[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 79 (Monday, April 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19110-19111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9515]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION


Pendency of Request for Determination of Substantial Damage With 
Respect to the Cessation of the Obligation To Contribute by USF Red 
Star, Inc., to the Freight Drivers and Helpers Local Union No. 557 
Pension Fund

AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

ACTION: Notice of Pendency.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice advises interested persons that the Pension 
Benefit Guaranty Corporation (``PBGC'') has received a request from the 
Freight Drivers and Helpers Local Union No. 557 Pension Fund for a 
determination of substantial damage under section 4203(d)(4) of the 
Employee Retirement Income Security Act, as amended (``ERISA''), with 
respect to the cessation of covered operations under the plan by USF 
Red Star, Inc. Section 4203(d) provides a special withdrawal rule for 
cessations of the obligation to contribute or the cessation of 
operations involving plans and employers in the trucking industry. 
Under that special rule, an employer ceasing covered operations is 
considered not to have withdrawn from the plan if certain conditions 
are met. One of these conditions is the employer must furnish a bond or 
deposit money in escrow with a bank or financial institution 
satisfactory to the plan. After the bond/escrow requirement has been 
satisfied, the PBGC may make a determination under section 4203(d)(4) 
that the cessation has caused substantial damage to the plan's 
contribution base, in which case the employer will be treated as having 
withdrawn from the plan and the bond/escrow will be paid to the plan. 
In making a determination, PBGC will consider the cessation of the 
obligation to contribute or cessation of covered operations by other 
employers. Thus, a determination in any one case may affect other cases 
involving the same plan. The purpose of this notice is to advise 
interested persons of this request for such a determination and to 
solicit their views on it.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before May 15, 2009, to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: All written comments should be addressed to: Pension Benefit 
Guaranty Corporation, Office of the Chief Counsel, 1200 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20005-4026. The request for a finding of substantial 
damage and the comments received will be available for public 
inspection at the PBGC Communications and Public Affairs Department, 
Suite 1100, at the above address, between the hours of 9 a.m. and 4 
p.m., Monday through Friday.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Field, Attorney, Office of the 
Chief Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20005-4026; telephone 202-326-4000, ext. 3987 (202-
326-4179 for TTY and TDD). These are not toll-free numbers.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Section 4203(a) of ERISA defines a complete withdrawal from a 
multiemployer plan as the permanent cessation of the obligation to 
contribute under the plan or the permanent cessation of all covered 
operations under the plan.
    Section 4203(d) of ERISA, however, provides a special withdrawal 
liability rule for plans in the trucking industry. That industry, for 
purposes of this rule, is considered to include the long and short haul 
trucking industry, the household goods moving industry, and the public 
warehousing industry. The rule is limited to trucking plans in which 
substantially all of the contributions required are made by employers 
primarily engaged in the trucking industry. The rule is also limited to 
trucking employers, i.e., those employers that have an obligation to 
contribute under a trucking plan primarily for work in the trucking 
industry.
    Under section 4203(d), a trucking employer will not be considered 
to have withdrawn from a plan within the meaning of a trucking industry 
plan merely because the employer permanently ceases to have an 
obligation to contribute under the plan or permanently ceases all 
covered operations under the plan, if certain conditions are met. One 
condition is that the employer must not continue to perform work within 
the jurisdiction of the plan. Another condition is that the employer 
must furnish a bond or establish an escrow account in an amount equal 
to 50 percent of its withdrawal liability.
    After the bond is posted or the escrow is established, the PBGC 
may, within 60 months after the cessation of the employer's covered 
operations or obligation to contribute, make a determination about 
whether the cessation (considered together with any cessations by other 
employers) substantially damaged the plan's contribution base. If the 
PBGC makes a finding under section 4203(d)(4) that the contribution 
base has suffered substantial damage, the employer will be treated as 
having withdrawn from the plan on the date when the obligation to 
contribute or covered operations ceased. In that event, the bond or 
escrow will be paid to the plan, and the employer will be liable for 
the remainder of the withdrawal liability. If the PBGC makes a finding 
under section 4203(d)(5) that no substantial damage has occurred, or if 
it does not make a finding of substantial damage under section

[[Page 19111]]

4203(d)(4) within the 60-month period referred to above, the bond will 
be canceled or the escrow refunded, and the employer will have no 
further liability with respect to the cessation.
    As stated above, each cessation must be considered within the 
context of other cessations under the same plan in determining its 
effect on the plan's contribution base. Thus, the treatment afforded 
one employer's cessation of the obligation to contribute may affect the 
treatment given a cessation by another employer. Accordingly, not only 
the plan and employer involved in a particular case, but other present 
and former contributing employers, and participants and beneficiaries, 
may have an interest in the outcome of a request for a determination of 
substantial damage or no substantial damage.

The Request

    The Freight Drivers and Helpers Local Union No. 557 Pension Fund 
(the ``Fund'') has requested a determination that the cessation of the 
obligation to contribute by USF Red Star, Inc. (``Red Star''), together 
with cessations by other employers, has resulted in substantial damage 
to the Fund's contribution base. In the request, the Fund represents 
that:
    1. The Fund is a trucking industry plan within the meaning of 
section 4203(d)(2), with over 85 percent of its contributing employers 
engaged in the trucking industry and over 85 percent of its 
contributions coming from those employers. Red Star was a trucking 
industry employer that operated for approximately 25 years in the 
Baltimore, Maryland area.
    2. On May 23, 2004, Red Star ceased the trucking operations for 
which it was obligated to contribute to the Fund. The Fund assessed 
withdrawal liability against Red Star in the amount of $11,756,604.
    3. In May 2005, Red Star became part of the Yellow-Roadway control 
group, and its parent is YRC Regional Transportation. YRC Regional 
Transportation established a letter of credit with Bank of America on 
February 16, 2007, in the amount of $3,840,154.74. (The Fund represents 
that, in a decision dated February 27, 2009, an arbitrator ruled that 
Red Star did not fail to timely post security and that it may do so 
now.)
    4. The Fund represents that the cumulative effect of Red Star's 
ceasing to have an obligation to contribute to the Fund caused 
substantial damage based on the following particulars:
    A. Decline in active population--The reported active population on 
the Fund's 2007 Form 5500, Schedule B, was 567. The number of active 
participants shows a 45 percent drop from 1997 to 2004, as the active 
participant count fell from 1,217 in 1997 to 671 in 2004, while the 
retiree and deferred participant population remained stable, going from 
2,357 participants in 1997 to 2,348 participants 2004 (it was at 2,311 
participants in 2006).
    B. Decline in hours of contributions--The number of hours for which 
contributions are required to be made (i.e., the contribution base 
units) have fallen 48 percent since 2000. For the plan year ending 
December 21, 2000, there were 2,091,015 hours of contributions; in 
2004, the year of withdrawal, contributions fell to 1,207,486 hours; 
and in 2006 the drop was to 1,083,042 hours.
    C. Decline in the number of contribution employers--In 1985, the 
Fund had 56 employers. In 1990, there were 33 employers. By 2000, there 
were 19 employers, and, in 2005, there were only 13 employers.
    D. Decline in contribution base--Red Star was approximately 21 
percent of the contribution base in the years leading up to its 2004 
withdrawal, with an individual five-year contribution base of 
$6,619,040. The contribution base was $31,047,940 for all employers in 
the same period. Further, for all employers, the five-year contribution 
base as of the end of 2001 was $35,102,710, and, as of the end of 2006, 
was $23,830,654.
    E. Investment losses--In 2000, the Fund had $174,305,491 in assets. 
In 2002 the amount was $139,746,646. As of 2006, the assets were 
$164,573,989. The latest asset figure, which was used in the 
certification of critical status that the Fund's actuary made on March 
31, 2009, was a projection of $119,256,121, as of January 1, 2009.
    F. Unfunded vested benefits--The Fund was fully funded from 1995 to 
2000. In 2001 The Fund's unfunded vested benefits for withdrawal 
liability purposes were $22,428,786. The corresponding amount for 2004 
was $69,511,407, and for the end of 2006 was $61,167,323. For its 2009 
certification of critical status, the Fund reported $119,256,121, in 
assets, and a present value of benefits equaling $50,833,707, for 
active participants, and $166,256,970, for non-active participants. 
That certification projects an accumulated funding deficiency under 
section 431 of the Internal Revenue Code of $9.2 million for the 2012 
plan year. The net funding charges for that year are about $20 million; 
projected contributions are $5.5 million and the projected credit 
balance at the beginning of the year is $4.5 million. Thus, 
contributions for the 2012 plan year would have to triple in order to 
avoid a funding deficiency.

Comments

    All interested persons are invited to submit written comments on 
the pending request to the PBGC to: Suite 930, Attn: Multiemployer 
Coordinator, at the above address. All comments will be made part of 
the record. Comments received, as well as the relevant information 
submitted in support of the request, will be available for public 
inspection in Suite 1100 at the above address.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on this 21st day of April 2009.
Vincent K. Snowbarger,
Acting Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
[FR Doc. E9-9515 Filed 4-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7708-01-P