[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 12, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46819-46821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18502]



[[Page 46819]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Part 252

RIN 0750-AF73


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Item 
Identification and Valuation Clause Update (DFARS Case 2007-D007)

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD has issued a final rule amending the Defense Federal 
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to update and clarify 
requirements for unique identification and valuation of items delivered 
under DoD contracts. The rule revises the applicable contract clause to 
reflect the current requirements.

DATES: Effective Date: August 12, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Michael Benavides, Defense 
Acquisition Regulations System, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP (DARS), IMD 3D139, 
3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3062. Telephone 703-602-
1302; facsimile 703-602-7887. Please cite DFARS Case 2007-D007.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Background

    The contract clause at DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and 
Valuation, requires unique identification for all delivered items for 
which the Government's unit acquisition cost is $5,000 or more, and for 
other items designated by the Government. In addition, the clause 
requires identification of the Government's unit acquisition cost for 
all delivered items, and provides instructions to contractors regarding 
the identification and valuation processes.
    This final rule updates and clarifies the requirements of the 
clause at DFARS 252.211-7003. The changes include: Update of references 
to standards and other documents; clarification of the definition of 
unique item identifier; specifically addressing the DoD recognized 
unique identification equivalent, where applicable; clarification of 
data submission requirements for end items and embedded items; 
clarification of requirements for inclusion of the clause in 
subcontracts; and update of referenced Internet addresses.
    DoD published a proposed rule at 72 FR 42367 on August 2, 2007. Two 
respondents submitted comments on the proposed rule. A discussion of 
the comments is provided below.
    1. Comment: ``Type designation'' should be added to the list of 
information to be reported by the contractor, in paragraph (d) of the 
clause, and a definition of ``type designation'' should be added to the 
clause.
    DoD Response: DoD does not believe it is necessary to address type 
designation in the contract clause. Contractors are required to report 
Item Unique Identification (IUID) data elements through use of the Wide 
Area WorkFlow (WAWF) Material Inspection and Receiving Report or by 
direct submission to the DoD IUID Registry using electronic XML, flat 
files, or user-defined formats. The WAWF Material Inspection and 
Receiving Report presently does not have the capability to report the 
Mark Content data elements, which include type designation. Therefore, 
relatively few items will have a type designation assigned. However, 
when required to do so, contractors can report type designation and 
other relevant Mark Content data elements using the ``Guidelines for 
Registering Government Serialization, Type Designation and Ownership of 
Major End Items, Assemblies and Subassemblies and Capital Equipment in 
the IUID Registry'' at http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/uid/guides.html.
    2. Comment: The clause should include more clarification of the 
IUID data elements. For the most part, clarification is needed for 
vendors that use WAWF to create a Material Inspection and Receiving 
Report and enter IUID data on the WAWF UID data entry forms.
    DoD Response: The clause refers vendors to the data submission 
procedures at http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/uid/data_submission_information.html, which has descriptions of the data elements and how 
to submit them. It is not necessary to repeat these procedures in the 
contract clause.
    3. Comment: With regard to the requirement for ``original part 
number (if there is serialization within the original part number),'' 
vendors are confused as to whether they can enter the delivered item's 
part number when UID Type 1 is the construct used (UID Type 1 is 
concatenated Issuing Agency Code + Enterprise Identifier + Serial 
Number). The clause should address the following:
    (1) Is the original part number only provided when there is 
serialization within the original part number (i.e., UID Type 2)?
    (2) Can the vendor enter the original part number in the WAWF form 
(or direct entry to the Registry) when it does not use UID Type 2 
(e.g., using UID Type 1, ESN, VIN)? WAWF will allow data entry of the 
original part number when any UID type is used, including ESN, VIN, 
GRAI, GIAI, etc.
    DoD Response: DoD does not believe clarification is necessary in 
the contract clause. The original part number must be submitted to the 
IUID Registry when serialization is unique within the part number 
(i.e., it is a component of the Unique Item Identifier (UII)). It is 
permissible to submit the original part number when not required by the 
clause (i.e., it is not a component of the UII). WAWF will allow the 
entry of the original part number with IUID types other than UID Type 
2.
    4. Comment: Clarification is needed with regard to the word 
``original.'' For example, a vendor will be delivering an item with a 
company part number of 123ABC-005. The item has evolved over the years; 
the true original part number was 123ABC-001. At the time the UII is 
assigned to the asset, the UID original part number is the company's 
current part number as recorded in its configuration management system. 
That is, for an item delivered today, the UID original part number 
would be 123ABC-005, not 123ABC-001. If this is correct, the definition 
of ``original part number'' should be clarified.
    DoD Response: DoD does not believe the clarification is necessary. 
The rule defines ``original part number'' as a combination of numbers 
or letters assigned by the enterprise at item creation to a class of 
items with the same form, fit, function, and interface. The key to the 
meaning of ``original part number'' is ``* * * at item creation to a 
class of items with the same form, fit, function, and interface.'' 
Thus, the original part number used in a UII Construct 2 must 
be that part number assigned to the class of items with the same form, 
fit, function, and interface that the UII item has. For new items 
(i.e., the items covered by this rule) the part number of the delivered 
item will be the original part number.
    5. Comment: Can a lot or batch number be entered if UID Type 2 is 
not used? WAWF allows entry of both the original part number and lot/
batch number when UID Type 2 is chosen. Should this be allowed? If not, 
the clause should state that only the original part number or lot/batch 
number may be used.
    DoD Response: The clause requires that the part, lot, or batch 
number be

[[Page 46820]]

used. As stated in the DoD Guide to Uniquely Identifying Items, 
Appendix C, Business Rule 13, available at http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/uid/guides.html, data elements not required to 
construct the concatenated UII shall remain discrete but may be 
contained within the same mark or media as the UII-required elements, 
as long as all the data elements contained in the mark or media are 
properly identified with a data qualifier. The UII data elements should 
appear first in the sequence. This means that a lot number can be 
included in the data matrix as long as the data qualifier used to 
define it is not one that is used for a UII data element. In the case 
of a lot number, the data qualifiers that can be used in the UII 
construct are the data identifier ``1T'' or the text element 
identifiers ``LOT'', ``LTN'', or ``BII''. These data qualifiers cannot 
be used to describe an additional data element not part of the 
Construct 2 UII when the original part number is used in the 
UII. The data identifier for current lot number ``30T'' can be used to 
describe the lot number when either ``1P'' or ``1T'' is used in the UII 
Construct 2. There is no other data qualifier for current lot 
number other than ``30T''.
    6. Comment: The clause should provide a clear definition of 
``current part number'' and should clarify when a current part number 
must be reported and submitted.
    DoD Response: MIL-STD-130N, Table IV, UII construct business rules 
and supplemental data, states that ``In instances where the part number 
changes with new configurations (also known as part number roll), the 
current part number shall be included on the item for traceability 
purposes and may be included as a separate data element.'' For new 
items (i.e., the items covered by this rule), the part number of the 
delivered item will be the current part number as well as the original 
part number.
    7. Comment: The clause does not mention the increase in value to an 
asset because of a change in the current part number. In WAWF, this 
value is called the ``current part cost.'' In the IUID Software User's 
Manual Version 3.4, it is called ``acquisition value'' (not to be 
confused with acquisition cost). The Manual states that acquisition 
value is the cost incurred by DoD when a part number changes, the value 
added to an item when it is updated. The IUID Flat File Specification, 
Version 2, June 19, 2007, defines ``acquisition value'' as the cost 
incurred by DoD when the part number changes. The IUID XML Data 
Submission Guide calls this value ``current acquisition value'' and 
defines it as the cost incurred by DoD when a part number changes. The 
clause, the IUID software manual, and WAWF should be consistent, and 
the DFARS clause should include the value added because of a part 
number change.
    DoD Response: The cost captured by the IUID Registry is the unit 
acquisition cost at the time of delivery of the item. Any additional 
cost added to the item after delivery is determined in the military 
equipment valuation process. DoD will revise the Software User's Manual 
to remove the phrase ``the value added to an item when it is updated'', 
since that is determined by the military equipment valuation rules.
    This rule was not subject to Office of Management and Budget review 
under Executive Order 12866, dated September 30, 1993.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    DoD certifies that this final rule will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the 
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., 
because the rule does not significantly change requirements relating to 
the identification and valuation of items delivered under DoD 
contracts. The rule updates and clarifies existing requirements.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply, because the rule does 
not impose any information collection requirements that require the 
approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, 
et seq.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 252

    Government procurement.

Michele P. Peterson,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.

0
Therefore, 48 CFR part 252 is amended as follows:

PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 252 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR Chapter 1.


0
2. Section 252.211-7003 is amended as follows:
0
a. By revising the clause date;
0
b. In paragraph (a), by revising the definitions of ``DoD recognized 
unique identification equivalent'', ``Issuing agency'', ``Unique item 
identifier'', and ``Unique item identifier type'';
0
c. By revising paragraphs (c) through (g); and
0
d. In Alternate I, by revising the Alternate I date and paragraph (d) 
to read as follows:


252.211-7003  Item Identification and Valuation.

* * * * *

ITEM IDENTIFICATION AND VALUATION (AUG 2008)

    (a) * * *
    DoD recognized unique identification equivalent means a unique 
identification method that is in commercial use and has been 
recognized by DoD. All DoD recognized unique identification 
equivalents are listed at http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/uid/iuid_equivalents.html.
* * * * *
    Issuing agency means an organization responsible for assigning a 
non-repeatable identifier to an enterprise (i.e., Dun & Bradstreet's 
Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) Number, GS1 Company Prefix, 
or Defense Logistics Information System (DLIS) Commercial and 
Government Entity (CAGE) Code).
* * * * *
    Unique item identifier means a set of data elements marked on 
items that is globally unique and unambiguous. The term includes a 
concatenated unique item identifier or a DoD recognized unique 
identification equivalent.
    Unique item identifier type means a designator to indicate which 
method of uniquely identifying a part has been used. The current 
list of accepted unique item identifier types is maintained at 
http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/uid/uii_types.html.
* * * * *
    (c) Unique item identifier.
    (1) The Contractor shall provide a unique item identifier for 
the following:
    (i) All delivered items for which the Government's unit 
acquisition cost is $5,000 or more.
    (ii) The following items for which the Government's unit 
acquisition cost is less than $5,000:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Contract line, subline, or  exhibit line
                 item No.                         Item description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (iii) Subassemblies, components, and parts embedded within 
delivered items as specified in Attachment Number ----.
    (2) The unique item identifier and the component data elements 
of the DoD unique item identification shall not change over the life 
of the item.
    (3) Data syntax and semantics of unique item identifiers. The 
Contractor shall ensure that--

[[Page 46821]]

    (i) The encoded data elements (except issuing agency code) of 
the unique item identifier are marked on the item using one of the 
following three types of data qualifiers, as determined by the 
Contractor:
    (A) Application Identifiers (AIs) (Format Indicator 05 of ISO/
IEC International Standard 15434), in accordance with ISO/IEC 
International Standard 15418, Information Technology--EAN/UCC 
Application Identifiers and Fact Data Identifiers and Maintenance 
and ANSI MH 10.8.2 Data Identifier and Application Identifier 
Standard.
    (B) Data Identifiers (DIs) (Format Indicator 06 of ISO/IEC 
International Standard 15434), in accordance with ISO/IEC 
International Standard 15418, Information Technology--EAN/UCC 
Application Identifiers and Fact Data Identifiers and Maintenance 
and ANSI MH 10.8.2 Data Identifier and Application Identifier 
Standard.
    (C) Text Element Identifiers (TEIs) (Format Indicator 12 of ISO/
IEC International Standard 15434), in accordance with the Air 
Transport Association Common Support Data Dictionary; and
    (ii) The encoded data elements of the unique item identifier 
conform to the transfer structure, syntax, and coding of messages 
and data formats specified for Format Indicators 05, 06, and 12 in 
ISO/IEC International Standard 15434, Information Technology--
Transfer Syntax for High Capacity Automatic Data Capture Media.
    (4) Unique item identifier.
    (i) The Contractor shall--
    (A) Determine whether to--
    (1) Serialize within the enterprise identifier;
    (2) Serialize within the part, lot, or batch number; or
    (3) Use a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent; and
    (B) Place the data elements of the unique item identifier 
(enterprise identifier; serial number; DoD recognized unique 
identification equivalent; and for serialization within the part, 
lot, or batch number only: original part, lot, or batch number) on 
items requiring marking by paragraph (c)(1) of this clause, based on 
the criteria provided in the version of MIL-STD-130, Identification 
Marking of U.S. Military Property, cited in the contract Schedule.
    (ii) The issuing agency code--
    (A) Shall not be placed on the item; and
    (B) Shall be derived from the data qualifier for the enterprise 
identifier.
    (d) For each item that requires unique item identification under 
paragraph (c)(1)(i) or (ii) of this clause, in addition to the 
information provided as part of the Material Inspection and 
Receiving Report specified elsewhere in this contract, the 
Contractor shall report at the time of delivery, either as part of, 
or associated with, the Material Inspection and Receiving Report, 
the following information:
    (1) Unique item identifier.
    (2) Unique item identifier type.
    (3) Issuing agency code (if concatenated unique item identifier 
is used).
    (4) Enterprise identifier (if concatenated unique item 
identifier is used).
    (5) Original part number (if there is serialization within the 
original part number).
    (6) Lot or batch number (if there is serialization within the 
lot or batch number).
    (7) Current part number (optional and only if not the same as 
the original part number).
    (8) Current part number effective date (optional and only if 
current part number is used).
    (9) Serial number (if concatenated unique item identifier is 
used).
    (10) Government's unit acquisition cost.
    (11) Unit of measure.
    (e) For embedded subassemblies, components, and parts that 
require DoD unique item identification under paragraph (c)(1)(iii) 
of this clause, the Contractor shall report as part of, or 
associated with, the Material Inspection and Receiving Report 
specified elsewhere in this contract, the following information:
    (1) Unique item identifier of the parent item under paragraph 
(c)(1) of this clause that contains the embedded subassembly, 
component, or part.
    (2) Unique item identifier of the embedded subassembly, 
component, or part.
    (3) Unique item identifier type.**
    (4) Issuing agency code (if concatenated unique item identifier 
is used).**
    (5) Enterprise identifier (if concatenated unique item 
identifier is used).**
    (6) Original part number (if there is serialization within the 
original part number).**
    (7) Lot or batch number (if there is serialization within the 
lot or batch number).**
    (8) Current part number (optional and only if not the same as 
the original part number).**
    (9) Current part number effective date (optional and only if 
current part number is used).**
    (10) Serial number (if concatenated unique item identifier is 
used).**
    (11) Description.

** Once per item.

    (f) The Contractor shall submit the information required by 
paragraphs (d) and (e) of this clause in accordance with the data 
submission procedures at http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/uid/data_submission_information.html.
    (g) Subcontracts. If the Contractor acquires by subcontract, any 
item(s) for which unique item identification is required in 
accordance with paragraph (c)(1) of this clause, the Contractor 
shall include this clause, including this paragraph (g), in the 
applicable subcontract(s).


(End of clause)

Alternate I (AUG 2008)
* * * * *
    (d) The Contractor shall submit the information required by 
paragraph (c) of this clause in accordance with the data submission 
procedures at http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/uid/data_submission_information.html.
[FR Doc. E8-18502 Filed 8-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-P