[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 106 (Thursday, June 4, 2009)] [Notices] [Pages 26917-26918] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: E9-12988] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration Environmental Impact Statement in Seattle, WA AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of intent. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this Notice to advise the public, Tribes, and agencies that it intends to prepare a [[Page 26918]] Second Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SSDEIS) for a proposed highway project to replace the Alaskan Way Viaduct (SR 99) in Seattle, King County, Washington. This Notice revises a Notice of Intent for the Alaskan Way Viaduct and Seawall Replacement Project, which was published on August 3, 2005 (70 FR 44716). Furthermore, this Notice rescinds the Notice of Intent published on July 16, 2008 (73 FR 40908). The 2008 Notice of Intent anticipated the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement that would evaluate various transportation modes and systems between the south Seattle city limits and N. 85th Street and Elliott Bay and Lake Washington, in addition to replacing the Alaskan Way Viaduct and Seawall. Rather than pursuing this more broad, multi-agency proposal, this Notice re-establishes FHWA's intent to continue the process begun with the publication of a Notice of Intent on June 22, 2001 (66 FR 33602), as revised on September 26, 2003 (68 FR 55712), and again in 2005. That process has resulted in the issuance of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement in March 2004, and a Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement in July 2006. The planned SSDEIS will build on these earlier documents and the alternatives evaluated therein. However, there are some important changes to the earlier proposal. The major change is that this proposal will now consider one or more alternatives that no longer include the seawall along the Elliott Bay shoreline, known as the Alaskan Way Seawall. The Seawall was the subject of a Notice of Intent issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on March 31, 2006 (71 FR 16293). The SSDEIS will also set forth a revised Purpose and Need for the proposed project, re-evaluate previous Viaduct replacement alternatives in light of the revised Purpose and Need, and introduce and evaluate at least one new build alternative--a bored tunnel. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy Everett, Major Projects Oversight Manager, Federal Highway Administration, Jackson Federal Building, 915 2nd Avenue, Room 3142, Seattle, WA 98174; telephone: (206) 220-7538; and e-mail: [email protected]. The FHWA Washington Division's Oversight Manager's regular office hours are between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. (Pacific Time). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FHWA, Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and the City of Seattle (City) will prepare a SSDEIS to document the environmental consequences of alternatives for the proposed replacement of the Alaskan Way Viaduct located in downtown Seattle, King County, Washington. The intent of the proposed project is to improve public safety by replacing the existing Alaskan Way Viaduct with a transportation facility with improved earthquake resistance that provides for the efficient movement of people and goods through downtown Seattle. The Alaskan Way Viaduct is at the end of its useful life and must be replaced to protect public safety. Mobility through downtown Seattle is vital to maintaining local, regional, and statewide economic health. In March 2004 a draft EIS was published evaluating five build alternatives; rebuild, aerial, cut and cover tunnel, bypass tunnel, and surface (http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/Viaduct/library-environmental.htm#deis). A supplemental draft EIS was published in July 2006 extending the project north of Battery Street Tunnel (http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/Viaduct/library-environmental.htm#sdeis). This document reduced the number of alternatives from five to two, a cut-and-cover tunnel and an elevated structure, based on information presented in the Draft EIS, public comments, and further study and design, and also evaluated different approaches to construction and their likely impacts. In an advisory ballot measure in March 2007, Seattle voters rejected both a cut-and-cover tunnel and an elevated structure. The vote caused the agencies to reassess the problem of replacing the aging Viaduct, and in doing so, they hoped they would find a solution that had not yet emerged. Therefore, WSDOT, the City and King County Department of Transportation with support from FHWA took a fresh look at the transportation systems surrounding the Viaduct, and considered whether a systems-level solution could be found. Concurrently, FHWA determined the portion of the Viaduct south of King Street was an independent project. A Finding of No Significant Impact for improvements to this portion of SR 99 was published in February 2009. (http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/Viaduct/library-environmental.htm) As part of the reassessment, the agencies considered improvements to SR 99, Interstate 5, Seattle streets, transit service, and transportation demand and systems management programs. An advisory group of stakeholders representing a wide range of interests was formed to provide input to the agencies. Public meetings were also held periodically throughout the reassessment process. During the reassessment process a bored tunnel emerged as an alternative that merited further consideration. This SSDEIS will focus on evaluating the bored tunnel alternative. In addition, other alternatives that emerged during the reassessment process will be reviewed. Further, the Purpose and Need for the project will be revised based on comments received on the previous environmental documents, and the issues that emerged during the reassessment process--providing through capacity for vehicles, avoiding extensive construction impacts, and reconnecting the waterfront with the downtown. In light of the revised Purpose and Need, previous alternatives considered will be re-evaluated. Finally, the southern terminus will be revised to connect to the Holgate to King Street project, which has completed its separate, independent environmental review, and is under construction. DATES: Scoping meetings will be held on June 8, 2009, at Seattle City Hall, Bertha Knight Landes Room, 600 Fourth Avenue, Seattle, WA, from 5 to 7 p.m.; June 10, 2009, at Madison Middle School, 3429 45th Ave., SW., Seattle, WA from 6 to 8 p.m.; and June 11, 2009, at Leif Erikson Hall, 2245 NW. 57th St., Seattle, WA from 6 to 8 p.m. FHWA invites agencies, Tribes, and the public to comment on the process that has been conducted up to now, the revised Purpose and Need, the bored tunnel alternative, and any potentially reasonable alternatives not previously considered to replace the aging Viaduct structure. In lieu of, or in addition to, providing comments at any of the scoping meetings, comments and questions concerning this action and the SSDEIS may be submitted to FHWA at the address provided above or provided via e-mail to [email protected]. FHWA requests that written comments be received by July 10, 2009. Authority: 23 U.S.C. 771. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities apply to this program.) Randy Everett, Major Projects Oversight Manager. [FR Doc. E9-12988 Filed 6-3-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-RY-P