[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 121 (Monday, June 23, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35402-35403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-14156]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2006-E-0440] (formerly Docket No. 2006E-0483)


Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent 
Extension; ERAXIS

AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the 
regulatory review period for ERAXIS and is publishing this notice of 
that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination 
because of the submission of an application to the Director of Patents 
and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent 
which claims that human drug product.

ADDRESSES:  Submit written comments and petitions to the Division of 
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments 
to http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Beverly Friedman, Office of 
Regulatory Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire 
Ave., Bldg. 51,

[[Page 35403]]

rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-3602.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term 
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug 
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100-670) generally provide 
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as 
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical 
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory 
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a 
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the 
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
    A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A 
testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the 
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical 
investigations of the human drug product becomes effective and runs 
until the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the 
initial submission of an application to market the human drug product 
and continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product. 
Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward 
the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and 
Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be 
subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent 
was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory review 
period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase 
and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
    FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product, ERAXIS 
(anidulafungin). ERAXIS is indicated for treatment of the following 
fungal infections: Candidemia and other forms of Candida infections 
(intra-abdominal abscess and peritonitis), and esophageal candidiasis. 
Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received a 
patent term restoration application for ERAXIS (U.S. Patent No. 
5,965,525) from Eli Lilly and Co., and the Patent and Trademark Office 
requested FDA's assistance in determining this patent's eligibility for 
patent term restoration. In a letter dated February 6, 2007, FDA 
advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this human drug product 
had undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval of 
ERAXIS represented the first permitted commercial marketing or use of 
the product. Thereafter, the Patent and Trademark Office requested that 
FDA determine the product's regulatory review period.
    FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for 
ERAXIS is 3,476 days. Of this time, 2,446 days occurred during the 
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 1,030 days 
occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived 
from the following dates:
    1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food, 
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: 
August 14, 1996. The applicant claims July 15, 1996, as the date the 
investigational new drug application (IND) became effective. However, 
FDA records indicate that the IND effective date was August 14, 1996, 
which was 30 days after FDA receipt of the IND.
    2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to 
the human drug product under section 505(b) of the act: April 25, 2003. 
The applicant claims August 18, 2005, as the date the new drug 
application (NDA) 21-948 for ERAXIS was initially submitted. However, 
FDA records indicate that NDA 21-948 was not the first NDA for 
anidulafungin submitted to the agency by Vicuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 
the owner of the applications at the time of submission. NDA 21-632, 
Vicuron's first NDA for anidulafungin, was submitted on April 25, 2003.
    3. The date the application was approved: February 17, 2006. FDA 
has verified the applicant's claim that NDA 21-948 was approved on 
February 17, 2006. NDA 21-632 was also approved on February 17, 2006.
    This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the 
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S. 
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in 
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its 
application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,224 days of 
patent term extension.
    Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are 
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see 
ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a redetermination 
by August 22, 2008. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA 
for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted 
with due diligence during the regulatory review period by December 22, 
2008. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to 
merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d 
sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in 
21 CFR 10.30.
    Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Division of 
Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be 
submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to 
be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading 
of this document. Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of 
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
    Please note that on January 15, 2008, the FDA Division of Dockets 
Management Web site transitioned to the Federal Dockets Management 
System (FDMS). FDMS is a Government-wide, electronic docket management 
system. Electronic comments or submissions will be accepted by FDA only 
through FDMS at http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: June 9, 2008.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E8-14156 Filed 6-20-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S