[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 147 (Wednesday, July 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44218-44220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17486]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-351-832, C-351-833, A-560-815, A-201-830, A-841-805, A-274-804, A-
823-812]


Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Brazil, Indonesia, 
Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine: Continuation of 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On September 4, 2007, the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') initiated sunset reviews of the antidumping duty (``AD'') 
orders on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod (``wire rod'') from 
Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine; 
and the countervailing duty (``CVD'') order on wire rod from Brazil. 
See Initiation of Five-year (``Sunset'') Reviews, 72 FR 50659 
(September 4, 2007). As a result of the determinations by the 
Department and the U.S. International Trade Commission (``ITC'') that 
revocation of the AD orders on wire rod from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, 
Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine, and the CVD order on wire 
rod from Brazil would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of 
dumping and countervailable subsidies, and material injury to an 
industry in the United States, the Department is publishing a notice of 
continuation of these AD and CVD orders.

DATES: Effective Date: July 30, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shelly Atkinson or Brandon Farlander, 
AD/CVD Operations, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0116 and 482-
0182, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On October 22, 2002, the Department published the CVD orders on 
wire rod from Brazil and Canada. See Notice of Countervailing Duty 
Orders: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil and Canada, 
67 FR 64871 (October 22, 2002). Additionally, the Department published 
the AD orders on wire rod from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, 
Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine on October 29, 2002. See Notice of 
Antidumping Duty Orders: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from 
Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine, 
67 FR 65945 (October 29, 2002). On January 23, 2004, the CVD order on 
wire rod from Canada was revoked, pursuant to a changed circumstance 
review. See 69 FR 3330 (January 23, 2004).
    On September 4, 2007, the Department initiated and the ITC 
instituted sunset reviews of the AD orders on wire rod from Brazil, 
Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine, and the 
CVD order on wire rod from Brazil pursuant to section 751(c) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''). See Initiation of Five-
year Sunset Reviews, 72 FR at 50659; see also Carbon and Certain Alloy 
Steel Wire Rod from Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, 
Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine, 72 FR 50696 (September 4, 2007). 
Additionally, on December 28, 2007, the ITC determined to conduct full 
five-year reviews concerning the CVD and AD orders. See Carbon and 
Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Mexico, 
Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine, 72 FR 73880 (December 28, 
2007).
    As a result of its reviews, the Department found that revocation of 
the AD and CVD orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence 
of dumping and countervailable subsidies, and notified the ITC of the 
magnitude of the margins and net countervailable subsidies likely to 
prevail were the orders to be revoked. See Carbon and Certain Alloy 
Steel Wire Rod from Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, 
Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset 
Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 73 FR 1321 (January 8, 2008) 
and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum; see also Carbon and 
Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil: Final Results of Expedited 
Five-year Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 73 FR 1323 
(January 8, 2008) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.
    On July 17, 2008, the ITC published its determination pursuant to 
section 751(c) of the Act, that revocation of the AD orders on wire rod 
from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and 
Ukraine, and the CVD order on wire rod from Brazil would likely lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. See ITC Final 
Determination: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil, 
Canada, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine, 
Investigation Nos. 701-TA-417 and

[[Page 44219]]

731-TA-953, 954, 957-959, 961, and 962 (Review) 73 FR 41116 (July 17, 
2008) (``ITC Wire Rod Final Determination''); and Carbon and Certain 
Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, 
Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine, USITC Publication 4014, Investigation 
Nos. 701-TA-417 and 731-TA-953, 954, 957-959, 961, and 962 (Review) 
(June 2008).
    With respect to the AD order on wire rod from Canada, the ITC 
determined that revocation of order would not be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time, pursuant to section 
751(c) of the Act. See ITC Wire Rod Final Determination. Therefore, 
pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(1)(iii), 
the Department is revoking the AD order on wire rod from Canada in a 
separate Federal Register notice.

Scope of the Orders

    The merchandise subject to these orders is certain hot-rolled 
products of carbon steel and alloy steel, in coils, of approximately 
round cross section, 5.00 mm or more, but less than 19.00 mm, in solid 
cross-sectional diameter.
    Specifically excluded are steel products possessing the above-noted 
physical characteristics and meeting the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States (``HTSUS'') definitions for (a) Stainless steel; (b) 
tool steel; (c) high nickel steel; (d) ball bearing steel; and (e) 
concrete reinforcing bars and rods. Also excluded are (f) free 
machining steel products (i.e., products that contain by weight one or 
more of the following elements: 0.03 percent or more of lead, 0.05 
percent or more of bismuth, 0.08 percent or more of sulfur, more than 
0.04 percent of phosphorus, more than 0.05 percent of selenium, or more 
than 0.01 percent of tellurium).
    Also excluded from the scope are 1080 grade tire cord quality wire 
rod and 1080 grade tire bead quality wire rod. Grade 1080 tire cord 
quality rod is defined as: (i) Grade 1080 tire cord quality wire rod 
measuring 5.0 mm or more but not more than 6.0 mm in cross-sectional 
diameter; (ii) with an average partial decarburization of no more than 
70 microns in depth (maximum individual 200 microns); (iii) having no 
non-deformable inclusions greater than 20 microns and no deformable 
inclusions greater than 35 microns; (iv) having a carbon segregation 
per heat average of 3.0 or better using European Method NFA 04-114; (v) 
having a surface quality with no surface defects of a length greater 
than 0.15 mm; (vi) capable of being drawn to a diameter of 0.30 mm or 
less with 3 or fewer breaks per ton, and (vii) containing by weight the 
following elements in the proportions shown: (1) 0.78 percent or more 
of carbon, (2) less than 0.01 percent of aluminum, (3) 0.040 percent or 
less, in the aggregate, of phosphorus and sulfur, (4) 0.006 percent or 
less of nitrogen, and (5) not more than 0.15 percent, in the aggregate, 
of copper, nickel and chromium.
    Grade 1080 tire bead quality rod is defined as: (i) Grade 1080 tire 
bead quality wire rod measuring 5.5 mm or more but not more than 7.0 mm 
in cross-sectional diameter; (ii) with an average partial 
decarburization of no more than 70 microns in depth (maximum individual 
200 microns); (iii) having no non-deformable inclusions greater than 20 
microns and no deformable inclusions greater than 35 microns; (iv) 
having a carbon segregation per heat average of 3.0 or better using 
European Method NFA 04-114; (v) having a surface quality with no 
surface defects of a length greater than 0.2 mm; (vi) capable of being 
drawn to a diameter of 0.78 mm or larger with 0.5 or fewer breaks per 
ton; and (vii) containing by weight the following elements in the 
proportions shown: (1) 0.78 percent or more of carbon, (2) less than 
0.01 percent of soluble aluminum, (3) 0.040 percent or less, in the 
aggregate, of phosphorus and sulfur, (4) 0.008 percent or less of 
nitrogen, and (5) either not more than 0.15 percent, in the aggregate, 
of copper, nickel and chromium (if chromium is not specified), or not 
more than 0.10 percent in the aggregate of copper and nickel and a 
chromium content of 0.24 to 0.30 percent (if chromium is specified). 
For purposes of grade 1080 tire cord quality wire rod and grade 1080 
tire bead quality wire rod, an inclusion will be considered to be 
deformable if its ratio of length (measured along the axis--that is, 
the direction of rolling of the rod) over thickness (measured on the 
same inclusion in a direction perpendicular to the axis of the rod) is 
equal to or greater than three. The size of an inclusion for purposes 
of the 20 microns and 35 microns limitations is the measurement of the 
largest dimension observed on a longitudinal section measured in a 
direction perpendicular to the axis of the rod. This measurement 
methodology applies only to inclusions on certain grade 1080 tire cord 
quality wire rod and certain grade 1080 tire bead quality wire rod that 
are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after 
July 24, 2003.
    The designation of the products as ``tire cord quality'' or ``tire 
bead quality'' indicates the acceptability of the product for use in 
the production of tire cord, tire bead, or wire for use in other rubber 
reinforcement applications such as hose wire. These quality 
designations are presumed to indicate that these products are being 
used in tire cord, tire bead, and other rubber reinforcement 
applications, and such merchandise intended for the tire cord, tire 
bead, or other rubber reinforcement applications is not included in the 
scope. However, should petitioners or other interested parties provide 
a reasonable basis to believe or suspect that there exists a pattern of 
importation of such products for other than those applications; end-use 
certification for the importation of such products may be required. 
Under such circumstances, only the importers of record would normally 
be required to certify the end use of the imported merchandise. All 
products meeting the physical description of subject merchandise that 
are not specifically excluded are included in this scope.
    The products subject to this order are currently classifiable under 
subheadings 7213.91.3011, 7213.91.3015, 7213.91.3020, 7213.91.3093, 
7213.91.4500, 7213.91.6000, 7213.99.0030, 7213.99.0090, 7227.20.0030, 
7227.20.0080, 7227.90.6010, 7227.90.6020, and 7227.90.6085 of the 
HTSUS. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and 
customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this 
proceeding is dispositive.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Effective July 1, 2008, U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(``CBP'') reclassified certain HTSUS numbers related to the subject 
merchandise. See http: //hotdocs.usitc.gov/tariff--chapters--
current/toc.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Determination

    As a result of the determinations by the Department and the ITC 
that revocation of these AD and CVD orders would likely lead to 
continuation or recurrence of dumping and countervailable subsidies; as 
well as material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant 
to section 751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department hereby orders the 
continuation of the AD orders on wire rod from Brazil, Indonesia, 
Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine, and the CVD order on 
wire rod from Brazil. Therefore, CBP will continue to collect AD and 
CVD cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all 
imports of subject merchandise.
    The effective date of continuation of these orders will be the date 
of publication in the Federal Register of this Notice of Continuation. 
Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the

[[Page 44220]]

Department intends to initiate the next five-year review of these 
orders not later than June 2013.
    These five-year sunset reviews and this notice are in accordance 
with section 751(c) of the Act. This notice is published pursuant to 
751(c) and 771(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4).

    Dated: July 23, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
 [FR Doc. E8-17486 Filed 7-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P