadline for NRC staff reply to motions to reverse NRC
staff determination(s).
40.................................................. (Receipt +30) If NRC staff finds standing and need for
SUNSI, deadline for NRC staff to complete information
processing and file motion for Protective Order and draft
Non-Disclosure Affidavit. Deadline for applicant/licensee
to file Non-Disclosure Agreement for SUNSI.
A................................................... If access granted: Issuance of presiding officer or other
designated officer decision on motion for protective
order for access to sensitive information (including
schedule for providing access and submission of
contentions) or decision reversing a final adverse
determination by the NRC staff.
A+3................................................. Deadline for filing executed Non-Disclosure Affidavits.
Access provided to SUNSI consistent with decision issuing
the protective order.
A+28................................................ Deadline for submission of contentions whose development
depends upon access to SUNSI. However, if more than 25
days remain between the petitioner's receipt of (or
access to) the information and the deadline for filing
all other contentions (as established in the notice of
hearing or opportunity for hearing), the petitioner may
file its SUNSI contentions by that later deadline.
A+53 (Contention receipt +25)....................... Answers to contentions whose development depends upon
access to SUNSI.
A+60 (Answer receipt +7)............................ Petitioner/Intervenor reply to answers.
B................................................... Decision on contention admission.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. E9-20808 Filed 8-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P