[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12911-12913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6399]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 030-33266; NRC-2009-0130]
Notice of Environmental Assessment Related to the Issuance of a
License Amendment To Terminate Byproduct Materials License No. 21-
26519-01, for Aastrom Biosciences, Ann Arbor, MI
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Issuance of Environmental Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impact for License Amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel J. Mulay, Health Physicist,
Materials Control, ISFSI, and Decommissioning Branch, Division of
Nuclear Materials Safety, Region III, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, 2443 Warrenville Road, Lisle, Illinois 60532; telephone:
(630) 829-9837.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering the
issuance of an amendment to terminate NRC Byproduct Materials License
No. 21-26519-01, which is held by Aastrom Biosciences (licensee). The
issuance of the amendment would authorize the unrestricted release of
the licensee's facility located at 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Lobby
K, Domino's Farm, Ann Arbor, Michigan (the Facility).
The NRC has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) in support of
this proposed action in accordance with the requirements of Title 10,
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), part 51 (10 CFR part 51). Based on
the EA, the NRC has concluded that a Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) is appropriate with respect to the proposed action. The
amendment will be issued to the licensee following the publication of
this FONSI and EA in the Federal Register.
II. Environmental Assessment
Identification of Proposed Action
The proposed action would approve the licensee's termination
amendment request dated September 30, 2008, (ML090210643), and approve
release of the Facility for unrestricted use in accordance with 10 CFR
part 20, subpart E. The licensee operated a research laboratory in a
20,000 square foot leased space. License No. 21-26519-01 was issued on
September 10, 1993, pursuant to 10 CFR part 30, and has been amended
periodically since that time. This license authorized the use of
unsealed byproduct materials for conducting a variety of research and
development applications on laboratory bench tops and in hoods. The
Facility is located in a mixed residential, agricultural and commercial
area, and a former authorized location of use there was previously
released by the NRC for unrestricted use. The licensee ceased licensed
activities in April 2007 and Lobby K was used to store standard sources
and a cell harvester. The licensee did not perform research activities
involving licensed material in Lobby K. Based on the Licensee's
historical knowledge of the site and the conditions of the facility,
the licensee determined that only routine decontamination activities,
in accordance with their NRC approved, operating radiation safety
procedures, were required. The licensee was not required to submit a
decommissioning plan to the NRC because worker cleanup activities and
procedures are consistent with those approved for routine operations.
The licensee submitted a license termination request in a letter dated
September 30, 2008, (ML090210643). The licensee submitted a final
status survey report to the NRC on October 31, 2008, (ML083080216), and
additional correspondence dated February 11, 2009, (ML090500353), which
demonstrates that the Lobby K
[[Page 12912]]
facility meets the criteria in subpart E of 10 CFR part 20 for
unrestricted use.
Need for the Proposed Action
The Licensee has ceased conducting licensed activities at the
Facility and seeks the unrestricted use of the Facility.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
The historical review of licensed research activities performed by
the licensee at the Facility determined that the activities involved
primarily the use of hydrogen-3, which has a half-life greater than 120
days.
The licensee's final status survey report was attached to the
Licensee's letter dated October 31, 2008, (ML083080216). The licensee's
report indicated that the final status survey of its Facility was
completed on October 1, 2008. Additional correspondence was submitted
in a letter dated February 11, 2009, (ML090500353) to clarify and
support information provided in the final status survey report.
The licensee elected to demonstrate compliance with the
radiological criteria for unrestricted release as specified in 10 CFR
20.1402 by using the screening approach described in NUREG-1757,
``Consolidated Decommissioning Guidance,'' Volume 2. The Licensee used
the radionuclide-specific derived concentration guideline levels
(DCGLs), developed there by the NRC, which comply with the dose
criterion in 10 CFR 20.1402. These DCGLs define the maximum amount of
residual radioactivity on building surfaces, equipment, and materials,
and in soils, that will satisfy the NRC requirements in subpart E of 10
CFR part 20 for unrestricted release. The Licensee's final status
survey results were below these DCGLs and are in compliance with the As
Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) requirement of 10 CFR 20.1402. The
NRC thus finds that the Licensee's final status survey results are
acceptable.
Based on its review, the staff has determined that the affected
environment and any environmental impacts associated with the proposed
action are bounded by the impacts evaluated by the ``Generic
Environmental Impact Statement in Support of Rulemaking on Radiological
Criteria for License Termination of NRC-Licensed Nuclear Facilities''
(NUREG-1496) Volumes 1-3 (ML042310492, ML042320379, and ML042330385).
The staff finds there were no significant environmental impacts from
the use of radioactive material at the Facility. The NRC staff reviewed
the docket file records and the final status survey report to identify
any non-radiological hazards that may have impacted the environment
surrounding the Facility. No such hazards or impacts to the environment
were identified. The NRC has identified no other radiological or non-
radiological activities in the area that could result in cumulative
environmental impacts.
The NRC staff finds that the proposed release of the Facility for
unrestricted use is in compliance with 10 CFR 20.1402. Based on its
review, the staff considered the impact of the residual radioactivity
at the Facility and concluded that the proposed action will not have a
significant effect on the quality of the human environment.
Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action
Due to the largely administrative nature of the proposed action,
its environmental impacts are small. Therefore, the only alternative
the staff considered is the no-action alternative, under which the
staff would leave things as they are by simply denying the amendment
request. This no-action alternative is not feasible because it
conflicts with 10 CFR 30.36(d) requiring that decommissioning of
byproduct material facilities be completed and approved by the NRC
after licensed activities cease. The NRC's analysis of the licensee's
final status survey data and additional, supporting documentation
confirmed that the Facility meets the requirements of 10 CFR 20.1402
for unrestricted release. Additionally, denying the amendment request
would result in no change in current environmental impacts. The
environmental impacts of the proposed action and the no-action
alternative are therefore similar, and the no-action alternative is
accordingly not further considered.
Conclusion
The NRC staff has concluded that the proposed action is consistent
with the NRC's unrestricted release criteria specified in 10 CFR
20.1402. Because the proposed action will not significantly impact the
quality of the human environment, the NRC staff concludes that the
proposed action is the preferred alternative.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
On February 4, 2009, the NRC provided a draft of this EA to the
State of Michigan, Radioactive Material and Medical Waste Materials
Unit, Waste and Hazardous Materials Division, Michigan Department of
Environmental Quality. The State responded by e-mail on February 4,
2009, and agreed with the conclusions of the EA, and otherwise had no
comments.
The NRC staff has determined that the proposed action is of a
procedural nature, and will not affect listed species or critical
habitat. Therefore, no further consultation is required under section 7
of the Endangered Species Act. The NRC staff also determined that the
proposed action is not the type of activity that has the potential to
cause effects on historic properties. Therefore, no further
consultation is required under section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
The NRC staff has prepared this EA in support of the proposed
action. On the basis of this EA, the NRC finds that there are no
significant environmental impacts from the proposed action, and that
preparation of an environmental impact statement is not warranted.
Accordingly, the NRC has determined that a Finding of No Significant
Impact is appropriate.
IV. Further Information
Documents related to this action, including the application for
license amendment and supporting documentation, are available
electronically at the NRC's Electronic Reading Room at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. From this site, you can access the
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), which
provides text and image files of NRC's public documents. The documents
related to this action are listed below, along with their ADAMS
accession numbers.
1. Bradley J. Martin, PhD., Aastrom Biosciences, letter to U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region III, dated September 30, 2008,
(ADAMS Accession No. ML090210643).
2. Bradley J. Martin, PhD., Aastrom Biosciences, letter dated
October 31, 2008, with the attached final status survey to U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Region III, (ADAMS Accession No. ML083080216).
3. Bradley J. Martin, PhD., Aastrom Biosciences, letter to the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region III, dated February 11, 2009,
(ADAMS Accession No. ML090500353).
4. Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations, part 20, subpart E,
``Radiological Criteria for License Termination'';
5. Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, ``Environmental
Protection Regulations for Domestic Licensing and Related Regulatory
Functions'';
[[Page 12913]]
6. NUREG-1496, ``Generic Environmental Impact Statement in Support
of Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for License Termination of NRC-
Licensed Nuclear Facilities'';
7. NUREG-1757, Consolidated Decommissioning Guidance.
If you do not have access to ADAMS, or if there are problems in
accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC Public
Document Room (PDR) Reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by e-mail to [email protected]. These documents may also be viewed
electronically on the public computers located at the NRC's PDR, O 1
F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.
The PDR reproduction contractor will copy documents for a fee.
Dated at Lisle, Illinois, this 13th day of March 2009.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Christine A. Lipa,
Chief, Materials Control, ISFSI, and Decommissioning Branch, Division
of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region III.
[FR Doc. E9-6399 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P