[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 24 (Friday, February 6, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6244-6248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2581]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 648

[Docket No. 0808041043-9036-02]
RIN 0648-AX16


Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Mackerel, 
Squid, and Butterfish Fisheries; Specifications and Management Measures

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action implements 2009 specifications and management 
measures for Atlantic mackerel, squid, and butterfish (MSB), and 
modifies existing management measures. Specifically, this action 
maintains quotas for Atlantic mackerel (mackerel), Illex squid (Illex), 
and butterfish at the same levels as 2008, while increasing the quota 
for Loligo squid (Loligo). Additionally, this action increases the 
incidental possession limit for mackerel and allows for the possibility 
of an inseason adjustment to increase the mackerel quota, if landings 
approach harvest limits. These specifications and management measures 
promote the utilization and conservation of the MSB resource.

DATES: Effective March 9, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Copies of supporting documents used by the Mid-Atlantic 
Fishery Management Council (Council), including the Environmental 
Assessment (EA) and Regulatory Impact Review (RIR)/Initial Regulatory 
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), are available from: Daniel Furlong, 
Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, Room 2115, 
Federal Building, 300 South New Street, Dover, DE 19904-6790. The EA/
RIR/IRFA is accessible via the Internet at http://www.nero.nmfs.gov. 
NMFS prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA), which is 
contained in the Classification section of this rule. Copies of the 
FRFA and the Small Entity Compliance Guide are available from the 
Regional Administrator, Northeast Regional Office, NMFS, 55 Great 
Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930-2276, and are also available via 
the internet at http://www.nero.nmfs.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carrie Nordeen, Fishery Policy 
Analyst, 978-281-9272, fax 978-281-9135.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Regulations implementing the Fishery Management Plan for the 
Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish Fisheries (FMP) appear at 50 
CFR part 648, subpart B. Regulations governing foreign fishing appear 
at 50 CFR part 600, subpart F. The regulations at Sec. Sec.  648.21 and 
600.516(c) require that NMFS, based on the maximum optimum yield (Max 
OY) of each fishery as established by the regulations, annually publish 
a rule specifying the amounts of the initial optimum yield (IOY), 
allowable biological catch (ABC), domestic annual harvest (DAH), and 
domestic annual processing (DAP), as well as, where applicable, the 
amounts for total allowable level of foreign fishing (TALFF) and joint 
venture processing (JVP) for the affected species managed under the 
FMP. In addition, these regulations allow specifications to be 
specified for up to 3 years, subject to annual review. The regulations 
found in Sec.  648.21 also specify that IOY for squid is equal to the 
combination of research quota (RQ) and DAH, with no TALFF specified for 
squid. For butterfish, the regulations specify that a butterfish 
bycatch TALFF will be specified only if TALFF is specified for 
mackerel.
    The Council adopted 2009 MSB specifications and management measures 
at its June 2008 meeting and submitted them to NMFS for review and 
approval. Initial submission was on August 1, 2008, and final 
submission was on September 18, 2008. A proposed rule for the 2009 MSB 
specifications and management measures was published on November 17, 
2008 (73 FR 67829), and the public comment period for the proposed rule 
ended on December 17, 2008. Details concerning the Council's 
development of these measures were presented in the preamble of the 
proposed rule and are not repeated here.

Final MSB Specifications and Management Measures for the 2009 Fishing 
Year

    This action implements the following MSB specifications and 
management measures for the 2009 fishing year, which are described in 
detail below.

    Table 1. Final Specifications, in Metric Tons (mt), for Atlantic
         Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish for 2009 Fishing Year.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Specifications      Loligo        Illex       Mackerel     Butterfish
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Max OY                 32,000       24,000           N/A       12,175
ABC                    19,000       24,000       156,000        1,500
IOY                 18,874\1\       24,000    115,000\2\          500
DAH                    18,874       24,000    115,000\3\          500
DAP                    18,874       24,000       100,000          500
JVP                         0            0             0            0

[[Page 6245]]

 
TALFF                       0            0             0            0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Excludes 125.6 mt for RQ.
\2\ IOY may be increased during the year, but the total ABC will not
  exceed 156,000 mt.
\3\ Includes a 15,000-mt catch of Atlantic mackerel by the recreational
  fishery.

Atlantic Mackerel

    This action specifies the mackerel ABC at 156,000 mt, based on the 
formula ABC = T - C. T is the yield (211,000 mt) associated with a 
fishing mortality rate (F) that is equal to the target F (F= 0.12); C 
is the estimated catch of mackerel in Canadian waters (55,000 mt) for 
the upcoming fishing year. Thus, 211,000 mt minus 55,000 mt results in 
the 2009 mackerel ABC of 156,000 mt. This action also specifies the 
mackerel IOY at 115,000 mt, a level that can be fully harvested by the 
domestic fleet, thereby precluding the specification of TALFF, while 
allowing the U.S. mackerel industry to expand. The Council heard from 
the industry that the availability of mackerel to the fishery, not the 
industry's ability to harvest mackerel, has curtailed catch in recent 
years. If mackerel are available to the fishery in 2009, NMFS believes 
that it is reasonable to assume that the commercial fishery will be 
able to harvest 100,000 mt of mackerel. Therefore, this action 
specifies the mackerel DAH at 115,000 mt, which is the commercial 
harvest plus the 15,000 mt anticipated to be harvested by the 
recreational fishery. Because IOY = DAH, this specification is 
consistent with the Council's recommendation that the level of IOY 
should not provide for TALFF.
    As recommended by the Council, this action specifies the mackerel 
DAP at 100,000 mt and the mackerel JVP at zero. In previous years, the 
Council recommended a JVP greater than zero because it believed U.S. 
processors lacked the capacity to process the total amount of mackerel 
that U.S. harvesters could land. However, for the past several years, 
the Council has recommended zero JVP because the surplus between DAH 
and DAP has been declining as U.S. shore-based processing capacity for 
mackerel has expanded. Again, the Council heard from the industry that 
the availability of mackerel to the fishery, rather than processing 
capacity, has curtailed catch in recent years. Based on this 
information, the Council concluded, and NMFS concurs, that processing 
capacity is no longer a limiting factor relative to domestic production 
of mackerel. Consequently, if U.S. harvesters land mackerel in excess 
of 100,000 mt, should the IOY be adjusted upward, U.S. processors have 
the capacity and intent to process it.

Mackerel Incidental Possession Limit

    Regulations at Sec.  648.25(a) specify that, during closures of the 
directed mackerel fishery, the incidental possession limit for mackerel 
is 20,000 lb (9.08 mt). In response to a request from the industry, the 
Council recommended increasing the incidental mackerel possession limit 
to minimize the potential for regulatory discarding of mackerel by the 
Atlantic herring fleet when mackerel and Atlantic herring co-occur in 
the Gulf of Maine during summer months. When considering an incidental 
possession limit increase, NMFS recognized that, relative to the quota, 
few mackerel are landed after June 1, because they move offshore and 
are largely unavailable to U.S. pelagic fishing fleets. NMFS also 
concluded that a moderate incidental possession limit increase is not 
anticipated to result in a quota overage because it is unlikely that 
the buffer between the threshold at which the directed mackerel fishery 
closes (103,500 mt) and the IOY (115,000 mt) would be landed between 
June 1 and December 31. Therefore, this action modifies the incidental 
possession limit for mackerel to minimize the potential for regulatory 
discarding by the Atlantic herring fleet in the Gulf of Maine, without 
creating directed fishing for mackerel during a closure of the mackerel 
fishery. Consistent with the Council's recommendation, this action 
specifies the mackerel incidental possession limit at 20,000 lb (9.08 
mt) if the directed mackerel fishery closes prior to June 1, and at 
50,000 lb (22.7 mt) if the directed mackerel fishery closes on or after 
June 1.

Inseason Adjustment of the Mackerel IOY

    Regulations at Sec.  648.21(e) provide that specifications may be 
adjusted inseason during the fishing year by the Regional 
Administrator, in consultation with the Council, by publishing a notice 
in the Federal Register and providing a 30-day public comment period. 
At the June 2008 Council meeting, both the mackerel industry and the 
Council reiterated interest in increasing the mackerel IOY if landings 
approach the IOY during the most active part of the fishing year 
(January-April). However, the mackerel fishing season is short and it 
would be difficult to implement a separate inseason action during the 
fishing season. To facilitate a timely inseason adjustment to the 
mackerel IOY, if necessary, public comment was solicited as part of the 
2009 MSB specifications. In conjunction with this action, NMFS is 
adopting the same protocol used in 2008 to guide the exercise of its 
discretion to make in-season adjustments to annual specifications 
provided for inSec.  648.21(e). This protocol specifies that, if using 
landings projections and all other available information, the Regional 
Administrator determines that 70 percent of the Atlantic mackerel IOY 
will be landed during the 2009 fishing year, the Regional Administrator 
will make available additional quota for a total IOY of 156,000 mt of 
Atlantic mackerel for harvest during 2009. NMFS's Northeast Fishery 
Statistic Office will summarize mackerel landings from dealer reports 
on a weekly basis and post this information on the Northeast Regional 
Office website (http://www.nero.noaa.gov/). NMFS staff will closely 
monitor these landings and industry trends to determine if an inseason 
adjustment is necessary. Additionally, if an inseason adjustment of the 
IOY is warranted, the Regional Administrator will notify the Council 
and the inseason adjustment will be published in the Federal Register.

Atlantic Squids

Loligo
    Consistent with the revised biological reference points and the 
analytical advice provided by the most recent Loligo stock assessment 
review committee (SARC 34), this action specifies the Loligo Max OY at 
32,000 mt and the ABC at 19,000 mt. One scientific research project 
proposal requesting 125.6 mt of Loligo RQ was recommended for approval 
and will be

[[Page 6246]]

forwarded to the NOAA Grants Office for award. Therefore, this action 
adjusts the Loligo IOY, DAH, and DAP to reflect the RQ, and specifies 
2009 Loligo IOY, DAH, and DAP at 18,874 mt. The FMP does not authorize 
the specification of JVP and TALFF for the Loligo fishery because of 
the domestic industry's capacity to harvest and process the OY for this 
fishery; therefore, there will be no JVP or TALFF in 2009.

Distribution of the Loligo DAH

    As was done in 2007 and 2008, this action allocates the 2009 Loligo 
DAH into trimesters, consistent with the Council's recommendation. The 
2009 trimester allocations are as follows:

          Table 2. Trimester Allocation of Loligo Quota in 2009
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Trimester                  Percent     Metric Tons\1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I (Jan-Apr)                                   43    8,116
II (May-Aug)                                  17    3,208
III (Sep-Dec)                                 40    7,550
Total                                        100    18,874
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Trimester allocations after 125.6 mt RQ deduction.

Illex
    This action specifies the Illex Max OY, IOY, ABC, and DAH at 24,000 
mt. The FMP does not authorize the specification of JVP or TALFF for 
the Illex fishery because of the domestic fishing industry's capacity 
to harvest and to process the IOY from this fishery.
Butterfish
    The status of the butterfish stock was most recently assessed in 
late 2004 and that assessment concluded that, while overfishing of the 
stock is not occurring, the stock is overfished. Based on this 
information, the Council was notified by NMFS on February 11, 2005, 
that the butterfish stock was designated as overfished, pursuant to the 
requirements of section 304(e) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 
Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), and the Council 
developed a proposed rebuilding plan for the butterfish stock in 
Amendment 10 to the FMP (Amendment 10). While the rebuilding program 
was being developed in Amendment 10, the Council recommended 
restricting butterfish landings to recent landings levels to prevent an 
expansion of the fishery and to protect the stock. Therefore, for 2009, 
as in 2008, this action sets the Max OY at 12,175 mt; the ABC at 1,500 
mt; and the IOY, DAH, and DAP at 500 mt. Harvest at these levels should 
prevent overfishing of the butterfish stock in 2009. Additionally, 
consistent with MSB regulations, the Council recommended, and this 
action is specifying, zero TALFF for butterfish in 2009 because zero 
TALFF is specified for mackerel.

Comments and Responses

    NMFS received one comment letter on the proposed 2009 MSB 
specifications and management measures, and the commenter indicated 
support for all proposed MSB specifications and management measures.

Changes From the Proposed Rule

    The proposed rule contained an arithmetic error in the calculation 
of Loligo IOY, DAH, and DAP that must be corrected for the record. The 
Council recommended that 3 percent of the 2009 Loligo, Illex, 
butterfish, and mackerel quotas be set aside to fund projects selected 
under the 2009 Mid-Atlantic RSA Program. At the time of the proposed 
rule, the project selection and award process for the 2009 Mid-Atlantic 
RSA Program had not concluded. The proposed rule specified that 3 
percent of the Loligo ABC was 5,700 mt, when it should have been 570 
mt, and reduced the Loligo IOY, DAH, and DAP to 13,300 mt, rather than 
18,430 mt.
    Since the proposed rule was published, the selection process for 
the 2009 Mid-Atlantic RSA Program has progressed, and one project 
requesting 125.6 mt of Loligo RQ has been forwarded to the NOAA Grants 
Office for award. Therefore, this action reduces the 2009 Loligo ABC of 
19,000 mt by 125.6 mt, resulting in a 2009 Loligo IOY, DAH, and DAP of 
18,874 mt. If any portion of the RQ is not awarded, NMFS will return 
any un-awarded RQ to the commercial fishery through the publication of 
a separate notice in the Federal Register.

Classification

    Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the 
NMFS Acting Assistant Administrator has determined that this rule is 
consistent with the Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish FMP, other 
provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law.
    This action is authorized by 50 CFR part 648 and has been 
determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866 
(E.O. 12866).
    NMFS, pursuant to section 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 
has prepared a final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA), included 
in this final rule, in support of the 2009 MSB specifications and 
management measures. The FRFA describes the economic impact that this 
final rule, along with other non-preferred alternatives, will have on 
small entities.
    The FRFA incorporates the economic impacts and analysis summarized 
in the IRFA, a summary of the significant issues raised by the public, 
and a summary of analyses prepared to support the action (i.e., the EA 
and the RIR). The contents of these documents are not repeated in 
detail here. A copy of the IRFA, the RIR, and the EA are available upon 
request (see ADDRESSES). A complete description of the reasons why this 
action is being considered, and the objectives of and legal basis for 
this action, is contained in the preamble to the proposed and final 
rules and is not repeated here.

Statement of Need for this Action

    This action specifies 2009 specifications and management measures 
for MSB fisheries and modifies existing management measures to improve 
the management of MSB fisheries.

A Summary of the Significant Issues Raised by the Public Comments in 
Response to the IRFA, a Summary of the Assessment of the Agency of Such 
Issues, and a Statement of Any Changes Made in the Proposed Rule as a 
Result of Such Comments

    NMFS received one comment letter in support of all proposed 2009 
MSB specifications and management measures; therefore, there are no 
changes from the proposed rule as a result of that comment letter. No 
comments were received about the IRFA or the general economic effects 
of the proposed rule.

Description and Estimate of Number of Small Entities to Which the Rule 
Will Apply

    Based on permit data for 2007, the number of potential fishing 
vessels in the 2009 fisheries are as follows: 383 for Loligo/
butterfish, 78 for Illex, 2,462 for mackerel, and 2,108 vessels with 
incidental catch permits for squid/butterfish. There are no large 
entities participating in this fishery, as defined in section 601 of 
the RFA. Therefore, there are no disproportionate economic impacts on 
small entities. Many vessels participate in more than one of these 
fisheries; therefore, permit numbers are not additive.

Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance 
Requirements

    This action does not contain any new collection-of-information, 
reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance

[[Page 6247]]

requirements. It does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any 
other Federal rules.

Description of the Steps the Agency has taken to Minimize the 
Significant Economic Impact on Small Entities Consistent with the 
Stated Objectives of Applicable Statutes, Including a Statement of the 
Factual, Policy, and Legal Reasons for Selecting the Alternative 
Adopted in the Final Rule and Why Each One of the Other Significant 
Alternatives to the Rule Considered by the Agency Which Affect the 
Impact on Small Entities was Rejected

Actions Implemented with the Final Rule
    The mackerel IOY specified in this action (115,000 mt, with 15,000 
mt allocated to recreational catch) represents status quo, as compared 
to 2008, and is no constraint to vessels relative to the landings in 
recent years. Landings were 55,528 mt in 2004, 43,246 mt in 2005, 
58,279 mt in 2006, and 24,446 mt in 2007. This action allows for an 
inseason adjustment, if landings approach the IOY early in the fishing 
year, to increase the IOY up to the ABC (156,000 mt). Therefore, no 
reductions in revenues for the mackerel fishery are expected as a 
result of this action; in fact, an increase in revenues as a result of 
this action is possible. Based on 2007 data, the mackerel fishery could 
increase its landings by 90,554 mt in 2009, if it takes the entire IOY. 
In 2007, the last year for which complete financial data are available, 
the average value for mackerel was $258 per mt. Using this value, the 
mackerel fishery could see an increase in revenues of $23,362,932 as a 
result of the 2009 IOY (115,000 mt), and an additional increase in 
revenues of $10,578,000 as a result of the adjustment to increase the 
IOY up to the ABC (156,000 mt).
    The Loligo ABC (19,000 mt) specified in this action represents a 
potential for increased landings when compared to the 2008 ABC (17,000 
mt). Landings were 15,447 in 2004, 16,984 mt in 2005, 15,880 mt in 
2006, and 12,342 mt in 2007. No reductions in revenues for the Loligo 
fishery are expected as a result of this action; in fact, an increase 
in revenues as a result of this action is possible. Based on 2007 data, 
the Loligo fishery could increase its landings by 6,658 mt in 2009, if 
it takes the entire ABC. Using the average value for Loligo from 2007 
($1,883 per mt), the Loligo fishery could see an increase in revenues 
of $12,537,014 as a result of the 2009 ABC (19,000 mt).
    The Illex IOY (24,000 mt) specified in this action represents 
status quo as compared to 2008. Landings were 26,098 mt in 2004, 12,032 
mt in 2005, 13,944 mt in 2006, and 9,022 mt in 2007. Implementation of 
this action will not result in a reduction in revenue or a constraint 
on the fishery in 2009. Based on 2007 data, the Illex fishery could 
increase its landings by 14,978 mt in 2009, if it takes the entire IOY. 
Using the average value for Illex from 2007 ($428 per mt), the Illex 
fishery could see an increase in revenues of $6,410,584 as a result of 
the 2009 IOY (24,000 mt).
    The butterfish IOY specified in this action (500 mt) represents 
status quo, as compared to 2008, and represents only a minimal 
constraint to vessels relative to the landings in recent years. Due to 
market conditions, there has been not been a directed butterfish 
fishery in recent years; therefore, recent landings have been low. 
Landings were 537 mt in 2004, 437 mt in 2005, 554 mt in 2006, and 673 
mt in 2007. Given the lack of a directed butterfish fishery and low 
butterfish landings, this action is not expected to reduce revenues in 
this fishery more than minimally. Based on 2007 data, the value of 
butterfish was $1,602 per mt, so a reduction from 2007 would represent 
a fishery- wide loss of only $277,146.

Alternatives to the Actions in the Final Rule

    The Council analysis evaluated three alternatives for mackerel, and 
all of them would have set the ABC at 156,000 mt, IOY at 115,000 mt, 
and maintained the status quo trigger for closing the directed fishery. 
This ABC and IOY do not represent a constraint on vessels in this 
fishery, so no negative impacts on revenues in this fishery are 
expected as a result of these alternatives. These alternatives only 
differed from this action with respect to incidental possession limits. 
This action specifies the incidental mackerel possession limit at 
20,000 lb (9.08 mt) if the directed mackerel fishery closes prior to 
June 1, and at 50,000 lb (22.7 mt) if the directed mackerel fishery 
closes on or after June 1. The alternatives to this action would have 
specified incidental mackerel possession limits at 20,000 lb (9.08 
mt)(status quo) and at 50,000 lb (22.7 mt)(least restrictive). These 
alternatives were not adopted by the Council because the status quo 
incidental possession limit could have resulted in the regulatory 
discarding of mackerel by the Atlantic herring fishery in the Gulf of 
Maine and, if mackerel are available to the fishery in 2009, the least 
restrictive incidental possession limit may have encouraged targeting 
on mackerel during a fishery closure early in the year (January-April). 
Differences in incidental possession limits may affect behavior and 
effort during closures of the directed fishery; however, all 
alternatives are expected to result in the same total landings for 
2009.
    For Loligo, alternatives to this action would have set the Max OY 
at 26,000 mt and ABC, IOY, DAH, and DAP at 17,000 mt (status quo) or 
Max OY at 32,000 mt and ABC, IOY, DAH, and DAP at 23,000 mt (least 
restrictive). These alternatives were not adopted by the Council 
because they were either not consistent with the revised reference 
points from SARC 34 (status quo) or not consistent with the management 
recommendations from SARC 34 and did not consider the uncertainty 
associated with the Loligo stock assessment model (least restrictive).
    For Illex, one alternative considered would have set Max OY, ABC, 
IOY, DAH, and DAP at 30,000 mt. This alternative would allow harvest 
far in excess of recent landings in this fishery. Therefore, there 
would be no constraints and, thus, no revenue reductions, associated 
with this alternative. However, the Council considered this alternative 
unacceptable because an ABC specification of 30,000 mt may not prevent 
overfishing in years of moderate to low abundance of Illex. Another 
alternative considered would have set MAX OY at 24,000 mt and ABC, IOY, 
DAH, and DAP at 19,000 mt. The Council considered this alternative 
unacceptable because it was unnecessarily restrictive.
    For butterfish, one alternative considered would have set the ABC 
at 4,525 mt, and IOY, DAH, and DAP at 1,861 mt; while another would 
have set ABC at 12,175 mt, and IOY, DAH, and DAP 9,131 mt. These 
amounts exceed the landings of this species in recent years. Therefore, 
neither alternative represents a constraint on vessels in this fishery 
or would reduce revenues in the fishery. However, neither of these 
alternatives were adopted by the Council because they would likely 
result in overfishing and the additional depletion of the spawning 
stock biomass of an overfished species.

Small Entity Compliance Guide

    Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness 
Act of 1996 states that, for each rule or group of related rules for 
which an agency is required to prepare a FRFA, the agency shall publish 
one or more guides to assist small entities in complying with the rule, 
and shall designate such publications as ``small entity

[[Page 6248]]

compliance guides.'' The agency shall explain the actions a small 
entity is required to take to comply with a rule or group of rules. As 
part of this rulemaking process, a small entity compliance guide was 
prepared. The guide will be sent to all holders of permits issued for 
the MSB fisheries. In addition, copies of this final rule and guide 
(i.e., permit holder letter) are available from the Regional 
Administrator and are also available from NMFS, Northeast Region (see 
ADDRESSES).

List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648

    Fisheries, Fishing, Recordkeeping and reporting requirements.

    Dated: February 2, 2009.
James W. Balsiger,
Acting Assistant Administrator For Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.

0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is amended as 
follows:

PART 648--FISHERIES OF THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES

0
1. The authority citation for part 648 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

0
2. In Sec.  648.25, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  648.25  Possession restrictions.

    (a) Atlantic mackerel. During a closure of the directed Atlantic 
mackerel fishery that occurs prior to June 1, vessels may not fish for, 
possess, or land more than 20,000 lb (9.08 mt) of Atlantic mackerel per 
trip at any time, and may only land Atlantic mackerel once on any 
calendar day, which is defined as the 24-hr period beginning at 0001 
hours and ending at 2400 hours. During a closure of the directed 
fishery for butterfish that occurs on or after June 1, vessels may not 
fish for, possess, or land more than 50,000 lb (22.7 mt) of Atlantic 
mackerel per trip at any time, and may only land Atlantic mackerel once 
on any calendar day.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E9-2581 Filed 2-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S