[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 201 (Thursday, October 16, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61358-61363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24591]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 80

[EPA-HQ-2005-0036; FRL-8729-7]
RIN 2060-A089


Control of Hazardous Air Pollutants From Mobile Sources:Early 
Credit Technology Requirement Revision

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to revise the February 26, 2007 
mobile source air toxics rule's requirements that specify which benzene 
control technologies a refiner may utilize to qualify to generate early 
benzene credits. This action will allow another specific benzene 
control technology, benzene alkylation, in addition to the four 
operational or technological changes specified in the current rule. 
This action also includes a general provision that allows a refiner to 
submit a request to EPA to approve other benzene-reducing operational 
changes or technologies for the purpose of generating early credits.

DATES: This final rule is effective on December 15, 2008.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID 
No. EPA-HQ-2005-0036. All documents in the docket are listed in the 
http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some 
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information 
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such 
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be 
publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket 
materials are available either electronically in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Docket, EPA/DC, EPA 
West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/
DC Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Eastern 
Standard Time, Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the 
telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-1742.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine Brunner, Office of 
Transportation and Air Quality, Assessment and Standards Division, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 2000 Traverwood, Ann Arbor, MI 48105; 
telephone number: (734) 214-4287; fax

[[Page 61359]]

number: (734) 214-4816; e-mail address: [email protected]. 
Alternative contact: Assessment and Standards Division Hotline, 
telephone number: (734) 214-4636; e-mail address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Does This Action Apply to Me?

    This action may affect you if you produce gasoline. The following 
table gives some examples of entities that may have to follow the 
regulations.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             NAICS \1\   SIC \2\
                  Category                     codes      codes      Examples of potentially regulated entities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry...................................     324110       2911  Petroleum Refiners.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).
\2\ Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) system code.

    This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but provides a guide 
for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this action. 
This table lists the types of entities that EPA is now aware could 
potentially be affected by this action. Other types of entities not 
listed in the table could also be affected. To decide whether your 
organization might be affected by this action, you should carefully 
examine today's action and the existing regulations in 40 CFR part 80. 
If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to 
a particular entity, consult the persons listed in the preceding FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

Outline of This Preamble

I. Background
II. Response to Comments
III. This Action
IV. Environmental and Economic Impact
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
    A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review
    B. Paperwork Reduction Act
    C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
    E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
    F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With 
Indian Tribal Governments
    G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From 
Environmental Health & Safety Risks
    H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect 
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
    I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
    J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address 
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income 
Populations
    K. Congressional Review Act
VI. Statutory Provisions and Legal Authority

I. Background

    The Control of Hazardous Air Pollutants From Mobile Sources final 
rule (also known as the Mobile Source Air Toxics rule or MSAT2) was 
published on February 26, 2007 (72 FR 8428). That rule requires that 
refiners and importers produce gasoline that has an annual average 
benzene content of 0.62 volume percent (vol%) or less, beginning in 
2011. (See Sec.  80.1230(a).) The rule also requires that no refiner or 
importer have an actual average gasoline benzene level greater than 1.3 
vol%. After achieving an actual annual average benzene level of 1.3 
vol%, refiners and importers may use benzene credits to reduce their 
average benzene level to 0.62 vol%. Refiners may generate benzene 
credits for their own use or to sell to others, in two ways. Once the 
program begins in 2011, a refiner generates credits (known as standard 
credits) when its average annual gasoline benzene level is less than 
0.62 vol%.
    Refiners may also generate credits prior to 2011. These credits are 
called early credits, and are the subject of this final rule. The MSAT2 
rule allows early benzene credits to be generated in any annual 
averaging period prior to 2011 (i.e., 2008, 2009, and 2010), as well as 
for the partial year period June 1-December 31, 2007. Early credits are 
generated on a refinery basis. In order to generate early credits, a 
refinery must meet several requirements:
    (1) Establish a benzene baseline based on the average benzene level 
of the gasoline produced at the refinery during the two-year period 
2004-05. (See Sec.  80.1285.)
    (2) Achieve an annual average benzene level at least 10% lower than 
its baseline level. (See Sec.  80.1275(a).)
    (3) Make operational changes or improvements in benzene control 
technology that will result in real benzene reductions. (See Sec.  
80.1275(d).)
    Any refining or operational changes may be utilized to comply with 
the average benzene content requirement. However, in order to generate 
early credits, the rule specifies four types of operational changes and 
benzene control technology improvements that would allow a refinery to 
qualify if it implemented the changes/improvements after 2005 (and if 
it also met the other related requirements). Sec.  80.1275(d)(1). These 
operational changes and technology improvements are:
    (1) Treating the heavy straight run naphtha entering the reformer 
using light naphtha splitting and/or isomerization.
    (2) Treating the reformate stream exiting the reformer using 
benzene extraction or benzene saturation.
    (3) Directing additional refinery streams to the reformer for 
treatment as described in (1) and (2) above.
    (4) Directing reformate streams to other refineries with treatment 
capabilities as described in (2) above.
    A refinery needs to implement at least one of these listed changes/
improvements in order to generate early credits.
    This list includes all the strategies we thought would reduce fuel 
benzene (and thus benzene emissions) and be cost-effective. The 
provision was intended to preclude refineries from generating early 
credits solely by benzene reductions achieved through ethanol blending.
    The final rule does not provide a way for EPA to consider 
alternative means of reducing fuel benzene and generating early 
credits, no matter how effective the alternative. Soon after the rule 
was finalized, it was brought to our attention that at least one 
refinery had plans to install benzene alkylation technology (also known 
as reformate alkylation). Benzene alkylation involves converting 
benzene into other aromatic compounds by the addition of alkyl groups 
to the benzene ring. Xylene, toluene and cumene are typical products 
formed by benzene alkylation. Benzene alkylation is not one of the four 
operational or technological changes enumerated in the final rule. 
Although EPA regarded benzene alkylation as a legitimate benzene 
reduction technology, and one which can be used to comply with the 
standard, we did not include it in the list of technologies for 
generation of early credits merely because we did not expect refiners 
to use it. (See the Regulatory Impact Analysis (EPA420-R-07-002, 
February 2007), Chapter 6, page 36.)
    We therefore considered a request to include benzene alkylation on 
the list of

[[Page 61360]]

early credit-generating technologies to have merit, and on March 12, 
2008, we published a direct final rulemaking and a parallel proposal 
that would have revised the February 26, 2007 MSAT2 requirement 
regarding the benzene control technologies that qualify a refiner to 
generate early benzene credits to allow benzene alkylation in addition 
to the four operational or technological changes allowed by the MSAT2 
rule. The direct final rule would have also allowed a refiner to submit 
a request to EPA to approve other benzene-reducing operational changes 
or technologies for the purpose of generating early credits.
    We stated that if we received adverse comment by April 11, 2008, 
the direct final rule would not take effect and we would publish a 
timely withdrawal in the Federal Register. Commenters did in fact 
submit significant adverse comment and we accordingly published a 
withdrawal of the direct final rule on May 9, 2008. (See 73 FR 26325.) 
We stated in the direct final rule and the parallel proposed rule that 
we would address comments in any subsequent final action, which would 
be based on the parallel proposed rule, without a second comment period 
on the action. Today's action is based on the parallel proposed rule, 
and finalizes that proposal, so that refiners using benzene alkylation 
may generate early credits, and refiners can make site-specific 
demonstrations to EPA which may result in other technologies being 
eligible to generate early credits.

II. Response to Comments

    We received comments from the Northeast States for Coordinated Air 
Use Management (NESCAUM) and the New York State Department of 
Environmental Conservation (NYDEC). The commenters expressed several 
concerns with the rule. First, they were concerned that the rule 
continued the 2007 rule's focus on gasoline benzene content rather than 
benzene vehicle emissions. Second, commenters expressed the related 
concern that although benzene alkylation reduces gasoline benzene 
levels, it may not reduce benzene vehicle emissions. One commenter 
suggested that early credits be discounted to account for vehicular 
benzene emissions attributable to re-formed benzene. Commenters also 
expressed concern about increased aromatics emissions from vehicles. 
Finally, commenters opposed allowing other future refinery operational 
changes to be approved after petition to and review by EPA for the 
purpose of generating early credits.
    As will be discussed below, benzene alkylation meaningfully reduces 
gasoline benzene levels and thus directly reduces benzene emissions. 
For this reason, we believe that allowing refiners to qualify to 
generate early credits through the use of benzene alkylation is 
consistent with the intent of technology requirement associated with 
the early credit provisions. Use of benzene alkylation will not have 
the adverse effects of concern to the commenters: benzene vehicle 
emissions will be reduced, and there will not be appreciable increases 
in aromatics emissions from vehicles.
    Fuel aromatics and fuel benzene levels both affect vehicle benzene 
emissions, but not to anywhere near the same degree. Fuel benzene has 
more than a 20-fold \1\ greater impact on benzene emissions from 
vehicles than other fuel components, including fuel aromatics levels. 
In the March 29, 2006 proposed rule, we discussed how non-benzene 
aromatics account for about 30% by volume of gasoline and contribute 
about 30% of benzene emissions while benzene constitutes only about one 
volume percent of the fuel but is responsible for about 25% of the 
benzene emissions. (The remaining benzene emissions are formed from 
other (non-aromatic) compounds. See 71 FR 15864). Based on evaluations 
using the Complex Model, we concluded there that a 20% reduction in 
aromatics would be needed to achieve the same level of benzene 
emissions reductions as the 0.62 vol% standard. (See 71 FR 15864.) \2\ 
Thus, in the 2007 final rule, we concluded that fuel benzene control is 
the most effective means of reducing benzene and overall MSAT emissions 
because it offers measurable and certain benzene reductions that are 
not affected by ``changes in fuel composition or vehicle technology.'' 
(See 72 FR 8477.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Based on mg/mi benzene emissions per volume fraction of the 
fuel component (benzene, aromatics, other) in gasoline.
    \2\ Though this effect can be seen through Complex Model runs 
(which is based on 1990 vehicle technology), in the 2007 rulemaking, 
we found that tailpipe benzene emissions from Tier 2 vehicles have a 
similar response, in that significantly greater reductions in fuel 
aromatics levels are needed to get the same benzene reduction 
emissions impact that results from the MSAT2 benzene standard. See 
Control of Hazardous Air Pollutants from Mobile Sources, Regulatory 
Impact Analysis, Chapter 6, ``Feasibility of the Benzene Control 
Program,'' February 2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Reducing fuel benzene through alkylation or any other benzene 
reduction technology results in greater than 95% reduction in benzene 
exhaust emissions compared to the benzene emissions caused by the fuel 
benzene removed. We estimate that there is less than a 1% difference 
among benzene reduction technologies in their effectiveness at reducing 
benzene emissions.\3\ Because benzene emissions reductions are 
significant regardless of the fuel benzene reduction technology, there 
is no reason to discourage the use of one technology over another. For 
the same reason, we do not agree with the suggestion to discount early 
credits generated by use of benzene alkylation to account for vehicular 
emissions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Data collected from a recent test program (described in 
Chapter 6.11 of the Regulatory Impact Analysis of the 2007 MSAT 
rule) suggest that a typical Tier 2 vehicle emits approximately 3.10 
mg/mi of benzene when burning gasoline with 1 vol% benzene and 30 
vol% aromatics. Simulations done using the Complex Model for 
gasoline compliance (described in 40 CFR 80.45) suggest that 
approximately 25 wt% of exhaust benzene emission is due to benzene 
in the fuel (typically about 1 vol%), about 30 wt% of exhaust 
benzene emission is due to aromatics in the fuel (typically about 30 
vol%), and the remaining 45 wt% of exhaust benzene emission is from 
the rest of the fuel (i.e., non-aromatic compounds). Given this 
information, and making the assumption that alkylation would be used 
to convert 0.4 vol% of benzene to 0.4 vol% aromatics (to take pool 
benzene from 1.0 vol% to 0.60 vol%, slightly overcomplying with the 
new standard), we can estimate that a vehicle's tailpipe benzene 
emissions would be reduced from 3.10 mg/mi to 2.80 mg/mi if 
alkylation were used to reduce fuel benzene, compared to 2.79 mg/mi 
if another method of benzene reduction were used that did not create 
additional aromatics. This difference is less than 1%, and is 
relatively insensitive to the original emission level of the vehicle 
or the amount of fuel benzene reduction occurring. The difference is 
even smaller if one includes evaporative benzene emission, which is 
reduced by an identical amount for any method of benzene reduction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The commenters' concern about increases in vehicle non-benzene 
aromatic emissions is also somewhat misplaced. Again, given the small 
amount of benzene in gasoline (1 vol%) relative to total aromatics (20-
40 vol%), the additional contribution of aromatics attributable to 
alkylating the benzene is minimal, as would be any increase in aromatic 
emissions. In addition, as we discussed in the 2007 rule, fuel 
aromatics levels are expected to decrease because of increased ethanol 
use, so aromatics emission levels should be dropping in any event.
    Thus, based on the analyses in the 2007 rule of the impacts of fuel 
benzene and aromatics reductions on emissions, the slight increase in 
fuel aromatics content that could result from refineries using benzene 
alkylation for the purposes of generating early credits under this rule 
should reduce benzene emissions that would otherwise not be reduced at 
this time. No deleterious vehicle emissions impacts are expected. It 
thus is appropriate for refiners using benzene alkylation to reduce 
fuel benzene levels to be eligible to generate early credits.
    With respect to the other portion of today's rule, we continue to 
believe that allowing a refiner to petition us to use

[[Page 61361]]

an operating change not currently listed in order to qualify to 
generate early benzene credits is appropriate. A refiner would have to 
show in the petition that the operating change would reduce fuel 
benzene levels which, as just discussed, is the best means of reducing 
benzene vehicle emissions. The MSAT2 program encourages early fuel 
benzene reductions in order to get early benzene emissions reductions. 
This action is not about permitting a refinery to implement a new 
technology or make an operating change--those actions can happen at any 
time within or outside of the early credit generation window, 
regardless of the refinery's intent vis-a-vis generating early credits. 
Today's action requires the petitioner to show that the change they 
intend to make reduces fuel benzene levels which directly and 
significantly reduces benzene vehicle emissions more than any other 
fuel compositional change. The petition process has the added value of 
being more timely than a rulemaking, which is important since early 
credits can only be generated through 2010, and refiners must apply to 
generate early credits before the start of the annual averaging period 
in which they first want to generate early credits.

III. This Action

    We published a Questions and Answers document related to the MSAT2 
program on August 16, 2007. (http://epa.gov/otaq/regs/toxics/420f07053.pdf) In that document, we specifically addressed benzene 
alkylation and indicated that benzene alkylation meets the intent of 
the technology requirement for early credits. As discussed in the 
preamble of the final rule, early credits are generated based on 
innovations in gasoline benzene control technology that result in real 
benzene reductions prior to the start of the program in 2011. (See 72 
FR 8486.) The use of benzene alkylation directly results in lower 
gasoline benzene levels.
    Today's action revises Sec.  80.1275(d)(1) to include benzene 
alkylation in the list of acceptable reduction operational and 
technological strategies. We have also included a general provision 
that allows a refiner to petition EPA to use an operational or 
technological change that is not listed in the regulation for the 
purpose of generating early credits. The refiner must demonstrate that 
the benzene control technology improvement or operational change 
results in a net reduction in the refinery's average gasoline benzene 
level, exclusive of benzene reductions due simply to blending 
practices. The petition must be submitted to EPA prior to the start of 
the first averaging period in which the refinery plans to generate 
early credits. EPA expects it would act on such a petition before the 
end of that averaging period. The refiner must also provide additional 
information requested by EPA.
    The other requirements for generating early credits are unchanged. 
These include submitting a benzene baseline, reducing the refinery's 
baseline benzene level by at least 10% in a given averaging period, and 
not moving gasoline or blendstock streams between refineries for the 
purpose of generating early credits. (See 72 FR 8486.)

IV. Environmental and Economic Impact

    This action allows companies that have alternative means or 
strategies for reducing gasoline benzene to request EPA approval to use 
them for the purpose of generating early benzene credits. Average 
gasoline benzene levels from such refiners will decrease faster and 
earlier than if they had not generated early credits leading to lower 
benzene emissions than would have been achieved otherwise. Such credits 
will also help provide for a robust credit pool when the program starts 
in 2011. Vehicle benzene emissions will be reduced and there will not 
be significant increases in vehicle emissions of other aromatics.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review

    This action revises the February 26, 2007 mobile source air toxics 
rule's requirements that specify the benzene control technologies that 
qualify a refiner to generate early benzene credits. It allows another 
specific benzene control technology, benzene alkylation, to be used for 
the purpose of generating early credits, and allows a refiner to submit 
a request to EPA to approve other benzene-reducing operational changes 
or technologies for the purpose of generating early credits. This 
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the terms of 
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is therefore 
not subject to review under the Executive Order.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act

    This action does not impose an information collection burden under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. 
because the amendments in this rule do not change the information 
collection requirements of the underlying rule.
    Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources 
expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or 
provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time 
needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize 
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and 
verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and 
disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to 
comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; 
train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; 
search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; 
and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's 
regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR Part 9.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency 
to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to 
notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative 
Procedure Act or any other statute unless the agency certifies that the 
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities. Small entities include small businesses, 
small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions.
    For purposes of assessing the impacts of this action on small 
entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A petroleum refining company 
with fewer than 1,500 employees or a petroleum wholesaler or broker 
with fewer than 100 employees, based on the North American Industrial 
Classification System (NAICS); (2) a small governmental jurisdiction 
that is a government of a city, county, town, school district or 
special district with a population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small 
organization that is any not-for-profit enterprise which is 
independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field.
    After considering the economic impacts of today's final rule, I 
certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on 
a substantial number of small entities.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    This action contains no Federal mandates under the provisions of 
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C. 
1531-

[[Page 61362]]

1538 for State, local, or tribal governments or the private sector. EPA 
has determined that this rule does not contain a Federal mandate that 
may result in expenditures of $100 million or more for State, local, 
and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or the private sector in any 
one year. Today's action simply modifies the original rule in a limited 
manner, and does not significantly change the original rule. Therefore, 
this action is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 or 205 
of the UMRA.
    This action is also not subject to the requirements of section 203 
of UMRA because it contains no regulatory requirements that might 
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. This action only 
applies to parties that produce gasoline.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 
10, 1999), requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure 
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the 
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.'' 
``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the 
Executive Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct 
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
    This final rule does not have federalism implications. It will not 
have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship 
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, 
as specified in Executive Order 13132. The rule amends existing 
regulatory provisions applicable only to producers of gasoline and does 
not alter State authority to regulate these entities. The amendments 
will impose no direct costs on State or local governments. Thus, 
Executive Order 13132 does not apply to this rule.

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in 
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). It will not have 
substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175. 
This rule amends existing regulatory provisions applicable only to 
producers of gasoline and will impose no direct costs on tribal 
governments. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental 
Health & Safety Risks

    Executive Order 13045: ``Protection of Children from Environmental 
Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) applies 
to any rule that: (1) Is determined to be ``economically significant'' 
as defined under Executive Order 12866, and (2) concerns an 
environmental health or safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may 
have a disproportionate effect on children. If the regulatory action 
meets both criteria, the Agency must evaluate the environmental health 
or safety effects of the planned rule on children, and explain why the 
planned regulation is preferable to other potentially effective and 
reasonably feasible alternatives considered by the Agency.
    This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it is not 
an economically significant regulatory action as defined in Executive 
Order 12866.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 18355 
(May 22, 2001)), because it is not a significant regulatory action 
under Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act of 1995 (``NTTAA''), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 
272 note) directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its 
regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with 
applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards 
are technical standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, 
sampling procedures, and business practices) that are developed or 
adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA 
to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when the Agency decides 
not to use available and applicable voluntary consensus standards.
    This action does not involve technical standards. Therefore, EPA 
did not consider the use of any voluntary consensus standards.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental 
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes 
federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision 
directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and 
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission 
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high 
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs, 
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income 
populations in the United States.
    EPA has determined that this final rule will not have 
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental 
effects on minority or low-income populations because it does not 
affect the level of protection provided to human health or the 
environment. This rule provides additional means for refiners to 
qualify to generate early credits by implementing a benzene reducing 
technology or operational mode. This in turn will reduce vehicle 
benzene emissions.

K. Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A Major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2). This final rule will be effective on December 15, 2008.

VI. Statutory Provisions and Legal Authority

    The statutory authority for the fuels controls in today's final 
rule can be found in sections 202(l) and 211(c) of the Clean Air Act 
(CAA), as amended. Support for any procedural and enforcement-related 
aspects of the fuel controls in today's rule, including

[[Page 61363]]

recordkeeping requirements, comes from sections 114(a) and 301(a) of 
the CAA.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 80

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Air pollution control, Confidential business information, Fuel 
additives, Gasoline, Imports, Labeling, Motor vehicle fuel, Motor 
vehicle pollution, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: October 9, 2008.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.

0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR part 80 is amended as 
set forth below:

PART 80--REGULATION OF FUELS AND FUEL ADDITIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 80 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7414, 7542, 7545 and 7601(a).


0
2. Section 80.1275 is amended as follows:
0
a. By adding paragraph (d)(1)(v).
0
b. By redesignating paragraph (d)(2) as paragraph (d)(3).
0
c. By adding paragraph (d)(2).


Sec.  80.1275  How are early benzene credits generated?

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (v) Providing for benzene alkylation.
    (2)(i) A refiner may petition EPA to approve, for purposes of 
paragraph (d)(1) of this section, the use of operational changes and/or 
improvements in benzene control technology that are not listed in 
paragraph (d)(1) of this section to reduce gasoline benzene levels at a 
refinery.
    (ii) The petition specified in paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section 
must be sent to: U.S. EPA, NVFEL-ASD, Attn: MSAT2 Early Credit Benzene 
Reduction Technology, 2000 Traverwood Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48105.
    (iii) The petition specified in paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section 
must show how the benzene control technology improvement or operational 
change results in a net reduction in the refinery's average gasoline 
benzene level, exclusive of benzene reductions due simply to blending 
practices.
    (iv) The petition specified in paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section 
must be submitted to EPA prior to the start of the first averaging 
period in which the refinery plans to generate early credits.
    (v) The refiner must provide additional information as requested by 
EPA.
* * * * *

 [FR Doc. E8-24591 Filed 10-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P