[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 140 (Monday, July 21, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42365-42366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-16628]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-646]


In the Matter of Certain Power Supplies; Notice of Commission 
Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting 
Complainants' Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation 
To Add a Respondent

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 5) 
granting complainant's motion to amend the complaint and notice of 
investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-1999. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on May 8, 2008, based on a complaint filed by Ultra Products, Inc. of 
Fletcher, Ohio and Systemax Inc. of Port Washington, New York 
(collectively ``Ultra''). 73 FR 26144-5 (May 8, 2008). The complaint, 
as amended and supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into 
the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the 
United States after importation of certain power supplies by reason of 
infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,133,293. The 
complaint further alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The 
Commission's notice of investigation named Aerocool Advanced 
Technologies Corporation of Taipei Hsien, Taiwan; Langears, Inc. d/b/a 
Aerocool U.S. of Fremont, California; Andyson International Co. of 
Taipei, Taiwan; Atng Power Co., Ltd. a/k/a I Horng, Power Co., Ltd. of 
Taipei Hsien, Taiwan; Coolmax Technology Inc. of Taipei, Taiwan; 
Enermax Technology Corporation of Taoyuan, Taiwan; Enermax USA 
Corporation of City of Industry, California; High Performance 
Enterprise PLC, d/b/a High Performance Group or Hiper Group of Milton 
Keynes, United Kingdom; High Performance Group Inc., d/b/a Hight 
Performance Group or Hiper Group of San Mateo, California; KWI 
Technology Inc. d/b/a Kingwin of City of Industry California; San Hawk 
Technic Co. Ltd., a/k/a Sky Hawk Group of Taipei Taiwan; Eagle 
Technology Inc., a/k/a Sky Hawk USA or Eagle Tech of City of Industry, 
California; Sunbearn Company

[[Page 42366]]

of Taipei City, Taiwan; and Sunbearntech, Inc. of Hacienda Heights, 
California as respondents.
    On May 20, 2008, Ultra filed a motion for leave to amend the 
complaint and notice of investigation to add a respondent, Super Flower 
Computer, Inc. (``Super Flower''). On June 11, 2008, the IA filed a 
response in support of the motion.
    On June 27, 2008, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting the 
motion, finding that, pursuant to Commission Rule 210.14(b)(1) (19 CFR 
210.14(b)(1)), there was good cause to add Super Flower as a 
respondent. No petitions for review of this ID were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in section 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
(19 CFR 210.42).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: July 16, 2008.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8-16628 Filed 7-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P