[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 23 (Thursday, February 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6183-6186]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2428]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-59323; File No. SR-BX-2009-002]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Adopt a 
Policy Relating to Its Treatment of Trade Reports That It Determines To 
Be Inconsistent With the Prevailing Market

January 30, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on January 14, 2009, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (the ``Exchange'') filed with 
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed 
rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been 
prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange has designated this proposal as 
eligible for immediate effectiveness pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 19b-
4(f)(6). The Commission is publishing this notice and order to solicit 
comments on the

[[Page 6184]]

proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to adopt a policy relating to its treatment 
of trade reports that it determines to be inconsistent with the 
prevailing market and for this policy to be in effect concurrent with 
the launch of cash equities trading by NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. The Exchange 
does not expect that the proposed rule change will have any direct 
effect, or significant indirect effect, on any other Exchange rule in 
effect at the time of this filing.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item III below, and is set forth in Sections A, B, and C below.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Trades in listed securities occasionally occur at prices that 
deviate from prevailing market prices and those trades sometimes 
establish a high, low or last sale price for a security that does not 
reflect the true market for the security. This filing, which is 
substantially similar to the New York Stock Exchange's (``NYSE'') and 
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC's (``Nasdaq'') recent filings, seek to 
address such instances of ``aberrant'' trades.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58736 (October 6, 
2008), 73 FR 60380 (October 10, 2008) (SR-NYSE-2008-91). See 
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59151 (December 23, 2008), 74 FR 
158 (January 2, 2009) (SR-NASDAQ-2008-100). The Exchange notes that 
these proposed policies relating to the Exchange's treatment of 
trade reports that it determines to be inconsistent with the 
prevailing market are substantially similar to the NYSE's and 
Nasdaq's proposed policies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes that its policy in this regard shall be to 
contact the listing exchange (if the Exchange is not the listing 
exchange) and other markets (in the case of executions that take place 
across multiple markets) to determine if any erroneous trade reports 
were filed. If not, or in the case of non-unlisted trading privilege 
trades, if the Exchange determines the trade price is inconsistent with 
the prevailing market for the security after considering the factors 
outlined herein, the Exchange may make the determination to append an 
indicator (an ``Aberrant Report Indicator'') to the trade.
    The Exchange will not initially list stocks on its own market, but 
will trade on an unlisted trading privilege (``UTP'') basis securities 
listed on other markets. Nasdaq operates the securities information 
processor (``SIP''), which processes trade and quote information for 
the Nasdaq UTP Plan (``Nasdaq SIP''). The Securities Industry 
Automation Corporation (``SIAC'') serves as the securities information 
processor for the CTA Plan and processes trade and quote information. 
The Nasdaq SIP and the Consolidated Tape Association (``CTA'') offer 
each participant in the Nasdaq SIP and CTA Plan the discretion to 
append to the Aberrant Report Indicator to a trade report to indicate 
that the market believes that the trade price in a trade executed on 
that market does not accurately reflect the prevailing market for the 
security.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The CTA recommends that data recipients should exclude the 
price of any trade to which the Aberrant Report Indicator has been 
appended from any calculation of the high, low and last sale prices 
for the security.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    During the course of surveillance by the Exchange or as a result of 
notification by another market, listed company or market participant, 
the Exchange may become aware of trade prices that do not accurately 
reflect the prevailing market for a security. In such a case, the 
Exchange proposes to adopt as policies that it:
    i. May determine to append an Aberrant Report Indicator to any 
trade report with respect to any trade executed on the Exchange that 
the Exchange determines to be inconsistent with the prevailing market; 
and
    ii. Shall discourage vendors and other data recipients from using 
prices to which the Exchange has appended the Aberrant Report Indicator 
in any calculation of the high, low or last sale price of a security.
    The Exchange will urge vendors to disclose the exclusion from high, 
low or last sale price data of any trades with an Aberrant Report 
Indicator and exclude them from high, low or last sale price 
information they disseminate and to provide to data users an 
explanation of the parameters used in the Exchange's aberrant trade 
policy.
    While SIAC, on behalf of the CTA Plan, and the Nasdaq SIP, on 
behalf of the Nasdaq UTP Plan, disseminate their own calculations of 
high, low and last sale prices, vendors and other data recipients--and 
not the Exchange--frequently determine their own methodology by which 
they wish to calculate high, low and last sale prices. Therefore, the 
Exchange shall endeavor to explain to those vendors and other data 
recipients the deleterious effects that can result from including in 
the calculations a trade to which the Aberrant Report Indicator has 
been appended.
    In making the determination to append the Aberrant Report 
Indicator, the Exchange shall consider all factors related to a trade, 
including, but not limited to, the following:
     Material news released for the security;
     Suspicious trading activity;
     System malfunctions or disruptions;
     Locked or crossed markets;
     A recent trading halt or resumption of trading in the 
security;
     Whether the security is in its initial public offering;
     Volume and volatility for the security;
     Whether the trade price represents a 52-week high or low 
for the security;
     Whether the trade price deviates significantly from recent 
trading patterns in the security;
     Whether the trade price reflects a stock-split, 
reorganization or other corporate action;
     The validity of consolidated tape trades and quotes in 
comparison to national best bids and offers; and
     The general volatility of market conditions.
    In determining whether trade prices are inconsistent with the 
prevailing market, the Exchange proposes that its policy shall be to 
follow the following general guidelines: The Exchange will review 
whether a trade price does not reflect the prevailing market for a 
security if the trade occurs during regular trading hours (i.e., 9:30 
a.m. to 4 p.m.) and occurs at a price that deviates from the 
``Reference Price'' by an amount that meets or exceeds the following 
thresholds:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Numerical
                        Trade price                           threshold
                                                              (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Between $0 and $15.00......................................            7
Between $15.01 and $50.00..................................            5
In excess of $50.00........................................            3
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The ``Reference Price'' refers to (a) if the primary market for the 
security is open at the time of the trade, the national best bid or 
offer for the security, or (b) if the primary market for the security 
is not open at the time of

[[Page 6185]]

the trade, the first executable quote or print for the security on the 
primary market after execution of the trade in question. However, if 
the circumstances suggest that a different Reference Price would be 
more appropriate, the Exchange will use the different Reference Price. 
For instance, if the national best bid and offer for the security are 
so wide apart as to fail to reflect the market for the security, the 
Exchange might use as the Reference Price a trade price or best bid or 
offer that was available prior to the trade in question.
    If the Exchange determines that a trade price does not reflect the 
prevailing market for a security and the trade represented the last 
sale of the security on the Exchange during a trading session, the 
Exchange may also determine to remove that trade's designation as the 
last sale and the preceding last sale eligible trade would become the 
new last sale. The Exchange may do so either on the day of the trade or 
at a later date, so as to provide reasonable time for the Exchange to 
conduct due diligence regarding the trade, including the consideration 
of input from markets and other market participants.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with Section 
6(b) of the Act,\5\ in general, and Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\6\ in 
particular, in that it is designed to promote just and equitable 
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with 
persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing 
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in 
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a 
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to 
protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Aberrant Report Indicator is consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest in that the Exchange 
will seek to ensure a proper understanding of the Aberrant Report 
Indicator among securities market participants by: (i) Urging vendors 
to disclose the exclusion from high, low or last sale price data of any 
aberrant trades excluded from high, low or last sale price information 
they disseminate and to provide to data users an explanation of the 
parameters used in the Exchange's aberrant trade policy; (ii) if the 
Exchange determines to list securities in the future, informing the 
affected listed company each time the Exchange or another market 
appends the Aberrant Report Indicator to a trade in an Exchange-listed 
stock; and (iii) reminding the users of the information that these are 
still valid trades in that they were executed and not unwound as in the 
case of a clearly erroneous trade.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \7\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) 
thereunder,\8\ the Exchange has designated this proposal as one that 
effects a change that: (A) Does not significantly affect the protection 
of investors or the public interest; (B) does not impose any 
significant burden on competition; and (C) by its terms, does not 
become operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or such 
shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under 19b-4(f)(6) normally may not 
become operative for 30 days after the date of filing.\9\ However, Rule 
19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \10\ permits the Commission to designate a shorter 
time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and 
the public interest. The Exchange has requested that the Commission 
waive the 30-day operative delay and designate the proposed rule change 
to become operative upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). In addition, Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) requires a self-regulatory organization to give the 
Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule 
change at least five business days prior to the date of filing of 
the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the 
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
    \10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is 
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest 
because the proposal is substantially similar to a proposal previously 
approved by the Commission.\11\ The Commission believes that the 
Exchange's proposal to append an Aberrant Report Indicator to certain 
trade reports is a reasonable means to alert investors and others that 
the Exchange believes that the trade price for a trade executed in its 
market does not accurately reflect the prevailing market for the 
security. In addition, the Commission notes that the Exchange will use 
objective numerical thresholds in determining whether a trade report is 
eligible to have an Aberrant Trade Indicator appended to it. The 
Commission further notes that the Exchange's appending the Aberrant 
Trade Indicator to a trade report has no effect on the validity of the 
underlying trade. Finally, waiving the 30-day operative delay will 
allow the Exchange to apply the proposed change to aberrant trades 
immediately.\12\ Based on the above, the Commission designates the 
proposal to become operative upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58736 (October 6, 
2008), 73 FR 60380 (October 10, 2008) (SR-NYSE-2008-91). See also 
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59151 (December 23, 2008), 74 FR 
158 (January 2, 2009) (SR-NASDAQ-2008-100).
    \12\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, 
the Commission has considered the impact of the proposed rule on 
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it 
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate 
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise 
in the furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-BX-2009-002 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.


[[Page 6186]]


All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2009-002. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and 
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room on official business 
days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also 
will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of 
the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the 
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from 
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make 
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-
2009-002 and should be submitted on or before February 26, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-2428 Filed 2-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P