[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 138 (Thursday, July 17, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40988-40992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-16283]


 ========================================================================
 Proposed Rules
                                                 Federal Register
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
 the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
 notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
 the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
 
 ========================================================================
 

  Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 138 / Thursday, July 17, 2008 / 
Proposed Rules  

[[Page 40988]]



FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

16 CFR Part 305

[RIN 3084-AB03]


Rule Concerning Disclosures Regarding Energy Consumption and 
Water Use of Certain Home Appliances and Other Products Required Under 
the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (``Appliance Labeling Rule'')

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission (FTC or Commission).

ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking and public meeting 
announcement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Section 321 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 
2007 requires the Commission to conduct a rulemaking to consider the 
effectiveness of current energy labeling for lamps (commonly referred 
to as ``light bulbs'') and to consider alternative labeling approaches. 
In response to that directive, the Commission seeks comments on the 
effectiveness of current labeling requirements for lamp packages and 
possible alternatives to those requirements. As part of this effort, 
the Commission will hold a public roundtable meeting on September 15, 
2008, from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hampton Newsome, Attorney, (202) 326-
2889, and Lemuel Dowdy, (202) 326-2981, Division of Enforcement, 
Federal Trade Commission, 601 New Jersey Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 
20001.

DATES: Comments must be received by September 29, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to ``Lamp Labeling, Project No. 
P084206'' to facilitate organization of comments. A comment filed in 
paper form should include this reference both in the text and on the 
envelope, and should be mailed to the following address: Federal Trade 
Commission/Office of the Secretary, Room H-135 (Annex N), 600 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20580. The FTC is requesting 
that any comment filed in paper form be sent by courier or overnight 
service, if possible, because U.S. postal mail in the Washington area 
and at the Commission is subject to delay due to heightened security 
precautions. Comments containing confidential material must be filed in 
paper form, must be clearly labeled ``Confidential,'' and must comply 
with Commission Rule 4.9(c).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The comment must be accompanied by an explicit request for 
confidential treatment, including the factual and legal basis for 
the request, and must identify the specific portions of the comment 
to be withheld from the public record. The Commission's General 
Counsel will grant or deny the request, consistent with applicable 
law and the public interest. See 16 CFR 4.9(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Comments filed in electronic form should be submitted by clicking 
on: (https://secure.commentworks.com/ftc-lamplabeling) and following 
the instructions on the web-based form. To ensure that the Commission 
considers an electronic comment, you must file it on the web-based form 
at the (https://secure.commentworks.com/ftc-lamplabeling) weblink. You 
may also visit http://www.regulations.gov to read this advance notice 
of proposed rulemaking, and file an electronic comment through that 
Website. The Commission will consider all comments that regulations.gov 
forwards to it.
    The FTC Act and other laws the Commission administers permit the 
collection of public comments to consider and use in this proceeding as 
appropriate. All timely and responsive comments received by the 
Commission, whether filed in paper or in electronic form, will be 
considered by the Commission, and will be available to the public on 
the FTC Website, to the extent practicable, at www.ftc.gov. As a matter 
of discretion, the FTC makes every effort to remove home contact 
information for individuals from public comments it receives before 
placing those comments on the FTC Website. More information, including 
routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, may be found in the FTC's 
privacy policy, at http://www.ftc.gov/privacy.htm.

Roundtable time and location: The public roundtable meeting will be 
held on September 15, 2008, from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. at the FTC's 
Satellite Building Conference Center, located at 601 New Jersey Avenue, 
NW, Washington, DC.

Roundtable information: The public roundtable will include 
participation by selected panelists. Other attendees also will have an 
opportunity to comment and ask questions. There is no fee for 
attendance. A stenographer will record the proceedings, and the 
Commission will place the transcription on the public record. The FTC 
also plans to make this workshop available live via webcast (see 
(http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/workshops/lamp/index.shtml)). For admittance to 
the Conference Center, all attendees must show a valid photo 
identification such as a driver's license. The FTC will accept pre-
registration for this workshop. Pre-registration is not necessary to 
attend, but is encouraged. To pre-register, please email your name and 
affiliation to [email protected]. When you pre-register, we will 
collect your name, affiliation, and your email address. The Commission 
will use this information to estimate how many people will attend. We 
may use your email address to contact you with information about the 
workshop.
    Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) or other laws, we may 
be required to disclose to outside organizations the information you 
provide. For additional information, including routine uses permitted 
by the Privacy Act, see the Commission's Privacy Policy at 
(www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.shtm.) The FTC Act and other laws the 
Commission administers permit the collection of this contact 
information to consider and use for the above purposes.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hampton Newsome, Attorney, (202) 326-
2889, and Lemuel Dowdy, (202) 326-2981, Division of Enforcement, 
Federal Trade Commission, 601 New Jersey Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 
20001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Lamp Labeling

    The lighting market is changing. Over the next several years, new 
energy standards mandated by Congress will eliminate low efficiency 
light bulbs (i.e., lamps) from store shelves in favor of more energy 
efficient products. Such products include high-efficiency incandescent 
lamps, and compact fluorescent lamps (i.e., compact fluorescent light 
bulbs or CFLs) that are widely available now, as well as even more 
energy efficient products, such as

[[Page 40989]]

solid-state lighting (e.g., light-emitting diode (LED) products).
    Given these changes, Congress has asked the FTC to consider the 
effectiveness of current lamp labeling and alternative labeling 
disclosures to help consumers understand new high-efficiency lamp 
products. As a first step toward fulfilling this mandate, the 
Commission is publishing this Notice which provides background about 
current labeling rules for lamps, the recent Congressional mandate, the 
purpose of the FTC labeling requirements, and various labeling 
considerations. This Notice also contains a series of questions related 
to the effectiveness of current labeling and potential labeling 
alternatives to aid comment and discussion at the September 15, 2008 
meeting.
    A. Background on Current FTC Labeling: Current FTC regulations 
require that most incandescent and compact fluorescent lamp packages 
display energy information.\2\ In particular, the packages must display 
the product's light output (in lumens), energy use (in watts), and lamp 
life (in hours).\3\ The package disclosures must also provide the 
following statement: ``To save energy costs, find the bulbs with the 
light output you need, then choose the one with the lowest watts.'' 
Additionally, catalog retailers (including websites) must disclose the 
required label information for the covered lamp products they sell.\4\ 
The current rules do not impose a uniform disclosure format. Instead, 
the labeling requirements provide manufacturers flexibility regarding 
the size, font, and style in which the information is presented.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The FTC issued the current lighting disclosure requirements 
in 1994 (see 16 CFR Sec. Sec.  305.15(a),(b), & (c)). See 59 FR 
25176 (May 13, 1994).
    \3\ See 16 CFR 305.15. A sample of the current label is attached 
to this Notice.
    \4\ 16 CFR 305.20.
    \5\ In addition to the requirements for common household lamps, 
the Rule directs manufacturers of fluorescent lamp ballasts and 
luminaires, metal halide lamp fixtures, and certain tube-type 
(``general service'') fluorescent lamps to mark their products with 
an encircled ``E,'' a symbol signifying compliance with DOE minimum 
efficiency standards. See 16 CFR 305.15. Packages for incandescent 
reflector lamps must also display the encircled ``E'' and 
information on light output, energy use, and watts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Rule also requires manufacturers to ``possess and rely upon a 
reasonable basis consisting of competent and reliable scientific 
tests'' to substantiate the information on their labels. For lamp life 
and light output representations, the Rule states that the Commission 
will accept as a reasonable basis, competent and reliable scientific 
tests conducted according to applicable IES (Illuminating Engineering 
Society) test protocols that substantiate the representations.\6\ The 
Rule, however, does not require manufacturers to use these protocols.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See 16 CFR Sec.  305.5. For fluorescent lamp ballasts, the 
Rule requires manufacturers to derive energy consumption information 
using specific DOE test procedures (10 CFR Part 430, subpart B, 
Sec.  430.23(q)). There were no DOE test procedures available for 
other lighting products when the FTC first published the lamp 
labeling rules in 1994.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    B. Congressional Mandate - Efficiency Standards and Labeling: The 
Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) directs the 
Department of Energy (DOE) to issue stringent energy efficiency 
standards for lighting products that will have the effect of phasing 
out traditional, low-efficiency incandescent lamps from the U.S. market 
over the next several years. Higher efficiency lamps, such as certain 
incandescent lamp types, CFLs, and LEDs, that meet the new standards, 
will take their place.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is currently supporting 
domestic research and development for new solid-state lighting 
technologies. (See http://www.netl.doe.gov/ssl/strategy.html.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To address these changes, Congress directed the FTC to consider the 
effectiveness of current lamp disclosures and to consider whether 
alternative labeling disclosures would be more effective in helping 
consumers make purchasing decisions.\8\ In particular, the law directs 
the Commission to consider labeling disclosures that address consumer 
needs for information about lighting level, light quality, lamp 
lifetime, and total lifecycle cost.\9\ The Commission must complete 
this effort by June of 2010.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See section 321(b) of the Energy Independence and Security 
Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110-140,324(a)). That provision amends section 
324(a)(2)(C) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) (42 
U.S.C. 6294(a)(2)(C)). Additional amendments in EISA redesignate 
6294(a)(2)(C) as 6294(a)(2)(D) (see section 324(d) of EISA).
    \9\ The law does not specifically authorize the Commission to 
require disclosures related to the hazardous content of lamps.
    \10\ Section 321(b) of EISA (42 U.S.C. 6294(a)(2)(D)) also gives 
the Commission the discretion to ``consider reopening the rulemaking 
not later than 180 days before the [statutorily mandated] effective 
dates of the standards for general service incandescent lamps 
established under section 325(i)(1)(A) [and implemented by DOE], if 
the Commission determines that further labeling changes are needed 
to help consumers understand lamp alternatives.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The EISA amendments also provide the Commission with discretion to 
require labeling for any consumer product not specified in the current 
labeling statute, if the Commission determines such labeling is likely 
to assist consumers in making purchasing decisions.\11\ Accordingly, 
the Commission now has the authority to require energy disclosures for 
consumer products that use lighting technologies not currently 
specified in the law (e.g., solid-state lighting such as LED 
products).\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The law defines ``consumer product'' as any article (other 
than an automobile) which ``in operation consumes, or is designed to 
consume energy'' and ``which, to any significant extent is 
distributed in commerce for personal use or consumption by an 
individual.'' 42 U.S.C. Sec.  6291(1).
    \12\ See section 325 of EISA (see 42 U.S.C. 6294(a)(6)). The 
EISA amendments to EPCA (the energy standards and labeling law) 
included definitions for solid-state lighting products (e.g., LED), 
but did not alter the scope of lighting products for which labeling 
is required. Therefore, the current law does not specifically direct 
the FTC to require labeling for solid-state lighting products. (See 
42 U.S.C. 6291(30)(BB-DD) and 42 U.S.C. 6294(a)(1)(B-D)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, we note that EISA (section 321(c)) directs the Secretary 
of Energy to conduct an annual assessment of the lighting market ``to 
identify trends'' and to ``better understand the degree to which 
consumer decisionmaking is based on'' the type of information currently 
appearing on FTC-required labels. EISA requires DOE to provide the 
results of the assessment to the FTC. The law also requires DOE, in 
cooperation with the FTC and other agencies, to conduct a ``proactive 
national program of consumer awareness, information, and education'' to 
help consumers understand the lamp labels and make energy-efficient 
lighting choices that meet their needs.
    C. Purpose of FTC Labeling: EPCA (see 42 U.S.C. 6294(D)) tasks the 
FTC with issuing labeling requirements for lighting products that 
``enable consumers to select the most energy efficient lamps which meet 
their needs.'' The recent EISA amendments add to EPCA's mandate by 
directing the FTC to consider alternative approaches that will help 
consumers understand new lighting products and to allow them to choose 
products that meet their various needs such as light output, light 
quality (e.g., color temperature) and lamp lifetime (see 42 U.S.C. 
6294(D)(iii)).
    To meet these and other related directives under EPCA, the FTC 
creates labeling programs that help ensure consumers receive truthful, 
objective information and enable them to choose energy-efficient 
products that meet their needs.\13\ At the same time, the task of 
promoting energy efficient products falls primarily to other agencies. 
Most notably, the Environmental Protection Agency and DOE provide the 
U.S. Government's imprimatur for high-

[[Page 40990]]

efficiency products through the successful ENERGY STAR program.\14\ The 
FTC's labels and the ENERGY STAR program work in tandem to provide a 
robust source of energy efficiency information to consumers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See, e.g., 72 FR 6836, 6841 (Feb. 13, 2007).
    \14\ See http://www.energystar.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    D. Labeling Considerations: Consumers are accustomed to using watts 
as a means to gauge the expected light output of lamps because the 
wattage (i.e., energy use) of incandescent lamps provides a consistent 
proxy for brightness (i.e., light output). For example, a consumer may 
seek a ``100-watt'' incandescent bulb because it provides the light 
output they desire for a reading lamp fixture. Conversely, a consumer 
may choose a ``40-watt'' incandescent bulb for a hallway or utility 
room where high light output may not be as important.
    This approach worked well in a market largely populated by standard 
incandescent lamps, but the emergence of new, more energy efficient 
technologies has changed matters. CFLs and solid-state lighting 
products can provide the same light output as traditional incandescent 
lamps, but at a fraction of the energy use. A traditional, standard 
incandescent bulb typically uses 100 watts to provide 1,600 lumens of 
light output. A CFL, on the other hand, can provide the same light 
output using only 25 watts, while a solid-state lamp (likely to be 
widely available in the future) may use even less energy to produce the 
same brightness. Accordingly, energy use (watts) no longer serves as a 
reliable proxy for light output.
    Light output expressed in ``lumens'' is a more accurate way for 
consumers to determine the brightness of lamps because it conveys the 
brightness of lighting products regardless of energy use or the 
technology upon which the lamp is based (e.g., incandescent, CFL, or 
solid-state). Nonetheless, anecdotal evidence suggests that consumers 
continue to look for watts (instead of lumens) as a means to gauge 
light output when purchasing lamps. Therefore, CFL packages routinely 
contain conspicuous comparisons to incandescent lamps (e.g., ``this 
bulb is a `100-watt' equivalent''). With these considerations in mind, 
as part of this rulemaking, the Commission will consider new labeling 
approaches that communicate light output in a way that is 
understandable and useful to consumers. For example, consistent with 
EISA's directive, the Commission will consider inclusion of additional 
lighting characteristics such as light quality (e.g., color rendering 
or temperature) to help consumers choose the kind of lighting they 
prefer.
    Along with light output and quality, the Commission also will look 
at new ways of communicating energy use. For example, packages could 
convey energy use information in terms of operating cost, such as 
dollars per year or dollars per light output (e.g., megalumens-hour), a 
lifecycle cost,\15\ or an efficacy factor (i.e., lumens-per-watt). 
Packages also could disclose relative energy use through a comparison 
range, similar to that used on the yellow EnergyGuide labels which the 
FTC requires on most household appliances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Information about impacts beyond consumers' operating costs 
such as costs related to manufacture or disposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Furthermore, as the Commission weighs possible label changes, there 
are a variety of alternative formats and disclosures to consider. For 
example, the FTC could consider requiring a uniform label format rather 
than the flexible labeling disclosures currently required. The FTC also 
could consider changing the prominence of certain information on the 
existing label, such as light output (lumens). In addition, the 
Commission could consider establishing categories for lamp brightness 
(e.g., 1600 lumens = Category A; 1,100 lumens = Category B) to help 
consumers identify the light output they need.

III. Request for Comment

    The Commission seeks written comments on a series of questions 
related to lamp labeling issues. These issues include the overall 
effectiveness of existing disclosures on lamp labels, alternative 
labeling disclosures, and the labeling of lamp types not currently 
covered by the Rule. The Commission invites interested persons to 
submit written comments on any issue of fact, law, or policy that may 
bear upon the FTC's labeling requirements. The Commission encourages 
commenters to respond to the specific questions. However, commenters do 
not need to respond to all questions. Please provide explanations for 
your answers and supporting evidence where appropriate. After examining 
the comments, the Commission will determine whether to propose any 
specific amendments.

A. Current Lamp Labeling

    To facilitate the Commission's efforts to examine the effectiveness 
of the existing labeling program, we request that commenters consider 
the following questions:
    1. Efficacy of Current Labels
    a. How should the Commission measure the effectiveness of current 
lamp labeling requirements (including required catalog disclosures) in 
assisting consumer purchasing decisions? For example, should the 
Commission measure effectiveness by evaluating consumer comprehension 
of specific label elements, consumer preference for different labels, 
the impact of labels on consumer product choice, or by other means?
    b. Are the current labeling requirements effective in providing 
consumers with useful, accurate information about the energy 
consumption and energy efficiency of covered products? If so, how?
    c. Do the current lamp label requirements aid in improving energy 
efficiency? If so, how?
    d. Do the current lamp label requirements aid consumers in choosing 
products that meet their lighting needs other than energy efficiency 
(e.g., brightness, color temperature, etc.)? If so, how? If not, why 
not?
    e. Should the Commission continue to require manufacturers to have 
a ``reasonable basis'' for their energy representations on current 
labels? Or, should the Commission require a specific test procedure, 
such as existing DOE test procedures (10 CFR Part 430, Subpart B, 
Appendix R), for measuring the energy characteristics represented on 
labels?
    2. Reports, Studies, or Research on Current Labels
    a. Do any recent reports, studies, or research provide data 
relevant to estimating the effectiveness of current energy disclosures 
on consumer lighting products in the United States?\16\ In particular, 
have any such reports, studies, or research examined the effectiveness 
of current disclosures compared to alternative formats and approaches?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ When statistical or scientific data is presented, the 
Commission requests enough detail about data, study design, 
statistical analysis, and findings to enable it to understand the 
methodology that was used to conduct the analysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    b. Are there any recent reports, studies, or research from other 
countries that the Commission should consider?
    3. Costs and Benefits of Current Labels
    a. What are the benefits to consumers, if any, of the current lamp 
labels?
    b. What costs, if any, have the current lamp labels imposed on 
consumers?
    c. What benefits, if any, have the current lamp labels provided to 
businesses, and in particular to small businesses?
    d. What costs, including compliance costs, have the current lamp 
labels had on businesses, and in particular on small businesses?

[[Page 40991]]

B. Possible Alternatives to Current Labels

    To aid the Commission in considering possible changes to current 
lamp labeling requirements, we request that commenters consider the 
following questions:
    1. Possible Alternative Information on Labels
    a. What changes, if any, should the Commission make to the 
information on current lighting labels?
    b. Should the Commission consider requiring descriptors other than 
those already required (i.e., lumens, watts, and hours)? For example, 
should the Commission consider operating costs (e.g., dollars per year 
or dollars per megalumen-hour), light quality (e.g., color temperature 
and color rendering index), lifecycle costs, an efficacy factor, or 
some other metric of energy use? If so, why?
    i. Should the Commission consider labels including the operating 
cost or lifetime cost of a lamp? If so, how should those figures be 
calculated? What assumptions regarding discount rates are made with 
this calculation?
    ii. Should the Commission consider labels that address light 
quality? If so, what attributes should they convey (e.g., color 
temperature and color rendering index)? Which of these attributes are 
most important for consumers?
    iii. Should the Commission consider labels including a range or 
scale comparing the energy use of similar products?
    c. If the Commission should require alternative descriptors on 
labels, for each proposed descriptor:
    i. How should the descriptor be presented to consumers?
    ii. Is use of the descriptor applicable to all lighting 
technologies?
    iii. Are there existing test procedures or other ways to measure or 
substantiate the descriptor (e.g., usage patterns for calculating 
annual operating costs)?
    d. Do recent or impending changes in technology affect whether and 
how the Rule should be modified? If so, which technologies would affect 
modification and how?
    e. What other information (other than that required by the Rule), 
if any, are manufacturers currently providing to consumers through 
packaging disclosures and other advertising to convey characteristics 
of light bulbs, such as energy use, lighting level, light quality, lamp 
lifetime, and total lifecycle cost?
    f. What modifications, if any, should be made to current 
``encircled E'' labeling requirements for lighting products covered by 
the Rule such as general service fluorescent lamps (and ballasts) and 
metal halide lamp fixtures?
    2. Possible Alternative Formats for Labels
    a. What changes, if any, should the Commission make to the 
requirements for the format of lighting disclosures (size, format, 
color, graphical presentation, etc.)? If appropriate, please provide 
examples of recommended label designs.
    b. Should the Commission require a uniform label with specific text 
styles, sizes, etc. (e.g., an ``EnergyGuide'' label for lighting 
packages)?
    3. Costs and Benefits of Possible Alternative Labels
    a. What are the benefits to consumers, if any, of any recommended 
label alternatives?
    b. What are the costs to consumers, if any, of any recommended 
label alternatives?
    c. What are the benefits to businesses, and in particular to small 
businesses, if any, of any recommended label alternatives?
    d. What are the costs, including compliance costs, to businesses, 
and in particular to small businesses, of any recommended label 
alternatives?
    4. Consumer Research Concerning Possible Alternative Labels
    a. If the Commission were to conduct consumer research on 
alternative label designs, what questions should be explored?
    b. Should the Commission explore the effect of various label 
designs on consumers' ability to rank products by energy use, 
efficiency, and operating cost? If so, how?
    c. Should the Commission explore the impact of different label 
designs on consumer product choice, product use, and consumer 
willingness to pay more for more energy efficient products? If so, how?
    5. Other Considerations
    a. Are there international laws, regulations, or standards with 
respect to lamp labeling that the Commission should consider as it 
explores labeling alternatives? If so, what are they and how do they 
affect the Commission's rulemaking?
    b. ENERGY STAR is a voluntary labeling program covering high 
efficiency products and administered by the Environmental Protection 
Agency (EPA) and DOE.\17\ What issues, if any, does the ENERGY STAR 
program raise with regard to the Commission's consideration of labeling 
alternatives? Are there any potential conflicts between ENERGY STAR 
requirements and possible changes to Commission label requirements?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See http://www.energystar.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    c. Should the Commission continue to require catalog sellers (paper 
catalogs and websites) to provide consumers with the information 
required for package labels? If so, why? If not, why not?

C. Coverage of New Lighting Products

    The current required disclosures for lumens, watts, and hours apply 
to compact fluorescent lamps and general service incandescent lamps as 
those terms are defined in 16 CFR section 305.3.\18\ The Rule also 
requires an encircled ``E'' for fluorescent ballasts, luminaires, metal 
halide lamp fixtures, and general service fluorescent lamps. To aid the 
Commission in considering possible Rule changes to cover additional 
product types, we request that commenters consider the following 
questions:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ As part of this rulemaking, the Commission will need to 
consider changes to existing definitions in the Rule. For example, 
section 321(a) of EISA revises the statutory definition of general 
service incandescent lamps to, among other things, add a lumen range 
to the definition and to add several categories of lamp types to the 
list of exclusions. See 42 U.S.C. 6291(30).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    1. Should the Commission consider issuing labeling requirements for 
consumer lighting products other than those currently covered by the 
Rule? If so, which lamp types should be included?
    2. If the Commission should consider labeling requirements for 
other lamp types, are there adequate test procedures in place to 
measure light output, energy use, life, and any other characteristics 
of these products that may be relevant to FTC labeling requirements? If 
so, what are they?
    3. If the Commission should consider labeling requirements for 
other lamp types, are there any issues that would affect labeling for 
those products? If so, what are those issues and how should the 
Commission address them?

[[Page 40992]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP17JY08.003

List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 305

    Advertising, Consumer Protection, Energy Conservation, Household 
appliances, Labeling, Lamp Products, Penalties, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.
    By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark
Secretary
[FR Doc. E8-16283 Filed 7-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-S